Loading…
Gentamicin Treatment Associated with Later Nosocomial Gentamicin-Resistant Serratia marcescens Infections
During a hospital epidemic of infections with gentamicin-resistant Serratia marcescens (GRS), we studied the relation between receiving antibiotics and acquiring GRS. In a five-month period, 22 patients acquired GRS, whereas 18 patients acquired gentamicin-sensitive Serratia (GSS). When compared wit...
Saved in:
Published in: | Infection control : IC 1981-01, Vol.2 (1), p.31-37 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-49c1b8429a3d6a26ee6b39987edd4ceed8129cc5d503c2bc119285d0bcdb1ac33 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-49c1b8429a3d6a26ee6b39987edd4ceed8129cc5d503c2bc119285d0bcdb1ac33 |
container_end_page | 37 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 31 |
container_title | Infection control : IC |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Graham, Donald R. Clegg, Herbert W. Anderson, Roger L. Chelgren, Gladys A. Mostow, Steven R. Dixon, Richard E. |
description | During a hospital epidemic of infections with gentamicin-resistant Serratia marcescens (GRS), we studied the relation between receiving antibiotics and acquiring GRS. In a five-month period, 22 patients acquired GRS, whereas 18 patients acquired gentamicin-sensitive Serratia (GSS). When compared with patients with nosocomial GSS infection, patients with nosocomial GRS had been in the hospital (p = 0.04) and the intensive care unit (p = 0.003) longer before infection and more had received gentamicin (p = 0.001) or ampicillin (p = 0.02) before infection. To control for the influence of underlying disease, we matched all 12 ICU patients with GRS infection and 12 patients without GRS infection for underlying illness and duration of intensive care. Use of any antibiotic (p = 0.04), or a combination of gentamicin plus ampicillin or cephalosporin (p = 0.047) was more common among patients with GRS infection. The hospital had not significantly increased the use of aminoglycosides from the previous year. We conclude that for the individual patient antimicrobial therapy, especially with gentamicin or ampicillin, creates a risk for later infection by GRS that is independent of the severity of the underlying illness. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0195941700053716 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75597241</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25702724</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25702724</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-49c1b8429a3d6a26ee6b39987edd4ceed8129cc5d503c2bc119285d0bcdb1ac33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUE1LAzEUDKLUWv0BHoQ9eVvNSzabzbEUrYWiYOt5ySavmNLdrUmK-O9NaakHT-9j3swbhpBboA9AQT4uKCihCpCUUsEllGdkyDiTuSoEnJPhHs73-CW5CmFNaVFKJgZkICkwWvIhcVPsom6dcV229Khjm-ZsHEJvnI5os28XP7N5an322qdt3zq9yf5Y-TsGF6JOrAV6r6PTWau9wWCwC9msW6GJru_CNblY6U3Am2MdkY_np-XkJZ-_TWeT8Tw3HKqYF8pAUxVMaW5LzUrEsuFKVRKtLQyirYApY4QVlBvWGADFKmFpY2wD2nA-IvcH3a3vv3YYYt265GWz0R32u1BLIZRkBaRDOBwa34fgcVVvvUvWf2qg9T7e-l-8iXN3FN81LdoT45jnH74OsfcnmAlJWXrKfwFV7oEE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75597241</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gentamicin Treatment Associated with Later Nosocomial Gentamicin-Resistant Serratia marcescens Infections</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Graham, Donald R. ; Clegg, Herbert W. ; Anderson, Roger L. ; Chelgren, Gladys A. ; Mostow, Steven R. ; Dixon, Richard E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Graham, Donald R. ; Clegg, Herbert W. ; Anderson, Roger L. ; Chelgren, Gladys A. ; Mostow, Steven R. ; Dixon, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><description>During a hospital epidemic of infections with gentamicin-resistant Serratia marcescens (GRS), we studied the relation between receiving antibiotics and acquiring GRS. In a five-month period, 22 patients acquired GRS, whereas 18 patients acquired gentamicin-sensitive Serratia (GSS). When compared with patients with nosocomial GSS infection, patients with nosocomial GRS had been in the hospital (p = 0.04) and the intensive care unit (p = 0.003) longer before infection and more had received gentamicin (p = 0.001) or ampicillin (p = 0.02) before infection. To control for the influence of underlying disease, we matched all 12 ICU patients with GRS infection and 12 patients without GRS infection for underlying illness and duration of intensive care. Use of any antibiotic (p = 0.04), or a combination of gentamicin plus ampicillin or cephalosporin (p = 0.047) was more common among patients with GRS infection. The hospital had not significantly increased the use of aminoglycosides from the previous year. We conclude that for the individual patient antimicrobial therapy, especially with gentamicin or ampicillin, creates a risk for later infection by GRS that is independent of the severity of the underlying