Loading…

Comparison of laboratory diagnostic methods for measles infection and identification of measles virus genotypes in Hong Kong

The sensitivities of IgM detection, virus isolation, and RT-PCR for the diagnosis of measles infection were assessed using samples collected from confirmed measles cases from 2006 to 2009. The optimal timing of specimen collection and the preferred specimen type(s) for these tests were also determin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of medical virology 2010-10, Vol.82 (10), p.1773-1781
Main Authors: Woo, Gibson K.S, Wong, Ann H, Lee, W.Y, Lau, C.S, Cheng, Peter K.C, Leung, Peter C.K, Lim, Wilina W.L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3868-92cc47aa24379f54cd957d0953b7f9955b55e9488868b60a0bdee0aec5f63aad3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3868-92cc47aa24379f54cd957d0953b7f9955b55e9488868b60a0bdee0aec5f63aad3
container_end_page 1781
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1773
container_title Journal of medical virology
container_volume 82
creator Woo, Gibson K.S
Wong, Ann H
Lee, W.Y
Lau, C.S
Cheng, Peter K.C
Leung, Peter C.K
Lim, Wilina W.L
description The sensitivities of IgM detection, virus isolation, and RT-PCR for the diagnosis of measles infection were assessed using samples collected from confirmed measles cases from 2006 to 2009. The optimal timing of specimen collection and the preferred specimen type(s) for these tests were also determined. IgM detection showed highest sensitivity when serum samples were collected ≥5 days after rash onset. Virus isolation gave the highest sensitivity when samples were collected [less-than or equal to]3 days after rash onset, with nasopharyngeal aspirate being the best specimen type, followed by urine and throat/combined throat and nasal swab. The highest RT-PCR positive rate (81.0%) was obtained with serum samples collected [less-than or equal to]3 days after rash onset. RT-PCR positive rate of 100% was observed with throat/combined throat and nasal swab, urine and nasopharyngeal aspirate collected [less-than or equal to]16, 4-16, and 4-7 days after rash onset, respectively. The genotype of each measles case was confirmed by sequencing. It was shown that the predominant measles viruses detected in Hong Kong during 2006-2009 belonged to genotype H1 (subtype a) and these strains were related closely to those detected in China. J. Med. Virol. 82:1773-1781, 2010.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jmv.21888
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754028229</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>754028229</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3868-92cc47aa24379f54cd957d0953b7f9955b55e9488868b60a0bdee0aec5f63aad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAURi0EokNhwQuAd4hF2msn_luiEUyBtghBYWk5jj24JPFgZwoj8fC4k053bHwt63xH8ncRek7ghADQ0-vh5oQSKeUDtCCgeKVAkIdoAaThFeeEHaEnOV8DgFSUPkZHFCQVQvAF-ruMw8akkOOIo8e9aWMyU0w73AWzHmOegsWDm37ELmMfU7mb3LuMw-idnUKJmbHDoXPjFHywZv9UTAfuJqRtxms3xmm32efwWRzX-GM5nqJH3vTZPbubx-jq3duvy7Pq_NPq_fLNeWVryWWlqLWNMIY2tVCeNbZTTHSgWN0KrxRjLWNONeX_XLYcDLSdc2CcZZ7XxnT1MXo1ezcp_tq6POkhZOv63owubrMWrAEqKVWFfD2TNsWck_N6k8Jg0k4T0Ldd69K13ndd2Bd31m07uO6ePJRbgNMZ-B16t_u_SX-4-HZQVnMi5Mn9uU-Y9FNzUQumv1-uNNRLefH5kutV4V_OvDdRm3VZo776QoHUcKsDRut_gsCjhQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>754028229</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of laboratory diagnostic methods for measles infection and identification of measles virus genotypes in Hong Kong</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Woo, Gibson K.S ; Wong, Ann H ; Lee, W.Y ; Lau, C.S ; Cheng, Peter K.C ; Leung, Peter C.K ; Lim, Wilina W.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Woo, Gibson K.S ; Wong, Ann H ; Lee, W.Y ; Lau, C.S ; Cheng, Peter K.C ; Leung, Peter C.K ; Lim, Wilina W.L</creatorcontrib><description>The sensitivities of IgM detection, virus isolation, and RT-PCR for the diagnosis of measles infection were assessed using samples collected from confirmed measles cases from 2006 to 2009. The optimal timing of specimen collection and the preferred specimen type(s) for these tests were also determined. IgM detection showed highest sensitivity when serum samples were collected ≥5 days after rash onset. Virus isolation gave the highest sensitivity when samples were collected [less-than or equal to]3 days after rash onset, with nasopharyngeal aspirate being the best specimen type, followed by urine and throat/combined throat and nasal swab. The highest RT-PCR positive rate (81.0%) was obtained with serum samples collected [less-than or equal to]3 days after rash onset. RT-PCR positive rate of 100% was observed with throat/combined throat and nasal swab, urine and nasopharyngeal aspirate collected [less-than or equal to]16, 4-16, and 4-7 days after rash onset, respectively. The genotype of each measles case was confirmed by sequencing. It was shown that the predominant measles viruses detected in Hong Kong during 2006-2009 belonged to genotype H1 (subtype a) and these strains were related closely to those detected in China. J. Med. Virol. 82:1773-1781, 2010.