Loading…
Safety and efficacy of two manual toothbrushes
To cite this article: Int J Dent Hygiene 8, 2010; 280–285 DOI: 10.1111/j.1601‐5037.2010.00475.x Rosema NAM, Timmerman MF, Versteeg PA, van Palenstein Helderman WH, van der Velden U, van der Weijden GA. Safety and efficacy of two manual toothbrushes. : Objective: The purpose of this study was to...
Saved in:
| Published in: | International journal of dental hygiene 2010-11, Vol.8 (4), p.280-285 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4625-2fbae8fc8daadd7ef2ada8ae0b9919394583ff044f2ef15dcfeba00f9272a70f3 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4625-2fbae8fc8daadd7ef2ada8ae0b9919394583ff044f2ef15dcfeba00f9272a70f3 |
| container_end_page | 285 |
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 280 |
| container_title | International journal of dental hygiene |
| container_volume | 8 |
| creator | Rosema, NAM Timmerman, MF Versteeg, PA Van Palenstein Helderman, WH Van Der Velden, U Van Der Weijden, GA |
| description | To cite this article:
Int J Dent Hygiene 8, 2010; 280–285
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601‐5037.2010.00475.x
Rosema NAM, Timmerman MF, Versteeg PA, van Palenstein Helderman WH, van der Velden U, van der Weijden GA. Safety and efficacy of two manual toothbrushes.
: Objective: The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy and safety of a newly designed multi‐level manual toothbrush (Profit‐Haije‐Brush) compared with a control flat‐trimmed manual reference toothbrush from the American Dental Association (ADA).
Material and methods: For this study, 36 healthy subjects without previous experience in the use of the Profit‐Haije‐Brush (PHB) were selected. Subjects were given a period of 2 weeks to become familiar with both types of brushes and were instructed to use them on alternate days for 2 min twice daily. Prior to their visit, subjects refrained from all oral hygiene procedures for 48 h. Prebrushing plaque and gingival abrasion scores were assessed. Subsequently, two randomly chosen contra‐lateral quadrants were brushed with one of both brushes and the other two quadrants with the alternate brush. Subjects were supervised during their 2‐min brushing exercise. After brushing, plaque and gingival abrasion were re‐assessed. A questionnaire was filled out to investigate the subjects’ attitudes towards both brushes.
Results: The overall mean prebrushing PI was 2.47 for the PHB and 2.44 for the ADA. The reduction in PI was 1.32 and 1.23 respectively (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2010.00475.x |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_759874744</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>759874744</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4625-2fbae8fc8daadd7ef2ada8ae0b9919394583ff044f2ef15dcfeba00f9272a70f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkNFO2zAUhi00BIXtFaZo0sRVgmM7cSztZivQIiGQBmiX1onjI9KlSWcnon17HFo6iSvsCx_Z3390_BESpTRJwzpfJGlO0zijXCaMhltKhcyS9QGZ7B8-7WumjsmJ9wtKWdjZETlmVOUpL8SEJPeAtt9E0FaRRawNmE3UYdQ_d9ES2gGaqO-6_ql0g3-y_jM5RGi8_bI7T8nj1eXDdB7f3M2upz9vYiNylsUMS7AFmqICqCppkUEFBVhaKpUqrkRWcEQqBDKLaVYZtCVQiopJBpIiPyVn274r1_0brO_1svbGNg20thu8lpkqpJBCBPLbO3LRDa4Nw2kZ_qhyLlSAii1kXOe9s6hXrl6C2-iU6tGoXuhRlh7F6dGofjWq1yH6ddd_KJe22gffFAbg-w4Ab6BBB62p_X-Oc8oKOc7wY8s9143dfHgAfX0xD0WIx9t47Xu73sfB_dW55IH8czvTTPBfD3LK9W_-ArEOnw8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>761396349</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety and efficacy of two manual toothbrushes</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Rosema, NAM ; Timmerman, MF ; Versteeg, PA ; Van Palenstein Helderman, WH ; Van Der Velden, U ; Van Der Weijden, GA</creator><creatorcontrib>Rosema, NAM ; Timmerman, MF ; Versteeg, PA ; Van Palenstein Helderman, WH ; Van Der Velden, U ; Van Der Weijden, GA</creatorcontrib><description>To cite this article:
Int J Dent Hygiene 8, 2010; 280–285
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601‐5037.2010.00475.x
Rosema NAM, Timmerman MF, Versteeg PA, van Palenstein Helderman WH, van der Velden U, van der Weijden GA. Safety and efficacy of two manual toothbrushes.