illness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-9417</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2327-9451</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0195941700053716</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7012063</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Charles B. Slack, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aminoglycosides ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Antibiotics ; Antimicrobials ; Cephalosporins ; Cross Infection - epidemiology ; Cross Infection - etiology ; Drug Resistance, Microbial ; Enterobacteriaceae Infections - drug therapy ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Gentamicins - therapeutic use ; Hospital Bed Capacity, 300 to 499 ; Humans ; Infections ; Intensive Care Units ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nursing ; Pseudomonas Infections - drug therapy ; Risk ; Serratia ; Serratia marcescens ; Sputum</subject><ispartof>Infection control : IC, 1981-01, Vol.2 (1), p.31-37</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1981 Charles B. Slack, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-49c1b8429a3d6a26ee6b39987edd4ceed8129cc5d503c2bc119285d0bcdb1ac33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-49c1b8429a3d6a26ee6b39987edd4ceed8129cc5d503c2bc119285d0bcdb1ac33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25702724$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25702724$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,58236,58469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7012063$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Graham, Donald R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clegg, Herbert W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Roger L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chelgren, Gladys A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mostow, Steven R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><title>Gentamicin Treatment Associated with Later Nosocomial Gentamicin-Resistant Serratia marcescens Infections</title><title>Infection control : IC</title><addtitle>Infect Control</addtitle><description>During a hospital epidemic of infections with gentamicin-resistant Serratia marcescens (GRS), we studied the relation between receiving antibiotics and acquiring GRS. In a five-month period, 22 patients acquired GRS, whereas 18 patients acquired gentamicin-sensitive Serratia (GSS). When compared with patients with nosocomial GSS infection, patients with nosocomial GRS had been in the hospital (p = 0.04) and the intensive care unit (p = 0.003) longer before infection and more had received gentamicin (p = 0.001) or ampicillin (p = 0.02) before infection. To control for the influence of underlying disease, we matched all 12 ICU patients with GRS infection and 12 patients without GRS infection for underlying illness and duration of intensive care. Use of any antibiotic (p = 0.04), or a combination of gentamicin plus ampicillin or cephalosporin (p = 0.047) was more common among patients with GRS infection. The hospital had not significantly increased the use of aminoglycosides from the previous year. We conclude that for the individual patient antimicrobial therapy, especially with gentamicin or ampicillin, creates a risk for later infection by GRS that is independent of the severity of the underlying illness.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aminoglycosides</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antimicrobials</subject><subject>Cephalosporins</subject><subject>Cross Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cross Infection - etiology</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Microbial</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gentamicins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Hospital Bed Capacity, 300 to 499</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Pseudomonas Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Serratia</subject><subject>Serratia marcescens</subject><subject>Sputum</subject><issn>0195-9417</issn><issn>2327-9451</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1981</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplUE1LAzEUDKLUWv0BHoQ9eVvNSzabzbEUrYWiYOt5ySavmNLdrUmK-O9NaakHT-9j3swbhpBboA9AQT4uKCihCpCUUsEllGdkyDiTuSoEnJPhHs73-CW5CmFNaVFKJgZkICkwWvIhcVPsom6dcV229Khjm-ZsHEJvnI5os28XP7N5an322qdt3zq9yf5Y-TsGF6JOrAV6r6PTWau9wWCwC9msW6GJru_CNblY6U3Am2MdkY_np-XkJZ-_TWeT8Tw3HKqYF8pAUxVMaW5LzUrEsuFKVRKtLQyirYApY4QVlBvWGADFKmFpY2wD2nA-IvcH3a3vv3YYYt265GWz0R32u1BLIZRkBaRDOBwa34fgcVVvvUvWf2qg9T7e-l-8iXN3FN81LdoT45jnH74OsfcnmAlJWXrKfwFV7oEE</recordid><startdate>19810101</startdate><enddate>19810101</enddate><creator>Graham, Donald R.</creator><creator>Clegg, Herbert W.</creator><creator>Anderson, Roger L.</creator><creator>Chelgren, Gladys A.</creator><creator>Mostow, Steven R.</creator><creator>Dixon, Richard E.