Loading…
Caution! All data are not created equal: The hazards of using National Weather Service data for calculating accumulated degree days
Abstract An increasing number of anthropological decomposition studies are utilizing accumulated degree days (ADD) to quantify and estimate the post-mortem interval (PMI) at given decompositional stages, or the number of ADD required for certain events, such as tooth exfoliation, to occur. This stud...
Saved in:
Published in: | Forensic science international 2010-10, Vol.202 (1), p.e49-e52 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-dd5afb667bc026a5b887a418c8f9e062862ac323726110a04313cdd14843024c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-dd5afb667bc026a5b887a418c8f9e062862ac323726110a04313cdd14843024c3 |
container_end_page | e52 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e49 |
container_title | Forensic science international |
container_volume | 202 |
creator | Dabbs, Gretchen R |
description | Abstract An increasing number of anthropological decomposition studies are utilizing accumulated degree days (ADD) to quantify and estimate the post-mortem interval (PMI) at given decompositional stages, or the number of ADD required for certain events, such as tooth exfoliation, to occur. This study addresses the utility of retroactively applying temperature data from the closest National Weather Service (NWS) station to these calculations as prescribed in the past. Hourly temperature readings were collected for 154 days at a research site in Farmington, AR between June 30 and December 25, 2008. These were converted to average daily temperatures by calculating the mean of the 24 hourly values, following the NWS reporting procedure. These data were compared to comparable data from the Owl Creek and Drake Field NWS stations, the two closest to the research site, located 5.7 and 9.9 km away, respectively. Paired samples t -tests between the research site and each of the NWS stations show significant differences between the average daily temperature data collected at the research station, and both Owl Creek (2.0 °C, p < 0.001) and Drake Field (0.6 °C, p < 0.001). When applied to a simulated recovery effort, the further NWS station also proved to represent the better model for the recovery site. Using a published equation for estimating post-mortem interval using ADD and total body decomposition scores (Megyesi et al., 2005 [1] ), the Drake Field data produced estimates of PMI more closely mirroring those of the research site than did Owl Creek. This demonstrates that instead of automatically choosing the nearest NWS station, care must be taken when choosing an NWS station for retroactively gathering temperature data for application of PMI estimation techniques using accumulated degree days to ensure the station adequately reflects temperature conditions at the recovery site. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.02.024 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755181362</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0379073810000800</els_id><sourcerecordid>2741020421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-dd5afb667bc026a5b887a418c8f9e062862ac323726110a04313cdd14843024c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk2LFDEQhoMo7rj6FzTqwdOMlY9OZz0Iw-AXLHrYFY8hk1TvZOzp3k26F8arf9xqZ11hQZAUhISn3qTqLcaeCVgIEOb1dtH0uYSUumEhgW5BUuh7bCZsLedGWnWfzUDVJ3OolT1ij0rZAkBVSfOQHUlQoIzVM_Zz5cch9d1zvmxbHv3guc_Iu37gIaMfMHK8Gn37hp9vkG_8D59j4X3Dx5K6C_7ZT8m-5d-I3WDmZ5ivU8CDEv2RB9-GsSWMaB_CuJsOpBrxIuPE7ctj9qDxbcEnN_sx-_r-3fnq4_z0y4dPq-XpPGgLwzzGyjdrY-p1AGl8tba29lrYYJsTBCrZSB-UVLU0QoAHrYQKMQpttaLeBHXMXh10L3N_NWIZ3C6VgG3rO-zH4uqqElYoI4l8cYfc9mOmOn9DlZ4WQS__BQlQWhsgiKj6QIXcl5KxcZc57XzeE-QmL93W3XrpJi8dSIpJ_-mN_rjeYbzN-2MeAcsDgNS064TZkQp2AWPKGAYX-_Qfj7y9oxHa1CVy7TvusfytyBVKcGfTSE0TJWiYwAKoX9Zfx6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1034460543</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Caution! All data are not created equal: The hazards of using National Weather Service data for calculating accumulated degree days</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Dabbs, Gretchen R</creator><creatorcontrib>Dabbs, Gretchen R</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract An increasing number of anthropological decomposition studies are utilizing accumulated degree days (ADD) to quantify and estimate the post-mortem interval (PMI) at given decompositional stages, or the number of ADD required for certain events, such as tooth exfoliation, to occur. This study addresses the utility of retroactively applying temperature data from the closest National Weather Service (NWS) station to these calculations as prescribed in the past. Hourly temperature readings were collected for 154 days at a research site in Farmington, AR between June 30 and December 25, 2008. These were converted to average daily temperatures by calculating the mean of the 24 hourly values, following the NWS reporting procedure. These data were compared to comparable data from the Owl Creek and Drake Field NWS stations, the two closest to the research site, located 5.7 and 9.9 km away, respectively. Paired samples t -tests between the research site and each of the NWS stations show significant differences