Loading…

Immunotherapy of endotoxemia and septicemia

Neutralization of endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) would be of considerable benefit in the treatment of Gram-negative sepsis. Administration of anti-LPS antibodies is an old approach which has been renewed by improvements in monoclonal antibody technology. The antibodies directed at the conserved...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Immunobiology (1979) 1993-04, Vol.187 (3-5), p.464-477
Main Authors: Baumgartner, J D, Glauser, M P
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-c83af2b9de22d86d9caae43658f994cd00797745e594cc5ae79deea9b0e856423
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-c83af2b9de22d86d9caae43658f994cd00797745e594cc5ae79deea9b0e856423
container_end_page 477
container_issue 3-5
container_start_page 464
container_title Immunobiology (1979)
container_volume 187
creator Baumgartner, J D
Glauser, M P
description Neutralization of endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) would be of considerable benefit in the treatment of Gram-negative sepsis. Administration of anti-LPS antibodies is an old approach which has been renewed by improvements in monoclonal antibody technology. The antibodies directed at the conserved core region of LPS or at the lipid A which have been studied in humans are discussed in this review. Some of these antibodies appeared to be protective in animal models or in clinical trials, but discrepant results have been reported and the mechanism of the postulated protection was not clarified. The polyclonal antibody preparations have given variable results in patients. The clinical studies of anti-lipid A monoclonal antibodies seemed promising because both antibodies appeared to protect subsets of patients. However, the studies gave discrepant results concerning the type of patients reported to benefit from the administration of these antibodies. One of these antibodies, E5, appeared to improve the survival of patients with Gram-negative sepsis provided they were not in shock, but a second trial failed to confirm this. The other antibody, HA-1A, appeared to protect patients with Gram-negative sepsis who were in refractory shock, but only when they were bacteremic. This antibody was recently released on the market in some european countries. However, the FDA agency decided that a confirmatory study should be done before it could consider to approve HA-1A because a careful reanalysis suggested that the observed differences were only of marginal statistical significance. Therefore, this type of treatment has not yet clearly been shown to benefit patients. More studies are needed to delineate the role of core LPS antibodies in the management of Gram-negative sepsis.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0171-2985(11)80357-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75855909</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>75855909</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-c83af2b9de22d86d9caae43658f994cd00797745e594cc5ae79deea9b0e856423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE9LxDAQxXNQ1nX1Iyz0JIpUJ03TJEdZ_LOw4EE9hzSZYqVtatOC--1td8uehje8N_P4EbKm8ECBZo8fQAWNEyX5LaV3EhgXsTwjy9P6glyG8ANAVSLkgiwkY6BALcn9tq6Hxvff2Jl2H_kiwsb53v9hXZrINC4K2PalneQVOS9MFfB6nivy9fL8uXmLd--v283TLrYM0j62kpkiyZXDJHEyc8oagynLuCyUSq0DEEqIlCMfleUGxWhFo3JAybM0YStyc7zbdv53wNDrugwWq8o06IegBZecj-1HIz8abedD6LDQbVfWpttrCnoCow9g9ERAU6oPYLQcc-v5wZDX6E6pmQr7B65jYFc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75855909</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Immunotherapy of endotoxemia and septicemia</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Baumgartner, J D ; Glauser, M P</creator><creatorcontrib>Baumgartner, J D ; Glauser, M P</creatorcontrib><description>Neutralization of endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) would be of considerable benefit in the treatment of Gram-negative sepsis. Administration of anti-LPS antibodies is an old approach which has been renewed by improvements in monoclonal antibody technology. The antibodies directed at the conserved core region of LPS or at the lipid A which have been studied in humans are discussed in this review. Some of these antibodies appeared to be protective in animal models or in clinical trials, but discrepant results have been reported and the mechanism of the postulated protection was not clarified. The polyclonal antibody preparations have given variable results in patients. The clinical studies of anti-lipid A monoclonal antibodies seemed promising because both antibodies appeared to protect subsets of patients. However, the studies gave discrepant results concerning the type of patients reported to benefit from the administration of these antibodies. One of these antibodies, E5, appeared to improve the survival of patients with Gram-negative sepsis provided they were not in shock, but a second trial failed to confirm this. The other antibody, HA-1A, appeared to protect patients with Gram-negative sepsis who were in refractory shock, but only when they were bacteremic. This antibody was recently released on the market in some european countries. However, the FDA agency decided that a confirmatory study should be done before it could consider to approve HA-1A because a careful reanalysis suggested that the observed differences were only of marginal statistical significance. Therefore, this type of treatment has not yet clearly been shown to benefit patients. More studies are needed to delineate the role of core LPS antibodies in the management of Gram-negative sepsis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0171-2985</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0171-2985(11)80357-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8330909</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antibodies, Monoclonal - therapeutic use ; Bacteremia - therapy ; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - therapy ; Humans ; Immunotherapy ; Lipopolysaccharides - immunology ; Toxemia - therapy</subject><ispartof>Immunobiology (1979), 1993-04, Vol.187 (3-5), p.464-477</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-c83af2b9de22d86d9caae43658f994cd00797745e594cc5ae79deea9b0e856423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-c83af2b9de22d86d9caae43658f994cd00797745e594cc5ae79deea9b0e856423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8330909$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baumgartner, J D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glauser, M P</creatorcontrib><title>Immunotherapy of endotoxemia and septicemia</title><title>Immunobiology (1979)</title><addtitle>Immunobiology</addtitle><description>Neutralization of endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) would be of considerable