</creator><general>Charles B. Slack, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19810101</creationdate><title>Gentamicin Treatment Associated with Later Nosocomial Gentamicin-Resistant Serratia marcescens Infections</title><author>Graham, Donald R. ; Clegg, Herbert W. ; Anderson, Roger L. ; Chelgren, Gladys A. ; Mostow, Steven R. ; Dixon, Richard E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-49c1b8429a3d6a26ee6b39987edd4ceed8129cc5d503c2bc119285d0bcdb1ac33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1981</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aminoglycosides</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antimicrobials</topic><topic>Cephalosporins</topic><topic>Cross Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cross Infection - etiology</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Microbial</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gentamicins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Hospital Bed Capacity, 300 to 499</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Pseudomonas Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Serratia</topic><topic>Serratia marcescens</topic><topic>Sputum</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Graham, Donald R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clegg, Herbert W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Roger L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chelgren, Gladys A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mostow, Steven R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Infection control : IC</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Graham, Donald R.</au><au>Clegg, Herbert W.</au><au>Anderson, Roger L.</au><au>Chelgren, Gladys A.</au><au>Mostow, Steven R.</au><au>Dixon, Richard E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gentamicin Treatment Associated with Later Nosocomial Gentamicin-Resistant Serratia marcescens Infections</atitle><jtitle>Infection control : IC</jtitle><addtitle>Infect Control</addtitle><date>1981-01-01</date><risdate>1981</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>31</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>31-37</pages><issn>0195-9417</issn><eissn>2327-9451</eissn><abstract>During a hospital epidemic of infections with gentamicin-resistant Serratia marcescens (GRS), we studied the relation between receiving antibiotics and acquiring GRS. In a five-month period, 22 patients acquired GRS, whereas 18 patients acquired gentamicin-sensitive Serratia (GSS). When compared with patients with nosocomial GSS infection, patients with nosocomial GRS had been in the hospital (p = 0.04) and the intensive care unit (p = 0.003) longer before infection and more had received gentamicin (p = 0.001) or ampicillin (p = 0.02) before infection. To control for the influence of underlying disease, we matched all 12 ICU patients with GRS infection and 12 patients without GRS infection for underlying illness and duration of intensive care. Use of any antibiotic (p = 0.04), or a combination of gentamicin plus ampicillin or cephalosporin (p = 0.047) was more common among patients with GRS infection. The hospital had not significantly increased the use of aminoglycosides from the previous year. We conclude that for the individual patient antimicrobial therapy, especially with gentamicin or ampicillin, creates a risk for later infection by GRS that is independent of the severity of the underlying illness.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Charles B. Slack, Inc</pub><pmid>7012063</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0195941700053716</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0195-9417 |
ispartof | Infection control : IC, 1981-01, Vol.2 (1), p.31-37 |
issn | 0195-9417 2327-9451 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75597241 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Aged Aminoglycosides Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use Antibiotics Antimicrobials Cephalosporins Cross Infection - epidemiology Cross Infection - etiology Drug Resistance, Microbial Enterobacteriaceae Infections - drug therapy Epidemiology Female Gentamicins - therapeutic use Hospital Bed Capacity, 300 to 499 Humans Infections Intensive Care Units Length of Stay Male Middle Aged Nursing Pseudomonas Infections - drug therapy Risk Serratia Serratia marcescens Sputum |
title | Gentamicin Treatment Associated with Later Nosocomial Gentamicin-Resistant Serratia marcescens Infections |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A04%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gentamicin%20Treatment%20Associated%20with%20Later%20Nosocomial%20Gentamicin-Resistant%20Serratia%20marcescens%20Infections&rft.jtitle=Infection%20control%20:%20IC&rft.au=Graham,%20Donald%20R.&rft.date=1981-01-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=31-37&rft.issn=0195-9417&rft.eissn=2327-9451&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0195941700053716&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25702724%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-49c1b8429a3d6a26ee6b39987edd4ceed8129cc5d503c2bc119285d0bcdb1ac33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75597241&rft_id=info:pmid/7012063&rft_jstor_id=25702724&rfr_iscdi=true |