Loading…

Cost reduction using ultrasound in blunt abdominal trauma

Ultrasound (US) provides a rapid, portable, and noninvasive method for evaluating the blunt trauma patient. In 1993, US was introduced into the workup of blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) at our institution and has rapidly become the modality of choice over computed tomography (CT) and diagnostic periton...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Emergency radiology 1997-01, Vol.4 (1), p.3-6
Main Authors: McKenney, Kimberley Lentz, McKenney, Mark G., Nu ez, Diego B., Martin, Larry
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c203t-27f213aca7659dab53962a80c2d6c4fe298aeaca488a22ab1f124ead413f2dc53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c203t-27f213aca7659dab53962a80c2d6c4fe298aeaca488a22ab1f124ead413f2dc53
container_end_page 6
container_issue 1
container_start_page 3
container_title Emergency radiology
container_volume 4
creator McKenney, Kimberley Lentz
McKenney, Mark G.
Nu ez, Diego B.
Martin, Larry
description Ultrasound (US) provides a rapid, portable, and noninvasive method for evaluating the blunt trauma patient. In 1993, US was introduced into the workup of blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) at our institution and has rapidly become the modality of choice over computed tomography (CT) and diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL). In this study, the cost effectiveness of utilizing US in BAT was evaluated. We compared the number of DPLs and CTs performed during the 6-month period in 1993 preceding the incorporation of US with the number of CTs, DPLs, and USs performed during the last 6 months of 1994. Costs were determined by the finance department based on actual expenditures by the hospital, excluding physician fees, in 1994 U.S. dollars. Six hundred twenty-six patients were evaluated for BAT during the 6-month period in 1993. In this group, 450 patients had CT examinations, 160 had DPL, and 16 had both. This resulted in a cost of $254,316. During the last 6 months in 1994,564 patients were evaluated for BAT, including 470 USs, 175 CTs, and 11 DPLs. The cost for this group was $133,077, with a decrease in hospital expenditure of $170 per patient. We conclude that utilizing US in the evaluation of BAt leads to a significant cost reduction. Extrapolated over 1 year, with 1100 blunt abdominal trauma patients, the cost savings would be over $187,000.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF01509334
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754567639</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>754567639</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c203t-27f213aca7659dab53962a80c2d6c4fe298aeaca488a22ab1f124ead413f2dc53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE9LxDAUxIMouK5e_ATFiyBUX_42OWpxVVjwoufymqbSpW3WpDn47Y2sIHh582B-DMMQcknhlgJUdw8boBIM5-KIrKjgusxHHucfKig5gDglZzHuAEAZpVfE1D4uRXBdssvg5yLFYf4o0rgEjD7NXTHMRTumeSmw7fw0zDgW2UsTnpOTHsfoLn51Td43j2_1c7l9fXqp77elZcCXklU9oxwtVkqaDlvJjWKowbJOWdE7ZjS6bAutkTFsaU-ZcNgJynvWWcnX5PqQuw_-M7m4NNMQrRtHnJ1PsamkkKpS3GTy6h-58ynkxrFRlGkmKqEydHOAbPAxBtc3-zBMGL4aCs3Phs3fhvwbvv5i5w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>612824746</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost reduction using ultrasound in blunt abdominal trauma</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>McKenney, Kimberley Lentz ; McKenney, Mark G. ; Nu ez, Diego B. ; Martin, Larry</creator><creatorcontrib>McKenney, Kimberley Lentz ; McKenney, Mark G. ; Nu ez, Diego B. ; Martin, Larry</creatorcontrib><description>Ultrasound (US) provides a rapid, portable, and noninvasive method for evaluating the blunt trauma patient. In 1993, US was introduced into the workup of blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) at our institution and has rapidly become the modality of choice over computed tomography (CT) and diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL). In this study, the cost effectiveness of utilizing US in BAT was evaluated. We compared the number of DPLs and CTs performed during the 6-month period in 1993 preceding the incorporation of US with the number of CTs, DPLs, and USs performed during the last 6 months of 1994. Costs were determined by the finance department based on actual expenditures by the hospital, excluding physician fees, in 1994 U.S. dollars. Six hundred twenty-six patients were evaluated for BAT during the 6-month period in 1993. In this group, 450 patients had CT examinations, 160 had DPL, and 16 had both. This resulted in a cost of $254,316. During the last 6 months in 1994,564 patients were evaluated for BAT, including 470 USs, 175 CTs, and 11 DPLs. The cost for this group was $133,077, with a decrease in hospital expenditure of $170 per patient. We conclude that utilizing US in the evaluation of BAt leads to a significant cost reduction. Extrapolated over 1 year, with 1100 blunt abdominal trauma patients, the cost savings would be over $187,000.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1070-3004</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1438-1435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF01509334</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Bats ; Cost control</subject><ispartof>Emergency radiology, 1997-01, Vol.4 (1), p.3-6</ispartof><rights>American Society of Emergency Radiology 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c203t-27f213aca7659dab53962a80c2d6c4fe298aeaca488a22ab1f124ead413f2dc53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c203t-27f213aca7659dab53962a80c2d6c4fe298aeaca488a22ab1f124ead413f2dc53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McKenney, Kimberley Lentz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKenney, Mark G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nu ez, Diego B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Larry</creatorcontrib><title>Cost reduction using ultrasound in blunt abdominal trauma</title><title>Emergency