Loading…
Preferred and energetically optimal gait transition speeds in human locomotion
A widespread assumption of previous researchers is that the gait transition during human locomotion takes place at speeds that minimize metabolic energy consumption. The primary purpose of this investigation was to determine, by direct measurements, whether changing gaits is actually an energy savin...
Saved in:
Published in: | Medicine and science in sports and exercise 1993-10, Vol.25 (10), p.1158-1162 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-2046ff1e7a656b3cab5462e856bd3cfc2594d14ffd862e9422390cb2e3ee9baf3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 1162 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1158 |
container_title | Medicine and science in sports and exercise |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | HRELJAC, A |
description | A widespread assumption of previous researchers is that the gait transition during human locomotion takes place at speeds that minimize metabolic energy consumption. The primary purpose of this investigation was to determine, by direct measurements, whether changing gaits is actually an energy saving mechanism. The secondary purpose of the experiment was determine whether the sense of effort, as measured by a Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE), was greater for walking or running at the preferred transition speed (PTS). Twenty young, healthy adults (10 males, 10 females) walked on a treadmill at five speeds ranging from 70-110% of their individually measured PTS, and ran at five speeds ranging from 90-130% of their PTS while VO2 was monitored to determine each individual's energetically optimal transition speed (EOTS). Although the EOTS found during this study (2.24 m.s-1) was significantly greater than the PTS (2.06 m.s-1), RPE was significantly greater while walking at the PTS (13.5) than running at the PTS (10.0), suggesting that the gait transition during human locomotion does not take place in order to minimize metabolic energy consumption. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1249/00005768-199310000-00012 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76055214</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76055214</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-2046ff1e7a656b3cab5462e856bd3cfc2594d14ffd862e9422390cb2e3ee9baf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE9PxCAQxYnRrOvqRzDhYLxVO1DacjQb_yUb9aBnQumw1rSlQnvw28u6dUkm5M17A5kfIRTSG2CZvE3jEUVeJiAlh51KYgE7IksQPAoO4pgsU5AikcDhlJyF8BUjBeewIIuScShyWJKXN48Wvcea6r6m2KPf4tgY3bY_1A1j0-mWbnUz0tHrPjRj43oaBsQ60Kann1One9o64zq3s87JidVtwIv5XpGPh_v39VOyeX18Xt9tEpMJMSYszXJrAQudi7ziRlciyxmWUdTcWMOEzGrIrK3L2JYZY1ympmLIEWWlLV-R6_27g3ffE4ZRdU0w2La6RzcFVeSpEAyyGCz3QeNdCHFXNfi4k_9RkKodSvWPUh1Qqj-UcfRy_mOqOqwPgzO76F_Nvg6Rl418TBMOMS4ZEwL4LzzUfG8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76055214</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preferred and energetically optimal gait transition speeds in human locomotion</title><source>HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</source><creator>HRELJAC, A</creator><creatorcontrib>HRELJAC, A</creatorcontrib><description>A widespread assumption of previous researchers is that the gait transition during human locomotion takes place at speeds that minimize metabolic energy consumption. The primary purpose of this investigation was to determine, by direct measurements, whether changing gaits is actually an energy saving mechanism. The secondary purpose of the experiment was determine whether the sense of effort, as measured by a Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE), was greater for walking or running at the preferred transition speed (PTS). Twenty young, healthy adults (10 males, 10 females) walked on a treadmill at five speeds ranging from 70-110% of their individually measured PTS, and ran at five speeds ranging from 90-130% of their PTS while VO2 was monitored to determine each individual's energetically optimal transition speed (EOTS). Although the EOTS found during this study (2.24 m.s-1) was significantly greater than the PTS (2.06 m.s-1), RPE was significantly greater while walking at the PTS (13.5) than running at the PTS (10.0), suggesting that the gait transition during human locomotion does not take place in order to minimize metabolic energy consumption.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-9131</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1249/00005768-199310000-00012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8231761</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MSPEDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Energy Metabolism - physiology ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gait - physiology ; Humans ; Linear Models ; Locomotion - physiology ; Male ; Oxygen Consumption ; Pulmonary Ventilation ; Running - physiology ; Space life sciences ; Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports ; Walking - physiology</subject><ispartof>Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 1993-10, Vol.25 (10), p.1158-1162</ispartof><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-2046ff1e7a656b3cab5462e856bd3cfc2594d14ffd862e9422390cb2e3ee9baf3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3922551$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8231761$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HRELJAC, A</creatorcontrib><title>Preferred and energetically optimal gait transition speeds in human locomotion</title><title>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</title><addtitle>Med Sci Sports Exerc</addtitle><description>A widespread assumption of previous researchers is that the gait transition during human locomotion takes place at speeds that minimize metabolic energy consumption. The primary purpose of this investigation was to determine, by direct measurements, whether changing gaits is actually an energy saving mechanism. The secondary purpose of the experiment was determine whether the sense of effort, as measured by a Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE), was greater for walking or running at the preferred transition speed (PTS). Twenty young, healthy adults (10 males, 10 females) walked on a treadmill at five speeds ranging from 70-110% of their individually measured PTS, and ran at five speeds ranging from 90-130% of their PTS while VO2 was monitored to determine each individual's energetically optimal transition speed (EOTS). Although the EOTS found during this study (2.24 m.s-1) was significantly greater than the PTS (2.06 m.s-1), RPE was significantly greater while walking at the PTS (13.5) than running at the PTS (10.0), suggesting that the gait transition during human locomotion does not take place in order to minimize metabolic energy consumption.