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-6615</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9071</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmv.21888</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20827776</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Antibodies, Viral - blood ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods ; Female ; Genotype ; genotyping ; Hong Kong ; Humans ; IgM ; Immunoassay - methods ; Immunoglobulin M - blood ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Male ; measles ; Measles - diagnosis ; Measles - virology ; Measles virus - classification ; Measles virus - genetics ; Measles virus - isolation &amp; purification ; Molecular Sequence Data ; RNA, Viral - genetics ; RT-PCR ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sequence Analysis, DNA ; Virology - methods ; Virus Cultivation ; virus isolation ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical virology, 2010-10, Vol.82 (10), p.1773-1781</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>(c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3868-92cc47aa24379f54cd957d0953b7f9955b55e9488868b60a0bdee0aec5f63aad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3868-92cc47aa24379f54cd957d0953b7f9955b55e9488868b60a0bdee0aec5f63aad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20827776$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Woo, Gibson K.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Ann H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, W.Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lau, C.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Peter K.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leung, Peter C.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Wilina W.L</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of laboratory diagnostic methods for measles infection and identification of measles virus genotypes in Hong Kong</title><title>Journal of medical virology</title><addtitle>J. Med. Virol</addtitle><description>The sensitivities of IgM detection, virus isolation, and RT-PCR for the diagnosis of measles infection were assessed using samples collected from confirmed measles cases from 2006 to 2009. The optimal timing of specimen collection and the preferred specimen type(s) for these tests were also determined. IgM detection showed highest sensitivity when serum samples were collected ≥5 days after rash onset. Virus isolation gave the highest sensitivity when samples were collected [less-than or equal to]3 days after rash onset, with nasopharyngeal aspirate being the best specimen type, followed by urine and throat/combined throat and nasal swab. The highest RT-PCR positive rate (81.0%) was obtained with serum samples collected [less-than or equal to]3 days after rash onset. RT-PCR positive rate of 100% was observed with throat/combined throat and nasal swab, urine and nasopharyngeal aspirate collected [less-than or equal to]16, 4-16, and 4-7 days after rash onset, respectively. The genotype of each measles case was confirmed by sequencing. It was shown that the predominant measles viruses detected in Hong Kong during 2006-2009 belonged to genotype H1 (subtype a) and these strains were related closely to those detected in China. J. Med. Virol. 82:1773-1781, 2010.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antibodies, Viral - blood</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>genotyping</subject><subject>Hong Kong</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>IgM</subject><subject>Immunoassay - methods</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin M - blood</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>measles</subject><subject>Measles - diagnosis</subject><subject>Measles - virology</subject><subject>Measles virus - classification</subject><subject>Measles virus - genetics</subject><subject>Measles virus - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Molecular Sequence Data</subject><subject>RNA, Viral - genetics</subject><subject>RT-PCR</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><subject>Virology - methods</subject><subject>Virus Cultivation</subject><subject>virus isolation</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0146-6615</issn><issn>1096-9071</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAURi0EokNhwQuAd4hF2msn_luiEUyBtghBYWk5jj24JPFgZwoj8fC4k053bHwt63xH8ncRek7ghADQ0-vh5oQSKeUDtCCgeKVAkIdoAaThFeeEHaEnOV8DgFSUPkZHFCQVQvAF-ruMw8akkOOIo8e9aWMyU0w73AWzHmOegsWDm37ELmMfU7mb3LuMw-idnUKJmbHDoXPjFHywZv9UTAfuJqRtxms3xmm32efwWRzX-GM5nqJH3vTZPbubx-jq3duvy7Pq_NPq_fLNeWVryWWlqLWNMIY2tVCeNbZTTHSgWN0KrxRjLWNONeX_XLYcDLSdc2CcZZ7XxnT1MXo1ezcp_tq6POkhZOv63owubrMWrAEqKVWFfD2TNsWck_N6k8Jg0k4T0Ldd69K13ndd2Bd31m07uO6ePJRbgNMZ-B16t_u_SX-4-HZQVnMi5Mn9uU-Y9FNzUQumv1-uNNRLefH5kutV4V_OvDdRm3VZo776QoHUcKsDRut_gsCjhQ</recordid><startdate>201010</startdate><enddate>201010</enddate><creator>Woo, Gibson K.S</creator><creator>Wong, Ann H</creator><creator>Lee, W.Y</creator><creator>Lau, C.S</creator><creator>Cheng, Peter K.C</creator><creator>Leung, Peter C.K</creator><creator>Lim, Wilina W.L</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201010</creationdate><title>Comparison of laboratory diagnostic methods for measles infection and identification of measles virus genotypes in Hong Kong</title><author>Woo, Gibson K.S ; Wong, Ann H ; Lee, W.Y ; Lau, C.S ; Cheng, Peter K.C ; Leung, Peter C.K ; Lim, Wilina W.