Loading…
The stability of the diagnosis of developmental disability between ages 2 and 8 in a geographic cohort of very preterm children born in 1997
Objective Studies reporting the developmental outcomes for very preterm (VPT) children often focus on development at age 2 years. The aim of this study was to assess the stability of the rates of diagnosis of developmental disability from age 2 to 8 years in a regional cohort of VPT and extremely lo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Archives of disease in childhood 2010-10, Vol.95 (10), p.786-790 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b465t-a23a80177baf0e7c9393f0955e8783e02c0601a4ef374d8c394820431f61a04c3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 790 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 786 |
container_title | Archives of disease in childhood |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Roberts, G Anderson, P J Doyle, L W |
description | Objective Studies reporting the developmental outcomes for very preterm (VPT) children often focus on development at age 2 years. The aim of this study was to assess the stability of the rates of diagnosis of developmental disability from age 2 to 8 years in a regional cohort of VPT and extremely low–birth weight (ELBW) children and compare these with term controls. Methods VPT (22–27 completed weeks of gestation) and ELBW (birth weight 500–999 g) children and matched term controls born in Victoria, Australia, in 1997 were enrolled at birth in a regional prospective longitudinal study. Outcomes were assessed at ages 2 and 8 years. Results Of the 283 VPT/ELBW live births, 71% survived to age 8 years and 94% were assessed. Of the 199 controls, 100% survived to age 8 years and 86.9% were assessed. At age 2 years, the rates of nil, mild, moderate and severe disabilities in the VPT/ELBW children were respectively 51.9%, 20.9%, 13.4% and 13.9%; and at age 8 years, 43.9%, 36.9%, 10.7% and 8.6%. The Cohen κ statistic revealed poor agreement between disability status at ages 2 and 8 years for VPT/ELBW children (0.20, p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/adc.2009.160283 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_756308398</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A244986608</galeid><sourcerecordid>A244986608</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b465t-a23a80177baf0e7c9393f0955e8783e02c0601a4ef374d8c394820431f61a04c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkduL1DAUh4so7rj67JsERAShs7m0uTwug1dWV2S9vIU0Pe1kbJsxyazO_-AfbcqMu-CLT0lOvnP4OL-ieEzwkhDGz0xrlxRjtSQcU8nuFAtScVlSXFV3iwXGmJVKSnlSPIhxgzGhUrL7xQlRMt8kXRS_r9aAYjKNG1zaI9-hlAutM_3ko4tzoYVrGPx2hCmZIX_Fv3AD6SfAhEwPEVFkphZJ5PIb9eD7YLZrZ5H1ax_SPOcawh5tAyQII7JrN7QhNzc-THMTUUo8LO51Zojw6HieFp9fvbxavSkvLl-_XZ1flE3F61QayozERIjGdBiEVUyxDqu6BikkA0wt5piYCjomqlZapiqZN8JIx4nBlWWnxfPD3G3wP3YQkx5dtDAMZgK_i1rUnGHJlMzk03_Ijd-FKctpklfIFReCZqo8UL0ZQLvJ-inBr2T9MEAPOruvLvU5rSolOcfz1LMDb4OPMUCnt8GNJuw1wXrOVedc9ZyrPuSaO54cPXbNCO0tfwwyA8-OgInWDF0wk3XxhqMsY4LVt6ouZsWbfxO-ay6YqPWHLyv9_t1X-unbR6ln1RcHvhk3_7X8Ays6xOM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1828696772</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The stability of the diagnosis of developmental disability between ages 2 and 8 in a geographic cohort of very preterm children born in 1997</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Roberts, G ; Anderson, P J ; Doyle, L W</creator><creatorcontrib>Roberts, G ; Anderson, P J ; Doyle, L W ; Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group ; the Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Studies reporting the developmental outcomes for very preterm (VPT) children often focus on development at age 2 years. The aim of this study was to assess the stability of the rates of diagnosis of developmental disability from age 2 to 8 years in a regional cohort of VPT and extremely low–birth weight (ELBW) children and compare these with term controls. Methods VPT (22–27 completed weeks of gestation) and ELBW (birth weight 500–999 g) children and matched term controls born in Victoria, Australia, in 1997 were enrolled at birth in a regional prospective longitudinal study. Outcomes were assessed at ages 2 and 8 years. Results Of the 283 VPT/ELBW live births, 71% survived to age 8 years and 94% were assessed. Of the 199 controls, 100% survived to age 8 years and 86.9% were assessed. At age 2 years, the rates of nil, mild, moderate and severe disabilities in the VPT/ELBW children were respectively 51.9%, 20.9%, 13.4% and 13.9%; and at age 8 years, 43.9%, 36.9%, 10.7% and 8.6%. The Cohen κ statistic revealed poor agreement between disability status at ages 2 and 8 years for VPT/ELBW children (0.20, p<0.001) but a higher level of agreement (0.37, p<0.001) for the control children. This was primarily driven by differences in classification of cognitive disability between ages 2 and 8 years. Conclusions Developmental outcomes at age 2 years are only a moderate predictor of long-term outcome and are not a reliable end point for follow-up studies of VPT and ELBW children.