Loading…

A comparison between robust and adaptive hybrid position/force control schemes for hydraulic underwater manipulators

Tele-operated hydrauilic underwater manipulators are commonly used to perform remote underwater intervention tasks such as weld inspection or mating of connectors Automation of these tasks to use tele-assitance requires a suitable hybrid position/force control scheme, to specify simultaneously the r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control 1997-01, Vol.19 (2), p.107-116
Main Authors: Lane, D.M., Dunnigan, M.W., Clegg, A.C., Dauchez, P., Cellier, L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-ecea6fd533ebe70ecc07974c06627ec039c6179249c7b76e9eae18067f663b2f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-ecea6fd533ebe70ecc07974c06627ec039c6179249c7b76e9eae18067f663b2f3
container_end_page 116
container_issue 2
container_start_page 107
container_title Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control
container_volume 19
creator Lane, D.M.
Dunnigan, M.W.
Clegg, A.C.
Dauchez, P.
Cellier, L.
description Tele-operated hydrauilic underwater manipulators are commonly used to perform remote underwater intervention tasks such as weld inspection or mating of connectors Automation of these tasks to use tele-assitance requires a suitable hybrid position/force control scheme, to specify simultaneously the robot motion and contact forces. Classical linear control does not allow for the highly non-linear and time varying robot dynamics in this situation. Adequate control performance requires more advanced controllers. This paper presents and compares two different advanced hybrid control algorithms. The first is based on a modified Variable Structure Control (VSC-HF) with a virtual environment, and the second uses a multivariable self-tuning adaptive controller. A direct comparison of the two proposed control schemes is performed in simulation, using a model of the dynamics of a hydraulic underwater manipulator (a Slingsby TA9) in contact with a surface. These comparisons look at the performance of the controllers under a wide variety of operating conditions, including different environment stiffnesses, positions of the robot and dynamic parameters. Conclusions are drawn based on the relative performance of each controller and on the practicalities of the proposed schemes.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/014233129701900205
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_760216023</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_014233129701900205</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1730090284</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-ecea6fd533ebe70ecc07974c06627ec039c6179249c7b76e9eae18067f663b2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U1rGzEQBmBRGqjr5A_0pFPby8ajD0vWMYS2CRhySc6LVjubKOxKW0lb439fGfdW8GEYGJ53DjOEfGFwy5jWG2CSC8G40cAMAIftB7JiUusGhDIfyeoEmpP4RD7n_A4AUiq5IuWOujjNNvkcA-2wHBADTbFbcqE29NT2di7-D9K3Y5d8T-eYffExbIaYHNZwKCmONLs3nDDTOq2yT3YZvaNL6DEdbMFEJxv8vIy2xJSvydVgx4w3__qavPz88Xz_0Oyffj3e3-0bJ3asNOjQqqHfCoEdakDnQBstHSjFNToQximmDZfG6U4rNGiR7UDpQSnR8UGsybfz3jnF3wvm0k4-OxxHGzAuudUKOKslqvx6UXK1FUZyU-H3i5BpAWCA72Sl_ExdijknHNo5-cmmY8ugPX2t_f9rNbQ5h7J9xfY9LinUC11K_AUpeZlT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1730090284</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison between robust and adaptive hybrid position/force control schemes for hydraulic underwater manipulators</title><source>SAGE Complete Deep Backfile Purchase 2012</source><creator>Lane, D.M. ; Dunnigan, M.W. ; Clegg, A.C. ; Dauchez, P. ; Cellier, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lane, D.M. ; Dunnigan, M.W. ; Clegg, A.C. ; Dauchez, P. ; Cellier, L.</creatorcontrib><description>Tele-operated hydrauilic underwater manipulators are commonly used to perform remote underwater intervention tasks such as weld inspection or mating of connectors Automation of these tasks to use tele-assitance requires a suitable hybrid position/force control scheme, to specify simultaneously the robot motion and contact forces. Classical linear control does not allow for the highly non-linear and time varying robot dynamics in this situation. Adequate control performance requires more advanced controllers. This paper presents and compares two different advanced hybrid control algorithms. The first is based on a modified Variable Structure Control (VSC-HF) with a virtual environment, and the second uses a multivariable self-tuning adaptive controller. A direct comparison of the two proposed control schemes is performed in simulation, using a model of the dynamics of a hydraulic underwater manipulator (a Slingsby TA9) in contact with a surface. These comparisons look at the performance of the controllers under a wide variety of operating conditions, including different environment stiffnesses, positions of the robot and dynamic parameters. Conclusions are drawn based on the relative performance of each controller and on the practicalities of the proposed schemes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-3312</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0369</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/014233129701900205</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Contact ; Controllers ; Dynamics ; Fluid flow ; Hydraulics ; Manipulators ; Robot arms ; Robots ; Underwater</subject><ispartof>Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 1997-01, Vol.19 (2), p.107-116</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-ecea6fd533ebe70ecc07974c06627ec039c6179249c7b76e9eae18067f663b2f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-ecea6fd533ebe70ecc07974c06627ec039c6179249c7b76e9eae18067f663b2f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/014233129701900205$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/014233129701900205$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21824,27901,27902,45058,45446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lane, D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunnigan, M.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clegg, A.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dauchez, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cellier, L.