Loading…

Flow cytometry versus urinary cytology in the diagnosis and follow-up of bladder tumors: critical review of a 5-year experience

The authors report the results of a 5-year experience with flow cytometry (FCM) in the diagnosis and evaluation of bladder tumors. FCM was applied to 400 patients (225 without a urinary tumor and 175 with a past or recent bladder tumor). For the patients without a tumor, bladder-irrigation-fluid FCM...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:World journal of urology 1993-08, Vol.11 (3), p.156-160
Main Authors: BILLEREY, C, LAMY, B, BITTARD, H, ROZAN, S, CARBILLET, J. P
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-32e755eccdafe17439f23bbdee2126c3786a5c456ab7abbf4f819e82c00941d83
cites
container_end_page 160
container_issue 3
container_start_page 156
container_title World journal of urology
container_volume 11
creator BILLEREY, C
LAMY, B
BITTARD, H
ROZAN, S
CARBILLET, J. P
description The authors report the results of a 5-year experience with flow cytometry (FCM) in the diagnosis and evaluation of bladder tumors. FCM was applied to 400 patients (225 without a urinary tumor and 175 with a past or recent bladder tumor). For the patients without a tumor, bladder-irrigation-fluid FCM was positive in 22% of samples vs 1% of those tested with conventional cytology. The high rate of false-positive results may have been due to an imperfect quality of the samples, to the staining procedure and to the high amount of squamous cells. For 72 selected tumors in which the bladder washing was performed under specific requirements, the detection rate of FCM was lower than that of conventional cytology, including G1-grade tumors. A comparison between bladder-irrigation-fluid FCM and disaggregated-biopsy FCM revealed a 22% rate of discordant results. From these data it does not seem desirable tu use bladder-irrigation FCM instead of conventional cytology in routine urologic examinations. The use of this technique must be more selective in bladder tumor evaluation.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF00211411
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75981110</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>75981110</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-32e755eccdafe17439f23bbdee2126c3786a5c456ab7abbf4f819e82c00941d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkDFPwzAQhS0EKqWwsCN5QAxIAV_sxAkbVBSQKrHAHDnOGYySuNhJSyf-Oqlalel0et97w0fIObAbYEzePswYiwEEwAEZg-A8ymScHpIxk7GIRJ7xY3ISwhdjIFOWjMgoEwxSLsbkd1a7FdXrzjXY-TVdog99oL23rRreTVC7jzW1Le0-kVZWfbQu2EBVW1Hj6qEd9QvqDC1rVVXoadc3zoc7qr3trFY19bi0uNogiibRGpWn-LNAb7HVeEqOjKoDnu3uhLzPHt-mz9H89ellej-PNAfoIh6jTBLUulIGQQqem5iXZYUYQ5xqLrNUJVokqSqlKksjTAY5ZrFmLBdQZXxCrra7C---ewxd0digsa5Vi64PhUzyDADYAF5vQe1dCB5NsfC2GVwUwIqN7eLf9gBf7Fb7ssFqj-70DvnlLldhUGG8arUNe4zLdBjJ-R-W7Yhs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75981110</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Flow cytometry versus urinary cytology in the diagnosis and follow-up of bladder tumors: critical review of a 5-year experience</title><source>Springer Nature - Connect here FIRST to enable access</source><creator>BILLEREY, C ; LAMY, B ; BITTARD, H ; ROZAN, S ; CARBILLET, J. P</creator><creatorcontrib>BILLEREY, C ; LAMY, B ; BITTARD, H ; ROZAN, S ; CARBILLET, J. P</creatorcontrib><description>The authors report the results of a 5-year experience with flow cytometry (FCM) in the diagnosis and evaluation of bladder tumors. FCM was applied to 400 patients (225 without a urinary tumor and 175 with a past or recent bladder tumor). For the patients without a tumor, bladder-irrigation-fluid FCM was positive in 22% of samples vs 1% of those tested with conventional cytology. The high rate of false-positive results may have been due to an imperfect quality of the samples, to the staining procedure and to the high amount of squamous cells. For 72 selected tumors in which the bladder washing was performed under specific requirements, the detection rate of FCM was lower than that of conventional cytology, including G1-grade tumors. A comparison between bladder-irrigation-fluid FCM and disaggregated-biopsy FCM revealed a 22% rate of discordant results. From these data it does not seem desirable tu use bladder-irrigation FCM instead of conventional cytology in routine urologic examinations. The use of this technique must be more selective in bladder tumor