Loading…

Evaluation of a component of the cloud response to climate change in an intercomparison of climate models

Most of the uncertainty in the climate sensitivity of contemporary general circulation models (GCMs) is believed to be connected with differences in the simulated radiative feedback from clouds. Traditional methods of evaluating clouds in GCMs compare time-mean geographical cloud fields or aspects o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Climate dynamics 2006-02, Vol.26 (2-3), p.145-165
Main Authors: WILLIAMS, K. D, RINGER, M. A, KNUTSON, T, LI, B, LO, K, MUSAT, I, WEGNER, J, SLINGO, A, MITCHELL, J. F. B, SENIOR, C. A, WEBB, M. J, MCAVANEY, B. J, ANDRONOVA, N, BONY, S, DUFRESNE, J.-L, EMORI, S, GUDGEL, R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-4e26bd11fea46d2371af8ab3e3e7983eacb05148cbf2412a19ec1447e2c0c17f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-4e26bd11fea46d2371af8ab3e3e7983eacb05148cbf2412a19ec1447e2c0c17f3
container_end_page 165
container_issue 2-3
container_start_page 145
container_title Climate dynamics
container_volume 26
creator WILLIAMS, K. D
RINGER, M. A
KNUTSON, T
LI, B
LO, K
MUSAT, I
WEGNER, J
SLINGO, A
MITCHELL, J. F. B
SENIOR, C. A
WEBB, M. J
MCAVANEY, B. J
ANDRONOVA, N
BONY, S
DUFRESNE, J.-L
EMORI, S
GUDGEL, R
description Most of the uncertainty in the climate sensitivity of contemporary general circulation models (GCMs) is believed to be connected with differences in the simulated radiative feedback from clouds. Traditional methods of evaluating clouds in GCMs compare time-mean geographical cloud fields or aspects of present-day cloud variability, with observational data. In both cases a hypothetical assumption is made that the quantity evaluated is relevant for the mean climate change response. Nine GCMs (atmosphere models coupled to mixed-layer ocean models) from the CFMIP and CMIP model comparison projects are used in this study to demonstrate a common relationship between the mean cloud response to climate change and present-day variability. Although atmosphere-mixed-layer ocean models are used here, the results are found to be equally applicable to transient coupled model simulations. When changes in cloud radiative forcing (CRF) are composited by changes in vertical velocity and saturated lower tropospheric stability, a component of the local mean climate change response can be related to present-day variability in all of the GCMs. This suggests that the relationship is not model specific and might be relevant in the real world. In this case, evaluation within the proposed compositing framework is a direct evaluation of a component of the cloud response to climate change. None of the models studied are found to be clearly superior or deficient when evaluated, but a couple appear to perform well on several relevant metrics. Whilst some broad similarities can be identified between the 60°N-60°S mean change in CRF to increased CO^sub 2^ and that predicted from present-day variability, the two cannot be quantitatively constrained based on changes in vertical velocity and stability alone. Hence other processes also contribute to the global mean cloud response to climate change.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00382-005-0067-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754567542</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19276502</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-4e26bd11fea46d2371af8ab3e3e7983eacb05148cbf2412a19ec1447e2c0c17f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtLxDAUhYMoOD5-gLsiqKtqbh5NuxTxBYIbXYc7mVunQycZk1bw35syiuDCRW7IyXcOXA5jJ8AvgXNzlTiXtSg51_lUpjQ7bAZKZqVu1C6b8Uby0mij99lBSivOQVVGzFh3-4H9iEMXfBHaAgsX1pvgyQ_Tc1hS4fowLopIKcuJiiFkpVvjkH-W6N-o6HyBPs-B4mTG2KVt2A-3Dgvq0xHba7FPdPx9H7LXu9uXm4fy6fn-8eb6qXRKwlAqEtV8AdASqmohpAFsa5xLkmSaWhK6OdegajdvhQKB0JADpQwJxx2YVh6yi23uJob3kdJg111y1PfoKYzJGq10lYfI5Pm_JDTCVJpP4OkfcBXG6PMWtgIptZC6zhBsIRdDSpFau4l5__hpgdupI7vtyOaO7NSRNdlz9h2MyWHfRvSuS79Go5oKGi2_AMdVkbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>613352358</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a component of the cloud response to climate change in an intercomparison of climate models</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>WILLIAMS, K. D ; RINGER, M. A ; KNUTSON, T ; LI, B ; LO, K ; MUSAT, I ; WEGNER, J ; SLINGO, A ; MITCHELL, J. F. B ; SENIOR, C. A ; WEBB, M. J ; MCAVANEY, B. J ; ANDRONOVA, N ; BONY, S ; DUFRESNE, J.-L ; EMORI, S ; GUDGEL, R</creator><creatorcontrib>WILLIAMS, K. D ; RINGER, M. A ; KNUTSON, T ; LI, B ; LO, K ; MUSAT, I ; WEGNER, J ; SLINGO, A ; MITCHELL, J. F. B ; SENIOR, C. A ; WEBB, M. J ; MCAVANEY, B. J ; ANDRONOVA, N ; BONY, S ; DUFRESNE, J.-L ; EMORI, S ; GUDGEL, R</creatorcontrib><description>Most of the uncertainty in the climate sensitivity of contemporary general circulation models (GCMs) is believed to be connected with differences in the simulated radiative feedback from clouds. Traditional methods of evaluating clouds in GCMs compare time-mean geographical cloud fields or aspects of present-day cloud variability, with observational data. In both cases a hypothetical assumption is made that the quantity evaluated is relevant for the mean climate change response. Nine GCMs (atmosphere models coupled to mixed-layer ocean models) from the CFMIP and CMIP model comparison projects are used in this study to demonstrate a common relationship between the mean cloud response to climate change and present-day variability. Although atmosphere-mixed-layer ocean models are used here, the results are found to be equally applicable to transient coupled model simulations. When changes in cloud radiative forcing (CRF) are composited by changes in vertical velocity and saturated lower tropospheric stability, a component of the local mean climate change response can be related to present-day variability in all of the GCMs. This suggests that the relationship is not model specific and might be relevant in the real world. In this case, evaluation within the proposed compositing framework is a direct evaluation of a component of the cloud response to climate change. None of the models studied are found to be clearly superior or deficient when evaluated, but a couple appear to perform well on several relevant metrics. Whilst some broad similarities can be identified between the 60°N-60°S mean change in CRF to increased CO^sub 2^ and that predicted from present-day variability, the two cannot be quantitatively constrained based on changes in vertical velocity and stability alone. Hence other processes also contribute to the global mean cloud response to climate change.