Loading…

Comparison of Energy Expenditure to Walk or Run a Mile in Adult Normal Weight and Overweight Men and Women

Loftin, M, Waddell, DE, Robinson, JH, and Owens, SG. Comparison of energy expenditure to walk or run a mile in adult normal weight and overweight men and women. J Strength Cond Res 24(10)2794-2798, 2010-We compared the energy expenditure to walk or run a mile in adult normal weight walkers (NWW), ov...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of strength and conditioning research 2010-10, Vol.24 (10), p.2794-2798
Main Authors: Loftin, Mark, Waddell, Dwight E, Robinson, James H, Owens, Scott G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428d-d99b604270954ade0f4940c86bd64abac83a7d1945e8959cc041b701a54f27933
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428d-d99b604270954ade0f4940c86bd64abac83a7d1945e8959cc041b701a54f27933
container_end_page 2798
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2794
container_title Journal of strength and conditioning research
container_volume 24
creator Loftin, Mark
Waddell, Dwight E
Robinson, James H
Owens, Scott G
description Loftin, M, Waddell, DE, Robinson, JH, and Owens, SG. Comparison of energy expenditure to walk or run a mile in adult normal weight and overweight men and women. J Strength Cond Res 24(10)2794-2798, 2010-We compared the energy expenditure to walk or run a mile in adult normal weight walkers (NWW), overweight walkers (OW), and marathon runners (MR). The sample consisted of 19 NWW, 11 OW, and 20 MR adults. Energy expenditure was measured at preferred walking speed (NWW and OW) and running speed of a recently completed marathon. Body composition was assessed via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Analysis of variance was used to compare groups with the Scheffeʼs procedure used for post hoc analysis. Multiple regression analysis was used to predict energy expenditure. Results that indicated OW exhibited significantly higher (p < 0.05) mass and fat weight than NWW or MR. Similar values were found between NWW and MR. Absolute energy expenditure to walk or run a mile was similar between groups (NWW 93.9 ± 15.0, OW 98.4 ± 29.9, MR 99.3 ± 10.8 kcal); however, significant differences were noted when energy expenditure was expressed relative to mass (MR > NWW > OW). When energy expenditure was expressed per kilogram of fat-free mass, similar values were found across groups. Multiple regression analysis yielded mass and gender as significant predictors of energy expenditure (R = 0.795, SEE = 10.9 kcal). We suggest that walking is an excellent physical activity for energy expenditure in overweight individuals that are capable of walking without predisposed conditions such as osteoarthritis or cardiovascular risk factors. Moreover, from a practical perspective, our regression equation (kcal = mass (kg) × 0.789 − gender (men = 1, women = 2) × 7.634 + 51.109) allows for the prediction of energy expenditure for a given distance (mile) rather than predicting energy expenditure for a given time (minutes).
doi_str_mv 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc26cd
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_756659097</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>756659097</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428d-d99b604270954ade0f4940c86bd64abac83a7d1945e8959cc041b701a54f27933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhS1ERUvhHyBksWGVcp3YTrysRgMF9SEV0Cwjx77pZOrYUzth2n-PYQqLLrq6D3336OgeQt4xOGGCqU_fvi9OoANWYcUaZkwpjX1BjpioqoKXTf0y9yB50QBjh-R1ShuAUghRvSKHJUhWSQFHZLMI41bHIQVPQ0-XHuPNA13eb9HbYZoj0inQlXa3NER6PXuq6cXgkA6entrZTfQyxFE7usLhZj1R7S29-oVxtx8v0P9drcKI_g056LVL-PaxHpOfn5c_FmfF-dWXr4vT88Jk27awSnUSeFmDElxbhJ4rDqaRnZVcd9o0la4tU1xgo4QyBjjramBa8L6sVVUdk4973W0MdzOmqR2HZNA57THMqa2FlEKBqjP54Qm5CXP02VyGlIQmPyxDfA-ZGFKK2LfbOIw6PrQM2j9JtDmJ9mkS-ez9o_bcjWj_H_17fQaaPbALbsKYbt28w9iuUbtp_bz2b73FloQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>759608025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Energy Expenditure to Walk or Run a Mile in Adult Normal Weight and Overweight Men and Women</title><source>HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</source><creator>Loftin, Mark ; Waddell, Dwight E ; Robinson, James H ; Owens, Scott G</creator><creatorcontrib>Loftin, Mark ; Waddell, Dwight E ; Robinson, James H ; Owens, Scott G</creatorcontrib><description>Loftin, M, Waddell, DE, Robinson, JH, and Owens, SG. Comparison of energy expenditure to walk or run a mile in adult normal weight and overweight men and women. J Strength Cond Res 24(10)2794-2798, 2010-We compared the energy expenditure to walk or run a mile in adult normal weight walkers (NWW), overweight walkers (OW), and marathon runners (MR). The sample consisted of 19 NWW, 11 OW, and 20 MR adults. Energy expenditure was measured at preferred walking speed (NWW and OW) and running speed of a recently completed marathon. Body composition was assessed via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Analysis of variance was used to compare groups with the Scheffeʼs procedure used for post hoc analysis. Multiple regression analysis was used to predict energy expenditure. Results that indicated OW exhibited significantly higher (p &lt; 0.05) mass and fat weight than NWW or MR. Similar values were found between NWW and MR. Absolute energy expenditure to walk or run a mile was similar between groups (NWW 93.9 ± 15.0, OW 98.4 ± 29.9, MR 99.3 ± 10.8 kcal); however, significant differences were noted when energy expenditure was expressed relative to mass (MR &gt; NWW &gt; OW). When energy expenditure was expressed per kilogram of fat-free mass, similar values were found across groups. Multiple regression analysis yielded mass and gender as significant predictors of energy expenditure (R = 0.795, SEE = 10.9 kcal). We suggest that walking is an excellent physical activity for energy expenditure in overweight individuals that are capable of walking without predisposed conditions such as osteoarthritis or cardiovascular risk factors. Moreover, from a practical perspective, our regression equation (kcal = mass (kg) × 0.789 − gender (men = 1, women = 2) × 7.634 + 51.109) allows for the prediction of energy expenditure for a given distance (mile) rather than predicting energy expenditure for a given time (minutes).