evaluation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0724-4983</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-8726</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00211411</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8401634</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WJURDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aneuploidy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - diagnosis ; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - epidemiology ; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - genetics ; DNA, Neoplasm - analysis ; False Positive Reactions ; Female ; Flow Cytometry ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; Therapeutic Irrigation ; Tumors of the urinary system ; Urinary Bladder - pathology ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - genetics ; Urinary tract. Prostate gland ; Urine - cytology</subject><ispartof>World journal of urology, 1993-08, Vol.11 (3), p.156-160</ispartof><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-32e755eccdafe17439f23bbdee2126c3786a5c456ab7abbf4f819e82c00941d83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3761139$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8401634$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BILLEREY, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAMY, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BITTARD, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROZAN, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CARBILLET, J. P</creatorcontrib><title>Flow cytometry versus urinary cytology in the diagnosis and follow-up of bladder tumors: critical review of a 5-year experience</title><title>World journal of urology</title><addtitle>World J Urol</addtitle><description>The authors report the results of a 5-year experience with flow cytometry (FCM) in the diagnosis and evaluation of bladder tumors. FCM was applied to 400 patients (225 without a urinary tumor and 175 with a past or recent bladder tumor). For the patients without a tumor, bladder-irrigation-fluid FCM was positive in 22% of samples vs 1% of those tested with conventional cytology. The high rate of false-positive results may have been due to an imperfect quality of the samples, to the staining procedure and to the high amount of squamous cells. For 72 selected tumors in which the bladder washing was performed under specific requirements, the detection rate of FCM was lower than that of conventional cytology, including G1-grade tumors. A comparison between bladder-irrigation-fluid FCM and disaggregated-biopsy FCM revealed a 22% rate of discordant results. From these data it does not seem desirable tu use bladder-irrigation FCM instead of conventional cytology in routine urologic examinations. The use of this technique must be more selective in bladder tumor evaluation.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aneuploidy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - epidemiology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - genetics</subject><subject>DNA, Neoplasm - analysis</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Therapeutic Irrigation</subject><subject>Tumors of the urinary system</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder - pathology</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Urinary tract. Prostate gland</subject><subject>Urine - cytology</subject><issn>0724-4983</issn><issn>1433-8726</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkDFPwzAQhS0EKqWwsCN5QAxIAV_sxAkbVBSQKrHAHDnOGYySuNhJSyf-Oqlalel0et97w0fIObAbYEzePswYiwEEwAEZg-A8ymScHpIxk7GIRJ7xY3ISwhdjIFOWjMgoEwxSLsbkd1a7FdXrzjXY-TVdog99oL23rRreTVC7jzW1Le0-kVZWfbQu2EBVW1Hj6qEd9QvqDC1rVVXoadc3zoc7qr3trFY19bi0uNogiibRGpWn-LNAb7HVeEqOjKoDnu3uhLzPHt-mz9H89ellej-PNAfoIh6jTBLUulIGQQqem5iXZYUYQ5xqLrNUJVokqSqlKksjTAY5ZrFmLBdQZXxCrra7C---ewxd0digsa5Vi64PhUzyDADYAF5vQe1dCB5NsfC2GVwUwIqN7eLf9gBf7Fb7ssFqj-70DvnlLldhUGG8arUNe4zLdBjJ-R-W7Yhs</recordid><startdate>19930801</startdate><enddate>19930801</enddate><creator>BILLEREY, C</creator><creator>LAMY, B</creator><creator>BITTARD, H</creator><creator>ROZAN, S</creator><creator>CARBILLET, J. P</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930801</creationdate><title>Flow cytometry versus urinary cytology in the diagnosis and follow-up of bladder tumors: critical review of a 5-year experience</title><author>BILLEREY, C ; LAMY, B ; BITTARD, H ; ROZAN, S ; CARBILLET, J. P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-32e755eccdafe17439f23bbdee2126c3786a5c456ab7abbf4f819e82c00941d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aneuploidy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - epidemiology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - genetics</topic><topic>DNA, Neoplasm - analysis</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Therapeutic Irrigation</topic><topic>Tumors of the urinary system</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder - pathology</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Urinary tract. Prostate gland</topic><topic>Urine - cytology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BILLEREY, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAMY, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BITTARD, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROZAN, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CARBILLET, J. P</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World journal of urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BILLEREY, C</au><au>LAMY, B</au><au>BITTARD, H</au><au>ROZAN, S</au><au>CARBILLET, J. P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Flow cytometry versus urinary cytology in the diagnosis and follow-up of bladder tumors: critical review of a 5-year experience</atitle><jtitle>World journal of urology</jtitle><addtitle>World J Urol</addtitle><date>1993-08-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>156</spage><epage>160</epage><pages>156-160</pages><issn>0724-4983</issn><eissn>1433-8726</eissn><coden>WJURDJ</coden><abstract>The authors report the results of a 5-year experience with flow cytometry (FCM) in the diagnosis and evaluation of bladder tumors. FCM was applied to 400 patients (225 without a urinary tumor and 175 with a past or recent bladder tumor). For the patients without a tumor, bladder-irrigation-fluid FCM was positive in 22% of samples vs 1% of those tested with conventional cytology. The high rate of false-positive results may have been due to an imperfect quality of the samples, to the staining procedure and to the high amount of squamous cells. For 72 selected tumors in which the bladder washing was performed under specific requirements, the detection rate of FCM was lower than that of conventional cytology, including G1-grade tumors. A comparison between bladder-irrigation-fluid FCM and disaggregated-biopsy FCM revealed a 22% rate of discordant results. From these data it does not seem desirable tu use bladder-irrigation FCM instead of conventional cytology in routine urologic examinations. The use of this technique must be more selective in bladder tumor evaluation.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><cop>Berlin</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>8401634</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF00211411</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0724-4983
ispartof World journal of urology, 1993-08, Vol.11 (3), p.156-160
issn 0724-4983
1433-8726
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75981110
source Springer Nature - Connect here FIRST to enable access
subjects Aged
Aneuploidy
Biological and medical sciences
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - diagnosis
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - epidemiology
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - genetics
DNA, Neoplasm - analysis
False Positive Reactions
Female
Flow Cytometry
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases
Therapeutic Irrigation
Tumors of the urinary system
Urinary Bladder - pathology
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - diagnosis
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - epidemiology
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - genetics
Urinary tract. Prostate gland
Urine - cytology
title Flow cytometry versus urinary cytology in the diagnosis and follow-up of bladder tumors: critical review of a 5-year experience
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T11%3A37%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Flow%20cytometry%20versus%20urinary%20cytology%20in%20the%20diagnosis%20and%20follow-up%20of%20bladder%20tumors:%20critical%20review%20of%20a%205-year%20experience&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20urology&rft.au=BILLEREY,%20C&rft.date=1993-08-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=156&rft.epage=160&rft.pages=156-160&rft.issn=0724-4983&rft.eissn=1433-8726&rft.coden=WJURDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00211411&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75981110%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-32e755eccdafe17439f23bbdee2126c3786a5c456ab7abbf4f819e82c00941d83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75981110&rft_id=info:pmid/8401634&rfr_iscdi=true