Loading…

Characterizing Species at Risk II: Using Bayesian Belief Networks as Decision Support Tools to Determine Species Conservation Categories Under the Northwest Forest Plan

We developed a set of decision-aiding models as Bayesian belief networks (BBNs) that represented a complex set of evaluation guidelines used to determine the appropriate conservation of hundreds of potentially rare species on federally-administered lands in the Pacific Northwest United States. The m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology and society 2006-12, Vol.11 (2), p.n.-n.
Main Authors: Marcot, B G, Hohenlohe, P A, Morey, S, Holmes, R, Molina, R, Turley, M C, Huff, M H, Laurence, JA
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page n.
container_issue 2
container_start_page n.
container_title Ecology and society
container_volume 11
creator Marcot, B G
Hohenlohe, P A
Morey, S
Holmes, R
Molina, R
Turley, M C
Huff, M H
Laurence, JA
description We developed a set of decision-aiding models as Bayesian belief networks (BBNs) that represented a complex set of evaluation guidelines used to determine the appropriate conservation of hundreds of potentially rare species on federally-administered lands in the Pacific Northwest United States. The models were used in a structured assessment and paneling procedure as part of an adaptive management process that evaluated new scientific information under the Northwest Forest Plan. The models were not prescriptive but helped resource managers and specialists to evaluate complicated and at times conflicting conservation guidelines and to reduce bias and uncertainty in evaluating the scientific data. We concluded that applying the BBN modeling framework to complex and equivocal evaluation guidelines provided a set of clear, intuitive decision-aiding tools that greatly aided the species evaluation and conservation process.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754899158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>754899158</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_7548991583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjMtKA0EQRRtRMD7-oXauApMX0-Myo8FsQjDJOjRjJdOm0zVW1Rj0i_xMe0DEpat7qXvqnJneIM9sf5TZ_PxPvzRXIq9ZNizGdtgzX2Xt2FWK7D993MOqwcqjgFN49nKA-fweNtItU_eB4l2EKQaPO1ignogPCRV4SE_iKcKqbRpihTVREFBKS1IffcRfc0lRkN-ddnzpFPfE3X0TX5BBa4RFMtQnFIUZcRfL4OKNudi5IHj7k9fmbva4Lp_6DdNbm6jt0UuFIaFIrWzzydgWxWBiR_8nvwFaX2RQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>754899158</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterizing Species at Risk II: Using Bayesian Belief Networks as Decision Support Tools to Determine Species Conservation Categories Under the Northwest Forest Plan</title><source>JSTOR Open Access Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Marcot, B G ; Hohenlohe, P A ; Morey, S ; Holmes, R ; Molina, R ; Turley, M C ; Huff, M H ; Laurence, JA</creator><creatorcontrib>Marcot, B G ; Hohenlohe, P A ; Morey, S ; Holmes, R ; Molina, R ; Turley, M C ; Huff, M H ; Laurence, JA</creatorcontrib><description>We developed a set of decision-aiding models as Bayesian belief networks (BBNs) that represented a complex set of evaluation guidelines used to determine the appropriate conservation of hundreds of potentially rare species on federally-administered lands in the Pacific Northwest United States. The models were used in a structured assessment and paneling procedure as part of an adaptive management process that evaluated new scientific information under the Northwest Forest Plan. The models were not prescriptive but helped resource managers and specialists to evaluate complicated and at times conflicting conservation guidelines and to reduce bias and uncertainty in evaluating the scientific data. We concluded that applying the BBN modeling framework to complex and equivocal evaluation guidelines provided a set of clear, intuitive decision-aiding tools that greatly aided the species evaluation and conservation process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1708-3087</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-3087</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Ecology and society, 2006-12, Vol.11 (2), p.n.-n.</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marcot, B G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hohenlohe, P A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morey, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molina, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turley, M C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huff, M H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laurence, JA</creatorcontrib><title>Characterizing Species at Risk II: Using Bayesian Belief Networks as Decision Support Tools to Determine Species Conservation Categories Under the Northwest Forest Plan</title><title>Ecology and society</title><description>We developed a set of decision-aiding models as Bayesian belief networks (BBNs) that represented a complex set of evaluation guidelines used to determine the appropriate conservation of hundreds of potentially rare species on federally-administered lands in the Pacific Northwest United States. The models were used in a structured assessment and paneling procedure as part of an adaptive management process that evaluated new scientific information under the Northwest Forest Plan. The models were not prescriptive but helped resource managers and specialists to evaluate complicated and at times conflicting conservation guidelines and to reduce bias and uncertainty in evaluating the scientific data. We concluded that applying the BBN modeling framework to complex and equivocal evaluation guidelines provided a set of clear, intuitive decision-aiding tools that greatly aided the species evaluation and conservation process.