Loading…

Stage D1 prostate cancer. A nonrandomized comparison of conservative treatment options versus radical prostatectomy

Background. Untreated Stage D1 prostate cancer is associated with a high progression rate. Various treatment modalities involving monotherapy alone have been associated with dismal results. In this retrospective study, the impact of combination therapy, local (surgery or radiation) and systemic (hor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cancer 1993-02, Vol.71 (S3), p.996-1004
Main Authors: Cheng, Christopher W. S., Bergstralh, Erik J., Zincke, Horst
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4137-14c1b6ea159bfbca8c91bda362c1cd8e0a4a02e4cab60add6cbad47ea23e25e93
container_end_page 1004
container_issue S3
container_start_page 996
container_title Cancer
container_volume 71
creator Cheng, Christopher W. S.
Bergstralh, Erik J.
Zincke, Horst
description Background. Untreated Stage D1 prostate cancer is associated with a high progression rate. Various treatment modalities involving monotherapy alone have been associated with dismal results. In this retrospective study, the impact of combination therapy, local (surgery or radiation) and systemic (hormonal), compared with that of monotherapy on disease outcome was evaluated. Methods. The authors reviewed 631 patients who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy for Stage D1 prostate cancer: 251 had radical prostatectomies and orchiectomies, 78 had radical prostatectomies alone, 97 received local irradiation and underwent orchiectomies, and 60 had orchiectomies alone. Results. Cause‐specific survival rates for prostatectom–orchiectomy‐treated (PO) patients at 5 and 10 years were 91% and 78%, respectively; they were 84% and 54% for irradiation–orchiectomy‐treated (IO) patients and 66% and 39% for orchiectomy alone‐treated (O) patients, respectively. Controlling for the number of nodes, the difference between PO‐treated and IO‐treated patients was not significant; the former group had a significantly longer survival than the O‐treated patients (P = 0.037). The 5‐year and 10‐year cause‐specific survival rates for prostatectomy alone‐treated patients were 91% and 75%, respectively, and 84% and 45% for irradiation alone‐treated patients. Thus, cause‐specific survival rates in prostatectomy alone‐treated patients were significantly better (P = 0.0085). Conclusions. For patients with Stage D1 prostate adenocarcinoma, radical prostatectomy and local irradiation as local treatments when combined with orchiectomy produce similar outcomes. These results should be verified in a prospective study.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/1097-0142(19930201)71:3+<996::AID-CNCR2820711417>3.0.CO;2-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75573123</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>75573123</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4137-14c1b6ea159bfbca8c91bda362c1cd8e0a4a02e4cab60add6cbad47ea23e25e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV2LEzEYhQdR1u7qTxByIeIiU_MmmclMV4Qy68fCYsEPELwI72TekZH5qElaqb_elNaCXohXIZyTk8N5kqQCPgfOxXPgpU45KPEUylJyweFSw0I-e1GW-WKxvLlOq3fVe1EIrgEU6JdyzufV6kqkxZ1kdnp9N5lxzos0U_Lz_eTc-2_xqkUmz5IzneuSKz1L_IeAX4ldA1u7yQcMxCyOltycLdk4jQ7HZhq6n9QwOw1rdJ2fRja18TZ6clsM3ZZYcIRhoDGwaR26qLAtOb_xzGHTWexP4TZMw-5Bcq_F3tPD43mRfHr96mP1Nr1dvbmplrepVSB1CspCnRNCVtZtbbGwJdQNylxYsE1BHBVyQcpinXNsmtzW2ChNKCSJjEp5kTw55Mbfv2_IBzN03lLf40jTxhudZVqCkNH45WC0saZ31Jq16wZ0OwPc7JGY_ahmP6r5jcRoMNKYiMSYiMT8iSRK3FQrI0wR0x8da2zqgZpT9pFB1B8fdfRxqzZObjt_sqlMQ1GoaKOD7UfX0-6_G-4L_rPfX4r8BY1uuW0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75573123</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stage D1 prostate cancer. A nonrandomized comparison of conservative treatment options versus radical prostatectomy</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Cheng, Christopher W. S. ; Bergstralh, Erik J. ; Zincke, Horst</creator><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Christopher W. S. ; Bergstralh, Erik J. ; Zincke, Horst</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Untreated Stage D1 prostate cancer is associated with a high progression rate. Various treatment modalities involving monotherapy alone have been associated with dismal results. In this retrospective study, the impact of combination therapy, local (surgery or radiation) and systemic (hormonal), compared with that of monotherapy on disease outcome was evaluated. Methods. The authors reviewed 631 patients who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy for Stage D1 prostate cancer: 251 had radical prostatectomies and orchiectomies, 78 had radical prostatectomies alone, 97 received local irradiation and underwent orchiectomies, and 60 had orchiectomies alone. Results. Cause‐specific survival rates for prostatectom–orchiectomy‐treated (PO) patients at 5 and 10 years were 91% and 78%, respectively; they were 84% and 54% for irradiation–orchiectomy‐treated (IO) patients and 66% and 39% for orchiectomy alone‐treated (O) patients, respectively. Controlling for the number of nodes, the difference between PO‐treated and IO‐treated patients was not significant; the former group had a significantly longer survival than the O‐treated patients (P = 