Loading…
Comparison of Energy Expenditure to Walk or Run a Mile in Adult Normal Weight and Overweight Men and Women
Loftin, M, Waddell, DE, Robinson, JH, and Owens, SG. Comparison of energy expenditure to walk or run a mile in adult normal weight and overweight men and women. J Strength Cond Res 24(10)2794-2798, 2010-We compared the energy expenditure to walk or run a mile in adult normal weight walkers (NWW), ov...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of strength and conditioning research 2010-10, Vol.24 (10), p.2794-2798 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428d-d99b604270954ade0f4940c86bd64abac83a7d1945e8959cc041b701a54f27933 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428d-d99b604270954ade0f4940c86bd64abac83a7d1945e8959cc041b701a54f27933 |
container_end_page | 2798 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2794 |
container_title | Journal of strength and conditioning research |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Loftin, Mark Waddell, Dwight E Robinson, James H Owens, Scott G |
description | Loftin, M, Waddell, DE, Robinson, JH, and Owens, SG. Comparison of energy expenditure to walk or run a mile in adult normal weight and overweight men and women. J Strength Cond Res 24(10)2794-2798, 2010-We compared the energy expenditure to walk or run a mile in adult normal weight walkers (NWW), overweight walkers (OW), and marathon runners (MR). The sample consisted of 19 NWW, 11 OW, and 20 MR adults. Energy expenditure was measured at preferred walking speed (NWW and OW) and running speed of a recently completed marathon. Body composition was assessed via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Analysis of variance was used to compare groups with the Scheffeʼs procedure used for post hoc analysis. Multiple regression analysis was used to predict energy expenditure. Results that indicated OW exhibited significantly higher (p < 0.05) mass and fat weight than NWW or MR. Similar values were found between NWW and MR. Absolute energy expenditure to walk or run a mile was similar between groups (NWW 93.9 ± 15.0, OW 98.4 ± 29.9, MR 99.3 ± 10.8 kcal); however, significant differences were noted when energy expenditure was expressed relative to mass (MR > NWW > OW). When energy expenditure was expressed per kilogram of fat-free mass, similar values were found across groups. Multiple regression analysis yielded mass and gender as significant predictors of energy expenditure (R = 0.795, SEE = 10.9 kcal). We suggest that walking is an excellent physical activity for energy expenditure in overweight individuals that are capable of walking without predisposed conditions such as osteoarthritis or cardiovascular risk factors. Moreover, from a practical perspective, our regression equation (kcal = mass (kg) × 0.789 − gender (men = 1, women = 2) × 7.634 + 51.109) allows for the prediction of energy expenditure for a given distance (mile) rather than predicting energy expenditure for a given time (minutes). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc26cd |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_756659097</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>756659097</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428d-d99b604270954ade0f4940c86bd64abac83a7d1945e8959cc041b701a54f27933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhS1ERUvhHyBksWGVcp3YTrysRgMF9SEV0Cwjx77pZOrYUzth2n-PYQqLLrq6D3336OgeQt4xOGGCqU_fvi9OoANWYcUaZkwpjX1BjpioqoKXTf0y9yB50QBjh-R1ShuAUghRvSKHJUhWSQFHZLMI41bHIQVPQ0-XHuPNA13eb9HbYZoj0inQlXa3NER6PXuq6cXgkA6entrZTfQyxFE7usLhZj1R7S29-oVxtx8v0P9drcKI_g056LVL-PaxHpOfn5c_FmfF-dWXr4vT88Jk27awSnUSeFmDElxbhJ4rDqaRnZVcd9o0la4tU1xgo4QyBjjramBa8L6sVVUdk4973W0MdzOmqR2HZNA57THMqa2FlEKBqjP54Qm5CXP02VyGlIQmPyxDfA-ZGFKK2LfbOIw6PrQM2j9JtDmJ9mkS-ez9o_bcjWj_H_17fQaaPbALbsKYbt28w9iuUbtp_bz2b73FloQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>759608025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Energy Expenditure to Walk or Run a Mile in Adult Normal Weight and Overweight Men and Women</title><source>HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</source><creator>Loftin, Mark ; Waddell, Dwight E ; Robinson, James H ; Owens, Scott G</creator><creatorcontrib>Loftin, Mark ; Waddell, Dwight E ; Robinson, James H ; Owens, Scott G</creatorcontrib><description>Loftin, M, Waddell, DE, Robinson, JH, and Owens, SG. Comparison of energy expenditure to walk or run a mile in adult normal weight and overweight men and women. J Strength Cond Res 24(10)2794-2798, 2010-We compared the energy expenditure to walk or run a mile in adult normal weight walkers (NWW), overweight walkers (OW), and marathon runners (MR). The sample consisted of 19 NWW, 11 OW, and 20 MR adults. Energy expenditure was measured at preferred walking speed (NWW and OW) and running speed of a recently completed marathon. Body composition was assessed via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Analysis of variance was used to compare groups with the Scheffeʼs procedure used for post hoc analysis. Multiple regression analysis was used to predict energy expenditure. Results that indicated OW exhibited significantly higher (p < 0.05) mass and fat weight than NWW or MR. Similar values were found between NWW and MR. Absolute energy expenditure to walk or run a mile was similar between groups (NWW 93.9 ± 15.0, OW 98.4 ± 29.9, MR 99.3 ± 10.8 kcal); however, significant differences were noted when energy expenditure was expressed relative to mass (MR > NWW > OW). When energy expenditure was expressed per kilogram of fat-free mass, similar values were found across groups. Multiple regression analysis yielded mass and gender as significant predictors of energy expenditure (R = 0.795, SEE = 10.9 kcal). We suggest that walking is an excellent physical activity for energy expenditure in overweight individuals that are capable of walking without predisposed conditions such as osteoarthritis or cardiovascular risk factors. Moreover, from a practical perspective, our regression equation (kcal = mass (kg) × 0.789 − gender (men = 1, women = 2) × 7.634 + 51.109) allows for the prediction of energy expenditure for a given distance (mile) rather than predicting energy expenditure for a given time (minutes).