Loading…

Effects of model resolution and subgrid-scale physics on the simulation of precipitation in the continental United States

We analyze simulations of the global climate performed at a range of spatial resolutions to assess the effects of horizontal spatial resolution on the ability to simulate precipitation in the continental United States. The model investigated is the CCM3 general circulation model. We also preliminari...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Climate dynamics 2004-09, Vol.23 (3-4), p.243-258
Main Authors: IORIO, J. P, DUFFY, P. B, GOVINDASAMY, B, THOMPSON, S. L, KHAIROUTDINOV, M, RANDALL, D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-b5bbcba9fa035997574276f9be60b48e0d9c59722d56f4505a9bc65ca1b60b693
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-b5bbcba9fa035997574276f9be60b48e0d9c59722d56f4505a9bc65ca1b60b693
container_end_page 258
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 243
container_title Climate dynamics
container_volume 23
creator IORIO, J. P
DUFFY, P. B
GOVINDASAMY, B
THOMPSON, S. L
KHAIROUTDINOV, M
RANDALL, D
description We analyze simulations of the global climate performed at a range of spatial resolutions to assess the effects of horizontal spatial resolution on the ability to simulate precipitation in the continental United States. The model investigated is the CCM3 general circulation model. We also preliminarily assess the effect of replacing cloud and convective parameterizations in a coarse-resolution (T42) model with an embedded cloud-system resolving model (CSRM). We examine both spatial patterns of seasonal-mean precipitation and daily time scale temporal variability of precipitation in the continental United States. For DJF and SON, high-resolution simulations produce spatial patterns of seasonal-mean precipitation that agree more closely with observed precipitation patterns than do results from the same model (CCM3) at coarse resolution. However, in JJA and MAM, there is little improvement in spatial patterns of seasonal-mean precipitation with increasing resolution, particularly in the southeast USA. This is because of the dominance of convective (i.e., parameterized) precipitation in these two seasons. We further find that higher-resolution simulations have more realistic daily precipitation statistics. In particular, the well-known tendency at coarse resolution to have too many days with weak precipitation and not enough intense precipitation is partially eliminated in higher-resolution simulations. However, even at the highest resolution examined here (T239), the simulated intensity of the mean and of high-percentile daily precipitation amounts is too low. This is especially true in the southeast USA, where the most extreme events occur. A new GCM, in which a cloud-resolving model (CSRM) is embedded in each grid cell and replaces convective and stratiform cloud parameterizations, solves this problem, and actually produces too much precipitation in the form of extreme events. However, in contrast to high-resolution versions of CCM3, this model produces little improvement in spatial patterns of seasonal-mean precipitation compared to models at the same resolution using traditional parameterizations.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00382-004-0440-y
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754883337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>754883337</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-b5bbcba9fa035997574276f9be60b48e0d9c59722d56f4505a9bc65ca1b60b693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U1rFTEUBuAgFrzW_oDugqCuRk8mX5OllGqFggvbdUgyiU2ZmxmTzGL-fXOdgtCFq8DheQ-cvAhdEvhMAOSXAkCHvgNgHTAG3fYKHQijbTIo9hodQFHoJJf8DXpbyiMAYUL2B7Rdh-BdLXgO-DiPfsLZl3laa5wTNmnEZbW_cxy74szk8fKwleiaTrg-eFzicZ3MX9vyS_YuLrHug7gTN6cak0_VTPg-xepH_KsJX96hs2Cm4i-e33N0_-367uqmu_35_cfV19vOUUFrZ7m1zhoVDFCuVDuB9VIEZb0AywYPo3Jcyb4fuQiMAzfKOsGdIbYBoeg5-rTvXfL8Z_Wl6mMszk-TSX5ei5acDQOlVDb58b-SSNFDT3iD71_Ax3nNqV2hBaGU98BJQ2RHLs-lZB_0kuPR5E0T0KfO9N6Zbp3pU2d6a5kPz4vN6b9DNsnF8i8oCFEwCPoEhZqYOw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>613352051</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of model resolution and subgrid-scale physics on the simulation of precipitation in the continental United States</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>IORIO, J. P ; DUFFY, P. B ; GOVINDASAMY, B ; THOMPSON, S. L ; KHAIROUTDINOV, M ; RANDALL, D</creator><creatorcontrib>IORIO, J. P ; DUFFY, P. B ; GOVINDASAMY, B ; THOMPSON, S. L ; KHAIROUTDINOV, M ; RANDALL, D</creatorcontrib><description>We analyze simulations of the global climate performed at a range of spatial resolutions to assess the effects of horizontal spatial resolution on the ability to simulate precipitation in the continental United States. The model investigated is the CCM3 general circulation model. We also preliminarily assess the effect of replacing cloud and convective parameterizations in a coarse-resolution (T42) model with an embedded cloud-system resolving model (CSRM). We examine both spatial patterns of seasonal-mean precipitation and daily time scale temporal variability of precipitation in the continental United States. For DJF and SON, high-resolution simulations produce spatial patterns of seasonal-mean precipitation that agree more closely with observed precipitation patterns than do results from the same model (CCM3) at coarse resolution. However, in JJA and MAM, there is little improvement in spatial patterns of seasonal-mean precipitation with increasing