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9888</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/adc.2009.160283</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19828882</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ADCHAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth Weight ; Case-Control Studies ; Cerebral palsy ; Child development deviations ; Child, Preschool ; Cognition ; Cognition Disorders - diagnosis ; Cognition Disorders - epidemiology ; Cognitive tests ; Control Groups ; Developmental disabilities ; Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis ; Developmental Disabilities - epidemiology ; Diagnosis ; Disability ; Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; General aspects ; Gestational Age ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Infant, Extremely Low Birth Weight ; Infant, Newborn ; Infant, Premature ; Infants (Premature) ; Longitudinal studies ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta ; Premature infants ; Prevention and actions ; Prognosis ; Psychological aspects ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Testing ; Validity ; Victoria - epidemiology ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Archives of disease in childhood, 2010-10, Vol.95 (10), p.786-790</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 2010 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b465t-a23a80177baf0e7c9393f0955e8783e02c0601a4ef374d8c394820431f61a04c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1828696772/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1828696772?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21378,21394,27924,27925,33611,33612,33877,33878,43733,43880,74221,74397</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23288735$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19828882$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roberts, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doyle, L W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>The stability of the diagnosis of developmental disability between ages 2 and 8 in a geographic cohort of very preterm children born in 1997</title><title>Archives of disease in childhood</title><addtitle>Arch Dis Child</addtitle><description>Objective Studies reporting the developmental outcomes for very preterm (VPT) children often focus on development at age 2 years. The aim of this study was to assess the stability of the rates of diagnosis of developmental disability from age 2 to 8 years in a regional cohort of VPT and extremely low–birth weight (ELBW) children and compare these with term controls. Methods VPT (22–27 completed weeks of gestation) and ELBW (birth weight 500–999 g) children and matched term controls born in Victoria, Australia, in 1997 were enrolled at birth in a regional prospective longitudinal study. Outcomes were assessed at ages 2 and 8 years. Results Of the 283 VPT/ELBW live births, 71% survived to age 8 years and 94% were assessed. Of the 199 controls, 100% survived to age 8 years and 86.9% were assessed. At age 2 years, the rates of nil, mild, moderate and severe disabilities in the VPT/ELBW children were respectively 51.9%, 20.9%, 13.4% and 13.9%; and at age 8 years, 43.9%, 36.9%, 10.7% and 8.6%. The Cohen κ statistic revealed poor agreement between disability status at ages 2 and 8 years for VPT/ELBW children (0.20, p<0.001) but a higher level of agreement (0.37, p<0.001) for the control children. This was primarily driven by differences in classification of cognitive disability between ages 2 and 8 years. Conclusions Developmental outcomes at age 2 years are only a moderate predictor of long-term outcome and are not a reliable end point for follow-up studies of VPT and ELBW children.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth Weight</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cerebral palsy</subject><subject>Child development deviations</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cognitive tests</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Developmental disabilities</subject><subject>Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis</subject><subject>Developmental Disabilities - epidemiology</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Extremely Low Birth Weight</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infant, Premature</subject><subject>Infants (Premature)</subject><subject>Longitudinal studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</subject><subject>Premature infants</subject><subject>Prevention and actions</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Victoria - epidemiology</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0003-9888</issn><issn>1468-2044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkduL1DAUh4so7rj67JsERAShs7m0uTwug1dWV2S9vIU0Pe1kbJsxyazO_-AfbcqMu-CLT0lOvnP4OL-ieEzwkhDGz0xrlxRjtSQcU8nuFAtScVlSXFV3iwXGmJVKSnlSPIhxgzGhUrL7xQlRMt8kXRS_r9aAYjKNG1zaI9-hlAutM_3ko4tzoYVrGPx2hCmZIX_Fv3AD6SfAhEwPEVFkphZJ5PIb9eD7YLZrZ5H1ax_SPOcawh5tAyQII7JrN7QhNzc-THMTUUo8LO51Zojw6HieFp9fvbxavSkvLl-_XZ1flE3F61QayozERIjGdBiEVUyxDqu6BikkA0wt5piYCjomqlZapiqZN8JIx4nBlWWnxfPD3G3wP3YQkx5dtDAMZgK_i1rUnGHJlMzk03_Ijd-FKctpklfIFReCZqo8UL0ZQLvJ-inBr2T9MEAPOruvLvU5rSolOcfz1LMDb4OPMUCnt8GNJuw1wXrOVedc9ZyrPuSaO54cPXbNCO0tfwwyA8-OgInWDF0wk3XxhqMsY4LVt6ouZsWbfxO-ay6YqPWHLyv9_t1X-unbR6ln1RcHvhk3_7X8Ays6xOM</recordid><startdate>20101001</startdate><enddate>20101001</enddate><creator>Roberts, G</creator><creator>Anderson, P J</creator><creator>Doyle, L W</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101001</creationdate><title>The stability of the diagnosis of developmental disability between ages 2 and 8 in a geographic cohort of very preterm children born in 1997</title><author>Roberts, G ; Anderson, P J ; Doyle, L W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b465t-a23a80177baf0e7c9393f0955e8783e02c0601a4ef374d8c394820431f61a04c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth Weight</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cerebral palsy</topic><topic>Child development deviations</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cognitive tests</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Developmental disabilities</topic><topic>Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis</topic><topic>Developmental Disabilities - epidemiology</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Extremely Low Birth Weight</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infant, Premature</topic><topic>Infants (Premature)</topic><topic>Longitudinal studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</topic><topic>Premature infants</topic><topic>Prevention and actions</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Victoria - epidemiology</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roberts, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doyle, L W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roberts, G</au><au>Anderson, P J</au><au>Doyle, L W</au><aucorp>Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group</aucorp><aucorp>the Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The stability of the diagnosis of developmental disability between ages 2 and 8 in a geographic cohort of very preterm children born in 1997</atitle><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Dis Child</addtitle><date>2010-10-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>786</spage><epage>790</epage><pages>786-790</pages><issn>0003-9888</issn><eissn>1468-2044</eissn><coden>ADCHAK</coden><abstract>Objective Studies reporting the developmental outcomes for very preterm (VPT) children often focus on development at age 2 years. The aim of this study was to assess the stability of the rates of diagnosis of developmental disability from age 2 to 8 years in a regional cohort of VPT and extremely low–birth weight (ELBW) children and compare these with term controls. Methods VPT (22–27 completed weeks of gestation) and ELBW (birth weight 500–999 g) children and matched term controls born in Victoria, Australia, in 1997 were enrolled at birth in a regional prospective longitudinal study. Outcomes were assessed at ages 2 and 8 years. Results Of the 283 VPT/ELBW live births, 71% survived to age 8 years and 94% were assessed. Of the 199 controls, 100% survived to age 8 years and 86.9% were assessed. At age 2 years, the rates of nil, mild, moderate and severe disabilities in the VPT/ELBW children were respectively 51.9%, 20.9%, 13.4% and 13.9%; and at age 8 years, 43.9%, 36.9%, 10.7% and 8.6%. The Cohen κ statistic revealed poor agreement between disability status at ages 2 and 8 years for VPT/ELBW children (0.20, p<0.001) but a higher level of agreement (0.37, p<0.001) for the control children. This was primarily driven by differences in classification of cognitive disability between ages 2 and 8 years. Conclusions Developmental outcomes at age 2 years are only a moderate predictor of long-term outcome and are not a reliable end point for follow-up studies of VPT and ELBW children.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</pub><pmid>19828882</pmid><doi>10.1136/adc.2009.160283</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-9888 |
ispartof | Archives of disease in childhood, 2010-10, Vol.95 (10), p.786-790 |
issn | 0003-9888 1468-2044 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_756308398 |
source | Social Science Premium Collection; Education Collection |
subjects | Agreements Biological and medical sciences Birth Weight Case-Control Studies Cerebral palsy Child development deviations Child, Preschool Cognition Cognition Disorders - diagnosis Cognition Disorders - epidemiology Cognitive tests Control Groups Developmental disabilities Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis Developmental Disabilities - epidemiology Diagnosis Disability Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy Female Follow-Up Studies General aspects Gestational Age Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Infant, Extremely Low Birth Weight Infant, Newborn Infant, Premature Infants (Premature) Longitudinal studies Male Medical sciences Miscellaneous Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta Premature infants Prevention and actions Prognosis Psychological aspects Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Testing Validity Victoria - epidemiology Young Children |
title | The stability of the diagnosis of developmental disability between ages 2 and 8 in a geographic cohort of very preterm children born in 1997 |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T17%3A46%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20stability%20of%20the%20diagnosis%20of%20developmental%20disability%20between%20ages%202%20and%208%20in%20a%20geographic%20cohort%20of%20very%20preterm%20children%20born%20in%201997&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20disease%20in%20childhood&rft.au=Roberts,%20G&rft.aucorp=Victorian%20Infant%20Collaborative%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=786&rft.epage=790&rft.pages=786-790&rft.issn=0003-9888&rft.eissn=1468-2044&rft.coden=ADCHAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/adc.2009.160283&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA244986608%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b465t-a23a80177baf0e7c9393f0955e8783e02c0601a4ef374d8c394820431f61a04c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1828696772&rft_id=info:pmid/19828882&rft_galeid=A244986608&rfr_iscdi=true |