Loading…
Stage D1 prostate cancer. A nonrandomized comparison of conservative treatment options versus radical prostatectomy
Background. Untreated Stage D1 prostate cancer is associated with a high progression rate. Various treatment modalities involving monotherapy alone have been associated with dismal results. In this retrospective study, the impact of combination therapy, local (surgery or radiation) and systemic (hor...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cancer 1993-02, Vol.71 (S3), p.996-1004 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4137-14c1b6ea159bfbca8c91bda362c1cd8e0a4a02e4cab60add6cbad47ea23e25e93 |
container_end_page | 1004 |
container_issue | S3 |
container_start_page | 996 |
container_title | Cancer |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Cheng, Christopher W. S. Bergstralh, Erik J. Zincke, Horst |
description | Background. Untreated Stage D1 prostate cancer is associated with a high progression rate. Various treatment modalities involving monotherapy alone have been associated with dismal results. In this retrospective study, the impact of combination therapy, local (surgery or radiation) and systemic (hormonal), compared with that of monotherapy on disease outcome was evaluated.
Methods. The authors reviewed 631 patients who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy for Stage D1 prostate cancer: 251 had radical prostatectomies and orchiectomies, 78 had radical prostatectomies alone, 97 received local irradiation and underwent orchiectomies, and 60 had orchiectomies alone.
Results. Cause‐specific survival rates for prostatectom–orchiectomy‐treated (PO) patients at 5 and 10 years were 91% and 78%, respectively; they were 84% and 54% for irradiation–orchiectomy‐treated (IO) patients and 66% and 39% for orchiectomy alone‐treated (O) patients, respectively. Controlling for the number of nodes, the difference between PO‐treated and IO‐treated patients was not significant; the former group had a significantly longer survival than the O‐treated patients (P = 0.037). The 5‐year and 10‐year cause‐specific survival rates for prostatectomy alone‐treated patients were 91% and 75%, respectively, and 84% and 45% for irradiation alone‐treated patients. Thus, cause‐specific survival rates in prostatectomy alone‐treated patients were significantly better (P = 0.0085).
Conclusions. For patients with Stage D1 prostate adenocarcinoma, radical prostatectomy and local irradiation as local treatments when combined with orchiectomy produce similar outcomes. These results should be verified in a prospective study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/1097-0142(19930201)71:3+<996::AID-CNCR2820711417>3.0.CO;2-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75573123</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>75573123</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4137-14c1b6ea159bfbca8c91bda362c1cd8e0a4a02e4cab60add6cbad47ea23e25e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV2LEzEYhQdR1u7qTxByIeIiU_MmmclMV4Qy68fCYsEPELwI72TekZH5qElaqb_elNaCXohXIZyTk8N5kqQCPgfOxXPgpU45KPEUylJyweFSw0I-e1GW-WKxvLlOq3fVe1EIrgEU6JdyzufV6kqkxZ1kdnp9N5lxzos0U_Lz_eTc-2_xqkUmz5IzneuSKz1L_IeAX4ldA1u7yQcMxCyOltycLdk4jQ7HZhq6n9QwOw1rdJ2fRja18TZ6clsM3ZZYcIRhoDGwaR26qLAtOb_xzGHTWexP4TZMw-5Bcq_F3tPD43mRfHr96mP1Nr1dvbmplrepVSB1CspCnRNCVtZtbbGwJdQNylxYsE1BHBVyQcpinXNsmtzW2ChNKCSJjEp5kTw55Mbfv2_IBzN03lLf40jTxhudZVqCkNH45WC0saZ31Jq16wZ0OwPc7JGY_ahmP6r5jcRoMNKYiMSYiMT8iSRK3FQrI0wR0x8da2zqgZpT9pFB1B8fdfRxqzZObjt_sqlMQ1GoaKOD7UfX0-6_G-4L_rPfX4r8BY1uuW0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75573123</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stage D1 prostate cancer. A nonrandomized comparison of conservative treatment options versus radical prostatectomy</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Cheng, Christopher W. S. ; Bergstralh, Erik J. ; Zincke, Horst</creator><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Christopher W. S. ; Bergstralh, Erik J. ; Zincke, Horst</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Untreated Stage D1 prostate cancer is associated with a high progression rate. Various treatment modalities involving monotherapy alone have been associated with dismal results. In this retrospective study, the impact of combination therapy, local (surgery or radiation) and systemic (hormonal), compared with that of monotherapy on disease outcome was evaluated.
Methods. The authors reviewed 631 patients who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy for Stage D1 prostate cancer: 251 had radical prostatectomies and orchiectomies, 78 had radical prostatectomies alone, 97 received local irradiation and underwent orchiectomies, and 60 had orchiectomies alone.