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc26cd</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20613650</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Strength and Conditioning Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Athletes ; Athletic Performance ; Body Composition - physiology ; Energy Metabolism - physiology ; Female ; Gallbladder diseases ; Humans ; Male ; Marathons ; Middle Aged ; Models, Biological ; Nutrition ; Obesity ; Overweight - metabolism ; Running - physiology ; Studies ; Walking - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2010-10, Vol.24 (10), p.2794-2798</ispartof><rights>2010 National Strength and Conditioning Association</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Oct 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428d-d99b604270954ade0f4940c86bd64abac83a7d1945e8959cc041b701a54f27933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428d-d99b604270954ade0f4940c86bd64abac83a7d1945e8959cc041b701a54f27933</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20613650$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loftin, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waddell, Dwight E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, James H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owens, Scott G</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Energy Expenditure to Walk or Run a Mile in Adult Normal Weight and Overweight Men and Women</title><title>Journal of strength and conditioning research</title><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><description>Loftin, M, Waddell, DE, Robinson, JH, and Owens, SG. Comparison of energy expenditure to walk or run a mile in adult normal weight and overweight men and women. J Strength Cond Res 24(10)2794-2798, 2010-We compared the energy expenditure to walk or run a mile in adult normal weight walkers (NWW), overweight walkers (OW), and marathon runners (MR). The sample consisted of 19 NWW, 11 OW, and 20 MR adults. Energy expenditure was measured at preferred walking speed (NWW and OW) and running speed of a recently completed marathon. Body composition was assessed via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Analysis of variance was used to compare groups with the Scheffeʼs procedure used for post hoc analysis. Multiple regression analysis was used to predict energy expenditure. Results that indicated OW exhibited significantly higher (p < 0.05) mass and fat weight than NWW or MR. Similar values were found between NWW and MR. Absolute energy expenditure to walk or run a mile was similar between groups (NWW 93.9 ± 15.0, OW 98.4 ± 29.9, MR 99.3 ± 10.8 kcal); however, significant differences were noted when energy expenditure was expressed relative to mass (MR > NWW > OW). When energy expenditure was expressed per kilogram of fat-free mass, similar values were found across groups. Multiple regression analysis yielded mass and gender as significant predictors of energy expenditure (R = 0.795, SEE = 10.9 kcal). We suggest that walking is an excellent physical activity for energy expenditure in overweight individuals that are capable of walking without predisposed conditions such as osteoarthritis or cardiovascular risk factors. Moreover, from a practical perspective, our regression equation (kcal = mass (kg) × 0.789 − gender (men = 1, women = 2) × 7.634 + 51.109) allows for the prediction of energy expenditure for a given distance (mile) rather than predicting energy expenditure for a given time (minutes).</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Athletes</subject><subject>Athletic Performance</subject><subject>Body Composition - physiology</subject><subject>Energy Metabolism - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gallbladder diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Marathons</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Overweight - metabolism</subject><subject>Running - physiology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Walking - physiology</subject><issn>1064-8011</issn><issn>1533-4287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhS1ERUvhHyBksWGVcp3YTrysRgMF9SEV0Cwjx77pZOrYUzth2n-PYQqLLrq6D3336OgeQt4xOGGCqU_fvi9OoANWYcUaZkwpjX1BjpioqoKXTf0y9yB50QBjh-R1ShuAUghRvSKHJUhWSQFHZLMI41bHIQVPQ0-XHuPNA13eb9HbYZoj0inQlXa3NER6PXuq6cXgkA6entrZTfQyxFE7usLhZj1R7S29-oVxtx8v0P9drcKI_g056LVL-PaxHpOfn5c_FmfF-dWXr4vT88Jk27awSnUSeFmDElxbhJ4rDqaRnZVcd9o0la4tU1xgo4QyBjjramBa8L6sVVUdk4973W0MdzOmqR2HZNA57THMqa2FlEKBqjP54Qm5CXP02VyGlIQmPyxDfA-ZGFKK2LfbOIw6PrQM2j9JtDmJ9mkS-ez9o_bcjWj_H_17fQaaPbALbsKYbt28w9iuUbtp_bz2b73FloQ</recordid><startdate>201010</startdate><enddate>201010</enddate><creator>Loftin, Mark</creator><creator>Waddell, Dwight