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-7575</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0894</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00382-005-0067-7</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CLDYEM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Atmosphere ; Climate change ; Climate models ; Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change ; Cloud physics ; Clouds ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; General circulation models ; Marine ; Meteorology</subject><ispartof>Climate dynamics, 2006-02, Vol.26 (2-3), p.145-165</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-4e26bd11fea46d2371af8ab3e3e7983eacb05148cbf2412a19ec1447e2c0c17f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-4e26bd11fea46d2371af8ab3e3e7983eacb05148cbf2412a19ec1447e2c0c17f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17496195$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>WILLIAMS, K. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RINGER, M. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KNUTSON, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LI, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LO, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MUSAT, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WEGNER, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SLINGO, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MITCHELL, J. F. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SENIOR, C. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WEBB, M. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCAVANEY, B. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ANDRONOVA, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BONY, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUFRESNE, J.-L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EMORI, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GUDGEL, R</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a component of the cloud response to climate change in an intercomparison of climate models</title><title>Climate dynamics</title><description>Most of the uncertainty in the climate sensitivity of contemporary general circulation models (GCMs) is believed to be connected with differences in the simulated radiative feedback from clouds. Traditional methods of evaluating clouds in GCMs compare time-mean geographical cloud fields or aspects of present-day cloud variability, with observational data. In both cases a hypothetical assumption is made that the quantity evaluated is relevant for the mean climate change response. Nine GCMs (atmosphere models coupled to mixed-layer ocean models) from the CFMIP and CMIP model comparison projects are used in this study to demonstrate a common relationship between the mean cloud response to climate change and present-day variability. Although atmosphere-mixed-layer ocean models are used here, the results are found to be equally applicable to transient coupled model simulations. When changes in cloud radiative forcing (CRF) are composited by changes in vertical velocity and saturated lower tropospheric stability, a component of the local mean climate change response can be related to present-day variability in all of the GCMs. This suggests that the relationship is not model specific and might be relevant in the real world. In this case, evaluation within the proposed compositing framework is a direct evaluation of a component of the cloud response to climate change. None of the models studied are found to be clearly superior or deficient when evaluated, but a couple appear to perform well on several relevant metrics. Whilst some broad similarities can be identified between the 60°N-60°S mean change in CRF to increased CO^sub 2^ and that predicted from present-day variability, the two cannot be quantitatively constrained based on changes in vertical velocity and stability alone. Hence other processes also contribute to the global mean cloud response to climate change.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Atmosphere</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change</subject><subject>Cloud physics</subject><subject>Clouds</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>General circulation models</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><issn>0930-7575</issn><issn>1432-0894</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUtLxDAUhYMoOD5-gLsiqKtqbh5NuxTxBYIbXYc7mVunQycZk1bw35syiuDCRW7IyXcOXA5jJ8AvgXNzlTiXtSg51_lUpjQ7bAZKZqVu1C6b8Uby0mij99lBSivOQVVGzFh3-4H9iEMXfBHaAgsX1pvgyQ_Tc1hS4fowLopIKcuJiiFkpVvjkH-W6N-o6HyBPs-B4mTG2KVt2A-3Dgvq0xHba7FPdPx9H7LXu9uXm4fy6fn-8eb6qXRKwlAqEtV8AdASqmohpAFsa5xLkmSaWhK6OdegajdvhQKB0JADpQwJxx2YVh6yi23uJob3kdJg111y1PfoKYzJGq10lYfI5Pm_JDTCVJpP4OkfcBXG6PMWtgIptZC6zhBsIRdDSpFau4l5__hpgdupI7vtyOaO7NSRNdlz9h2MyWHfRvSuS79Go5oKGi2_AMdVkbQ</recordid><startdate>20060201</startdate><enddate>20060201</enddate><creator>WILLIAMS, K. D</creator><creator>RINGER, M. A</creator><creator>KNUTSON, T</creator><creator>LI, B</creator><creator>LO, K</creator><creator>MUSAT, I</creator><creator>WEGNER, J</creator><creator>SLINGO, A</creator><creator>MITCHELL, J. F. B</creator><creator>SENIOR, C. A</creator><creator>WEBB, M. J</creator><creator>MCAVANEY, B. J</creator><creator>ANDRONOVA, N</creator><creator>BONY, S</creator><creator>DUFRESNE, J.