Loading…

Comparison of fracture patterns between rural and urban populations in a developing country

The pattern of fracture, including the anatomical location and age distribution, may differ among urban and rural populations due to various factors such as the inhabitants' occupation and living environment. This was a retrospective multicentre study involving two urban and three rural hospita...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Singapore medical journal 2010-09, Vol.51 (9), p.702-708
Main Authors: SAW, A, SALLEHUDDIN, A. Y, CHUAH, U. C, ISMAIL, M. S, YOGA, R, HOSSAIN, M. G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 708
container_issue 9
container_start_page 702
container_title Singapore medical journal
container_volume 51
creator SAW, A
SALLEHUDDIN, A. Y
CHUAH, U. C
ISMAIL, M. S
YOGA, R
HOSSAIN, M. G
description The pattern of fracture, including the anatomical location and age distribution, may differ among urban and rural populations due to various factors such as the inhabitants' occupation and living environment. This was a retrospective multicentre study involving two urban and three rural hospitals in Malaysia. The demographic data and anatomical location of fracture of patients admitted in 2007 were collected for analysis. A total of 7,973 patients were admitted for fractures between January and December 2007. The femur was the commonest fracture site that required admission in the urban population (21.9 percent), followed by the tibia-fibula (18.7 percent), while the radius-ulna was the commonest site among the rural population (22.0 percent), followed by the tibia-fibula (19.4 percent). The rates of head and pelvic fractures were comparatively higher in the urban population, while hand fractures were more common in the rural population. The higher rate of femur fracture in the urban group, especially among the elderly, may be due to the higher incidence of osteoporosis or a higher proportion of older people in the population. The anatomical locations of common fractures differed between the urban and rural populations. A higher rate of upper limb fractures was observed in the rural areas, while femur fractures in the elderly was the main cause of fracture admission in the urban areas. The relatively high rate of hand fractures in the rural areas, especially among children and young adults, may require further investigation.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_757795845</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>757795845</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p240t-b6c7cf50290a95d3bd56d3cbe5228ec534d5839a827096c81484704573c095eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0DtLxEAUBeAUiruu_gWZRqwCs5lnSll8wYKNVhbhZuZGIsnMOA9l_70BV6xO83E4nJNqTSlTtZBKrKrzlD4obRTV-qxaNbRlWm7punrb-TlAHJN3xA9kiGByiUgC5IzRJdJj_kZ0JJYIEwFnSYk9OBJ8KBPk0S9mdASIxS-cfBjdOzG-uBwPF9XpAFPCy2Nuqtf7u5fdY71_fnja3e7r0HCa614aZQZBm5ZCKyzrrZCWmR5F02g0gnErNGtBL-tbafSWa64oF4oZ2grs2aa6-e0N0X8WTLmbx2RwmsChL6lTQqlWaC4WeXWUpZ_RdiGOM8RD9_fHAq6PAJKBabnDmTH9O8a3gkrJfgCUnWim</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>757795845</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of fracture patterns between rural and urban populations in a developing country</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>SAW, A ; SALLEHUDDIN, A. Y ; CHUAH, U. C ; ISMAIL, M. S ; YOGA, R ; HOSSAIN, M. G</creator><creatorcontrib>SAW, A ; SALLEHUDDIN, A. Y ; CHUAH, U. C ; ISMAIL, M. S ; YOGA, R ; HOSSAIN, M. G</creatorcontrib><description>The pattern of fracture, including the anatomical location and age distribution, may differ among urban and rural populations due to various factors such as the inhabitants' occupation and living environment. This was a retrospective multicentre study involving two urban and three rural hospitals in Malaysia. The demographic data and anatomical location of fracture of patients admitted in 2007 were collected for analysis. A total of 7,973 patients were admitted for fractures between January and December 2007. The femur was the commonest fracture site that required admission in the urban population (21.9 percent), followed by the tibia-fibula (18.7 percent), while the radius-ulna was the commonest site among the rural population (22.0 percent), followed by the tibia-fibula (19.4 percent). The rates of head and pelvic fractures were comparatively higher in the urban population, while hand fractures were more common in the rural population. The higher rate of femur fracture in the urban group, especially among the elderly, may be due to the higher incidence of osteoporosis or a higher proportion of older people in the population. The anatomical locations of common fractures differed between the urban and rural populations. A higher rate of upper limb fractures was observed in the rural areas, while femur fractures in the elderly was the main cause of fracture admission in the urban areas. The relatively high rate of hand fractures in the rural areas, especially among children and young adults, may require further