Loading…
Comparison of laboratory diagnostic methods for measles infection and identification of measles virus genotypes in Hong Kong
The sensitivities of IgM detection, virus isolation, and RT-PCR for the diagnosis of measles infection were assessed using samples collected from confirmed measles cases from 2006 to 2009. The optimal timing of specimen collection and the preferred specimen type(s) for these tests were also determin...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of medical virology 2010-10, Vol.82 (10), p.1773-1781 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3868-92cc47aa24379f54cd957d0953b7f9955b55e9488868b60a0bdee0aec5f63aad3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3868-92cc47aa24379f54cd957d0953b7f9955b55e9488868b60a0bdee0aec5f63aad3 |
container_end_page | 1781 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1773 |
container_title | Journal of medical virology |
container_volume | 82 |
creator | Woo, Gibson K.S Wong, Ann H Lee, W.Y Lau, C.S Cheng, Peter K.C Leung, Peter C.K Lim, Wilina W.L |
description | The sensitivities of IgM detection, virus isolation, and RT-PCR for the diagnosis of measles infection were assessed using samples collected from confirmed measles cases from 2006 to 2009. The optimal timing of specimen collection and the preferred specimen type(s) for these tests were also determined. IgM detection showed highest sensitivity when serum samples were collected ≥5 days after rash onset. Virus isolation gave the highest sensitivity when samples were collected [less-than or equal to]3 days after rash onset, with nasopharyngeal aspirate being the best specimen type, followed by urine and throat/combined throat and nasal swab. The highest RT-PCR positive rate (81.0%) was obtained with serum samples collected [less-than or equal to]3 days after rash onset. RT-PCR positive rate of 100% was observed with throat/combined throat and nasal swab, urine and nasopharyngeal aspirate collected [less-than or equal to]16, 4-16, and 4-7 days after rash onset, respectively. The genotype of each measles case was confirmed by sequencing. It was shown that the predominant measles viruses detected in Hong Kong during 2006-2009 belonged to genotype H1 (subtype a) and these strains were related closely to those detected in China. J. Med. Virol. 82:1773-1781, 2010. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jmv.21888 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754028229</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>754028229</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3868-92cc47aa24379f54cd957d0953b7f9955b55e9488868b60a0bdee0aec5f63aad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAURi0EokNhwQuAd4hF2msn_luiEUyBtghBYWk5jj24JPFgZwoj8fC4k053bHwt63xH8ncRek7ghADQ0-vh5oQSKeUDtCCgeKVAkIdoAaThFeeEHaEnOV8DgFSUPkZHFCQVQvAF-ruMw8akkOOIo8e9aWMyU0w73AWzHmOegsWDm37ELmMfU7mb3LuMw-idnUKJmbHDoXPjFHywZv9UTAfuJqRtxms3xmm32efwWRzX-GM5nqJH3vTZPbubx-jq3duvy7Pq_NPq_fLNeWVryWWlqLWNMIY2tVCeNbZTTHSgWN0KrxRjLWNONeX_XLYcDLSdc2CcZZ7XxnT1MXo1ezcp_tq6POkhZOv63owubrMWrAEqKVWFfD2TNsWck_N6k8Jg0k4T0Ldd69K13ndd2Bd31m07uO6ePJRbgNMZ-B16t_u_SX-4-HZQVnMi5Mn9uU-Y9FNzUQumv1-uNNRLefH5kutV4V_OvDdRm3VZo776QoHUcKsDRut_gsCjhQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>754028229</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of laboratory diagnostic methods for measles infection and identification of measles virus genotypes in Hong Kong</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Woo, Gibson K.S ; Wong, Ann H ; Lee, W.Y ; Lau, C.S ; Cheng, Peter K.C ; Leung, Peter C.K ; Lim, Wilina W.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Woo, Gibson K.S ; Wong, Ann H ; Lee, W.Y ; Lau, C.S ; Cheng, Peter K.C ; Leung, Peter C.K ; Lim, Wilina W.L</creatorcontrib><description>The sensitivities of IgM detection, virus isolation, and RT-PCR for the diagnosis of measles infection were assessed using samples collected from confirmed measles cases from 2006 to 2009. The optimal timing of specimen collection and the preferred specimen type(s) for these tests were also determined. IgM detection showed highest sensitivity when serum samples were collected ≥5 days after rash onset. Virus isolation gave the highest sensitivity when samples were collected [less-than or equal to]3 days after rash onset, with nasopharyngeal aspirate being the best specimen type, followed by urine and throat/combined throat and nasal swab. The highest RT-PCR positive rate (81.0%) was obtained with serum samples collected [less-than or equal to]3 days after rash onset. RT-PCR positive rate of 100% was observed with throat/combined throat and nasal swab, urine and nasopharyngeal aspirate collected [less-than or equal to]16, 4-16, and 4-7 days after rash onset, respectively. The genotype of each measles case was confirmed by sequencing. It was shown that the predominant measles viruses detected in Hong Kong during 2006-2009 belonged to genotype H1 (subtype a) and these strains were related closely to those detected in China. J. Med. Virol. 82:1773-1781, 2010.