0.037). The 5‐year and 10‐year cause‐specific survival rates for prostatectomy alone‐treated patients were 91% and 75%, respectively, and 84% and 45% for irradiation alone‐treated patients. Thus, cause‐specific survival rates in prostatectomy alone‐treated patients were significantly better (P = 0.0085). Conclusions. For patients with Stage D1 prostate adenocarcinoma, radical prostatectomy and local irradiation as local treatments when combined with orchiectomy produce similar outcomes. These results should be verified in a prospective study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930201)71:3+&lt;996::AID-CNCR2820711417&gt;3.0.CO;2-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7679047</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CANCAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Biomarkers, Tumor - blood ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - blood ; Neoplasm Staging ; orchiectomy ; Proportional Hazards Models ; prostate cancer ; Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood ; prostatectomy ; Prostatectomy - methods ; Prostatic Neoplasms - blood ; Prostatic Neoplasms - mortality ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy ; radiation therapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the urinary system ; Survival Rate</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 1993-02, Vol.71 (S3), p.996-1004</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1993 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4137-14c1b6ea159bfbca8c91bda362c1cd8e0a4a02e4cab60add6cbad47ea23e25e93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23910,23911,25119,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4571884$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7679047$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Christopher W. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergstralh, Erik J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zincke, Horst</creatorcontrib><title>Stage D1 prostate cancer. A nonrandomized comparison of conservative treatment options versus radical prostatectomy</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>Background. Untreated Stage D1 prostate cancer is associated with a high progression rate. Various treatment modalities involving monotherapy alone have been associated with dismal results. In this retrospective study, the impact of combination therapy, local (surgery or radiation) and systemic (hormonal), compared with that of monotherapy on disease outcome was evaluated. Methods. The authors reviewed 631 patients who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy for Stage D1 prostate cancer: 251 had radical prostatectomies and orchiectomies, 78 had radical prostatectomies alone, 97 received local irradiation and underwent orchiectomies, and 60 had orchiectomies alone. Results. Cause‐specific survival rates for prostatectom–orchiectomy‐treated (PO) patients at 5 and 10 years were 91% and 78%, respectively; they were 84% and 54% for irradiation–orchiectomy‐treated (IO) patients and 66% and 39% for orchiectomy alone‐treated (O) patients, respectively. Controlling for the number of nodes, the difference between PO‐treated and IO‐treated patients was not significant; the former group had a significantly longer survival than the O‐treated patients (P = 0.037). The 5‐year and 10‐year cause‐specific survival rates for prostatectomy alone‐treated patients were 91% and 75%, respectively, and 84% and 45% for irradiation alone‐treated patients. Thus, cause‐specific survival rates in prostatectomy alone‐treated patients were significantly better (P = 0.0085). Conclusions. For patients with Stage D1 prostate adenocarcinoma, radical prostatectomy and local irradiation as local treatments when combined with orchiectomy produce similar outcomes. These results should be verified in a prospective study.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - blood</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - blood</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>orchiectomy</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</subject><subject>prostatectomy</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - blood</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>radiation therapy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the urinary system</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkV2LEzEYhQdR1u7qTxByIeIiU_MmmclMV4Qy68fCYsEPELwI72TekZH5qElaqb_elNaCXohXIZyTk8N5kqQCPgfOxXPgpU45KPEUylJyweFSw0I-e1GW-WKxvLlOq3fVe1EIrgEU6JdyzufV6kqkxZ1kdnp9N5lxzos0U_Lz_eTc-2_xqkUmz5IzneuSKz1L_IeAX4ldA1u7yQcMxCyOltycLdk4jQ7HZhq6n9QwOw1rdJ2fRja18TZ6clsM3ZZYcIRhoDGwaR26qLAtOb_xzGHTWexP4TZMw-5Bcq_F3tPD43mRfHr96mP1Nr1dvbmplrepVSB1CspCnRNCVtZtbbGwJdQNylxYsE1BHBVyQcpinXNsmtzW2ChNKCSJjEp5kTw55Mbfv2_IBzN03lLf40jTxhudZVqCkNH45WC0saZ31Jq16wZ0OwPc7JGY_ahmP6r5jcRoMNKYiMSYiMT8iSRK3FQrI0wR0x8da2zqgZpT9pFB1B8fdfRxqzZObjt_sqlMQ1GoaKOD7UfX0-6_G-4L_rPfX4r8BY1uuW0</recordid><startdate>19930201</startdate><enddate>19930201</enddate><creator>Cheng, Christopher W. S.</creator><creator>Bergstralh, Erik J.