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc26cd</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20613650</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Strength and Conditioning Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Athletes ; Athletic Performance ; Body Composition - physiology ; Energy Metabolism - physiology ; Female ; Gallbladder diseases ; Humans ; Male ; Marathons ; Middle Aged ; Models, Biological ; Nutrition ; Obesity ; Overweight - metabolism ; Running - physiology ; Studies ; Walking - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2010-10, Vol.24 (10), p.2794-2798</ispartof><rights>2010 National Strength and Conditioning Association</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Oct 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428d-d99b604270954ade0f4940c86bd64abac83a7d1945e8959cc041b701a54f27933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428d-d99b604270954ade0f4940c86bd64abac83a7d1945e8959cc041b701a54f27933</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20613650$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loftin, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waddell, Dwight E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, James H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owens, Scott G</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Energy Expenditure to Walk or Run a Mile in Adult Normal Weight and Overweight Men and Women</title><title>Journal of strength and conditioning research</title><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><description>Loftin, M, Waddell, DE, Robinson, JH, and Owens, SG. Comparison of energy expenditure to walk or run a mile in adult normal weight and overweight men and women. J Strength Cond Res 24(10)2794-2798, 2010-We compared the energy expenditure to walk or run a mile in adult normal weight walkers (NWW), overweight walkers (OW), and marathon runners (MR). The sample consisted of 19 NWW, 11 OW, and 20 MR adults. Energy expenditure was measured at preferred walking speed (NWW and OW) and running speed of a recently completed marathon. Body composition was assessed via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Analysis of variance was used to compare groups with the Scheffeʼs procedure used for post hoc analysis. Multiple regression analysis was used to predict energy expenditure. Results that indicated OW exhibited significantly higher (p &lt; 0.05) mass and fat weight than NWW or MR. Similar values were found between NWW and MR. Absolute energy expenditure to walk or run a mile was similar between groups (NWW 93.9 ± 15.0, OW 98.4 ± 29.9, MR 99.3 ± 10.8 kcal); however, significant differences were noted when energy expenditure was expressed relative to mass (MR &gt; NWW &gt; OW). When energy expenditure was expressed per kilogram of fat-free mass, similar values were found across groups. Multiple regression analysis yielded mass and gender as significant predictors of energy expenditure (R = 0.795, SEE = 10.9 kcal). We suggest that walking is an excellent physical activity for energy expenditure in overweight individuals that are capable of walking without predisposed conditions such as osteoarthritis or cardiovascular risk factors. Moreover, from a practical perspective, our regression equation (kcal = mass (kg) × 0.789 − gender (men = 1, women = 2) × 7.634 + 51.109) allows for the prediction of energy expenditure for a given distance (mile) rather than predicting energy expenditure for a given time (minutes).</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Athletes</subject><subject>Athletic Performance</subject><subject>Body Composition - physiology</subject><subject>Energy Metabolism - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gallbladder diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Marathons</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Overweight - metabolism</subject><subject>Running - physiology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Walking - physiology</subject><issn>1064-8011</issn><issn>1533-4287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhS1ERUvhHyBksWGVcp3YTrysRgMF9SEV0Cwjx77pZOrYUzth2n-PYQqLLrq6D3336OgeQt4xOGGCqU_fvi9OoANWYcUaZkwpjX1BjpioqoKXTf0y9yB50QBjh-R1ShuAUghRvSKHJUhWSQFHZLMI41bHIQVPQ0-XHuPNA13eb9HbYZoj0inQlXa3NER6PXuq6cXgkA6entrZTfQyxFE7usLhZj1R7S29-oVxtx8v0P9drcKI_g056LVL-PaxHpOfn5c_FmfF-dWXr4vT88Jk27awSnUSeFmDElxbhJ4rDqaRnZVcd9o0la4tU1xgo4QyBjjramBa8L6sVVUdk4973W0MdzOmqR2HZNA57THMqa2FlEKBqjP54Qm5CXP02VyGlIQmPyxDfA-ZGFKK2LfbOIw6PrQM2j9JtDmJ9mkS-ez9o_bcjWj_H_17fQaaPbALbsKYbt28w9iuUbtp_bz2b73FloQ</recordid><startdate>201010</startdate><enddate>201010</enddate><creator>Loftin, Mark</creator><creator>Waddell, Dwight