Loading…

Gentamicin Treatment Associated with Later Nosocomial Gentamicin-Resistant Serratia marcescens Infections

During a hospital epidemic of infections with gentamicin-resistant Serratia marcescens (GRS), we studied the relation between receiving antibiotics and acquiring GRS. In a five-month period, 22 patients acquired GRS, whereas 18 patients acquired gentamicin-sensitive Serratia (GSS). When compared wit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Infection control : IC 1981-01, Vol.2 (1), p.31-37
Main Authors: Graham, Donald R., Clegg, Herbert W., Anderson, Roger L., Chelgren, Gladys A., Mostow, Steven R., Dixon, Richard E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-49c1b8429a3d6a26ee6b39987edd4ceed8129cc5d503c2bc119285d0bcdb1ac33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-49c1b8429a3d6a26ee6b39987edd4ceed8129cc5d503c2bc119285d0bcdb1ac33
container_end_page 37
container_issue 1
container_start_page 31
container_title Infection control : IC
container_volume 2
creator Graham, Donald R.
Clegg, Herbert W.
Anderson, Roger L.
Chelgren, Gladys A.
Mostow, Steven R.
Dixon, Richard E.
description During a hospital epidemic of infections with gentamicin-resistant Serratia marcescens (GRS), we studied the relation between receiving antibiotics and acquiring GRS. In a five-month period, 22 patients acquired GRS, whereas 18 patients acquired gentamicin-sensitive Serratia (GSS). When compared with patients with nosocomial GSS infection, patients with nosocomial GRS had been in the hospital (p = 0.04) and the intensive care unit (p = 0.003) longer before infection and more had received gentamicin (p = 0.001) or ampicillin (p = 0.02) before infection. To control for the influence of underlying disease, we matched all 12 ICU patients with GRS infection and 12 patients without GRS infection for underlying illness and duration of intensive care. Use of any antibiotic (p = 0.04), or a combination of gentamicin plus ampicillin or cephalosporin (p = 0.047) was more common among patients with GRS infection. The hospital had not significantly increased the use of aminoglycosides from the previous year. We conclude that for the individual patient antimicrobial therapy, especially with gentamicin or ampicillin, creates a risk for later infection by GRS that is independent of the severity of the underlying illness.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0195941700053716
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75597241</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25702724</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25702724</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-49c1b8429a3d6a26ee6b39987edd4ceed8129cc5d503c2bc119285d0bcdb1ac33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUE1LAzEUDKLUWv0BHoQ9eVvNSzabzbEUrYWiYOt5ySavmNLdrUmK-O9NaakHT-9j3swbhpBboA9AQT4uKCihCpCUUsEllGdkyDiTuSoEnJPhHs73-CW5CmFNaVFKJgZkICkwWvIhcVPsom6dcV229Khjm-ZsHEJvnI5os28XP7N5an322qdt3zq9yf5Y-TsGF6JOrAV6r6PTWau9wWCwC9msW6GJru_CNblY6U3Am2MdkY_np-XkJZ-_TWeT8Tw3HKqYF8pAUxVMaW5LzUrEsuFKVRKtLQyirYApY4QVlBvWGADFKmFpY2wD2nA-IvcH3a3vv3YYYt265GWz0R32u1BLIZRkBaRDOBwa34fgcVVvvUvWf2qg9T7e-l-8iXN3FN81LdoT45jnH74OsfcnmAlJWXrKfwFV7oEE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75597241</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gentamicin Treatment Associated with Later Nosocomial Gentamicin-Resistant Serratia marcescens Infections</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Graham, Donald R. ; Clegg, Herbert W. ; Anderson, Roger L. ; Chelgren, Gladys A. ; Mostow, Steven R. ; Dixon, Richard E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Graham, Donald R. ; Clegg, Herbert W. ; Anderson, Roger L. ; Chelgren, Gladys A. ; Mostow, Steven R. ; Dixon, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><description>During a hospital epidemic of infections with gentamicin-resistant Serratia marcescens (GRS), we studied the relation between receiving antibiotics and acquiring GRS. In a five-month period, 22 patients acquired GRS, whereas 18 patients acquired gentamicin-sensitive Serratia (GSS). When compared with patients with nosocomial GSS infection, patients with nosocomial GRS had been in the hospital (p = 0.04) and the intensive care unit (p = 0.003) longer before infection and more had received gentamicin (p = 0.001) or ampicillin (p = 0.02) before infection. To control for the influence of underlying disease, we matched all 12 ICU patients with GRS infection and 12 patients without GRS infection for underlying illness and duration of intensive care. Use of any antibiotic (p = 0.04), or a combination of gentamicin plus ampicillin or cephalosporin (p = 0.047) was more common among patients with GRS infection. The hospital had not significantly increased the use of aminoglycosides from the previous year. We conclude that for the individual patient antimicrobial therapy, especially with gentamicin or ampicillin, creates a risk for later infection by GRS that is independent of the severity of the underlying