: Objective: The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy and safety of a newly designed multi‐level manual toothbrush (Profit‐Haije‐Brush) compared with a control flat‐trimmed manual reference toothbrush from the American Dental Association (ADA).
Material and methods: For this study, 36 healthy subjects without previous experience in the use of the Profit‐Haije‐Brush (PHB) were selected. Subjects were given a period of 2 weeks to become familiar with both types of brushes and were instructed to use them on alternate days for 2 min twice daily. Prior to their visit, subjects refrained from all oral hygiene procedures for 48 h. Prebrushing plaque and gingival abrasion scores were assessed. Subsequently, two randomly chosen contra‐lateral quadrants were brushed with one of both brushes and the other two quadrants with the alternate brush. Subjects were supervised during their 2‐min brushing exercise. After brushing, plaque and gingival abrasion were re‐assessed. A questionnaire was filled out to investigate the subjects’ attitudes towards both brushes.
Results: The overall mean prebrushing PI was 2.47 for the PHB and 2.44 for the ADA. The reduction in PI was 1.32 and 1.23 respectively (P < 0.05). With regard to gingival abrasion the overall mean prebrushing scores were 4.57 (PHB) and 5.34 (ADA). Post‐brushing scores were 13.49 and 13.77 for the PHB and ADA respectively.
Conclusion: Statistically, the multi‐level PHB was significantly more efficacious than the flat‐trimmed ADA. However, the difference is clinically considered small and the amount of remaining plaque was not significantly different between brushes. No greater potential to cause gingival abrasion to the oral tissues was observed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1601-5029</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1601-5037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2010.00475.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20961384</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Comparative studies ; Dental Devices, Home Care ; Dental Plaque - prevention & control ; Dental Plaque Index ; Dental research ; Dentistry ; Equipment Design ; Equipment Safety ; Facial bones, jaws, teeth, parodontium: diseases, semeiology ; Female ; gingival abrasion ; Humans ; Innovations ; Male ; Matched-Pair Analysis ; Medical sciences ; multi-level ; Non tumoral diseases ; Oral hygiene ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; plaque ; Single-Blind Method ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; toothbrush ; Toothbrushing - instrumentation</subject><ispartof>International journal of dental hygiene, 2010-11, Vol.8 (4), p.280-285</ispartof><rights>2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4625-2fbae8fc8daadd7ef2ada8ae0b9919394583ff044f2ef15dcfeba00f9272a70f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4625-2fbae8fc8daadd7ef2ada8ae0b9919394583ff044f2ef15dcfeba00f9272a70f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23302879$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20961384$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rosema, NAM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timmerman, MF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Versteeg, PA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Palenstein Helderman, WH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Der Velden, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Der Weijden, GA</creatorcontrib><title>Safety and efficacy of two manual toothbrushes</title><title>International journal of dental hygiene</title><addtitle>Int J Dent Hyg</addtitle><description>To cite this article:
Int J Dent Hygiene 8, 2010; 280–285
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601‐5037.2010.00475.x
Rosema NAM, Timmerman MF, Versteeg PA, van Palenstein Helderman WH, van der Velden U, van der Weijden GA. Safety and efficacy of two manual toothbrushes.
: Objective: The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy and safety of a newly designed multi‐level manual toothbrush (Profit‐Haije‐Brush) compared with a control flat‐trimmed manual reference toothbrush from the American Dental Association (ADA).