</creator><creator>Zincke, Horst</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930201</creationdate><title>Stage D1 prostate cancer. A nonrandomized comparison of conservative treatment options versus radical prostatectomy</title><author>Cheng, Christopher W. S. ; Bergstralh, Erik J. ; Zincke, Horst</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4137-14c1b6ea159bfbca8c91bda362c1cd8e0a4a02e4cab60add6cbad47ea23e25e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - blood</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - blood</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>orchiectomy</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</topic><topic>prostatectomy</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - blood</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>radiation therapy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the urinary system</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Christopher W. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergstralh, Erik J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zincke, Horst</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cheng, Christopher W. S.</au><au>Bergstralh, Erik J.</au><au>Zincke, Horst</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stage D1 prostate cancer. A nonrandomized comparison of conservative treatment options versus radical prostatectomy</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>1993-02-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>S3</issue><spage>996</spage><epage>1004</epage><pages>996-1004</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><coden>CANCAR</coden><abstract>Background. Untreated Stage D1 prostate cancer is associated with a high progression rate. Various treatment modalities involving monotherapy alone have been associated with dismal results. In this retrospective study, the impact of combination therapy, local (surgery or radiation) and systemic (hormonal), compared with that of monotherapy on disease outcome was evaluated. Methods. The authors reviewed 631 patients who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy for Stage D1 prostate cancer: 251 had radical prostatectomies and orchiectomies, 78 had radical prostatectomies alone, 97 received local irradiation and underwent orchiectomies, and 60 had orchiectomies alone. Results. Cause‐specific survival rates for prostatectom–orchiectomy‐treated (PO) patients at 5 and 10 years were 91% and 78%, respectively; they were 84% and 54% for irradiation–orchiectomy‐treated (IO) patients and 66% and 39% for orchiectomy alone‐treated (O) patients, respectively. Controlling for the number of nodes, the difference between PO‐treated and IO‐treated patients was not significant; the former group had a significantly longer survival than the O‐treated patients (P = 0.037). The 5‐year and 10‐year cause‐specific survival rates for prostatectomy alone‐treated patients were 91% and 75%, respectively, and 84% and 45% for irradiation alone‐treated patients. Thus, cause‐specific survival rates in prostatectomy alone‐treated patients were significantly better (P = 0.0085). Conclusions. For patients with Stage D1 prostate adenocarcinoma, radical prostatectomy and local irradiation as local treatments when combined with orchiectomy produce similar outcomes. These results should be verified in a prospective study.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>7679047</pmid><doi>10.1002/1097-0142(19930201)71:3+&lt;996::AID-CNCR2820711417&gt;3.0.CO;2-8</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 1993-02, Vol.71 (S3), p.996-1004
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75573123
source EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Biomarkers, Tumor - blood
Combined Modality Therapy
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Lymph Node Excision
Lymphatic Metastasis
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - blood
Neoplasm Staging
orchiectomy
Proportional Hazards Models
prostate cancer
Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood
prostatectomy
Prostatectomy - methods
Prostatic Neoplasms - blood
Prostatic Neoplasms - mortality
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy
radiation therapy
Retrospective Studies
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the urinary system
Survival Rate
title Stage D1 prostate cancer. A nonrandomized comparison of conservative treatment options versus radical prostatectomy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T03%3A20%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stage%20D1%20prostate%20cancer.%20A%20nonrandomized%20comparison%20of%20conservative%20treatment%20options%20versus%20radical%20prostatectomy&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Cheng,%20Christopher%20W.%20S.&rft.date=1993-02-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=S3&rft.spage=996&rft.epage=1004&rft.pages=996-1004&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft.coden=CANCAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/1097-0142(19930201)71:3+%3C996::AID-CNCR2820711417%3E3.0.CO;2-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75573123%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4137-14c1b6ea159bfbca8c91bda362c1cd8e0a4a02e4cab60add6cbad47ea23e25e93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75573123&rft_id=info:pmid/7679047&rfr_iscdi=true