Loading…

HAEMODYNAMIC AND CATECHOLAMINE RESPONSES TO INDUCTION OF ANAESTHESIA AND TRACHEAL INTUBATION: COMPARISON BETWEEN PROPOFOL AND THIOPENTONE

We have studied the haemodynamic changes, QT intervals and catecholamine responses to induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation in 24 ASA I patients allocated randomly to receive either pro-pofol 2.5 mg kg-1 or thiopentone 5 mg kg-1 over 60 s. After disappearance of the eyelash reflex, the lu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of anaesthesia : BJA 1993-03, Vol.70 (3), p.306-310
Main Authors: LINDGREN, L., YLI-HANKALA, A., RANDELL, T., KIRVELÄ, M., SCHEININ, M., NEUVONEN, P.J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-e405b2f0fab81a912e84cd930838f6b8aa1f00e7a0a18d08be3ac5ad00ad1a583
cites
container_end_page 310
container_issue 3
container_start_page 306
container_title British journal of anaesthesia : BJA
container_volume 70
creator LINDGREN, L.
YLI-HANKALA, A.
RANDELL, T.
KIRVELÄ, M.
SCHEININ, M.
NEUVONEN, P.J.
description We have studied the haemodynamic changes, QT intervals and catecholamine responses to induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation in 24 ASA I patients allocated randomly to receive either pro-pofol 2.5 mg kg-1 or thiopentone 5 mg kg-1 over 60 s. After disappearance of the eyelash reflex, the lungs were ventilated with 100% oxygen for 3 min. The trachea was intubated after administration of vecuronium. With thiopentone, heart rate (HR) was greater than with propofol before intubation (P < 0.05). During induction, systolic (SAP) and diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) decreased more with propofol than with thiopentone. The QT interval was prolonged only during induction with thiopentone. In both groups, HR, SAP, DAP and the QT were increased in response to intubation (P < 0.001). The SAP and QT interval responses to intubation were significantly greater with thiopentone than with propofol (P < 0.05). One patient in the thiopentone group with a significantly prolonged QT interval had episodes of bigeminy and ventricular tachycardia. In both groups, concentrations of noradrenaline in mixed venous plasma increased after intubation (P < 0.001). Concentrations of adrenaline increased after intubation only in the thiopentone group (P < 0.001). (Br. J. Anaesth. 1993; 70: 306–310)
doi_str_mv 10.1093/bja/70.3.306
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75671206</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0007091217448100</els_id><sourcerecordid>75671206</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-e405b2f0fab81a912e84cd930838f6b8aa1f00e7a0a18d08be3ac5ad00ad1a583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0M2O0zAUBeAIgYYysGOLlAViRTrXdRI77Dyp20SkcWhSAbOxnMSRMvRniFsEj8Bb45lUXbGy5PudK_s4zlsEUwQRvqnv1Q2BKZ5iCJ85E-QT5IWEoOfOBACIBxGavXReGXMPgMgsCq6cK2oRJsHE-ZswvhLz7zlbpbHL8rkbs4rHicjsRc7dNS8LkZe8dCvhpvl8E1epyF2xsJbxskp4mbKnXLVmccJZZlW1uWWP7JMbi1XB1mlpI7e8-sp57hZrUYiFyMZQkoqC55XI-WvnRae2Rr85n9fOZsGrOPEysUxjlnkNDnDoaR-CetZBp2qKlP2apn7TRhgopl1YU6VQB6CJAoVoC7TWWDWBagFUi1RA8bXzYdz7MBx-nrQ5yl1vGr3dqr0-nIwkQUjQDEILP46wGQ7GDLqTD0O_U8MfiUA-Ni9t85KAxBI_8Xfnvad6p9sLPldt5-_Pc2Uate0GtW96c2F-QEOgkWXeyHpz1L8vYzX8kCGxe2Ty7U4Gdyt_uURf5Gfrw9Fr29mvXg_SNL3eN7rtB90cZXvo___ef0P_oko</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75671206</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>HAEMODYNAMIC AND CATECHOLAMINE RESPONSES TO INDUCTION OF ANAESTHESIA AND TRACHEAL INTUBATION: COMPARISON BETWEEN PROPOFOL AND THIOPENTONE</title><source>Oxford University Press Archive</source><creator>LINDGREN, L. ; YLI-HANKALA, A. ; RANDELL, T. ; KIRVELÄ, M. ; SCHEININ, M. ; NEUVONEN, P.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>LINDGREN, L. ; YLI-HANKALA, A. ; RANDELL, T. ; KIRVELÄ, M. ; SCHEININ, M. ; NEUVONEN, P.J.