between the average daily temperature data collected at the research station, and both Owl Creek (2.0 °C, p < 0.001) and Drake Field (0.6 °C, p < 0.001). When applied to a simulated recovery effort, the further NWS station also proved to represent the better model for the recovery site. Using a published equation for estimating post-mortem interval using ADD and total body decomposition scores (Megyesi et al., 2005 [1] ), the Drake Field data produced estimates of PMI more closely mirroring those of the research site than did Owl Creek. This demonstrates that instead of automatically choosing the nearest NWS station, care must be taken when choosing an NWS station for retroactively gathering temperature data for application of PMI estimation techniques using accumulated degree days to ensure the station adequately reflects temperature conditions at the recovery site.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0379-0738</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6283</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.02.024</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20303684</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Autopsies ; Data Collection ; Data validation ; Decomposition ; Decomposition rates ; F6 data ; Forensic Anthropology ; Forensic Pathology ; Forensic sciences ; Human body ; Humans ; Models, Biological ; Pathology ; Postmortem Changes ; Temperature ; Temperature effects ; Weather</subject><ispartof>Forensic science international, 2010-10, Vol.202 (1), p.e49-e52</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Oct 10, 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-dd5afb667bc026a5b887a418c8f9e062862ac323726110a04313cdd14843024c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-dd5afb667bc026a5b887a418c8f9e062862ac323726110a04313cdd14843024c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20303684$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dabbs, Gretchen R</creatorcontrib><title>Caution! All data are not created equal: The hazards of using National Weather Service data for calculating accumulated degree days</title><title>Forensic science international</title><addtitle>Forensic Sci Int</addtitle><description>Abstract An increasing number of anthropological decomposition studies are utilizing accumulated degree days (ADD) to quantify and estimate the post-mortem interval (PMI) at given decompositional stages, or the number of ADD required for certain events, such as tooth exfoliation, to occur. This study addresses the utility of retroactively applying temperature data from the closest National Weather Service (NWS) station to these calculations as prescribed in the past. Hourly temperature readings were collected for 154 days at a research site in Farmington, AR between June 30 and December 25, 2008. These were converted to average daily temperatures by calculating the mean of the 24 hourly values, following the NWS reporting procedure. These data were compared to comparable data from the Owl Creek and Drake Field NWS stations, the two closest to the research site, located 5.7 and 9.9 km away, respectively. Paired samples t -tests between the research site and each of the NWS stations show significant differences between the average daily temperature data collected at the research station, and both Owl Creek (2.0 °C, p < 0.001) and Drake Field (0.6 °C, p < 0.001). When applied to a simulated recovery effort, the further NWS station also proved to represent the better model for the recovery site. Using a published equation for estimating post-mortem interval using ADD and total body decomposition scores (Megyesi et al., 2005 [1] ), the Drake Field data produced estimates of PMI more closely mirroring those of the research site than did Owl Creek. This demonstrates that instead of automatically choosing the nearest NWS station, care must be taken when choosing an NWS station for retroactively gathering temperature data for application of PMI estimation techniques using accumulated degree days to ensure the station adequately reflects temperature conditions at the recovery site.</description><subject>Autopsies</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Data validation</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>Decomposition rates</subject><subject>F6 data</subject><subject>Forensic Anthropology</subject><subject>Forensic Pathology</subject><subject>Forensic sciences</subject><subject>Human body</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Postmortem Changes</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><subject>Weather</subject><issn>0379-0738</issn><issn>1872-6283</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkk2LFDEQhoMo7rj6FzTqwdOMlY9OZz0Iw-AXLHrYFY8hk1TvZOzp3k26F8arf9xqZ11hQZAUhISn3qTqLcaeCVgIEOb1dtH0uYSUumEhgW5BUuh7bCZsLedGWnWfzUDVJ3OolT1ij0rZAkBVSfOQHUlQoIzVM_Zz5cch9d1zvmxbHv3guc_Iu37gIaMfMHK8Gn37hp9vkG_8D59j4X3Dx5K6C_7ZT8m-5d-I3WDmZ5ivU8CDEv2RB9-GsSWMaB_CuJsOpBrxIuPE7ctj9qDxbcEnN_sx-_r-3fnq4_z0y4dPq-XpPGgLwzzGyjdrY-p1AGl8tba29lrYYJsTBCrZSB-UVLU0QoAHrYQKMQpttaLeBHXMXh10L3N_NWIZ3C6VgG3rO-zH4uqqElYoI4l8cYfc9mOmOn9DlZ4WQS__BQlQWhsgiKj6QIXcl5KxcZc57XzeE-QmL93W3XrpJi8dSIpJ_-mN_rjeYbzN-2MeAcsDgNS064TZkQp2AWPKGAYX-_Qfj7y9oxHa1CVy7TvusfytyBVKcGfTSE0TJWiYwAKoX9Zfx6w</recordid><startdate>20101010</startdate><enddate>20101010</enddate><creator>Dabbs, Gretchen