investigation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0037-5675</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20938610</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SIMJA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Singapore Medical Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Developing Countries ; Female ; Femoral Fractures - diagnosis ; Femoral Fractures - pathology ; Fractures, Bone - diagnosis ; Fractures, Bone - pathology ; General aspects ; Hospitals, Rural ; Humans ; Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine ; Malaysia ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Radius Fractures - diagnosis ; Radius Fractures - pathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Rural Population ; Tibial Fractures - diagnosis ; Tibial Fractures - pathology ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents ; Ulna Fractures - diagnosis ; Ulna Fractures - pathology ; Urban Population</subject><ispartof>Singapore medical journal, 2010-09, Vol.51 (9), p.702-708</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23415066$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20938610$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SAW, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SALLEHUDDIN, A. Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHUAH, U. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ISMAIL, M. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YOGA, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOSSAIN, M. G</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of fracture patterns between rural and urban populations in a developing country</title><title>Singapore medical journal</title><addtitle>Singapore Med J</addtitle><description>The pattern of fracture, including the anatomical location and age distribution, may differ among urban and rural populations due to various factors such as the inhabitants' occupation and living environment. This was a retrospective multicentre study involving two urban and three rural hospitals in Malaysia. The demographic data and anatomical location of fracture of patients admitted in 2007 were collected for analysis. A total of 7,973 patients were admitted for fractures between January and December 2007. The femur was the commonest fracture site that required admission in the urban population (21.9 percent), followed by the tibia-fibula (18.7 percent), while the radius-ulna was the commonest site among the rural population (22.0 percent), followed by the tibia-fibula (19.4 percent). The rates of head and pelvic fractures were comparatively higher in the urban population, while hand fractures were more common in the rural population. The higher rate of femur fracture in the urban group, especially among the elderly, may be due to the higher incidence of osteoporosis or a higher proportion of older people in the population. The anatomical locations of common fractures differed between the urban and rural populations. A higher rate of upper limb fractures was observed in the rural areas, while femur fractures in the elderly was the main cause of fracture admission in the urban areas. The relatively high rate of hand fractures in the rural areas, especially among children and young adults, may require further investigation.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Developing Countries</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - diagnosis</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - pathology</subject><subject>Fractures, Bone - diagnosis</subject><subject>Fractures, Bone - pathology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Hospitals, Rural</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</subject><subject>Malaysia</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Radius Fractures - diagnosis</subject><subject>Radius Fractures - pathology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Rural Population</subject><subject>Tibial Fractures - diagnosis</subject><subject>Tibial Fractures - pathology</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><subject>Ulna Fractures - diagnosis</subject><subject>Ulna Fractures - pathology</subject><subject>Urban Population</subject><issn>0037-5675</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpF0DtLxEAUBeAUiruu_gWZRqwCs5lnSll8wYKNVhbhZuZGIsnMOA9l_70BV6xO83E4nJNqTSlTtZBKrKrzlD4obRTV-qxaNbRlWm7punrb-TlAHJN3xA9kiGByiUgC5IzRJdJj_kZ0JJYIEwFnSYk9OBJ8KBPk0S9mdASIxS-cfBjdOzG-uBwPF9XpAFPCy2Nuqtf7u5fdY71_fnja3e7r0HCa614aZQZBm5ZCKyzrrZCWmR5F02g0gnErNGtBL-tbafSWa64oF4oZ2grs2aa6-e0N0X8WTLmbx2RwmsChL6lTQqlWaC4WeXWUpZ_RdiGOM8RD9_fHAq6PAJKBabnDmTH9O8a3gkrJfgCUnWim</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>SAW, A</creator><creator>SALLEHUDDIN, A. Y</creator><creator>CHUAH, U. C</creator><creator>ISMAIL, M. S</creator><creator>YOGA, R</creator><creator>HOSSAIN, M. G</creator><general>Singapore Medical Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Comparison of fracture patterns between rural and urban populations in a developing country</title><author>SAW, A ; SALLEHUDDIN, A. Y ; CHUAH, U. C ; ISMAIL, M. S ; YOGA, R ; HOSSAIN, M. G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p240t-b6c7cf50290a95d3bd56d3cbe5228ec534d5839a827096c81484704573c095eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Developing