Loading…
A comparison between robust and adaptive hybrid position/force control schemes for hydraulic underwater manipulators
Tele-operated hydrauilic underwater manipulators are commonly used to perform remote underwater intervention tasks such as weld inspection or mating of connectors Automation of these tasks to use tele-assitance requires a suitable hybrid position/force control scheme, to specify simultaneously the r...
Saved in:
Published in: | Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control 1997-01, Vol.19 (2), p.107-116 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-ecea6fd533ebe70ecc07974c06627ec039c6179249c7b76e9eae18067f663b2f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-ecea6fd533ebe70ecc07974c06627ec039c6179249c7b76e9eae18067f663b2f3 |
container_end_page | 116 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 107 |
container_title | Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Lane, D.M. Dunnigan, M.W. Clegg, A.C. Dauchez, P. Cellier, L. |
description | Tele-operated hydrauilic underwater manipulators are commonly used to perform remote underwater intervention tasks such as weld inspection or mating of connectors Automation of these tasks to use tele-assitance requires a suitable hybrid position/force control scheme, to specify simultaneously the robot motion and contact forces. Classical linear control does not allow for the highly non-linear and time varying robot dynamics in this situation. Adequate control performance requires more advanced controllers. This paper presents and compares two different advanced hybrid control algorithms. The first is based on a modified Variable Structure Control (VSC-HF) with a virtual environment, and the second uses a multivariable self-tuning adaptive controller. A direct comparison of the two proposed control schemes is performed in simulation, using a model of the dynamics of a hydraulic underwater manipulator (a Slingsby TA9) in contact with a surface. These comparisons look at the performance of the controllers under a wide variety of operating conditions, including different environment stiffnesses, positions of the robot and dynamic parameters. Conclusions are drawn based on the relative performance of each controller and on the practicalities of the proposed schemes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/014233129701900205 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_760216023</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_014233129701900205</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1730090284</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-ecea6fd533ebe70ecc07974c06627ec039c6179249c7b76e9eae18067f663b2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U1rGzEQBmBRGqjr5A_0pFPby8ajD0vWMYS2CRhySc6LVjubKOxKW0lb439fGfdW8GEYGJ53DjOEfGFwy5jWG2CSC8G40cAMAIftB7JiUusGhDIfyeoEmpP4RD7n_A4AUiq5IuWOujjNNvkcA-2wHBADTbFbcqE29NT2di7-D9K3Y5d8T-eYffExbIaYHNZwKCmONLs3nDDTOq2yT3YZvaNL6DEdbMFEJxv8vIy2xJSvydVgx4w3__qavPz88Xz_0Oyffj3e3-0bJ3asNOjQqqHfCoEdakDnQBstHSjFNToQximmDZfG6U4rNGiR7UDpQSnR8UGsybfz3jnF3wvm0k4-OxxHGzAuudUKOKslqvx6UXK1FUZyU-H3i5BpAWCA72Sl_ExdijknHNo5-cmmY8ugPX2t_f9rNbQ5h7J9xfY9LinUC11K_AUpeZlT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1730090284</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison between robust and adaptive hybrid position/force control schemes for hydraulic underwater manipulators</title><source>SAGE Complete Deep Backfile Purchase 2012</source><creator>Lane, D.M. ; Dunnigan, M.W. ; Clegg, A.C. ; Dauchez, P. ; Cellier, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lane, D.M. ; Dunnigan, M.W. ; Clegg, A.C. ; Dauchez, P. ; Cellier, L.</creatorcontrib><description>Tele-operated hydrauilic underwater manipulators are commonly used to perform remote underwater intervention tasks such as weld inspection or mating of connectors Automation of these tasks to use tele-assitance requires a suitable hybrid position/force control scheme, to specify simultaneously the robot motion and contact forces. Classical linear control does not allow for the highly non-linear and time varying robot dynamics in this situation. Adequate control performance requires more advanced controllers. This paper presents and compares two different advanced hybrid control algorithms. The first is based on a modified Variable Structure Control (VSC-HF) with a virtual environment, and the second uses a multivariable self-tuning adaptive controller. A direct comparison of the two proposed control schemes is performed in simulation, using a model of the dynamics of a hydraulic underwater manipulator (a Slingsby TA9) in contact with a surface. These comparisons look at the performance of the controllers under a wide variety of operating conditions, including different environment stiffnesses, positions of the robot and dynamic parameters. Conclusions are drawn based on the relative performance of each controller and on the practicalities of the proposed schemes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-3312</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0369</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/014233129701900205</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Contact ; Controllers ; Dynamics ; Fluid flow ; Hydraulics ; Manipulators ; Robot arms ; Robots ; Underwater</subject><ispartof>Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 1997-01, Vol.19 (2), p.107-116</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-ecea6fd533ebe70ecc07974c06627ec039c6179249c7b76e9eae18067f663b2f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-ecea6fd533ebe70ecc07974c06627ec039c6179249c7b76e9eae18067f663b2f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/014233129701900205$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/014233129701900205$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21824,27901,27902,45058,45446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lane, D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunnigan, M.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clegg, A.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dauchez, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cellier, L.