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Energy Metabolism - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gait - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Locomotion - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Oxygen Consumption</subject><subject>Pulmonary Ventilation</subject><subject>Running - physiology</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</subject><subject>Walking - physiology</subject><issn>0195-9131</issn><issn>1530-0315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE9PxCAQxYnRrOvqRzDhYLxVO1DacjQb_yUb9aBnQumw1rSlQnvw28u6dUkm5M17A5kfIRTSG2CZvE3jEUVeJiAlh51KYgE7IksQPAoO4pgsU5AikcDhlJyF8BUjBeewIIuScShyWJKXN48Wvcea6r6m2KPf4tgY3bY_1A1j0-mWbnUz0tHrPjRj43oaBsQ60Kann1One9o64zq3s87JidVtwIv5XpGPh_v39VOyeX18Xt9tEpMJMSYszXJrAQudi7ziRlciyxmWUdTcWMOEzGrIrK3L2JYZY1ympmLIEWWlLV-R6_27g3ffE4ZRdU0w2La6RzcFVeSpEAyyGCz3QeNdCHFXNfi4k_9RkKodSvWPUh1Qqj-UcfRy_mOqOqwPgzO76F_Nvg6Rl418TBMOMS4ZEwL4LzzUfG8</recordid><startdate>19931001</startdate><enddate>19931001</enddate><creator>HRELJAC, A</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19931001</creationdate><title>Preferred and energetically optimal gait transition speeds in human locomotion</title><author>HRELJAC, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-2046ff1e7a656b3cab5462e856bd3cfc2594d14ffd862e9422390cb2e3ee9baf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Energy Metabolism - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gait - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Locomotion - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Oxygen Consumption</topic><topic>Pulmonary Ventilation</topic><topic>Running - physiology</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</topic><topic>Walking - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HRELJAC, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HRELJAC, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preferred and energetically optimal gait transition speeds in human locomotion</atitle><jtitle>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</jtitle><addtitle>Med Sci Sports Exerc</addtitle><date>1993-10-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1158</spage><epage>1162</epage><pages>1158-1162</pages><issn>0195-9131</issn><eissn>1530-0315</eissn><coden>MSPEDA</coden><abstract>A widespread assumption of previous researchers is that the gait transition during human locomotion takes place at speeds that minimize metabolic energy consumption. The primary purpose of this investigation was to determine, by direct measurements, whether changing gaits is actually an energy saving mechanism. The secondary purpose of the experiment was determine whether the sense of effort, as measured by a Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE), was greater for walking or running at the preferred transition speed (PTS). Twenty young, healthy adults (10 males, 10 females) walked on a treadmill at five speeds ranging from 70-110% of their individually measured PTS, and ran at five speeds ranging from 90-130% of their PTS while VO2 was monitored to determine each individual's energetically optimal transition speed (EOTS). Although the EOTS found during this study (2.24 m.s-1) was significantly greater than the PTS (2.06 m.s-1), RPE was significantly greater while walking at the PTS (13.5) than running at the PTS (10.0), suggesting that the gait transition during human locomotion does not take place in order to minimize metabolic energy consumption.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>8231761</pmid><doi>10.1249/00005768-199310000-00012</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0195-9131 |
ispartof | Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 1993-10, Vol.25 (10), p.1158-1162 |
issn | 0195-9131 1530-0315 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76055214 |
source | HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Biomechanical Phenomena Energy Metabolism - physiology Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gait - physiology Humans Linear Models Locomotion - physiology Male Oxygen Consumption Pulmonary Ventilation Running - physiology Space life sciences Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports Walking - physiology |
title | Preferred and energetically optimal gait transition speeds in human locomotion |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T14%3A28%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preferred%20and%20energetically%20optimal%20gait%20transition%20speeds%20in%20human%20locomotion&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20and%20science%20in%20sports%20and%20exercise&rft.au=HRELJAC,%20A&rft.date=1993-10-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1158&rft.epage=1162&rft.pages=1158-1162&rft.issn=0195-9131&rft.eissn=1530-0315&rft.coden=MSPEDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1249/00005768-199310000-00012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76055214%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-2046ff1e7a656b3cab5462e856bd3cfc2594d14ffd862e9422390cb2e3ee9baf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76055214&rft_id=info:pmid/8231761&rfr_iscdi=true |