Results. Cause‐specific survival rates for prostatectom–orchiectomy‐treated (PO) patients at 5 and 10 years were 91% and 78%, respectively; they were 84% and 54% for irradiation–orchiectomy‐treated (IO) patients and 66% and 39% for orchiectomy alone‐treated (O) patients, respectively. Controlling for the number of nodes, the difference between PO‐treated and IO‐treated patients was not significant; the former group had a significantly longer survival than the O‐treated patients (P = 0.037). The 5‐year and 10‐year cause‐specific survival rates for prostatectomy alone‐treated patients were 91% and 75%, respectively, and 84% and 45% for irradiation alone‐treated patients. Thus, cause‐specific survival rates in prostatectomy alone‐treated patients were significantly better (P = 0.0085).
Conclusions. For patients with Stage D1 prostate adenocarcinoma, radical prostatectomy and local irradiation as local treatments when combined with orchiectomy produce similar outcomes. These results should be verified in a prospective study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930201)71:3+<996::AID-CNCR2820711417>3.0.CO;2-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7679047</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CANCAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Biomarkers, Tumor - blood ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - blood ; Neoplasm Staging ; orchiectomy ; Proportional Hazards Models ; prostate cancer ; Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood ; prostatectomy ; Prostatectomy - methods ; Prostatic Neoplasms - blood ; Prostatic Neoplasms - mortality ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy ; radiation therapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the urinary system ; Survival Rate</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 1993-02, Vol.71 (S3), p.996-1004</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1993 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4137-14c1b6ea159bfbca8c91bda362c1cd8e0a4a02e4cab60add6cbad47ea23e25e93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23910,23911,25119,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4571884$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7679047$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Christopher W. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergstralh, Erik J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zincke, Horst</creatorcontrib><title>Stage D1 prostate cancer. A nonrandomized comparison of conservative treatment options versus radical prostatectomy</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>Background. Untreated Stage D1 prostate cancer is associated with a high progression rate. Various treatment modalities involving monotherapy alone have been associated with dismal results. In this retrospective study, the impact of combination therapy, local (surgery or radiation) and systemic (hormonal), compared with that of monotherapy on disease outcome was evaluated.
Methods. The authors reviewed 631 patients who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy for Stage D1 prostate cancer: 251 had radical prostatectomies and orchiectomies, 78 had radical prostatectomies alone, 97 received local irradiation and underwent orchiectomies, and 60 had orchiectomies alone.
Results. Cause‐specific survival rates for prostatectom–orchiectomy‐treated (PO) patients at 5 and 10 years were 91% and 78%, respectively; they were 84% and 54% for irradiation–orchiectomy‐treated (IO) patients and 66% and 39% for orchiectomy alone‐treated (O) patients, respectively. Controlling for the number of nodes, the difference between PO‐treated and IO‐treated patients was not significant; the former group had a significantly longer survival than the O‐treated patients (P = 0.037). The 5‐year and 10‐year cause‐specific survival rates for prostatectomy alone‐treated patients were 91% and 75%, respectively, and 84% and 45% for irradiation alone‐treated patients. Thus, cause‐specific survival rates in prostatectomy alone‐treated patients were significantly better (P = 0.0085).
