Loading…
Flow cytometry versus urinary cytology in the diagnosis and follow-up of bladder tumors: critical review of a 5-year experience
The authors report the results of a 5-year experience with flow cytometry (FCM) in the diagnosis and evaluation of bladder tumors. FCM was applied to 400 patients (225 without a urinary tumor and 175 with a past or recent bladder tumor). For the patients without a tumor, bladder-irrigation-fluid FCM...
Saved in:
Published in: | World journal of urology 1993-08, Vol.11 (3), p.156-160 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-32e755eccdafe17439f23bbdee2126c3786a5c456ab7abbf4f819e82c00941d83 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 160 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 156 |
container_title | World journal of urology |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | BILLEREY, C LAMY, B BITTARD, H ROZAN, S CARBILLET, J. P |
description | The authors report the results of a 5-year experience with flow cytometry (FCM) in the diagnosis and evaluation of bladder tumors. FCM was applied to 400 patients (225 without a urinary tumor and 175 with a past or recent bladder tumor). For the patients without a tumor, bladder-irrigation-fluid FCM was positive in 22% of samples vs 1% of those tested with conventional cytology. The high rate of false-positive results may have been due to an imperfect quality of the samples, to the staining procedure and to the high amount of squamous cells. For 72 selected tumors in which the bladder washing was performed under specific requirements, the detection rate of FCM was lower than that of conventional cytology, including G1-grade tumors. A comparison between bladder-irrigation-fluid FCM and disaggregated-biopsy FCM revealed a 22% rate of discordant results. From these data it does not seem desirable tu use bladder-irrigation FCM instead of conventional cytology in routine urologic examinations. The use of this technique must be more selective in bladder tumor evaluation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF00211411 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75981110</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>75981110</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-32e755eccdafe17439f23bbdee2126c3786a5c456ab7abbf4f819e82c00941d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkDFPwzAQhS0EKqWwsCN5QAxIAV_sxAkbVBSQKrHAHDnOGYySuNhJSyf-Oqlalel0et97w0fIObAbYEzePswYiwEEwAEZg-A8ymScHpIxk7GIRJ7xY3ISwhdjIFOWjMgoEwxSLsbkd1a7FdXrzjXY-TVdog99oL23rRreTVC7jzW1Le0-kVZWfbQu2EBVW1Hj6qEd9QvqDC1rVVXoadc3zoc7qr3trFY19bi0uNogiibRGpWn-LNAb7HVeEqOjKoDnu3uhLzPHt-mz9H89ellej-PNAfoIh6jTBLUulIGQQqem5iXZYUYQ5xqLrNUJVokqSqlKksjTAY5ZrFmLBdQZXxCrra7C---ewxd0digsa5Vi64PhUzyDADYAF5vQe1dCB5NsfC2GVwUwIqN7eLf9gBf7Fb7ssFqj-70DvnlLldhUGG8arUNe4zLdBjJ-R-W7Yhs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75981110</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Flow cytometry versus urinary cytology in the diagnosis and follow-up of bladder tumors: critical review of a 5-year experience</title><source>Springer Nature - Connect here FIRST to enable access</source><creator>BILLEREY, C ; LAMY, B ; BITTARD, H ; ROZAN, S ; CARBILLET, J. P</creator><creatorcontrib>BILLEREY, C ; LAMY, B ; BITTARD, H ; ROZAN, S ; CARBILLET, J. P</creatorcontrib><description>The authors report the results of a 5-year experience with flow cytometry (FCM) in the diagnosis and evaluation of bladder tumors. FCM was applied to 400 patients (225 without a urinary tumor and 175 with a past or recent bladder tumor). For the patients without a tumor, bladder-irrigation-fluid FCM was positive in 22% of samples vs 1% of those tested with conventional cytology. The high rate of false-positive results may have been due to an imperfect quality of the samples, to the staining procedure and to the high amount of squamous cells. For 72 selected tumors in which the bladder washing was performed under specific requirements, the detection rate of FCM was lower than that of conventional cytology, including G1-grade tumors. A comparison between bladder-irrigation-fluid FCM and disaggregated-biopsy FCM revealed a 22% rate of discordant results. From these data it does not seem desirable tu use bladder-irrigation FCM instead of conventional cytology in routine urologic examinations. The use of this technique must be more selective in bladder tumor evaluation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0724-4983</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-8726</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00211411</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8401634</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WJURDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aneuploidy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - diagnosis ; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - epidemiology ; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - genetics ; DNA, Neoplasm - analysis ; False Positive Reactions ; Female ; Flow Cytometry ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; Therapeutic Irrigation ; Tumors of the urinary system ; Urinary Bladder - pathology ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - genetics ; Urinary tract. Prostate gland ; Urine - cytology</subject><ispartof>World journal of urology, 1993-08, Vol.11 (3), p.156-160</ispartof><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-32e755eccdafe17439f23bbdee2126c3786a5c456ab7abbf4f819e82c00941d83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3761139$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8401634$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BILLEREY, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAMY, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BITTARD, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROZAN, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CARBILLET, J. P</creatorcontrib><title>Flow cytometry versus urinary cytology in the diagnosis and follow-up of bladder tumors: critical review of a 5-year experience</title><title>World journal of urology</title><addtitle>World J Urol</addtitle><description>The authors report the results of a 5-year experience with flow cytometry (FCM) in the diagnosis and evaluation of bladder tumors. FCM was applied to 400 patients (225 without a urinary tumor and 175 with a past or recent bladder tumor). For the patients without a tumor, bladder-irrigation-fluid FCM was positive in 22% of samples vs 1% of those tested with conventional cytology. The high rate of false-positive results may have been due to an imperfect quality of the samples, to the staining procedure and to the high amount of squamous cells. For 72 selected tumors in which the bladder washing was performed under specific requirements, the detection rate of FCM was lower than that of conventional cytology, including G1-grade tumors. A comparison between bladder-irrigation-fluid FCM and disaggregated-biopsy FCM revealed a 22% rate of discordant results. From these data it does not seem desirable tu use bladder-irrigation FCM instead of conventional cytology in routine urologic examinations. The use of this technique must be more selective in bladder tumor evaluation.