Loading…

Smart Growth and Development Reality: The Difficult Co-ordination of Land Use and Transport Objectives

A supportive distribution of residential density is perceived to be an essential component of strategies aimed at increasing the use of public transit. To alter substantially land use-transport dynamics in a fashion that favours public transit patronage, residential density policies must be deployed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Urban studies (Edinburgh, Scotland) Scotland), 2007-03, Vol.44 (3), p.501-523
Main Authors: Filion, Pierre, McSpurren, Kathleen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-38d0e2695293b9345ff13f4ad764d1cda9504009c8e93ddfa99962b9dbaca42a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-38d0e2695293b9345ff13f4ad764d1cda9504009c8e93ddfa99962b9dbaca42a3
container_end_page 523
container_issue 3
container_start_page 501
container_title Urban studies (Edinburgh, Scotland)
container_volume 44
creator Filion, Pierre
McSpurren, Kathleen
description A supportive distribution of residential density is perceived to be an essential component of strategies aimed at increasing the use of public transit. To alter substantially land use-transport dynamics in a fashion that favours public transit patronage, residential density policies must be deployed over long periods and unfold at local and metropolitan levels simultaneously. The article narrates policies that attempted, since the late 1950s, a juxtaposition of high residential density and quality public transit services in the Toronto metropolitan region. Findings highlight the difficulties of pursuing such policies due to the power of neighbourhoodbased interests, disagreement among jurisdictions within the metropolitan region and changes in priorities and intervention capacity. The article ends with proposals that seek to enhance the possibility of transforming the structure and dynamics of cities in ways that are compatible with smart growth principles.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00420980601176055
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_759311984</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43084356</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1080_00420980601176055</sage_id><sourcerecordid>43084356</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-38d0e2695293b9345ff13f4ad764d1cda9504009c8e93ddfa99962b9dbaca42a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoMouFZ_gBdCQNSraU8mH5vjnWy1CgsF3YJ3QzYfNsvsZE2yLf33nXGLikJ7lYvzvM8h5yXkJYNjBhpOAEQLqEEBY3MFUj4iM8YVNKD498dkNs2bCXhKnpWyAQDVopyR8G1rcqVnOV3XS2oGR0_9le_TbuuHSr9608d6856uLj09jSFEu-8rXaQmZRcHU2MaaAp0OQUviv8lWGUzlF0arefrjbc1XvnynDwJpi_-xd17RC4-fVwtPjfL87Mviw_LxgqNteHagW8Vyhb5GrmQITAehHFzJRyzzqAEAYBWe-TOBYOIql2jWxtrRGv4EXl38O5y-rn3pXbbWKzvezP4tC_dXCJnDLUYybf3koopqZCxB0GuFJNMTODrf8BN2udh_G7HsNVcaIHzkWIHyuZUSvah2-U4dnDTMeimKrv_qhwzb-7MpljTh_HANpY_Qa2VZBxH7vjAFfPD_7X9HvGrQ2BTasq_hYLDeCGp-C1eJ7MQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928348497</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Smart Growth and Development Reality: The Difficult Co-ordination of Land Use and Transport Objectives</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCO_EconLit with Full Text(美国经济学会全文数据库)</source><creator>Filion, Pierre ; McSpurren, Kathleen</creator><creatorcontrib>Filion, Pierre ; McSpurren, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><description>A supportive distribution of residential density is perceived to be an essential component of strategies aimed at increasing the use of public transit. To alter substantially land use-transport dynamics in a fashion that favours public transit patronage, residential density policies must be deployed over long periods and unfold at local and metropolitan levels simultaneously. The article narrates policies that attempted, since the late 1950s, a juxtaposition of high residential density and quality public transit services in the Toronto metropolitan region. Findings highlight the difficulties of pursuing such policies due to the power of neighbourhoodbased interests, disagreement among jurisdictions within the metropolitan region and changes in priorities and intervention capacity. The article ends with proposals that seek to enhance the possibility of transforming the structure and dynamics of cities in ways that are compatible with smart growth principles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-0980</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1360-063X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00420980601176055</identifier><identifier>CODEN: URBSAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Routledge Journal, Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</publisher><subject>Bgi / Prodig ; Canada ; Cities ; City Planning ; Density ; Distribution ; Economic Development ; Housing ; Human geography ; Intervention ; Land Use ; Metropolitan Areas ; Neighborhoods ; Ontario ; Ordination ; Patronage ; Policies ; Power ; Priorities ; Public infrastructure ; Public