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3868-92cc47aa24379f54cd957d0953b7f9955b55e9488868b60a0bdee0aec5f63aad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antibodies, Viral - blood</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>genotyping</topic><topic>Hong Kong</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>IgM</topic><topic>Immunoassay - methods</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin M - blood</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>measles</topic><topic>Measles - diagnosis</topic><topic>Measles - virology</topic><topic>Measles virus - classification</topic><topic>Measles virus - genetics</topic><topic>Measles virus - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Molecular Sequence Data</topic><topic>RNA, Viral - genetics</topic><topic>RT-PCR</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, DNA</topic><topic>Virology - methods</topic><topic>Virus Cultivation</topic><topic>virus isolation</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Woo, Gibson K.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Ann H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, W.Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lau, C.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Peter K.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leung, Peter C.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Wilina W.L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical virology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Woo, Gibson K.S</au><au>Wong, Ann H</au><au>Lee, W.Y</au><au>Lau, C.S</au><au>Cheng, Peter K.C</au><au>Leung, Peter C.K</au><au>Lim, Wilina W.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of laboratory diagnostic methods for measles infection and identification of measles virus genotypes in Hong Kong</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical virology</jtitle><addtitle>J. Med. Virol</addtitle><date>2010-10</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1773</spage><epage>1781</epage><pages>1773-1781</pages><issn>0146-6615</issn><eissn>1096-9071</eissn><abstract>The sensitivities of IgM detection, virus isolation, and RT-PCR for the diagnosis of measles infection were assessed using samples collected from confirmed measles cases from 2006 to 2009. The optimal timing of specimen collection and the preferred specimen type(s) for these tests were also determined. IgM detection showed highest sensitivity when serum samples were collected ≥5 days after rash onset. Virus isolation gave the highest sensitivity when samples were collected [less-than or equal to]3 days after rash onset, with nasopharyngeal aspirate being the best specimen type, followed by urine and throat/combined throat and nasal swab. The highest RT-PCR positive rate (81.0%) was obtained with serum samples collected [less-than or equal to]3 days after rash onset. RT-PCR positive rate of 100% was observed with throat/combined throat and nasal swab, urine and nasopharyngeal aspirate collected [less-than or equal to]16, 4-16, and 4-7 days after rash onset, respectively. The genotype of each measles case was confirmed by sequencing. It was shown that the predominant measles viruses detected in Hong Kong during 2006-2009 belonged to genotype H1 (subtype a) and these strains were related closely to those detected in China. J. Med. Virol. 82:1773-1781, 2010.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>20827776</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmv.21888</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0146-6615
ispartof Journal of medical virology, 2010-10, Vol.82 (10), p.1773-1781
issn 0146-6615
1096-9071
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754028229
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Antibodies, Viral - blood
Child
Child, Preschool
Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods
Female
Genotype
genotyping
Hong Kong
Humans
IgM
Immunoassay - methods
Immunoglobulin M - blood
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Male
measles
Measles - diagnosis
Measles - virology
Measles virus - classification
Measles virus - genetics
Measles virus - isolation & purification
Molecular Sequence Data
RNA, Viral - genetics
RT-PCR
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sequence Analysis, DNA
Virology - methods
Virus Cultivation
virus isolation
Young Adult
title Comparison of laboratory diagnostic methods for measles infection and identification of measles virus genotypes in Hong Kong
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A25%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20laboratory%20diagnostic%20methods%20for%20measles%20infection%20and%20identification%20of%20measles%20virus%20genotypes%20in%20Hong%20Kong&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20virology&rft.au=Woo,%20Gibson%20K.S&rft.date=2010-10&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1773&rft.epage=1781&rft.pages=1773-1781&rft.issn=0146-6615&rft.eissn=1096-9071&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmv.21888&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E754028229%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3868-92cc47aa24379f54cd957d0953b7f9955b55e9488868b60a0bdee0aec5f63aad3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=754028229&rft_id=info:pmid/20827776&rfr_iscdi=true