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison between robust and adaptive hybrid position/force control schemes for hydraulic underwater manipulators</title><title>Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control</title><description>Tele-operated hydrauilic underwater manipulators are commonly used to perform remote underwater intervention tasks such as weld inspection or mating of connectors Automation of these tasks to use tele-assitance requires a suitable hybrid position/force control scheme, to specify simultaneously the robot motion and contact forces. Classical linear control does not allow for the highly non-linear and time varying robot dynamics in this situation. Adequate control performance requires more advanced controllers. This paper presents and compares two different advanced hybrid control algorithms. The first is based on a modified Variable Structure Control (VSC-HF) with a virtual environment, and the second uses a multivariable self-tuning adaptive controller. A direct comparison of the two proposed control schemes is performed in simulation, using a model of the dynamics of a hydraulic underwater manipulator (a Slingsby TA9) in contact with a surface. These comparisons look at the performance of the controllers under a wide variety of operating conditions, including different environment stiffnesses, positions of the robot and dynamic parameters. Conclusions are drawn based on the relative performance of each controller and on the practicalities of the proposed schemes.</description><subject>Contact</subject><subject>Controllers</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Hydraulics</subject><subject>Manipulators</subject><subject>Robot arms</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Underwater</subject><issn>0142-3312</issn><issn>1477-0369</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90U1rGzEQBmBRGqjr5A_0pFPby8ajD0vWMYS2CRhySc6LVjubKOxKW0lb439fGfdW8GEYGJ53DjOEfGFwy5jWG2CSC8G40cAMAIftB7JiUusGhDIfyeoEmpP4RD7n_A4AUiq5IuWOujjNNvkcA-2wHBADTbFbcqE29NT2di7-D9K3Y5d8T-eYffExbIaYHNZwKCmONLs3nDDTOq2yT3YZvaNL6DEdbMFEJxv8vIy2xJSvydVgx4w3__qavPz88Xz_0Oyffj3e3-0bJ3asNOjQqqHfCoEdakDnQBstHSjFNToQximmDZfG6U4rNGiR7UDpQSnR8UGsybfz3jnF3wvm0k4-OxxHGzAuudUKOKslqvx6UXK1FUZyU-H3i5BpAWCA72Sl_ExdijknHNo5-cmmY8ugPX2t_f9rNbQ5h7J9xfY9LinUC11K_AUpeZlT</recordid><startdate>19970101</startdate><enddate>19970101</enddate><creator>Lane, D.M.</creator><creator>Dunnigan, M.W.</creator><creator>Clegg, A.C.</creator><creator>Dauchez, P.</creator><creator>Cellier, L.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970101</creationdate><title>A comparison between robust and adaptive hybrid position/force control schemes for hydraulic underwater manipulators</title><author>Lane, D.M. ; Dunnigan, M.W. ; Clegg, A.C. ; Dauchez, P. ; Cellier, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-ecea6fd533ebe70ecc07974c06627ec039c6179249c7b76e9eae18067f663b2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Contact</topic><topic>Controllers</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Hydraulics</topic><topic>Manipulators</topic><topic>Robot arms</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Underwater</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lane, D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunnigan, M.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clegg, A.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dauchez, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cellier, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lane, D.M.</au><au>Dunnigan, M.W.</au><au>Clegg, A.C.</au><au>Dauchez, P.</au><au>Cellier, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison between robust and adaptive hybrid position/force control schemes for hydraulic underwater manipulators</atitle><jtitle>Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control</jtitle><date>1997-01-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>107</spage><epage>116</epage><pages>107-116</pages><issn>0142-3312</issn><eissn>1477-0369</eissn><abstract>Tele-operated hydrauilic underwater manipulators are commonly used to perform remote underwater intervention tasks such as weld inspection or mating of connectors Automation of these tasks to use tele-assitance requires a suitable hybrid position/force control scheme, to specify simultaneously the robot motion and contact forces. Classical linear control does not allow for the highly non-linear and time varying robot dynamics in this situation. Adequate control performance requires more advanced controllers. This paper presents and compares two different advanced hybrid control algorithms. The first is based on a modified Variable Structure Control (VSC-HF) with a virtual environment, and the second uses a multivariable self-tuning adaptive controller. A direct comparison of the two proposed control schemes is performed in simulation, using a model of the dynamics of a hydraulic underwater manipulator (a Slingsby TA9) in contact with a surface. These comparisons look at the performance of the controllers under a wide variety of operating conditions, including different environment stiffnesses, positions of the robot and dynamic parameters. Conclusions are drawn based on the relative performance of each controller and on the practicalities of the proposed schemes.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/014233129701900205</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0142-3312
ispartof Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 1997-01, Vol.19 (2), p.107-116
issn 0142-3312
1477-0369
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_760216023
source SAGE Complete Deep Backfile Purchase 2012
subjects Contact
Controllers
Dynamics
Fluid flow
Hydraulics
Manipulators
Robot arms
Robots
Underwater
title A comparison between robust and adaptive hybrid position/force control schemes for hydraulic underwater manipulators
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T22%3A45%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20between%20robust%20and%20adaptive%20hybrid%20position/force%20control%20schemes%20for%20hydraulic%20underwater%20manipulators&rft.jtitle=Transactions%20of%20the%20Institute%20of%20Measurement%20and%20Control&rft.au=Lane,%20D.M.&rft.date=1997-01-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=107&rft.epage=116&rft.pages=107-116&rft.issn=0142-3312&rft.eissn=1477-0369&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/014233129701900205&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1730090284%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-ecea6fd533ebe70ecc07974c06627ec039c6179249c7b76e9eae18067f663b2f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1730090284&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_014233129701900205&rfr_iscdi=true