illness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-9417</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2327-9451</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0195941700053716</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7012063</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Charles B. Slack, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aminoglycosides ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Antibiotics ; Antimicrobials ; Cephalosporins ; Cross Infection - epidemiology ; Cross Infection - etiology ; Drug Resistance, Microbial ; Enterobacteriaceae Infections - drug therapy ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Gentamicins - therapeutic use ; Hospital Bed Capacity, 300 to 499 ; Humans ; Infections ; Intensive Care Units ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nursing ; Pseudomonas Infections - drug therapy ; Risk ; Serratia ; Serratia marcescens ; Sputum</subject><ispartof>Infection control : IC, 1981-01, Vol.2 (1), p.31-37</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1981 Charles B. Slack, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-49c1b8429a3d6a26ee6b39987edd4ceed8129cc5d503c2bc119285d0bcdb1ac33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-49c1b8429a3d6a26ee6b39987edd4ceed8129cc5d503c2bc119285d0bcdb1ac33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25702724$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25702724$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,58236,58469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7012063$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Graham, Donald R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clegg, Herbert W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Roger L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chelgren, Gladys A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mostow, Steven R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><title>Gentamicin Treatment Associated with Later Nosocomial Gentamicin-Resistant Serratia marcescens Infections</title><title>Infection control : IC</title><addtitle>Infect Control</addtitle><description>During a hospital epidemic of infections with gentamicin-resistant Serratia marcescens (GRS), we studied the relation between receiving antibiotics and acquiring GRS. In a five-month period, 22 patients acquired GRS, whereas 18 patients acquired gentamicin-sensitive Serratia (GSS). When compared with patients with nosocomial GSS infection, patients with nosocomial GRS had been in the hospital (p = 0.04) and the intensive care unit (p = 0.003) longer before infection and more had received gentamicin (p = 0.001) or ampicillin (p = 0.02) before infection. To control for the influence of underlying disease, we matched all 12 ICU patients with GRS infection and 12 patients without GRS infection for underlying illness and duration of intensive care. Use of any antibiotic (p = 0.04), or a combination of gentamicin plus ampicillin or cephalosporin (p = 0.047) was more common among patients with GRS infection. The hospital had not significantly increased the use of aminoglycosides from the previous year. We conclude that for the individual patient antimicrobial therapy, especially with gentamicin or ampicillin, creates a risk for later infection by GRS that is independent of the severity of the underlying illness.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aminoglycosides</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antimicrobials</subject><subject>Cephalosporins</subject><subject>Cross Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cross Infection - etiology</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Microbial</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gentamicins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Hospital Bed Capacity, 300 to 499</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Pseudomonas Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Serratia</subject><subject>Serratia marcescens</subject><subject>Sputum</subject><issn>0195-9417</issn><issn>2327-9451</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1981</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplUE1LAzEUDKLUWv0BHoQ9eVvNSzabzbEUrYWiYOt5ySavmNLdrUmK-O9NaakHT-9j3swbhpBboA9AQT4uKCihCpCUUsEllGdkyDiTuSoEnJPhHs73-CW5CmFNaVFKJgZkICkwWvIhcVPsom6dcV229Khjm-ZsHEJvnI5os28XP7N5an322qdt3zq9yf5Y-TsGF6JOrAV6r6PTWau9wWCwC9msW6GJru_CNblY6U3Am2MdkY_np-XkJZ-_TWeT8Tw3HKqYF8pAUxVMaW5LzUrEsuFKVRKtLQyirYApY4QVlBvWGADFKmFpY2wD2nA-IvcH3a3vv3YYYt265GWz0R32u1BLIZRkBaRDOBwa34fgcVVvvUvWf2qg9T7e-l-8iXN3FN81LdoT45jnH74OsfcnmAlJWXrKfwFV7oEE</recordid><startdate>19810101</startdate><enddate>19810101</enddate><creator>Graham, Donald R.</creator><creator>Clegg, Herbert W.</creator><creator>Anderson, Roger L.</creator><creator>Chelgren, Gladys A.</creator><creator>Mostow, Steven R.</creator><creator>Dixon, Richard E.