Implant surgery using bone- and mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides in totally edentulous jaws: surgical and post-operative outcomes of computer-aided vs. standard techniques

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the surgical and post‐operative outcomes of a computer‐aided implant surgery performed by bone‐ and mucosa‐supported stereolithographic (SLA) guides against the standard technique. Material and methods: Multiple‐ and single‐type SLA guides from two co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical oral implants research 2010-09, Vol.21 (9), p.980-988
Main Authors: Arısan, Volkan, Karabuda, Cüneyt Z., Özdemir, Tayfun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Analgesics - therapeutic use
Computer-Aided Design - instrumentation
computer-assisted
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Dental Implantation, Endosseous - instrumentation
Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods
dental implants
Dental Restoration Failure
Dentistry
Edema - etiology
Equipment Design
Female
flapless
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Jaw, Edentulous - diagnostic imaging
Jaw, Edentulous - surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Mouth Mucosa - pathology
Mouth Mucosa - surgery
oral
Osteotomy - instrumentation
Osteotomy - methods
pain
Pain Measurement
Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy
Pain, Postoperative - etiology
Patient Care Planning
post-operative period
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Postoperative Hemorrhage - etiology
Radiography, Panoramic
stereolithography
surgery
Surgery, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation
Surgical Flaps
Survival Analysis
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Trismus - etiology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the surgical and post‐operative outcomes of a computer‐aided implant surgery performed by bone‐ and mucosa‐supported stereolithographic (SLA) guides against the standard technique. Material and methods: Multiple‐ and single‐type SLA guides from two commercial manufacturers were produced and a total of 341 implants were placed to 52 patients using the standard technique (Control group), bone‐ (bone‐supported guide [BSG] group) and mucosa‐supported SLA guides (Flapless group) in 21, 16 and 15 patients, respectively. Surgical duration (min), number of analgesics (tablets) as well as hemorrhage, difficulty in mouth opening (or trismus) and other incidences were recorded. Pain and swelling was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS). Parametric and non‐parametric tests were used for statistical analysis (P
ISSN:0905-7161
1600-0501
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01957.x