radiology</title><description>Ultrasound (US) provides a rapid, portable, and noninvasive method for evaluating the blunt trauma patient. In 1993, US was introduced into the workup of blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) at our institution and has rapidly become the modality of choice over computed tomography (CT) and diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL). In this study, the cost effectiveness of utilizing US in BAT was evaluated. We compared the number of DPLs and CTs performed during the 6-month period in 1993 preceding the incorporation of US with the number of CTs, DPLs, and USs performed during the last 6 months of 1994. Costs were determined by the finance department based on actual expenditures by the hospital, excluding physician fees, in 1994 U.S. dollars. Six hundred twenty-six patients were evaluated for BAT during the 6-month period in 1993. In this group, 450 patients had CT examinations, 160 had DPL, and 16 had both. This resulted in a cost of $254,316. During the last 6 months in 1994,564 patients were evaluated for BAT, including 470 USs, 175 CTs, and 11 DPLs. The cost for this group was $133,077, with a decrease in hospital expenditure of $170 per patient. We conclude that utilizing US in the evaluation of BAt leads to a significant cost reduction. Extrapolated over 1 year, with 1100 blunt abdominal trauma patients, the cost savings would be over $187,000.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Bats</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><issn>1070-3004</issn><issn>1438-1435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE9LxDAUxIMouK5e_ATFiyBUX_42OWpxVVjwoufymqbSpW3WpDn47Y2sIHh582B-DMMQcknhlgJUdw8boBIM5-KIrKjgusxHHucfKig5gDglZzHuAEAZpVfE1D4uRXBdssvg5yLFYf4o0rgEjD7NXTHMRTumeSmw7fw0zDgW2UsTnpOTHsfoLn51Td43j2_1c7l9fXqp77elZcCXklU9oxwtVkqaDlvJjWKowbJOWdE7ZjS6bAutkTFsaU-ZcNgJynvWWcnX5PqQuw_-M7m4NNMQrRtHnJ1PsamkkKpS3GTy6h-58ynkxrFRlGkmKqEydHOAbPAxBtc3-zBMGL4aCs3Phs3fhvwbvv5i5w</recordid><startdate>19970101</startdate><enddate>19970101</enddate><creator>McKenney, Kimberley Lentz</creator><creator>McKenney, Mark G.</creator><creator>Nu ez, Diego B.</creator><creator>Martin, Larry</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970101</creationdate><title>Cost reduction using ultrasound in blunt abdominal trauma</title><author>McKenney, Kimberley Lentz ; McKenney, Mark G. ; Nu ez, Diego B. ; Martin, Larry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c203t-27f213aca7659dab53962a80c2d6c4fe298aeaca488a22ab1f124ead413f2dc53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Bats</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McKenney, Kimberley Lentz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKenney, Mark G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nu ez, Diego B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Larry</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Complete (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Emergency radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McKenney, Kimberley Lentz</au><au>McKenney, Mark G.</au><au>Nu ez, Diego B.</au><au>Martin, Larry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost reduction using ultrasound in blunt abdominal trauma</atitle><jtitle>Emergency radiology</jtitle><date>1997-01-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>6</epage><pages>3-6</pages><issn>1070-3004</issn><eissn>1438-1435</eissn><abstract>Ultrasound (US) provides a rapid, portable, and noninvasive method for evaluating the blunt trauma patient. In 1993, US was introduced into the workup of blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) at our institution and has rapidly become the modality of choice over computed tomography (CT) and diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL). In this study, the cost effectiveness of utilizing US in BAT was evaluated. We compared the number of DPLs and CTs performed during the 6-month period in 1993 preceding the incorporation of US with the number of CTs, DPLs, and USs performed during the last 6 months of 1994. Costs were determined by the finance department based on actual expenditures by the hospital, excluding physician fees, in 1994 U.S. dollars. Six hundred twenty-six patients were evaluated for BAT during the 6-month period in 1993. In this group, 450 patients had CT examinations, 160 had DPL, and 16 had both. This resulted in a cost of $254,316. During the last 6 months in 1994,564 patients were evaluated for BAT, including 470 USs, 175 CTs, and 11 DPLs. The cost for this group was $133,077, with a decrease in hospital expenditure of $170 per patient. We conclude that utilizing US in the evaluation of BAt leads to a significant cost reduction. Extrapolated over 1 year, with 1100 blunt abdominal trauma patients, the cost savings would be over $187,000.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/BF01509334</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1070-3004
ispartof Emergency radiology, 1997-01, Vol.4 (1), p.3-6
issn 1070-3004
1438-1435
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754567639
source Springer Nature
subjects Bats
Cost control
title Cost reduction using ultrasound in blunt abdominal trauma
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A54%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost%20reduction%20using%20ultrasound%20in%20blunt%20abdominal%20trauma&rft.jtitle=Emergency%20radiology&rft.au=McKenney,%20Kimberley%20Lentz&rft.date=1997-01-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=6&rft.pages=3-6&rft.issn=1070-3004&rft.eissn=1438-1435&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF01509334&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E754567639%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c203t-27f213aca7659dab53962a80c2d6c4fe298aeaca488a22ab1f124ead413f2dc53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=612824746&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true