E</creator><creator>Robinson, James H</creator><creator>Owens, Scott G</creator><general>National Strength and Conditioning Association</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201010</creationdate><title>Comparison of Energy Expenditure to Walk or Run a Mile in Adult Normal Weight and Overweight Men and Women</title><author>Loftin, Mark ; Waddell, Dwight E ; Robinson, James H ; Owens, Scott G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428d-d99b604270954ade0f4940c86bd64abac83a7d1945e8959cc041b701a54f27933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Athletes</topic><topic>Athletic Performance</topic><topic>Body Composition - physiology</topic><topic>Energy Metabolism - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gallbladder diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Marathons</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Overweight - metabolism</topic><topic>Running - physiology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Walking - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loftin, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waddell, Dwight E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, James H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owens, Scott G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loftin, Mark</au><au>Waddell, Dwight E</au><au>Robinson, James H</au><au>Owens, Scott G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Energy Expenditure to Walk or Run a Mile in Adult Normal Weight and Overweight Men and Women</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><date>2010-10</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2794</spage><epage>2798</epage><pages>2794-2798</pages><issn>1064-8011</issn><eissn>1533-4287</eissn><abstract>Loftin, M, Waddell, DE, Robinson, JH, and Owens, SG. Comparison of energy expenditure to walk or run a mile in adult normal weight and overweight men and women. J Strength Cond Res 24(10)2794-2798, 2010-We compared the energy expenditure to walk or run a mile in adult normal weight walkers (NWW), overweight walkers (OW), and marathon runners (MR). The sample consisted of 19 NWW, 11 OW, and 20 MR adults. Energy expenditure was measured at preferred walking speed (NWW and OW) and running speed of a recently completed marathon. Body composition was assessed via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Analysis of variance was used to compare groups with the Scheffeʼs procedure used for post hoc analysis. Multiple regression analysis was used to predict energy expenditure. Results that indicated OW exhibited significantly higher (p < 0.05) mass and fat weight than NWW or MR. Similar values were found between NWW and MR. Absolute energy expenditure to walk or run a mile was similar between groups (NWW 93.9 ± 15.0, OW 98.4 ± 29.9, MR 99.3 ± 10.8 kcal); however, significant differences were noted when energy expenditure was expressed relative to mass (MR > NWW > OW). When energy expenditure was expressed per kilogram of fat-free mass, similar values were found across groups. Multiple regression analysis yielded mass and gender as significant predictors of energy expenditure (R = 0.795, SEE = 10.9 kcal). We suggest that walking is an excellent physical activity for energy expenditure in overweight individuals that are capable of walking without predisposed conditions such as osteoarthritis or cardiovascular risk factors. Moreover, from a practical perspective, our regression equation (kcal = mass (kg) × 0.789 − gender (men = 1, women = 2) × 7.634 + 51.109) allows for the prediction of energy expenditure for a given distance (mile) rather than predicting energy expenditure for a given time (minutes).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Strength and Conditioning Association</pub><pmid>20613650</pmid><doi>10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc26cd</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1064-8011 |
ispartof | Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2010-10, Vol.24 (10), p.2794-2798 |
issn | 1064-8011 1533-4287 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_756659097 |
source | HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
subjects | Adult Athletes Athletic Performance Body Composition - physiology Energy Metabolism - physiology Female Gallbladder diseases Humans Male Marathons Middle Aged Models, Biological Nutrition Obesity Overweight - metabolism Running - physiology Studies Walking - physiology |
title | Comparison of Energy Expenditure to Walk or Run a Mile in Adult Normal Weight and Overweight Men and Women |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T22%3A14%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Energy%20Expenditure%20to%20Walk%20or%20Run%20a%20Mile%20in%20Adult%20Normal%20Weight%20and%20Overweight%20Men%20and%20Women&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strength%20and%20conditioning%20research&rft.au=Loftin,%20Mark&rft.date=2010-10&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2794&rft.epage=2798&rft.pages=2794-2798&rft.issn=1064-8011&rft.eissn=1533-4287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc26cd&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E756659097%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428d-d99b604270954ade0f4940c86bd64abac83a7d1945e8959cc041b701a54f27933%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=759608025&rft_id=info:pmid/20613650&rfr_iscdi=true |