</creator><general>Charles B. Slack, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19810101</creationdate><title>Gentamicin Treatment Associated with Later Nosocomial Gentamicin-Resistant Serratia marcescens Infections</title><author>Graham, Donald R. ; Clegg, Herbert W. ; Anderson, Roger L. ; Chelgren, Gladys A. ; Mostow, Steven R. ; Dixon, Richard E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-49c1b8429a3d6a26ee6b39987edd4ceed8129cc5d503c2bc119285d0bcdb1ac33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1981</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aminoglycosides</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antimicrobials</topic><topic>Cephalosporins</topic><topic>Cross Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cross Infection - etiology</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Microbial</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gentamicins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Hospital Bed Capacity, 300 to 499</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Pseudomonas Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Serratia</topic><topic>Serratia marcescens</topic><topic>Sputum</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Graham, Donald R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clegg, Herbert W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Roger L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chelgren, Gladys A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mostow, Steven R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Infection control : IC</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Graham, Donald R.</au><au>Clegg, Herbert W.</au><au>Anderson, Roger L.</au><au>Chelgren, Gladys A.</au><au>Mostow, Steven R.</au><au>Dixon, Richard E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gentamicin Treatment Associated with Later Nosocomial Gentamicin-Resistant Serratia marcescens Infections</atitle><jtitle>Infection control : IC</jtitle><addtitle>Infect Control</addtitle><date>1981-01-01</date><risdate>1981</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>31</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>31-37</pages><issn>0195-9417</issn><eissn>2327-9451</eissn><abstract>During a hospital epidemic of infections with gentamicin-resistant Serratia marcescens (GRS), we studied the relation between receiving antibiotics and acquiring GRS. In a five-month period, 22 patients acquired GRS, whereas 18 patients acquired gentamicin-sensitive Serratia (GSS). When compared with patients with nosocomial GSS infection, patients with nosocomial GRS had been in the hospital (p = 0.04) and the intensive care unit (p = 0.003) longer before infection and more had received gentamicin (p = 0.001) or ampicillin (p = 0.02) before infection. To control for the influence of underlying disease, we matched all 12 ICU patients with GRS infection and 12 patients without GRS infection for underlying illness and duration of intensive care. Use of any antibiotic (p = 0.04), or a combination of gentamicin plus ampicillin or cephalosporin (p = 0.047) was more common among patients with GRS infection. The hospital had not significantly increased the use of aminoglycosides from the previous year. We conclude that for the individual patient antimicrobial therapy, especially with gentamicin or ampicillin, creates a risk for later infection by GRS that is independent of the severity of the underlying illness.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Charles B. Slack, Inc</pub><pmid>7012063</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0195941700053716</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-9417
ispartof Infection control : IC, 1981-01, Vol.2 (1), p.31-37
issn 0195-9417
2327-9451
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75597241
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Aged
Aminoglycosides
Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use
Antibiotics
Antimicrobials
Cephalosporins
Cross Infection - epidemiology
Cross Infection - etiology
Drug Resistance, Microbial
Enterobacteriaceae Infections - drug therapy
Epidemiology
Female
Gentamicins - therapeutic use
Hospital Bed Capacity, 300 to 499
Humans
Infections
Intensive Care Units
Length of Stay
Male
Middle Aged
Nursing
Pseudomonas Infections - drug therapy
Risk
Serratia
Serratia marcescens
Sputum
title Gentamicin Treatment Associated with Later Nosocomial Gentamicin-Resistant Serratia marcescens Infections
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A04%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gentamicin%20Treatment%20Associated%20with%20Later%20Nosocomial%20Gentamicin-Resistant%20Serratia%20marcescens%20Infections&rft.jtitle=Infection%20control%20:%20IC&rft.au=Graham,%20Donald%20R.&rft.date=1981-01-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=31-37&rft.issn=0195-9417&rft.eissn=2327-9451&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0195941700053716&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25702724%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-49c1b8429a3d6a26ee6b39987edd4ceed8129cc5d503c2bc119285d0bcdb1ac33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75597241&rft_id=info:pmid/7012063&rft_jstor_id=25702724&rfr_iscdi=true