R</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101010</creationdate><title>Caution! All data are not created equal: The hazards of using National Weather Service data for calculating accumulated degree days</title><author>Dabbs, Gretchen R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-dd5afb667bc026a5b887a418c8f9e062862ac323726110a04313cdd14843024c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Autopsies</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Data validation</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>Decomposition rates</topic><topic>F6 data</topic><topic>Forensic Anthropology</topic><topic>Forensic Pathology</topic><topic>Forensic sciences</topic><topic>Human body</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Postmortem Changes</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><topic>Weather</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dabbs, Gretchen R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Forensic science international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dabbs, Gretchen R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Caution! All data are not created equal: The hazards of using National Weather Service data for calculating accumulated degree days</atitle><jtitle>Forensic science international</jtitle><addtitle>Forensic Sci Int</addtitle><date>2010-10-10</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>202</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e49</spage><epage>e52</epage><pages>e49-e52</pages><issn>0379-0738</issn><eissn>1872-6283</eissn><abstract>Abstract An increasing number of anthropological decomposition studies are utilizing accumulated degree days (ADD) to quantify and estimate the post-mortem interval (PMI) at given decompositional stages, or the number of ADD required for certain events, such as tooth exfoliation, to occur. This study addresses the utility of retroactively applying temperature data from the closest National Weather Service (NWS) station to these calculations as prescribed in the past. Hourly temperature readings were collected for 154 days at a research site in Farmington, AR between June 30 and December 25, 2008. These were converted to average daily temperatures by calculating the mean of the 24 hourly values, following the NWS reporting procedure. These data were compared to comparable data from the Owl Creek and Drake Field NWS stations, the two closest to the research site, located 5.7 and 9.9 km away, respectively. Paired samples t -tests between the research site and each of the NWS stations show significant differences between the average daily temperature data collected at the research station, and both Owl Creek (2.0 °C, p < 0.001) and Drake Field (0.6 °C, p < 0.001). When applied to a simulated recovery effort, the further NWS station also proved to represent the better model for the recovery site. Using a published equation for estimating post-mortem interval using ADD and total body decomposition scores (Megyesi et al., 2005 [1] ), the Drake Field data produced estimates of PMI more closely mirroring those of the research site than did Owl Creek. This demonstrates that instead of automatically choosing the nearest NWS station, care must be taken when choosing an NWS station for retroactively gathering temperature data for application of PMI estimation techniques using accumulated degree days to ensure the station adequately reflects temperature conditions at the recovery site.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>20303684</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.02.024</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0379-0738 |
ispartof | Forensic science international, 2010-10, Vol.202 (1), p.e49-e52 |
issn | 0379-0738 1872-6283 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755181362 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Autopsies Data Collection Data validation Decomposition Decomposition rates F6 data Forensic Anthropology Forensic Pathology Forensic sciences Human body Humans Models, Biological Pathology Postmortem Changes Temperature Temperature effects Weather |
title | Caution! All data are not created equal: The hazards of using National Weather Service data for calculating accumulated degree days |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T08%3A06%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Caution!%20All%20data%20are%20not%20created%20equal:%20The%20hazards%20of%20using%20National%20Weather%20Service%20data%20for%20calculating%20accumulated%20degree%20days&rft.jtitle=Forensic%20science%20international&rft.au=Dabbs,%20Gretchen%20R&rft.date=2010-10-10&rft.volume=202&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e49&rft.epage=e52&rft.pages=e49-e52&rft.issn=0379-0738&rft.eissn=1872-6283&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.02.024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2741020421%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-dd5afb667bc026a5b887a418c8f9e062862ac323726110a04313cdd14843024c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1034460543&rft_id=info:pmid/20303684&rfr_iscdi=true |