resolution, particularly in the southeast USA. This is because of the dominance of convective (i.e., parameterized) precipitation in these two seasons. We further find that higher-resolution simulations have more realistic daily precipitation statistics. In particular, the well-known tendency at coarse resolution to have too many days with weak precipitation and not enough intense precipitation is partially eliminated in higher-resolution simulations. However, even at the highest resolution examined here (T239), the simulated intensity of the mean and of high-percentile daily precipitation amounts is too low. This is especially true in the southeast USA, where the most extreme events occur. A new GCM, in which a cloud-resolving model (CSRM) is embedded in each grid cell and replaces convective and stratiform cloud parameterizations, solves this problem, and actually produces too much precipitation in the form of extreme events. However, in contrast to high-resolution versions of CCM3, this model produces little improvement in spatial patterns of seasonal-mean precipitation compared to models at the same resolution using traditional parameterizations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-7575</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0894</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00382-004-0440-y</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CLDYEM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; General circulation models ; Global climate ; Meteorology ; Water in the atmosphere (humidity, clouds, evaporation, precipitation)</subject><ispartof>Climate dynamics, 2004-09, Vol.23 (3-4), p.243-258</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-b5bbcba9fa035997574276f9be60b48e0d9c59722d56f4505a9bc65ca1b60b693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-b5bbcba9fa035997574276f9be60b48e0d9c59722d56f4505a9bc65ca1b60b693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16119086$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>IORIO, J. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUFFY, P. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOVINDASAMY, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THOMPSON, S. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KHAIROUTDINOV, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RANDALL, D</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of model resolution and subgrid-scale physics on the simulation of precipitation in the continental United States</title><title>Climate dynamics</title><description>We analyze simulations of the global climate performed at a range of spatial resolutions to assess the effects of horizontal spatial resolution on the ability to simulate precipitation in the continental United States. The model investigated is the CCM3 general circulation model. We also preliminarily assess the effect of replacing cloud and convective parameterizations in a coarse-resolution (T42) model with an embedded cloud-system resolving model (CSRM). We examine both spatial patterns of seasonal-mean precipitation and daily time scale temporal variability of precipitation in the continental United States. For DJF and SON, high-resolution simulations produce spatial patterns of seasonal-mean precipitation that agree more closely with observed precipitation patterns than do results from the same model (CCM3) at coarse resolution. However, in JJA and MAM, there is little improvement in spatial patterns of seasonal-mean precipitation with increasing resolution, particularly in the southeast USA. This is because of the dominance of convective (i.e., parameterized) precipitation in these two seasons. We further find that higher-resolution simulations have more realistic daily precipitation statistics. In particular, the well-known tendency at coarse resolution to have too many days with weak precipitation and not enough intense precipitation is partially eliminated in higher-resolution simulations. However, even at the highest resolution examined here (T239), the simulated intensity of the mean and of high-percentile daily precipitation amounts is too low. This is especially true in the southeast USA, where the most extreme events occur. A new GCM, in which a cloud-resolving model (CSRM) is embedded in each grid cell and replaces convective and stratiform cloud parameterizations, solves this problem, and actually produces too much precipitation in the form of extreme events. However, in contrast to high-resolution versions of CCM3, this model produces little improvement in spatial patterns of seasonal-mean precipitation compared to models at the same resolution using traditional parameterizations.</description><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>General circulation models</subject><subject>Global climate</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Water in the atmosphere (humidity, clouds, evaporation, precipitation)</subject><issn>0930-7575</issn><issn>1432-0894</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90U1rFTEUBuAgFrzW_oDugqCuRk8mX5OllGqFggvbdUgyiU2ZmxmTzGL-fXOdgtCFq8DheQ-cvAhdEvhMAOSXAkCHvgNgHTAG3fYKHQijbTIo9hodQFHoJJf8DXpbyiMAYUL2B7Rdh-BdLXgO-DiPfsLZl3laa5wTNmnEZbW_cxy74szk8fKwleiaTrg-eFzicZ3MX9vyS_YuLrHug7gTN6cak0_VTPg-xepH_KsJX96hs2Cm4i-e33N0_-367uqmu_35_cfV19vOUUFrZ7m1zhoVDFCuVDuB9VIEZb0AywYPo3Jcyb4fuQiMAzfKOsGdIbYBoeg5-rTvXfL8Z_Wl6mMszk-TSX5ei5acDQOlVDb58b-SSNFDT3iD71_Ax3nNqV2hBaGU98BJQ2RHLs-lZB_0kuPR5E0T0KfO9N6Zbp3pU2d6a5kPz4vN6b9DNsnF8i8oCFEwCPoEhZqYOw</recordid><startdate>20040901</startdate><enddate>20040901</enddate><creator>IORIO, J. P</creator><creator>DUFFY, P. B</creator><creator>GOVINDASAMY, B</creator><creator>THOMPSON, S. L</creator><creator>KHAIROUTDINOV, M</creator><creator>RANDALL, D</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040901</creationdate><title>Effects