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-6615</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9071</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmv.21888</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20827776</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Antibodies, Viral - blood ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods ; Female ; Genotype ; genotyping ; Hong Kong ; Humans ; IgM ; Immunoassay - methods ; Immunoglobulin M - blood ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Male ; measles ; Measles - diagnosis ; Measles - virology ; Measles virus - classification ; Measles virus - genetics ; Measles virus - isolation & purification ; Molecular Sequence Data ; RNA, Viral - genetics ; RT-PCR ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sequence Analysis, DNA ; Virology - methods ; Virus Cultivation ; virus isolation ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical virology, 2010-10, Vol.82 (10), p.1773-1781</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>(c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3868-92cc47aa24379f54cd957d0953b7f9955b55e9488868b60a0bdee0aec5f63aad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3868-92cc47aa24379f54cd957d0953b7f9955b55e9488868b60a0bdee0aec5f63aad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20827776$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Woo, Gibson K.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Ann H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, W.Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lau, C.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Peter K.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leung, Peter C.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Wilina W.L</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of laboratory diagnostic methods for measles infection and identification of measles virus genotypes in Hong Kong</title><title>Journal of medical virology</title><addtitle>J. Med. Virol</addtitle><description>The sensitivities of IgM detection, virus isolation, and RT-PCR for the diagnosis of measles infection were assessed using samples collected from confirmed measles cases from 2006 to 2009. The optimal timing of specimen collection and the preferred specimen type(s) for these tests were also determined. IgM detection showed highest sensitivity when serum samples were collected ≥5 days after rash onset. Virus isolation gave the highest sensitivity when samples were collected [less-than or equal to]3 days after rash onset, with nasopharyngeal aspirate being the best specimen type, followed by urine and throat/combined throat and nasal swab. The highest RT-PCR positive rate (81.0%) was obtained with serum samples collected [less-than or equal to]3 days after rash onset. RT-PCR positive rate of 100% was observed with throat/combined throat and nasal swab, urine and nasopharyngeal aspirate collected [less-than or equal to]16, 4-16, and 4-7 days after rash onset, respectively. The genotype of each measles case was confirmed by sequencing. It was shown that the predominant measles viruses detected in Hong Kong during 2006-2009 belonged to genotype H1 (subtype a) and these strains were related closely to those detected in China. J. Med. Virol. 82:1773-1781, 2010.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antibodies, Viral - blood</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>genotyping</subject><subject>Hong Kong</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>IgM</subject><subject>Immunoassay - methods</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin M - blood</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>measles</subject><subject>Measles - diagnosis</subject><subject>Measles - virology</subject><subject>Measles virus - classification</subject><subject>Measles virus - genetics</subject><subject>Measles virus - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Molecular Sequence Data</subject><subject>RNA, Viral - genetics</subject><subject>RT-PCR</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><subject>Virology - methods</subject><subject>Virus Cultivation</subject><subject>virus isolation</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0146-6615</issn><issn>1096-9071</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAURi0EokNhwQuAd4hF2msn_luiEUyBtghBYWk5jj24JPFgZwoj8fC4k053bHwt63xH8ncRek7ghADQ0-vh5oQSKeUDtCCgeKVAkIdoAaThFeeEHaEnOV8DgFSUPkZHFCQVQvAF-ruMw8akkOOIo8e9aWMyU0w73AWzHmOegsWDm37ELmMfU7mb3LuMw-idnUKJmbHDoXPjFHywZv9UTAfuJqRtxms3xmm32efwWRzX-GM5nqJH3vTZPbubx-jq3duvy7Pq_NPq_fLNeWVryWWlqLWNMIY2tVCeNbZTTHSgWN0KrxRjLWNONeX_XLYcDLSdc2CcZZ7XxnT1MXo1ezcp_tq6POkhZOv63owubrMWrAEqKVWFfD2TNsWck_N6k8Jg0k4T0Ldd69K13ndd2Bd31m07uO6ePJRbgNMZ-B16t_u_SX-4-HZQVnMi5Mn9uU-Y9FNzUQumv1-uNNRLefH5kutV4V_OvDdRm3VZo776QoHUcKsDRut_gsCjhQ</recordid><startdate>201010</startdate><enddate>201010</enddate><creator>Woo, Gibson K.S</creator><creator>Wong, Ann H</creator><creator>Lee, W.Y</creator><creator>Lau, C.S</creator><creator>Cheng, Peter K.C</creator><creator>Leung, Peter C.K</creator><creator>Lim, Wilina W.L</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201010</creationdate><title>Comparison of laboratory diagnostic methods for measles infection and identification of measles virus genotypes in Hong Kong</title><author>Woo, Gibson K.S ; Wong, Ann H ; Lee, W.Y ; Lau, C.S ; Cheng, Peter K.C ; Leung, Peter C.K ; Lim, Wilina W.