Material and methods: For this study, 36 healthy subjects without previous experience in the use of the Profit‐Haije‐Brush (PHB) were selected. Subjects were given a period of 2 weeks to become familiar with both types of brushes and were instructed to use them on alternate days for 2 min twice daily. Prior to their visit, subjects refrained from all oral hygiene procedures for 48 h. Prebrushing plaque and gingival abrasion scores were assessed. Subsequently, two randomly chosen contra‐lateral quadrants were brushed with one of both brushes and the other two quadrants with the alternate brush. Subjects were supervised during their 2‐min brushing exercise. After brushing, plaque and gingival abrasion were re‐assessed. A questionnaire was filled out to investigate the subjects’ attitudes towards both brushes.
Results: The overall mean prebrushing PI was 2.47 for the PHB and 2.44 for the ADA. The reduction in PI was 1.32 and 1.23 respectively (P < 0.05). With regard to gingival abrasion the overall mean prebrushing scores were 4.57 (PHB) and 5.34 (ADA). Post‐brushing scores were 13.49 and 13.77 for the PHB and ADA respectively.
Conclusion: Statistically, the multi‐level PHB was significantly more efficacious than the flat‐trimmed ADA. However, the difference is clinically considered small and the amount of remaining plaque was not significantly different between brushes. No greater potential to cause gingival abrasion to the oral tissues was observed.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Dental Devices, Home Care</subject><subject>Dental Plaque - prevention & control</subject><subject>Dental Plaque Index</subject><subject>Dental research</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Equipment Safety</subject><subject>Facial bones, jaws, teeth, parodontium: diseases, semeiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>gingival abrasion</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Matched-Pair Analysis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>multi-level</subject><subject>Non tumoral diseases</subject><subject>Oral hygiene</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>plaque</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>toothbrush</subject><subject>Toothbrushing - instrumentation</subject><issn>1601-5029</issn><issn>1601-5037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkNFO2zAUhi00BIXtFaZo0sRVgmM7cSztZivQIiGQBmiX1onjI9KlSWcnon17HFo6iSvsCx_Z3390_BESpTRJwzpfJGlO0zijXCaMhltKhcyS9QGZ7B8-7WumjsmJ9wtKWdjZETlmVOUpL8SEJPeAtt9E0FaRRawNmE3UYdQ_d9ES2gGaqO-6_ql0g3-y_jM5RGi8_bI7T8nj1eXDdB7f3M2upz9vYiNylsUMS7AFmqICqCppkUEFBVhaKpUqrkRWcEQqBDKLaVYZtCVQiopJBpIiPyVn274r1_0brO_1svbGNg20thu8lpkqpJBCBPLbO3LRDa4Nw2kZ_qhyLlSAii1kXOe9s6hXrl6C2-iU6tGoXuhRlh7F6dGofjWq1yH6ddd_KJe22gffFAbg-w4Ab6BBB62p_X-Oc8oKOc7wY8s9143dfHgAfX0xD0WIx9t47Xu73sfB_dW55IH8czvTTPBfD3LK9W_-ArEOnw8</recordid><startdate>201011</startdate><enddate>201011</enddate><creator>Rosema, NAM</creator><creator>Timmerman, MF</creator><creator>Versteeg, PA</creator><creator>Van Palenstein Helderman, WH</creator><creator>Van Der Velden, U</creator><creator>Van Der Weijden, GA</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201011</creationdate><title>Safety and efficacy of two manual toothbrushes</title><author>Rosema, NAM ; Timmerman, MF ; Versteeg, PA ; Van Palenstein Helderman, WH ; Van Der Velden, U ; Van Der Weijden, GA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4625-2fbae8fc8daadd7ef2ada8ae0b9919394583ff044f2ef15dcfeba00f9272a70f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Dental Devices, Home Care</topic><topic>Dental Plaque - prevention & control</topic><topic>Dental Plaque Index</topic><topic>Dental research</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Equipment Safety</topic><topic>Facial bones, jaws, teeth, parodontium: diseases, semeiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>gingival abrasion</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Matched-Pair Analysis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>multi-level</topic><topic>Non tumoral diseases</topic><topic>Oral hygiene</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>plaque</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>toothbrush</topic><topic>Toothbrushing - instrumentation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosema, NAM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timmerman, MF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Versteeg, PA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Palenstein Helderman, WH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Der Velden, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Der Weijden, GA</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of dental hygiene</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosema, NAM</au><au>Timmerman, MF</au><au>Versteeg, PA</au><au>Van Palenstein Helderman, WH</au><au>Van Der Velden, U</au><au>Van Der Weijden, GA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety and efficacy of two manual toothbrushes</atitle><jtitle>International journal of dental hygiene</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Dent Hyg</addtitle><date>2010-11</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>280</spage><epage>285</epage><pages>280-285</pages><issn>1601-5029</issn><eissn>1601-5037</eissn><abstract>To cite this article:
Int J Dent Hygiene 8, 2010; 280–285
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601‐5037.2010.00475.x
Rosema NAM, Timmerman MF, Versteeg PA, van Palenstein Helderman WH, van der Velden U, van der Weijden GA. Safety and efficacy of two manual toothbrushes.