</creatorcontrib><description>We have studied the haemodynamic changes, QT intervals and catecholamine responses to induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation in 24 ASA I patients allocated randomly to receive either pro-pofol 2.5 mg kg-1 or thiopentone 5 mg kg-1 over 60 s. After disappearance of the eyelash reflex, the lungs were ventilated with 100% oxygen for 3 min. The trachea was intubated after administration of vecuronium. With thiopentone, heart rate (HR) was greater than with propofol before intubation (P &lt; 0.05). During induction, systolic (SAP) and diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) decreased more with propofol than with thiopentone. The QT interval was prolonged only during induction with thiopentone. In both groups, HR, SAP, DAP and the QT were increased in response to intubation (P &lt; 0.001). The SAP and QT interval responses to intubation were significantly greater with thiopentone than with propofol (P &lt; 0.05). One patient in the thiopentone group with a significantly prolonged QT interval had episodes of bigeminy and ventricular tachycardia. In both groups, concentrations of noradrenaline in mixed venous plasma increased after intubation (P &lt; 0.001). Concentrations of adrenaline increased after intubation only in the thiopentone group (P &lt; 0.001). (Br. J. Anaesth. 1993; 70: 306–310)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bja/70.3.306</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8471375</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJANAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Anaesthetics ; Anaesthetics, intravenous: propofol, thiopentone ; Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Pressure - drug effects ; Electrocardiography - drug effects ; Epinephrine - blood ; Female ; Heart Rate - drug effects ; Hemodynamics - physiology ; Humans ; intravenous: propofol ; Intubation ; Intubation, Intratracheal ; Intubation, tracheal: haemodynamic response ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Neuropharmacology ; Norepinephrine - blood ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Propofol ; Sympathetic nervous system: catecholamines ; Thiopental ; thiopentone ; Time Factors ; tracheal: haemodynamic response</subject><ispartof>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 1993-03, Vol.70 (3), p.306-310</ispartof><rights>1993</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-e405b2f0fab81a912e84cd930838f6b8aa1f00e7a0a18d08be3ac5ad00ad1a583</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4586089$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8471375$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>LINDGREN, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YLI-HANKALA, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RANDELL, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIRVELÄ, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHEININ, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEUVONEN, P.J.</creatorcontrib><title>HAEMODYNAMIC AND CATECHOLAMINE RESPONSES TO INDUCTION OF ANAESTHESIA AND TRACHEAL INTUBATION: COMPARISON BETWEEN PROPOFOL AND THIOPENTONE</title><title>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</title><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><description>We have studied the haemodynamic changes, QT intervals and catecholamine responses to induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation in 24 ASA I patients allocated randomly to receive either pro-pofol 2.5 mg kg-1 or thiopentone 5 mg kg-1 over 60 s. After disappearance of the eyelash reflex, the lungs were ventilated with 100% oxygen for 3 min. The trachea was intubated after administration of vecuronium. With thiopentone, heart rate (HR) was greater than with propofol before intubation (P &lt; 0.05). During induction, systolic (SAP) and diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) decreased more with propofol than with thiopentone. The QT interval was prolonged only during induction with thiopentone. In both groups, HR, SAP, DAP and the QT were increased in response to intubation (P &lt; 0.001). The SAP and QT interval responses to intubation were significantly greater with thiopentone than with propofol (P &lt; 0.05). One patient in the thiopentone group with a significantly prolonged QT interval had episodes of bigeminy and ventricular tachycardia. In both groups, concentrations of noradrenaline in mixed venous plasma increased after intubation (P &lt; 0.001). Concentrations of adrenaline increased after intubation only in the thiopentone group (P &lt; 0.001). (Br. J. Anaesth. 