Role of preliminary etching for one-step self-etch adhesives

• Published in: European journal of oral sciences 2010-10, Vol.118 (5), p.517-524
• Main Authors: Taschner, Michael, Nato, Fernando, Mazzoni, Annalisa, Frankenberger, Roland, Krämer, Norbert, Di Lenarda, Roberto, Petschelt, Anselm, Breschi, Lorenzo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acid Etching, Dental; Chi-Square Distribution; Dental Bonding; Dental Enamel - drug effects; Dental Leakage; Dental Stress Analysis; Dentin - drug effects; dentine bonding systems; Dentistry; etching; Humans; microtensile; Phosphoric Acids - pharmacology; Resin Cements; self-etch; Shear Strength; Statistics, Nonparametric; Surface Properties; Tensile Strength
• ISSN: 0909-8836; 1600-0722
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00769.x

Taschner M, Nato F, Mazzoni A, Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Di Lenarda R, Petschelt A, Breschi L. Role of preliminary etching for one‐step self‐etch adhesives.
Eur J Oral Sci 2010; 118: 517–524. © 2010 Eur J Oral Sci The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of preliminary phosphoric acid etching of enamel and dentine before the application of two, one‐step self‐etch adhesive systems. The systems were applied onto acid‐etched or smear‐layer‐covered enamel and dentine. The treatment groups were as follows: group 1, Adper Easy Bond (3M ESPE) on etched substrate; group 2, Adper Easy Bond (control); group 3, iBond Self‐Etch (Heraeus Kulzer) on etched substrate; and group 4, iBond Self‐Etch (control). Enamel and dentine bond strengths were calculated using microshear and microtensile bond‐strength tests. Additional specimens were prepared to evaluate nanoleakage at the dentine–adhesive interface and were investigated using light microscopy or transmission electron microscopy. Both adhesives demonstrated higher microshear bond strengths when enamel was pre‐acid‐etched with phosphoric acid (Adper Easy Bond 28.7 ± 4.8 MPa; iBond Self‐Etch 19.7 ± 3.6 MPa) compared with controls (Adper Easy Bond 19.2 ± 3.3 MPa; iBond Self‐Etch 17.5 ± 2.7 MPa) and increased microtensile bond strength when applied on acid‐etched (Adper Easy Bond 35.8 ± 5.7 MPa; iBond Self‐Etch 24.3 ± 7.9 MPa) vs. smear‐layer‐covered dentine (Adper Easy Bond 26.9 ± 6.2 MPa; iBond Self‐Etch 17.6 ± 4.3 MPa). Adper Easy Bond showed lower nanoleakage than iBond Self‐Etch, irrespective of preliminary etching. The results of this study support the use of phosphoric acid etching before the application of one‐step self‐etch adhesive systems.