</description><issn>1708-3087</issn><issn>1708-3087</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjMtKA0EQRRtRMD7-oXauApMX0-Myo8FsQjDJOjRjJdOm0zVW1Rj0i_xMe0DEpat7qXvqnJneIM9sf5TZ_PxPvzRXIq9ZNizGdtgzX2Xt2FWK7D993MOqwcqjgFN49nKA-fweNtItU_eB4l2EKQaPO1ignogPCRV4SE_iKcKqbRpihTVREFBKS1IffcRfc0lRkN-ddnzpFPfE3X0TX5BBa4RFMtQnFIUZcRfL4OKNudi5IHj7k9fmbva4Lp_6DdNbm6jt0UuFIaFIrWzzydgWxWBiR_8nvwFaX2RQ</recordid><startdate>20061201</startdate><enddate>20061201</enddate><creator>Marcot, B G</creator><creator>Hohenlohe, P A</creator><creator>Morey, S</creator><creator>Holmes, R</creator><creator>Molina, R</creator><creator>Turley, M C</creator><creator>Huff, M H</creator><creator>Laurence, JA</creator><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061201</creationdate><title>Characterizing Species at Risk II: Using Bayesian Belief Networks as Decision Support Tools to Determine Species Conservation Categories Under the Northwest Forest Plan</title><author>Marcot, B G ; Hohenlohe, P A ; Morey, S ; Holmes, R ; Molina, R ; Turley, M C ; Huff, M H ; Laurence, JA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_7548991583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marcot, B G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hohenlohe, P A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morey, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molina, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turley, M C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huff, M H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laurence, JA</creatorcontrib><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Ecology and society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marcot, B G</au><au>Hohenlohe, P A</au><au>Morey, S</au><au>Holmes, R</au><au>Molina, R</au><au>Turley, M C</au><au>Huff, M H</au><au>Laurence, JA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterizing Species at Risk II: Using Bayesian Belief Networks as Decision Support Tools to Determine Species Conservation Categories Under the Northwest Forest Plan</atitle><jtitle>Ecology and society</jtitle><date>2006-12-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>n.</spage><epage>n.</epage><pages>n.-n.</pages><issn>1708-3087</issn><eissn>1708-3087</eissn><abstract>We developed a set of decision-aiding models as Bayesian belief networks (BBNs) that represented a complex set of evaluation guidelines used to determine the appropriate conservation of hundreds of potentially rare species on federally-administered lands in the Pacific Northwest United States. The models were used in a structured assessment and paneling procedure as part of an adaptive management process that evaluated new scientific information under the Northwest Forest Plan. The models were not prescriptive but helped resource managers and specialists to evaluate complicated and at times conflicting conservation guidelines and to reduce bias and uncertainty in evaluating the scientific data. We concluded that applying the BBN modeling framework to complex and equivocal evaluation guidelines provided a set of clear, intuitive decision-aiding tools that greatly aided the species evaluation and conservation process.</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1708-3087
ispartof Ecology and society, 2006-12, Vol.11 (2), p.n.-n.
issn 1708-3087
1708-3087
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754899158
source JSTOR Open Access Journals; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
title Characterizing Species at Risk II: Using Bayesian Belief Networks as Decision Support Tools to Determine Species Conservation Categories Under the Northwest Forest Plan
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T03%3A07%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterizing%20Species%20at%20Risk%20II:%20Using%20Bayesian%20Belief%20Networks%20as%20Decision%20Support%20Tools%20to%20Determine%20Species%20Conservation%20Categories%20Under%20the%20Northwest%20Forest%20Plan&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20and%20society&rft.au=Marcot,%20B%20G&rft.date=2006-12-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=n.&rft.epage=n.&rft.pages=n.-n.&rft.issn=1708-3087&rft.eissn=1708-3087&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E754899158%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_7548991583%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=754899158&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true