Loading…
Prospective investigation of serum anti-Müllerian hormone concentration in ovulatory intrauterine insemination patients: a preliminary study
Abstract This preliminary prospective study investigated serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) through correlations to other basal parameters (123 patients) and according to ovarian response to 75 IU recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH)/day (62 patients) in ovulatory patients’ first rFSH tre...
Saved in:
Published in: | Reproductive biomedicine online 2010-05, Vol.20 (5), p.582-587 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Abstract This preliminary prospective study investigated serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) through correlations to other basal parameters (123 patients) and according to ovarian response to 75 IU recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH)/day (62 patients) in ovulatory patients’ first rFSH treatment cycle before intrauterine insemination. Mean age of the patients was 33 years. Serum AMH significantly correlated to age ( r = −0.38), antral follicle count (AFC) ( r = 0.68), ovarian volume ( r = 0.40), FSH ( r = −0.31), ( P < 0.001) and cycle length ( r = 0.26, P = 0.004). Serum AMH median (interquartile range; IQR) was 8.5 pmol/l (1.9–15.1) in hyporesponders (one mature follicle) versus 10.7 (7.3–17.3) in normal responders (2–3 follicles, with a maximum of two follicles ⩾18 mm and no need for dose reduction) and 13.4 (4.4–24.2) in hyperresponders (>2–3 mature follicles or dose reduction). There was a significant trend over response groups for body weight ( P = 0.005), body mass index ( P = 0.035), AFC ( P = 0.031) and FSH ( P = 0.001). Serum AMH median (IQR) was 10.6 pmol/l (6.9–18.2) in the 23 patients who achieved an ongoing pregnancy versus 10.5 (5.9–17.2) in the 100 non-pregnant women. Serum AMH may not be the best marker of the ovarian response in these patients. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1472-6483 1472-6491 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.02.007 |