Behaviorally based modeling and computational approaches to neuroscience

• Published in: Annual review of neuroscience 1993-01, Vol.16 (1), p.597-623
• Main Authors: REEKE, G. N, SPORNS, O
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Artificial Intelligence; Biological and medical sciences; Brain - physiology; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; General aspects. Models. Methods; Humans; Learning - physiology; Models, Neurological; Nerve Net - physiology; Neural Networks (Computer); Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs
• ISSN: 0147-006X; 1545-4126
• DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ne.16.030193.003121

The almost incredible advances that have recently occurred in the power of computers available to scientists in all disciplines have encouraged an explosion of neural network and behavioral models. Some of these have been constrained more by the imagination of the programmer than by rude biological facts. Their relevance for the experimental neuroscientist thus varies from case to case. Some models (e.g. Grillner's model of lamprey swimming movements) are so closely based on known neuroanatomy and neurophysiology that it becomes possible to generate and test precise experimental predictions. Other models (such as MURPHY and NOMAD) use neurobiological principles in their architectures, but do not portray any particular organism. Although it is harder to relate the study of these models of the study of real animals, they fulfill an important explanatory role. They make possible insights into how behavior is controlled by neuronal activity that would be unobtainable in real animals using present methods. Thus, even the excesses of neural modeling have provided a useful impetus to what is undoubtedly a most promising approach to integrating data from the various disciplines concerned with behavior and the mind. The problems have been pointed out by many authors (see citations in our introduction), and a phase of more critical evaluation appears to have begun. We hope that our brief survey of models based on widely different theoretical approaches, but all aimed at explaining behavior, will encourage critical comparisons to be made. As in more mature fields, such as thermodynamics, we can expect that more complete models will force an evaluation of theoretical hypotheses against the entire body of available evidence, rather than just a few pertinent test cases. Such evaluation will make possible a much more rigorous exclusion of invalid or inconsistent theoretical ideas. From such studies, a much smaller, but more robust, set of basic principles can be expected to emerge. From the perspective afforded by our own modeling studies, it appears essential that modeling be informed by a general theory of brain function. In this work, the theory of neuronal group selection provides a useful basis for further work by virtue of its consistency with basic evolutionary and physiological principles and the power of the selection paradigm to shape neural networks in behaviorally adaptive directions.