of model resolution and subgrid-scale physics on the simulation of precipitation in the continental United States</title><author>IORIO, J. P ; DUFFY, P. B ; GOVINDASAMY, B ; THOMPSON, S. L ; KHAIROUTDINOV, M ; RANDALL, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-b5bbcba9fa035997574276f9be60b48e0d9c59722d56f4505a9bc65ca1b60b693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>General circulation models</topic><topic>Global climate</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Water in the atmosphere (humidity, clouds, evaporation, precipitation)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>IORIO, J. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUFFY, P. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOVINDASAMY, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THOMPSON, S. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KHAIROUTDINOV, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RANDALL, D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Science Journals (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Climate dynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>IORIO, J. P</au><au>DUFFY, P. B</au><au>GOVINDASAMY, B</au><au>THOMPSON, S. L</au><au>KHAIROUTDINOV, M</au><au>RANDALL, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of model resolution and subgrid-scale physics on the simulation of precipitation in the continental United States</atitle><jtitle>Climate dynamics</jtitle><date>2004-09-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>243</spage><epage>258</epage><pages>243-258</pages><issn>0930-7575</issn><eissn>1432-0894</eissn><coden>CLDYEM</coden><abstract>We analyze simulations of the global climate performed at a range of spatial resolutions to assess the effects of horizontal spatial resolution on the ability to simulate precipitation in the continental United States. The model investigated is the CCM3 general circulation model. We also preliminarily assess the effect of replacing cloud and convective parameterizations in a coarse-resolution (T42) model with an embedded cloud-system resolving model (CSRM). We examine both spatial patterns of seasonal-mean precipitation and daily time scale temporal variability of precipitation in the continental United States. For DJF and SON, high-resolution simulations produce spatial patterns of seasonal-mean precipitation that agree more closely with observed precipitation patterns than do results from the same model (CCM3) at coarse resolution. However, in JJA and MAM, there is little improvement in spatial patterns of seasonal-mean precipitation with increasing resolution, particularly in the southeast USA. This is because of the dominance of convective (i.e., parameterized) precipitation in these two seasons. We further find that higher-resolution simulations have more realistic daily precipitation statistics. In particular, the well-known tendency at coarse resolution to have too many days with weak precipitation and not enough intense precipitation is partially eliminated in higher-resolution simulations. However, even at the highest resolution examined here (T239), the simulated intensity of the mean and of high-percentile daily precipitation amounts is too low. This is especially true in the southeast USA, where the most extreme events occur. A new GCM, in which a cloud-resolving model (CSRM) is embedded in each grid cell and replaces convective and stratiform cloud parameterizations, solves this problem, and actually produces too much precipitation in the form of extreme events. However, in contrast to high-resolution versions of CCM3, this model produces little improvement in spatial patterns of seasonal-mean precipitation compared to models at the same resolution using traditional parameterizations.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s00382-004-0440-y</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0930-7575
ispartof Climate dynamics, 2004-09, Vol.23 (3-4), p.243-258
issn 0930-7575
1432-0894
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754883337
source Springer Nature
subjects Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
External geophysics
General circulation models
Global climate
Meteorology
Water in the atmosphere (humidity, clouds, evaporation, precipitation)
title Effects of model resolution and subgrid-scale physics on the simulation of precipitation in the continental United States
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T08%3A24%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20model%20resolution%20and%20subgrid-scale%20physics%20on%20the%20simulation%20of%20precipitation%20in%20the%20continental%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Climate%20dynamics&rft.au=IORIO,%20J.%20P&rft.date=2004-09-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=258&rft.pages=243-258&rft.issn=0930-7575&rft.eissn=1432-0894&rft.coden=CLDYEM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00382-004-0440-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E754883337%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-b5bbcba9fa035997574276f9be60b48e0d9c59722d56f4505a9bc65ca1b60b693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=613352051&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true