Conclusions. For patients with Stage D1 prostate adenocarcinoma, radical prostatectomy and local irradiation as local treatments when combined with orchiectomy produce similar outcomes. These results should be verified in a prospective study.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - blood</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - blood</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>orchiectomy</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</subject><subject>prostatectomy</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - blood</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>radiation therapy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the urinary system</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkV2LEzEYhQdR1u7qTxByIeIiU_MmmclMV4Qy68fCYsEPELwI72TekZH5qElaqb_elNaCXohXIZyTk8N5kqQCPgfOxXPgpU45KPEUylJyweFSw0I-e1GW-WKxvLlOq3fVe1EIrgEU6JdyzufV6kqkxZ1kdnp9N5lxzos0U_Lz_eTc-2_xqkUmz5IzneuSKz1L_IeAX4ldA1u7yQcMxCyOltycLdk4jQ7HZhq6n9QwOw1rdJ2fRja18TZ6clsM3ZZYcIRhoDGwaR26qLAtOb_xzGHTWexP4TZMw-5Bcq_F3tPD43mRfHr96mP1Nr1dvbmplrepVSB1CspCnRNCVtZtbbGwJdQNylxYsE1BHBVyQcpinXNsmtzW2ChNKCSJjEp5kTw55Mbfv2_IBzN03lLf40jTxhudZVqCkNH45WC0saZ31Jq16wZ0OwPc7JGY_ahmP6r5jcRoMNKYiMSYiMT8iSRK3FQrI0wR0x8da2zqgZpT9pFB1B8fdfRxqzZObjt_sqlMQ1GoaKOD7UfX0-6_G-4L_rPfX4r8BY1uuW0</recordid><startdate>19930201</startdate><enddate>19930201</enddate><creator>Cheng, Christopher W. S.</creator><creator>Bergstralh, Erik J.</creator><creator>Zincke, Horst</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930201</creationdate><title>Stage D1 prostate cancer. A nonrandomized comparison of conservative treatment options versus radical prostatectomy</title><author>Cheng, Christopher W. S. ; Bergstralh, Erik J. ; Zincke, Horst</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4137-14c1b6ea159bfbca8c91bda362c1cd8e0a4a02e4cab60add6cbad47ea23e25e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - blood</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - blood</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>orchiectomy</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</topic><topic>prostatectomy</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - blood</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>radiation therapy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the urinary system</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Christopher W. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergstralh, Erik J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zincke, Horst</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cheng, Christopher W. S.</au><au>Bergstralh, Erik J.</au><au>Zincke, Horst</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stage D1 prostate cancer. A nonrandomized comparison of conservative treatment options versus radical prostatectomy</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>1993-02-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>S3</issue><spage>996</spage><epage>1004</epage><pages>996-1004</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><coden>CANCAR</coden><abstract>Background. Untreated Stage D1 prostate cancer is associated with a high progression rate. Various treatment modalities involving monotherapy alone have been associated with dismal results. In this retrospective study, the impact of combination therapy, local (surgery or radiation) and systemic (hormonal), compared with that of monotherapy on disease outcome was evaluated.
Methods. The authors reviewed 631 patients who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy for Stage D1 prostate cancer: 251 had radical prostatectomies and orchiectomies, 78 had radical prostatectomies alone, 97 received local irradiation and underwent orchiectomies, and 60 had orchiectomies alone.
Results. Cause‐specific survival rates for prostatectom–orchiectomy‐treated (PO) patients at 5 and 10 years were 91% and 78%, respectively; they were 84% and 54% for irradiation–orchiectomy‐treated (IO) patients and 66% and 39% for orchiectomy alone‐treated (O) patients, respectively. Controlling for the number of nodes, the difference between PO‐treated and IO‐treated patients was not significant; the former group had a significantly longer survival than the O‐treated patients (P = 0.037). The 5‐year and 10‐year cause‐specific survival rates for prostatectomy alone‐treated patients were 91% and 75%, respectively, and 84% and 45% for irradiation alone‐treated patients. Thus, cause‐specific survival rates in prostatectomy alone‐treated patients were significantly better (P = 0.0085).
Conclusions. For patients with Stage D1 prostate adenocarcinoma, radical prostatectomy and local irradiation as local treatments when combined with orchiectomy produce similar outcomes. These results should be verified in a prospective study.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>7679047</pmid><doi>10.1002/1097-0142(19930201)71:3+<996::AID-CNCR2820711417>3.0.CO;2-8</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-543X |
ispartof | Cancer, 1993-02, Vol.71 (S3), p.996-1004 |
issn | 0008-543X 1097-0142 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75573123 |
source | EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Biomarkers, Tumor - blood Combined Modality Therapy Follow-Up Studies Humans Lymph Node Excision Lymphatic Metastasis Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - blood Neoplasm Staging orchiectomy Proportional Hazards Models prostate cancer Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood prostatectomy Prostatectomy - methods Prostatic Neoplasms - blood Prostatic Neoplasms - mortality Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy radiation therapy Retrospective Studies Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the urinary system Survival Rate |
title | Stage D1 prostate cancer. A nonrandomized comparison of conservative treatment options versus radical prostatectomy |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T03%3A20%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stage%20D1%20prostate%20cancer.%20A%20nonrandomized%20comparison%20of%20conservative%20treatment%20options%20versus%20radical%20prostatectomy&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Cheng,%20Christopher%20W.%20S.&rft.date=1993-02-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=S3&rft.spage=996&rft.epage=1004&rft.pages=996-1004&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft.coden=CANCAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/1097-0142(19930201)71:3+%3C996::AID-CNCR2820711417%3E3.0.CO;2-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75573123%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4137-14c1b6ea159bfbca8c91bda362c1cd8e0a4a02e4cab60add6cbad47ea23e25e93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75573123&rft_id=info:pmid/7679047&rfr_iscdi=true |