Diagnosis of cruciate ligament injury using single contrast arthrography

• Published in: The American journal of sports medicine 1984-11, Vol.12 (6), p.451-454
• Main Author: Bruce Reider William Clancy, JR Leonard O. Langer
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Humans; Knee Injuries - diagnostic imaging; Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging; Ligaments, Articular - diagnostic imaging; Ligaments, Articular - injuries; Radiography
• ISSN: 0363-5465; 1552-3365
• DOI: 10.1177/036354658401200609

To evaluate the accuracy of arthrography for assessing the status of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), 212 arthrograms from 212 knees in 205 consecutive pa tients undergoing single contrast arthrography and sub sequent arthroscopy or arthrotomy were reviewed. Cri teria for evaluation of the ACL included the clarity of its radiographic appearance as well as the anterior laxity of the knee as seen on manual stress views. Of the 111 knees having intact ACLs at surgery, 98 (88%) were evaluated correctly by arthrography. Of the 101 knees having a damaged ACL, 85 were read as torn or attenuated on the arthrogram. When the torn and at tenuated ligaments were considered separately, accu racy was decreased. Of the 87 ligaments actually torn, 68 (78%) were read as torn and 9 (10%) as attenuated. Of the 14 actually attenuated, 5 (36%) were read as attenuated and 3 (21 %) as torn. Of 114 arthrograms read as intact, 98 (86%) were correct. Of 77 arthro grams read as torn, 68 (88%), were correct. Of 21 arthrograms read as attenuated, 5 (24%) were correct. Of 114 torn medial menisci, 112 (98%) were correctly diagnosed, as were 38 (69%) of 55 torn lateral menisci. Sixteen of the 17 missed lateral meniscus tears were in knees with torn medial menisci. Single contrast ar thrography is, therefore, highly accurate in distinguish ing intact from damaged ACLs. The distinction between torn and attenuated ligaments, however, is not valua ble.