benefit in the treatment of Gram-negative sepsis. Administration of anti-LPS antibodies is an old approach which has been renewed by improvements in monoclonal antibody technology. The antibodies directed at the conserved core region of LPS or at the lipid A which have been studied in humans are discussed in this review. Some of these antibodies appeared to be protective in animal models or in clinical trials, but discrepant results have been reported and the mechanism of the postulated protection was not clarified. The polyclonal antibody preparations have given variable results in patients. The clinical studies of anti-lipid A monoclonal antibodies seemed promising because both antibodies appeared to protect subsets of patients. However, the studies gave discrepant results concerning the type of patients reported to benefit from the administration of these antibodies. One of these antibodies, E5, appeared to improve the survival of patients with Gram-negative sepsis provided they were not in shock, but a second trial failed to confirm this. The other antibody, HA-1A, appeared to protect patients with Gram-negative sepsis who were in refractory shock, but only when they were bacteremic. This antibody was recently released on the market in some european countries. However, the FDA agency decided that a confirmatory study should be done before it could consider to approve HA-1A because a careful reanalysis suggested that the observed differences were only of marginal statistical significance. Therefore, this type of treatment has not yet clearly been shown to benefit patients. More studies are needed to delineate the role of core LPS antibodies in the management of Gram-negative sepsis.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bacteremia - therapy</subject><subject>Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunotherapy</subject><subject>Lipopolysaccharides - immunology</subject><subject>Toxemia - therapy</subject><issn>0171-2985</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE9LxDAQxXNQ1nX1Iyz0JIpUJ03TJEdZ_LOw4EE9hzSZYqVtatOC--1td8uehje8N_P4EbKm8ECBZo8fQAWNEyX5LaV3EhgXsTwjy9P6glyG8ANAVSLkgiwkY6BALcn9tq6Hxvff2Jl2H_kiwsb53v9hXZrINC4K2PalneQVOS9MFfB6nivy9fL8uXmLd--v283TLrYM0j62kpkiyZXDJHEyc8oagynLuCyUSq0DEEqIlCMfleUGxWhFo3JAybM0YStyc7zbdv53wNDrugwWq8o06IegBZecj-1HIz8abedD6LDQbVfWpttrCnoCow9g9ERAU6oPYLQcc-v5wZDX6E6pmQr7B65jYFc</recordid><startdate>19930401</startdate><enddate>19930401</enddate><creator>Baumgartner, J D</creator><creator>Glauser, M P</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930401</creationdate><title>Immunotherapy of endotoxemia and septicemia</title><author>Baumgartner, J D ; Glauser, M P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-c83af2b9de22d86d9caae43658f994cd00797745e594cc5ae79deea9b0e856423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bacteremia - therapy</topic><topic>Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunotherapy</topic><topic>Lipopolysaccharides - immunology</topic><topic>Toxemia - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baumgartner, J D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glauser, M P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Immunobiology (1979)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baumgartner, J D</au><au>Glauser, M P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Immunotherapy of endotoxemia and septicemia</atitle><jtitle>Immunobiology (1979)</jtitle><addtitle>Immunobiology</addtitle><date>1993-04-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>187</volume><issue>3-5</issue><spage>464</spage><epage>477</epage><pages>464-477</pages><issn>0171-2985</issn><abstract>Neutralization of endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) would be of considerable benefit in the treatment of Gram-negative sepsis. Administration of anti-LPS antibodies is an old approach which has been renewed by improvements in monoclonal antibody technology. The antibodies directed at the conserved core region of LPS or at the lipid A which have been studied in humans are discussed in this review. Some of these antibodies appeared to be protective in animal models or in clinical trials, but discrepant results have been reported and the mechanism of the postulated protection was not clarified. The polyclonal antibody preparations have given variable results in patients. The clinical studies of anti-lipid A monoclonal antibodies seemed promising because both antibodies appeared to protect subsets of patients. However, the studies gave discrepant results concerning the type of patients reported to benefit from the administration of these antibodies. One of these antibodies, E5, appeared to improve the survival of patients with Gram-negative sepsis provided they were not in shock, but a second trial failed to confirm this. The other antibody, HA-1A, appeared to protect patients with Gram-negative sepsis who were in refractory shock, but only when they were bacteremic. This antibody was recently released on the market in some european countries. However, the FDA agency decided that a confirmatory study should be done before it could consider to approve HA-1A because a careful reanalysis suggested that the observed differences were only of marginal statistical significance. Therefore, this type of treatment has not yet clearly been shown to benefit patients. More studies are needed to delineate the role of core LPS antibodies in the management of Gram-negative sepsis.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pmid>8330909</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0171-2985(11)80357-8</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0171-2985
ispartof Immunobiology (1979), 1993-04, Vol.187 (3-5), p.464-477
issn 0171-2985
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75855909
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animals
Antibodies, Monoclonal - therapeutic use
Bacteremia - therapy
Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - therapy
Humans
Immunotherapy
Lipopolysaccharides - immunology
Toxemia - therapy
title Immunotherapy of endotoxemia and septicemia
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T21%3A16%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Immunotherapy%20of%20endotoxemia%20and%20septicemia&rft.jtitle=Immunobiology%20(1979)&rft.au=Baumgartner,%20J%20D&rft.date=1993-04-01&rft.volume=187&rft.issue=3-5&rft.spage=464&rft.epage=477&rft.pages=464-477&rft.issn=0171-2985&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0171-2985(11)80357-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75855909%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-c83af2b9de22d86d9caae43658f994cd00797745e594cc5ae79deea9b0e856423%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75855909&rft_id=info:pmid/8330909&rfr_iscdi=true