1993; 70: 306–310)</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anaesthetics</subject><subject>Anaesthetics, intravenous: propofol, thiopentone</subject><subject>Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Pressure - drug effects</subject><subject>Electrocardiography - drug effects</subject><subject>Epinephrine - blood</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Rate - drug effects</subject><subject>Hemodynamics - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intravenous: propofol</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal</subject><subject>Intubation, tracheal: haemodynamic response</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neuropharmacology</subject><subject>Norepinephrine - blood</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Propofol</subject><subject>Sympathetic nervous system: catecholamines</subject><subject>Thiopental</subject><subject>thiopentone</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>tracheal: haemodynamic response</subject><issn>0007-0912</issn><issn>1471-6771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpt0M2O0zAUBeAIgYYysGOLlAViRTrXdRI77Dyp20SkcWhSAbOxnMSRMvRniFsEj8Bb45lUXbGy5PudK_s4zlsEUwQRvqnv1Q2BKZ5iCJ85E-QT5IWEoOfOBACIBxGavXReGXMPgMgsCq6cK2oRJsHE-ZswvhLz7zlbpbHL8rkbs4rHicjsRc7dNS8LkZe8dCvhpvl8E1epyF2xsJbxskp4mbKnXLVmccJZZlW1uWWP7JMbi1XB1mlpI7e8-sp57hZrUYiFyMZQkoqC55XI-WvnRae2Rr85n9fOZsGrOPEysUxjlnkNDnDoaR-CetZBp2qKlP2apn7TRhgopl1YU6VQB6CJAoVoC7TWWDWBagFUi1RA8bXzYdz7MBx-nrQ5yl1vGr3dqr0-nIwkQUjQDEILP46wGQ7GDLqTD0O_U8MfiUA-Ni9t85KAxBI_8Xfnvad6p9sLPldt5-_Pc2Uate0GtW96c2F-QEOgkWXeyHpz1L8vYzX8kCGxe2Ty7U4Gdyt_uURf5Gfrw9Fr29mvXg_SNL3eN7rtB90cZXvo___ef0P_oko</recordid><startdate>199303</startdate><enddate>199303</enddate><creator>LINDGREN, L.</creator><creator>YLI-HANKALA, A.</creator><creator>RANDELL, T.</creator><creator>KIRVELÄ, M.</creator><creator>SCHEININ, M.</creator><creator>NEUVONEN, P.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199303</creationdate><title>HAEMODYNAMIC AND CATECHOLAMINE RESPONSES TO INDUCTION OF ANAESTHESIA AND TRACHEAL INTUBATION: COMPARISON BETWEEN PROPOFOL AND THIOPENTONE</title><author>LINDGREN, L. ; YLI-HANKALA, A. ; RANDELL, T. ; KIRVELÄ, M. ; SCHEININ, M. ; NEUVONEN, P.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-e405b2f0fab81a912e84cd930838f6b8aa1f00e7a0a18d08be3ac5ad00ad1a583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anaesthetics</topic><topic>Anaesthetics, intravenous: propofol, thiopentone</topic><topic>Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Pressure - drug effects</topic><topic>Electrocardiography - drug effects</topic><topic>Epinephrine - blood</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Rate - drug effects</topic><topic>Hemodynamics - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intravenous: propofol</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal</topic><topic>Intubation, tracheal: haemodynamic response</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neuropharmacology</topic><topic>Norepinephrine - blood</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Propofol</topic><topic>Sympathetic nervous system: catecholamines</topic><topic>Thiopental</topic><topic>thiopentone</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>tracheal: haemodynamic response</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LINDGREN, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YLI-HANKALA, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RANDELL, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIRVELÄ, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHEININ, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEUVONEN, P.