E</creator><creator>Robinson, James H</creator><creator>Owens, Scott G</creator><general>National Strength and Conditioning Association</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201010</creationdate><title>Comparison of Energy Expenditure to Walk or Run a Mile in Adult Normal Weight and Overweight Men and Women</title><author>Loftin, Mark ; Waddell, Dwight E ; Robinson, James H ; Owens, Scott G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428d-d99b604270954ade0f4940c86bd64abac83a7d1945e8959cc041b701a54f27933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Athletes</topic><topic>Athletic Performance</topic><topic>Body Composition - physiology</topic><topic>Energy Metabolism - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gallbladder diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Marathons</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Overweight - metabolism</topic><topic>Running - physiology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Walking - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loftin, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waddell, Dwight E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, James H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owens, Scott G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loftin, Mark</au><au>Waddell, Dwight E</au><au>Robinson, James H</au><au>Owens, Scott G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Energy Expenditure to Walk or Run a Mile in Adult Normal Weight and Overweight Men and Women</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><date>2010-10</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2794</spage><epage>2798</epage><pages>2794-2798</pages><issn>1064-8011</issn><eissn>1533-4287</eissn><abstract>Loftin, M, Waddell, DE, Robinson, JH, and Owens, SG. Comparison of energy expenditure to walk or run a mile in adult normal weight and overweight men and women. J Strength Cond Res 24(10)2794-2798, 2010-We compared the energy expenditure to walk or run a mile in adult normal weight walkers (NWW), overweight walkers (OW), and marathon runners (MR). The sample consisted of 19 NWW, 11 OW, and 20 MR adults. Energy expenditure was measured at preferred walking speed (NWW and OW) and running speed of a recently completed marathon. Body composition was assessed via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Analysis of variance was used to compare groups with the Scheffeʼs procedure used for post hoc analysis. Multiple regression analysis was used to predict energy expenditure. Results that indicated OW exhibited significantly higher (p &lt; 0.05) mass and fat weight than NWW or MR. Similar values were found between NWW and MR. Absolute energy expenditure to walk or run a mile was similar between groups (NWW 93.9 ± 15.0, OW 98.4 ± 29.9, MR 99.3 ± 10.8 kcal); however, significant differences were noted when energy expenditure was expressed relative to mass (MR &gt; NWW &gt; OW). When energy expenditure was expressed per kilogram of fat-free mass, similar values were found across groups. Multiple regression analysis yielded mass and gender as significant predictors of energy expenditure (R = 0.795, SEE = 10.9 kcal). We suggest that walking is an excellent physical activity for energy expenditure in overweight individuals that are capable of walking without predisposed conditions such as osteoarthritis or cardiovascular risk factors. Moreover, from a practical perspective, our regression equation (kcal = mass (kg) × 0.789 − gender (men = 1, women = 2) × 7.634 + 51.109) allows for the prediction of energy expenditure for a given distance (mile) rather than predicting energy expenditure for a given time (minutes).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Strength and Conditioning Association</pub><pmid>20613650</pmid><doi>10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc26cd</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1064-8011
ispartof Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2010-10, Vol.24 (10), p.2794-2798
issn 1064-8011
1533-4287
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_756659097
source HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
subjects Adult
Athletes
Athletic Performance
Body Composition - physiology
Energy Metabolism - physiology
Female
Gallbladder diseases
Humans
Male
Marathons
Middle Aged
Models, Biological
Nutrition
Obesity
Overweight - metabolism
Running - physiology
Studies
Walking - physiology
title Comparison of Energy Expenditure to Walk or Run a Mile in Adult Normal Weight and Overweight Men and Women
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T22%3A14%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Energy%20Expenditure%20to%20Walk%20or%20Run%20a%20Mile%20in%20Adult%20Normal%20Weight%20and%20Overweight%20Men%20and%20Women&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strength%20and%20conditioning%20research&rft.au=Loftin,%20Mark&rft.date=2010-10&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2794&rft.epage=2798&rft.pages=2794-2798&rft.issn=1064-8011&rft.eissn=1533-4287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc26cd&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E756659097%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428d-d99b604270954ade0f4940c86bd64abac83a7d1945e8959cc041b701a54f27933%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=759608025&rft_id=info:pmid/20613650&rfr_iscdi=true