Loading…

Comparative study of extraction techniques for determination of garlic flavor components by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

Several sampling techniques based on steam distillation (SD), simultaneous distillation and solvent extraction (SDE), solid-phase trapping solvent extraction (SPTE), and headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) have been compared for the determination of Korean garlic flavor components by gas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry 2003-10, Vol.377 (4), p.749-756
Main Authors: Lee, Sun-Neo, Kim, Nam-Sun, Lee, Dong-Sun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Several sampling techniques based on steam distillation (SD), simultaneous distillation and solvent extraction (SDE), solid-phase trapping solvent extraction (SPTE), and headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) have been compared for the determination of Korean garlic flavor components by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Diallyl disulfide (57.88%), allyl sulfide (23.59%), and diallyl trisulfide (11.40%) were found to be the predominant flavor components of garlic samples extracted by SDE whereas these components were at levels of 89.77%, 2.43%, and 3.89% when the same sample was extracted by SD, 97.77%, 0.17%, and 0.10% by SPTE, and 97.85%, 0.01%, and 0.01% by HS-SPME using the 50/30-microm divinyl benzene/carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (DVB/CAR/PDMS) fiber. Thermal degradation of components such as allyl methyl sulfide, dimethyl disulfide, and thiirane were observed for SDE and SD but not for SPTE or HS-SPME. HS-SPME had several advantages compared with SD, SDE, and SPTE-rapid solvent-free extraction, no apparent thermal degradation, less laborious manipulation, and less sample requirement. Five different fiber coatings were evaluated to select a suitable fiber for HS-SPME of garlic flavor components. DVB/CAR/PDMS was most efficient among the five types of fiber investigated.
ISSN:1618-2642
1618-2650
DOI:10.1007/s00216-003-2163-z