: Objective: The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy and safety of a newly designed multi‐level manual toothbrush (Profit‐Haije‐Brush) compared with a control flat‐trimmed manual reference toothbrush from the American Dental Association (ADA).
Material and methods: For this study, 36 healthy subjects without previous experience in the use of the Profit‐Haije‐Brush (PHB) were selected. Subjects were given a period of 2 weeks to become familiar with both types of brushes and were instructed to use them on alternate days for 2 min twice daily. Prior to their visit, subjects refrained from all oral hygiene procedures for 48 h. Prebrushing plaque and gingival abrasion scores were assessed. Subsequently, two randomly chosen contra‐lateral quadrants were brushed with one of both brushes and the other two quadrants with the alternate brush. Subjects were supervised during their 2‐min brushing exercise. After brushing, plaque and gingival abrasion were re‐assessed. A questionnaire was filled out to investigate the subjects’ attitudes towards both brushes.
Results: The overall mean prebrushing PI was 2.47 for the PHB and 2.44 for the ADA. The reduction in PI was 1.32 and 1.23 respectively (P < 0.05). With regard to gingival abrasion the overall mean prebrushing scores were 4.57 (PHB) and 5.34 (ADA). Post‐brushing scores were 13.49 and 13.77 for the PHB and ADA respectively.
Conclusion: Statistically, the multi‐level PHB was significantly more efficacious than the flat‐trimmed ADA. However, the difference is clinically considered small and the amount of remaining plaque was not significantly different between brushes. No greater potential to cause gingival abrasion to the oral tissues was observed.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>20961384</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1601-5037.2010.00475.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1601-5029 |
| ispartof | International journal of dental hygiene, 2010-11, Vol.8 (4), p.280-285 |
| issn | 1601-5029 1601-5037 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_759874744 |
| source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences Comparative studies Dental Devices, Home Care Dental Plaque - prevention & control Dental Plaque Index Dental research Dentistry Equipment Design Equipment Safety Facial bones, jaws, teeth, parodontium: diseases, semeiology Female gingival abrasion Humans Innovations Male Matched-Pair Analysis Medical sciences multi-level Non tumoral diseases Oral hygiene Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology plaque Single-Blind Method Surveys and Questionnaires toothbrush Toothbrushing - instrumentation |
| title | Safety and efficacy of two manual toothbrushes |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A34%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20and%20efficacy%20of%20two%20manual%20toothbrushes&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20dental%20hygiene&rft.au=Rosema,%20NAM&rft.date=2010-11&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=280&rft.epage=285&rft.pages=280-285&rft.issn=1601-5029&rft.eissn=1601-5037&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1601-5037.2010.00475.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E759874744%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4625-2fbae8fc8daadd7ef2ada8ae0b9919394583ff044f2ef15dcfeba00f9272a70f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=761396349&rft_id=info:pmid/20961384&rfr_iscdi=true |