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison between robust and adaptive hybrid position/force control schemes for hydraulic underwater manipulators</title><title>Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control</title><description>Tele-operated hydrauilic underwater manipulators are commonly used to perform remote underwater intervention tasks such as weld inspection or mating of connectors Automation of these tasks to use tele-assitance requires a suitable hybrid position/force control scheme, to specify simultaneously the robot motion and contact forces. Classical linear control does not allow for the highly non-linear and time varying robot dynamics in this situation. Adequate control performance requires more advanced controllers. This paper presents and compares two different advanced hybrid control algorithms. The first is based on a modified Variable Structure Control (VSC-HF) with a virtual environment, and the second uses a multivariable self-tuning adaptive controller. A direct comparison of the two proposed control schemes is performed in simulation, using a model of the dynamics of a hydraulic underwater manipulator (a Slingsby TA9) in contact with a surface. These comparisons look at the performance of the controllers under a wide variety of operating conditions, including different environment stiffnesses, positions of the robot and dynamic parameters. Conclusions are drawn based on the relative performance of each controller and on the practicalities of the proposed schemes.</description><subject>Contact</subject><subject>Controllers</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Hydraulics</subject><subject>Manipulators</subject><subject>Robot arms</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Underwater</subject><issn>0142-3312</issn><issn>1477-0369</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90U1rGzEQBmBRGqjr5A_0pFPby8ajD0vWMYS2CRhySc6LVjubKOxKW0lb439fGfdW8GEYGJ53DjOEfGFwy5jWG2CSC8G40cAMAIftB7JiUusGhDIfyeoEmpP4RD7n_A4AUiq5IuWOujjNNvkcA-2wHBADTbFbcqE29NT2di7-D9K3Y5d8T-eYffExbIaYHNZwKCmONLs3nDDTOq2yT3YZvaNL6DEdbMFEJxv8vIy2xJSvydVgx4w3__qavPz88Xz_0Oyffj3e3-0bJ3asNOjQqqHfCoEdakDnQBstHSjFNToQximmDZfG6U4rNGiR7UDpQSnR8UGsybfz3jnF3wvm0k4-OxxHGzAuudUKOKslqvx6UXK1FUZyU-H3i5BpAWCA72Sl_ExdijknHNo5-cmmY8ugPX2t_f9rNbQ5h7J9xfY9LinUC11K_AUpeZlT</recordid><startdate>19970101</startdate><enddate>19970101</enddate><creator>Lane, D.M.</creator><creator>Dunnigan, M.W.</creator><creator>Clegg, A.C.</creator><creator>Dauchez, P.</creator><creator>Cellier, L.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970101</creationdate><title>A comparison between robust and adaptive hybrid position/force control schemes for hydraulic underwater manipulators</title><author>Lane, D.M. ; Dunnigan, M.W. ; Clegg, A.C. ; Dauchez, P. ; Cellier, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-ecea6fd533ebe70ecc07974c06627ec039c6179249c7b76e9eae18067f663b2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Contact</topic><topic>Controllers</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Hydraulics</topic><topic>Manipulators</topic><topic>Robot arms</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Underwater</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lane, D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunnigan, M.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clegg, A.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dauchez, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cellier, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lane, D.M.</au><au>Dunnigan, M.W.</au><au>Clegg, A.C.</au><au>Dauchez, P.</au><au>Cellier, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison between robust and adaptive hybrid position/force control schemes for hydraulic underwater manipulators</atitle><jtitle>Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control</jtitle><date>1997-01-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>107</spage><epage>116</epage><pages>107-116</pages><issn>0142-3312</issn><eissn>1477-0369</eissn><abstract>Tele-operated hydrauilic underwater manipulators are commonly used to perform remote underwater intervention tasks such as weld inspection or mating of connectors Automation of these tasks to use tele-assitance requires a suitable hybrid position/force control scheme, to specify simultaneously the robot motion and contact forces. Classical linear control does not allow for the highly non-linear and time varying robot dynamics in this situation. Adequate control performance requires more advanced controllers. This paper presents and compares two different advanced hybrid control algorithms. The first is based on a modified Variable Structure Control (VSC-HF) with a virtual environment, and the second uses a multivariable self-tuning adaptive controller. A direct comparison of the two proposed control schemes is performed in simulation, using a model of the dynamics of a hydraulic underwater manipulator (a Slingsby TA9) in contact with a surface. These comparisons look at the performance of the controllers under a wide variety of operating conditions, including different environment stiffnesses, positions of the robot and dynamic parameters. Conclusions are drawn based on the relative performance of each controller and on the practicalities of the proposed schemes.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/014233129701900205</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0142-3312 |
ispartof | Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 1997-01, Vol.19 (2), p.107-116 |
issn | 0142-3312 1477-0369 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_760216023 |
source | SAGE Complete Deep Backfile Purchase 2012 |
subjects | Contact Controllers Dynamics Fluid flow Hydraulics Manipulators Robot arms Robots Underwater |
title | A comparison between robust and adaptive hybrid position/force control schemes for hydraulic underwater manipulators |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T22%3A45%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20between%20robust%20and%20adaptive%20hybrid%20position/force%20control%20schemes%20for%20hydraulic%20underwater%20manipulators&rft.jtitle=Transactions%20of%20the%20Institute%20of%20Measurement%20and%20Control&rft.au=Lane,%20D.M.&rft.date=1997-01-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=107&rft.epage=116&rft.pages=107-116&rft.issn=0142-3312&rft.eissn=1477-0369&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/014233129701900205&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1730090284%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-ecea6fd533ebe70ecc07974c06627ec039c6179249c7b76e9eae18067f663b2f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1730090284&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_014233129701900205&rfr_iscdi=true |