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LINDGREN, L.</au><au>YLI-HANKALA, A.</au><au>RANDELL, T.</au><au>KIRVELÄ, M.</au><au>SCHEININ, M.</au><au>NEUVONEN, P.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>HAEMODYNAMIC AND CATECHOLAMINE RESPONSES TO INDUCTION OF ANAESTHESIA AND TRACHEAL INTUBATION: COMPARISON BETWEEN PROPOFOL AND THIOPENTONE</atitle><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><date>1993-03</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>306</spage><epage>310</epage><pages>306-310</pages><issn>0007-0912</issn><eissn>1471-6771</eissn><coden>BJANAD</coden><abstract>We have studied the haemodynamic changes, QT intervals and catecholamine responses to induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation in 24 ASA I patients allocated randomly to receive either pro-pofol 2.5 mg kg-1 or thiopentone 5 mg kg-1 over 60 s. After disappearance of the eyelash reflex, the lungs were ventilated with 100% oxygen for 3 min. The trachea was intubated after administration of vecuronium. With thiopentone, heart rate (HR) was greater than with propofol before intubation (P &lt; 0.05). During induction, systolic (SAP) and diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) decreased more with propofol than with thiopentone. The QT interval was prolonged only during induction with thiopentone. In both groups, HR, SAP, DAP and the QT were increased in response to intubation (P &lt; 0.001). The SAP and QT interval responses to intubation were significantly greater with thiopentone than with propofol (P &lt; 0.05). One patient in the thiopentone group with a significantly prolonged QT interval had episodes of bigeminy and ventricular tachycardia. In both groups, concentrations of noradrenaline in mixed venous plasma increased after intubation (P &lt; 0.001). Concentrations of adrenaline increased after intubation only in the thiopentone group (P &lt; 0.001). (Br. J. Anaesth. 1993; 70: 306–310)</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>8471375</pmid><doi>10.1093/bja/70.3.306</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-0912
ispartof British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 1993-03, Vol.70 (3), p.306-310
issn 0007-0912
1471-6771
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75671206
source Oxford University Press Archive
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Anaesthetics
Anaesthetics, intravenous: propofol, thiopentone
Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents
Biological and medical sciences
Blood Pressure - drug effects
Electrocardiography - drug effects
Epinephrine - blood
Female
Heart Rate - drug effects
Hemodynamics - physiology
Humans
intravenous: propofol
Intubation
Intubation, Intratracheal
Intubation, tracheal: haemodynamic response
Male
Medical sciences
Neuropharmacology
Norepinephrine - blood
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Propofol
Sympathetic nervous system: catecholamines
Thiopental
thiopentone
Time Factors
tracheal: haemodynamic response
title HAEMODYNAMIC AND CATECHOLAMINE RESPONSES TO INDUCTION OF ANAESTHESIA AND TRACHEAL INTUBATION: COMPARISON BETWEEN PROPOFOL AND THIOPENTONE
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A32%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=HAEMODYNAMIC%20AND%20CATECHOLAMINE%20RESPONSES%20TO%20INDUCTION%20OF%20ANAESTHESIA%20AND%20TRACHEAL%20INTUBATION:%20COMPARISON%20BETWEEN%20PROPOFOL%20AND%20THIOPENTONE&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20anaesthesia%20:%20BJA&rft.au=LINDGREN,%20L.&rft.date=1993-03&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=306&rft.epage=310&rft.pages=306-310&rft.issn=0007-0912&rft.eissn=1471-6771&rft.coden=BJANAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bja/70.3.306&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75671206%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-e405b2f0fab81a912e84cd930838f6b8aa1f00e7a0a18d08be3ac5ad00ad1a583%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75671206&rft_id=info:pmid/8471375&rfr_iscdi=true