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3868-92cc47aa24379f54cd957d0953b7f9955b55e9488868b60a0bdee0aec5f63aad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antibodies, Viral - blood</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>genotyping</topic><topic>Hong Kong</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>IgM</topic><topic>Immunoassay - methods</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin M - blood</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>measles</topic><topic>Measles - diagnosis</topic><topic>Measles - virology</topic><topic>Measles virus - classification</topic><topic>Measles virus - genetics</topic><topic>Measles virus - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Molecular Sequence Data</topic><topic>RNA, Viral - genetics</topic><topic>RT-PCR</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, DNA</topic><topic>Virology - methods</topic><topic>Virus Cultivation</topic><topic>virus isolation</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Woo, Gibson K.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Ann H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, W.Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lau, C.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Peter K.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leung, Peter C.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Wilina W.L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical virology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Woo, Gibson K.S</au><au>Wong, Ann H</au><au>Lee, W.Y</au><au>Lau, C.S</au><au>Cheng, Peter K.C</au><au>Leung, Peter C.K</au><au>Lim, Wilina W.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of laboratory diagnostic methods for measles infection and identification of measles virus genotypes in Hong Kong</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical virology</jtitle><addtitle>J. Med. Virol</addtitle><date>2010-10</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1773</spage><epage>1781</epage><pages>1773-1781</pages><issn>0146-6615</issn><eissn>1096-9071</eissn><abstract>The sensitivities of IgM detection, virus isolation, and RT-PCR for the diagnosis of measles infection were assessed using samples collected from confirmed measles cases from 2006 to 2009. The optimal timing of specimen collection and the preferred specimen type(s) for these tests were also determined. IgM detection showed highest sensitivity when serum samples were collected ≥5 days after rash onset. Virus isolation gave the highest sensitivity when samples were collected [less-than or equal to]3 days after rash onset, with nasopharyngeal aspirate being the best specimen type, followed by urine and throat/combined throat and nasal swab. The highest RT-PCR positive rate (81.0%) was obtained with serum samples collected [less-than or equal to]3 days after rash onset. RT-PCR positive rate of 100% was observed with throat/combined throat and nasal swab, urine and nasopharyngeal aspirate collected [less-than or equal to]16, 4-16, and 4-7 days after rash onset, respectively. The genotype of each measles case was confirmed by sequencing. It was shown that the predominant measles viruses detected in Hong Kong during 2006-2009 belonged to genotype H1 (subtype a) and these strains were related closely to those detected in China. J. Med. Virol. 82:1773-1781, 2010.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>20827776</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmv.21888</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0146-6615 |
ispartof | Journal of medical virology, 2010-10, Vol.82 (10), p.1773-1781 |
issn | 0146-6615 1096-9071 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754028229 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Antibodies, Viral - blood Child Child, Preschool Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods Female Genotype genotyping Hong Kong Humans IgM Immunoassay - methods Immunoglobulin M - blood Infant Infant, Newborn Male measles Measles - diagnosis Measles - virology Measles virus - classification Measles virus - genetics Measles virus - isolation & purification Molecular Sequence Data RNA, Viral - genetics RT-PCR Sensitivity and Specificity Sequence Analysis, DNA Virology - methods Virus Cultivation virus isolation Young Adult |
title | Comparison of laboratory diagnostic methods for measles infection and identification of measles virus genotypes in Hong Kong |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A25%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20laboratory%20diagnostic%20methods%20for%20measles%20infection%20and%20identification%20of%20measles%20virus%20genotypes%20in%20Hong%20Kong&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20virology&rft.au=Woo,%20Gibson%20K.S&rft.date=2010-10&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1773&rft.epage=1781&rft.pages=1773-1781&rft.issn=0146-6615&rft.eissn=1096-9071&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmv.21888&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E754028229%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3868-92cc47aa24379f54cd957d0953b7f9955b55e9488868b60a0bdee0aec5f63aad3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=754028229&rft_id=info:pmid/20827776&rfr_iscdi=true |