lands ; Public Services ; Public transport ; Public Transportation ; Rail transit ; Residential density ; Smart growth ; Suburban density ; Suburbs ; Subway systems ; Toronto, Ontario ; Transport policy ; Transportation ; Urban areas ; Urban economics. Equipment. Transportation ; Urban geography ; Urban growth ; Urban planning ; Urban population ; Urban transport</subject><ispartof>Urban studies (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2007-03, Vol.44 (3), p.501-523</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2007 The Editors of Urban Studies</rights><rights>Tous droits réservés © Prodig - Bibliographie Géographique Internationale (BGI), 2007</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Mar 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-38d0e2695293b9345ff13f4ad764d1cda9504009c8e93ddfa99962b9dbaca42a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-38d0e2695293b9345ff13f4ad764d1cda9504009c8e93ddfa99962b9dbaca42a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43084356$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43084356$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,33223,33224,33774,33775,58238,58471,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18865139$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Filion, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McSpurren, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><title>Smart Growth and Development Reality: The Difficult Co-ordination of Land Use and Transport Objectives</title><title>Urban studies (Edinburgh, Scotland)</title><description>A supportive distribution of residential density is perceived to be an essential component of strategies aimed at increasing the use of public transit. To alter substantially land use-transport dynamics in a fashion that favours public transit patronage, residential density policies must be deployed over long periods and unfold at local and metropolitan levels simultaneously. The article narrates policies that attempted, since the late 1950s, a juxtaposition of high residential density and quality public transit services in the Toronto metropolitan region. Findings highlight the difficulties of pursuing such policies due to the power of neighbourhoodbased interests, disagreement among jurisdictions within the metropolitan region and changes in priorities and intervention capacity. The article ends with proposals that seek to enhance the possibility of transforming the structure and dynamics of cities in ways that are compatible with smart growth principles.</description><subject>Bgi / Prodig</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>City Planning</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Economic Development</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Human geography</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Land Use</subject><subject>Metropolitan Areas</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>Ontario</subject><subject>Ordination</subject><subject>Patronage</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Priorities</subject><subject>Public infrastructure</subject><subject>Public lands</subject><subject>Public Services</subject><subject>Public transport</subject><subject>Public Transportation</subject><subject>Rail transit</subject><subject>Residential density</subject><subject>Smart growth</subject><subject>Suburban density</subject><subject>Suburbs</subject><subject>Subway systems</subject><subject>Toronto, Ontario</subject><subject>Transport policy</subject><subject>Transportation</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban economics. Equipment. Transportation</subject><subject>Urban geography</subject><subject>Urban growth</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><subject>Urban population</subject><subject>Urban transport</subject><issn>0042-0980</issn><issn>1360-063X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoMouFZ_gBdCQNSraU8mH5vjnWy1CgsF3YJ3QzYfNsvsZE2yLf33nXGLikJ7lYvzvM8h5yXkJYNjBhpOAEQLqEEBY3MFUj4iM8YVNKD498dkNs2bCXhKnpWyAQDVopyR8G1rcqVnOV3XS2oGR0_9le_TbuuHSr9608d6856uLj09jSFEu-8rXaQmZRcHU2MaaAp0OQUviv8lWGUzlF0arefrjbc1XvnynDwJpi_-xd17RC4-fVwtPjfL87Mviw_LxgqNteHagW8Vyhb5GrmQITAehHFzJRyzzqAEAYBWe-TOBYOIql2jWxtrRGv4EXl38O5y-rn3pXbbWKzvezP4tC_dXCJnDLUYybf3koopqZCxB0GuFJNMTODrf8BN2udh_G7HsNVcaIHzkWIHyuZUSvah2-U4dnDTMeimKrv_qhwzb-7MpljTh_HANpY_Qa2VZBxH7vjAFfPD_7X9HvGrQ2BTasq_hYLDeCGp-C1eJ7MQ</recordid><startdate>20070301</startdate><enddate>20070301</enddate><creator>Filion, Pierre</creator><creator>McSpurren, Kathleen</creator><general>Routledge Journal, Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Longman Group</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070301</creationdate><title>Smart Growth and Development Reality: The Difficult Co-ordination of Land Use and Transport Objectives</title><author>Filion, Pierre ; McSpurren, Kathleen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-38d0e2695293b9345ff13f4ad764d1cda9504009c8e93ddfa99962b9dbaca42a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Bgi / Prodig</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>City Planning</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Economic Development</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Human geography</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Land Use</topic><topic>Metropolitan Areas</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>Ontario</topic><topic>Ordination</topic><topic>Patronage</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Priorities</topic><topic>Public infrastructure</topic><topic>Public lands</topic><topic>Public Services</topic><topic>Public transport</topic><topic>Public Transportation</topic><topic>Rail transit</topic><topic>Residential density</topic><topic>Smart growth</topic><topic>Suburban density</topic><topic>Suburbs</topic><topic>Subway systems</topic><topic>Toronto, Ontario</topic><topic>Transport policy</topic><topic>Transportation</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban economics. Equipment. Transportation</topic><topic>Urban geography</topic><topic>Urban growth</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><topic>Urban population</topic><topic>Urban transport</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Filion, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McSpurren, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Urban studies (Edinburgh, Scotland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Filion, Pierre</au><au>McSpurren, Kathleen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Smart Growth and Development Reality: The Difficult Co-ordination of Land Use and Transport Objectives</atitle><jtitle>Urban studies (Edinburgh, Scotland)</jtitle><date>2007-03-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>501</spage><epage>523</epage><pages>501-523</pages><issn>0042-0980</issn><eissn>1360-063X</eissn><coden>URBSAQ</coden><abstract>A supportive distribution of residential density is perceived to be an essential component of strategies aimed at increasing the use of public transit. To alter substantially land use-transport dynamics in a fashion that favours public transit patronage, residential density policies must be deployed over long periods and unfold at local and metropolitan levels simultaneously. The article narrates policies that attempted, since the late 1950s, a juxtaposition of high residential density and quality public transit services in the Toronto metropolitan region. Findings highlight the difficulties of pursuing such policies due to the power of neighbourhoodbased interests, disagreement among jurisdictions within the metropolitan region and changes in priorities and intervention capacity. The article ends with proposals that seek to enhance the possibility of transforming the structure and dynamics of cities in ways that are compatible with smart growth principles.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Routledge Journal, Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</pub><doi>10.1080/00420980601176055</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0042-0980
ispartof Urban studies (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2007-03, Vol.44 (3), p.501-523
issn 0042-0980
1360-063X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_759311984
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; PAIS Index; Sage Journals Online; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCO_EconLit with Full Text(美国经济学会全文数据库)
subjects Bgi / Prodig
Canada
Cities
City Planning
Density
Distribution
Economic Development
Housing
Human geography
Intervention
Land Use
Metropolitan Areas
Neighborhoods
Ontario
Ordination
Patronage
Policies
Power
Priorities
Public infrastructure
Public lands
Public Services
Public transport
Public Transportation
Rail transit
Residential density
Smart growth
Suburban density
Suburbs
Subway systems
Toronto, Ontario
Transport policy
Transportation
Urban areas
Urban economics. Equipment. Transportation
Urban geography
Urban growth
Urban planning
Urban population
Urban transport
title Smart Growth and Development Reality: The Difficult Co-ordination of Land Use and Transport Objectives
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A35%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Smart%20Growth%20and%20Development%20Reality:%20The%20Difficult%20Co-ordination%20of%20Land%20Use%20and%20Transport%20Objectives&rft.jtitle=Urban%20studies%20(Edinburgh,%20Scotland)&rft.au=Filion,%20Pierre&rft.date=2007-03-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=501&rft.epage=523&rft.pages=501-523&rft.issn=0042-0980&rft.eissn=1360-063X&rft.coden=URBSAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00420980601176055&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43084356%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-38d0e2695293b9345ff13f4ad764d1cda9504009c8e93ddfa99962b9dbaca42a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928348497&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43084356&rft_sage_id=10.1080_00420980601176055&rfr_iscdi=true