Countries</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - diagnosis</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - pathology</topic><topic>Fractures, Bone - diagnosis</topic><topic>Fractures, Bone - pathology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Hospitals, Rural</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</topic><topic>Malaysia</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Radius Fractures - diagnosis</topic><topic>Radius Fractures - pathology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Rural Population</topic><topic>Tibial Fractures - diagnosis</topic><topic>Tibial Fractures - pathology</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><topic>Ulna Fractures - diagnosis</topic><topic>Ulna Fractures - pathology</topic><topic>Urban Population</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SAW, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SALLEHUDDIN, A. Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHUAH, U. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ISMAIL, M. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YOGA, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOSSAIN, M. G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Singapore medical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SAW, A</au><au>SALLEHUDDIN, A. Y</au><au>CHUAH, U. C</au><au>ISMAIL, M. S</au><au>YOGA, R</au><au>HOSSAIN, M. G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of fracture patterns between rural and urban populations in a developing country</atitle><jtitle>Singapore medical journal</jtitle><addtitle>Singapore Med J</addtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>702</spage><epage>708</epage><pages>702-708</pages><issn>0037-5675</issn><coden>SIMJA3</coden><abstract>The pattern of fracture, including the anatomical location and age distribution, may differ among urban and rural populations due to various factors such as the inhabitants' occupation and living environment. This was a retrospective multicentre study involving two urban and three rural hospitals in Malaysia. The demographic data and anatomical location of fracture of patients admitted in 2007 were collected for analysis. A total of 7,973 patients were admitted for fractures between January and December 2007. The femur was the commonest fracture site that required admission in the urban population (21.9 percent), followed by the tibia-fibula (18.7 percent), while the radius-ulna was the commonest site among the rural population (22.0 percent), followed by the tibia-fibula (19.4 percent). The rates of head and pelvic fractures were comparatively higher in the urban population, while hand fractures were more common in the rural population. The higher rate of femur fracture in the urban group, especially among the elderly, may be due to the higher incidence of osteoporosis or a higher proportion of older people in the population. The anatomical locations of common fractures differed between the urban and rural populations. A higher rate of upper limb fractures was observed in the rural areas, while femur fractures in the elderly was the main cause of fracture admission in the urban areas. The relatively high rate of hand fractures in the rural areas, especially among children and young adults, may require further investigation.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Singapore Medical Association</pub><pmid>20938610</pmid><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0037-5675
ispartof Singapore medical journal, 2010-09, Vol.51 (9), p.702-708
issn 0037-5675
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_757795845
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Developing Countries
Female
Femoral Fractures - diagnosis
Femoral Fractures - pathology
Fractures, Bone - diagnosis
Fractures, Bone - pathology
General aspects
Hospitals, Rural
Humans
Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine
Malaysia
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Radius Fractures - diagnosis
Radius Fractures - pathology
Retrospective Studies
Rural Population
Tibial Fractures - diagnosis
Tibial Fractures - pathology
Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents
Ulna Fractures - diagnosis
Ulna Fractures - pathology
Urban Population
title Comparison of fracture patterns between rural and urban populations in a developing country
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T14%3A06%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20fracture%20patterns%20between%20rural%20and%20urban%20populations%20in%20a%20developing%20country&rft.jtitle=Singapore%20medical%20journal&rft.au=SAW,%20A&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=702&rft.epage=708&rft.pages=702-708&rft.issn=0037-5675&rft.coden=SIMJA3&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E757795845%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p240t-b6c7cf50290a95d3bd56d3cbe5228ec534d5839a827096c81484704573c095eb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=757795845&rft_id=info:pmid/20938610&rfr_iscdi=true