-L</creator><creator>EMORI, S</creator><creator>GUDGEL, R</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060201</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a component of the cloud response to climate change in an intercomparison of climate models</title><author>WILLIAMS, K. D ; RINGER, M. A ; KNUTSON, T ; LI, B ; LO, K ; MUSAT, I ; WEGNER, J ; SLINGO, A ; MITCHELL, J. F. B ; SENIOR, C. A ; WEBB, M. J ; MCAVANEY, B. J ; ANDRONOVA, N ; BONY, S ; DUFRESNE, J.-L ; EMORI, S ; GUDGEL, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-4e26bd11fea46d2371af8ab3e3e7983eacb05148cbf2412a19ec1447e2c0c17f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Atmosphere</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change</topic><topic>Cloud physics</topic><topic>Clouds</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>General circulation models</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WILLIAMS, K. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RINGER, M. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KNUTSON, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LI, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LO, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MUSAT, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WEGNER, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SLINGO, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MITCHELL, J. F. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SENIOR, C. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WEBB, M. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCAVANEY, B. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ANDRONOVA, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BONY, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUFRESNE, J.-L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EMORI, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GUDGEL, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Climate dynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WILLIAMS, K. D</au><au>RINGER, M. A</au><au>KNUTSON, T</au><au>LI, B</au><au>LO, K</au><au>MUSAT, I</au><au>WEGNER, J</au><au>SLINGO, A</au><au>MITCHELL, J. F. B</au><au>SENIOR, C. A</au><au>WEBB, M. J</au><au>MCAVANEY, B. J</au><au>ANDRONOVA, N</au><au>BONY, S</au><au>DUFRESNE, J.-L</au><au>EMORI, S</au><au>GUDGEL, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a component of the cloud response to climate change in an intercomparison of climate models</atitle><jtitle>Climate dynamics</jtitle><date>2006-02-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2-3</issue><spage>145</spage><epage>165</epage><pages>145-165</pages><issn>0930-7575</issn><eissn>1432-0894</eissn><coden>CLDYEM</coden><abstract>Most of the uncertainty in the climate sensitivity of contemporary general circulation models (GCMs) is believed to be connected with differences in the simulated radiative feedback from clouds. Traditional methods of evaluating clouds in GCMs compare time-mean geographical cloud fields or aspects of present-day cloud variability, with observational data. In both cases a hypothetical assumption is made that the quantity evaluated is relevant for the mean climate change response. Nine GCMs (atmosphere models coupled to mixed-layer ocean models) from the CFMIP and CMIP model comparison projects are used in this study to demonstrate a common relationship between the mean cloud response to climate change and present-day variability. Although atmosphere-mixed-layer ocean models are used here, the results are found to be equally applicable to transient coupled model simulations. When changes in cloud radiative forcing (CRF) are composited by changes in vertical velocity and saturated lower tropospheric stability, a component of the local mean climate change response can be related to present-day variability in all of the GCMs. This suggests that the relationship is not model specific and might be relevant in the real world. In this case, evaluation within the proposed compositing framework is a direct evaluation of a component of the cloud response to climate change. None of the models studied are found to be clearly superior or deficient when evaluated, but a couple appear to perform well on several relevant metrics. Whilst some broad similarities can be identified between the 60°N-60°S mean change in CRF to increased CO^sub 2^ and that predicted from present-day variability, the two cannot be quantitatively constrained based on changes in vertical velocity and stability alone. Hence other processes also contribute to the global mean cloud response to climate change.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s00382-005-0067-7</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0930-7575
ispartof Climate dynamics, 2006-02, Vol.26 (2-3), p.145-165
issn 0930-7575
1432-0894
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754567542
source Springer Link
subjects Atmosphere
Climate change
Climate models
Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change
Cloud physics
Clouds
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
External geophysics
General circulation models
Marine
Meteorology
title Evaluation of a component of the cloud response to climate change in an intercomparison of climate models
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A48%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20component%20of%20the%20cloud%20response%20to%20climate%20change%20in%20an%20intercomparison%20of%20climate%20models&rft.jtitle=Climate%20dynamics&rft.au=WILLIAMS,%20K.%20D&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2-3&rft.spage=145&rft.epage=165&rft.pages=145-165&rft.issn=0930-7575&rft.eissn=1432-0894&rft.coden=CLDYEM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00382-005-0067-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19276502%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-4e26bd11fea46d2371af8ab3e3e7983eacb05148cbf2412a19ec1447e2c0c17f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=613352358&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true