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aneuploidy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - epidemiology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - genetics</subject><subject>DNA, Neoplasm - analysis</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Therapeutic Irrigation</subject><subject>Tumors of the urinary system</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder - pathology</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Urinary tract. Prostate gland</subject><subject>Urine - cytology</subject><issn>0724-4983</issn><issn>1433-8726</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkDFPwzAQhS0EKqWwsCN5QAxIAV_sxAkbVBSQKrHAHDnOGYySuNhJSyf-Oqlalel0et97w0fIObAbYEzePswYiwEEwAEZg-A8ymScHpIxk7GIRJ7xY3ISwhdjIFOWjMgoEwxSLsbkd1a7FdXrzjXY-TVdog99oL23rRreTVC7jzW1Le0-kVZWfbQu2EBVW1Hj6qEd9QvqDC1rVVXoadc3zoc7qr3trFY19bi0uNogiibRGpWn-LNAb7HVeEqOjKoDnu3uhLzPHt-mz9H89ellej-PNAfoIh6jTBLUulIGQQqem5iXZYUYQ5xqLrNUJVokqSqlKksjTAY5ZrFmLBdQZXxCrra7C---ewxd0digsa5Vi64PhUzyDADYAF5vQe1dCB5NsfC2GVwUwIqN7eLf9gBf7Fb7ssFqj-70DvnlLldhUGG8arUNe4zLdBjJ-R-W7Yhs</recordid><startdate>19930801</startdate><enddate>19930801</enddate><creator>BILLEREY, C</creator><creator>LAMY, B</creator><creator>BITTARD, H</creator><creator>ROZAN, S</creator><creator>CARBILLET, J. P</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930801</creationdate><title>Flow cytometry versus urinary cytology in the diagnosis and follow-up of bladder tumors: critical review of a 5-year experience</title><author>BILLEREY, C ; LAMY, B ; BITTARD, H ; ROZAN, S ; CARBILLET, J. P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-32e755eccdafe17439f23bbdee2126c3786a5c456ab7abbf4f819e82c00941d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aneuploidy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - epidemiology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - genetics</topic><topic>DNA, Neoplasm - analysis</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Therapeutic Irrigation</topic><topic>Tumors of the urinary system</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder - pathology</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Urinary tract. Prostate gland</topic><topic>Urine - cytology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BILLEREY, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAMY, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BITTARD, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROZAN, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CARBILLET, J. P</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World journal of urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BILLEREY, C</au><au>LAMY, B</au><au>BITTARD, H</au><au>ROZAN, S</au><au>CARBILLET, J. P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Flow cytometry versus urinary cytology in the diagnosis and follow-up of bladder tumors: critical review of a 5-year experience</atitle><jtitle>World journal of urology</jtitle><addtitle>World J Urol</addtitle><date>1993-08-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>156</spage><epage>160</epage><pages>156-160</pages><issn>0724-4983</issn><eissn>1433-8726</eissn><coden>WJURDJ</coden><abstract>The authors report the results of a 5-year experience with flow cytometry (FCM) in the diagnosis and evaluation of bladder tumors. FCM was applied to 400 patients (225 without a urinary tumor and 175 with a past or recent bladder tumor). For the patients without a tumor, bladder-irrigation-fluid FCM was positive in 22% of samples vs 1% of those tested with conventional cytology. The high rate of false-positive results may have been due to an imperfect quality of the samples, to the staining procedure and to the high amount of squamous cells. For 72 selected tumors in which the bladder washing was performed under specific requirements, the detection rate of FCM was lower than that of conventional cytology, including G1-grade tumors. A comparison between bladder-irrigation-fluid FCM and disaggregated-biopsy FCM revealed a 22% rate of discordant results. From these data it does not seem desirable tu use bladder-irrigation FCM instead of conventional cytology in routine urologic examinations. The use of this technique must be more selective in bladder tumor evaluation.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><cop>Berlin</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>8401634</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF00211411</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0724-4983 |
ispartof | World journal of urology, 1993-08, Vol.11 (3), p.156-160 |
issn | 0724-4983 1433-8726 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75981110 |
source | Springer Nature - Connect here FIRST to enable access |
subjects | Aged Aneuploidy Biological and medical sciences Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - diagnosis Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - epidemiology Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - genetics DNA, Neoplasm - analysis False Positive Reactions Female Flow Cytometry Follow-Up Studies Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases Therapeutic Irrigation Tumors of the urinary system Urinary Bladder - pathology Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - diagnosis Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - epidemiology Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - genetics Urinary tract. Prostate gland Urine - cytology |
title | Flow cytometry versus urinary cytology in the diagnosis and follow-up of bladder tumors: critical review of a 5-year experience |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T11%3A37%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Flow%20cytometry%20versus%20urinary%20cytology%20in%20the%20diagnosis%20and%20follow-up%20of%20bladder%20tumors:%20critical%20review%20of%20a%205-year%20experience&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20urology&rft.au=BILLEREY,%20C&rft.date=1993-08-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=156&rft.epage=160&rft.pages=156-160&rft.issn=0724-4983&rft.eissn=1433-8726&rft.coden=WJURDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00211411&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75981110%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-32e755eccdafe17439f23bbdee2126c3786a5c456ab7abbf4f819e82c00941d83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75981110&rft_id=info:pmid/8401634&rfr_iscdi=true |