Comparison of natural organic matter adsorption capacities of super-powdered activated carbon and powdered activated Carbon

• Published in: Water research (Oxford) 2010-07, Vol.44 (14), p.4127-4136
• Main Authors: Ando, Naoya, Matsui, Yoshihiko, Kurotobi, Ryuji, Nakano, Yu, Matsushita, Taku, Ohno, Koichi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Activated carbon; Adsorbents; Adsorption; Applied sciences; Atmospheric pollution; Carbon; Charcoal - chemistry; Exact sciences and technology; Fulvic; Humic; Isotherm; Molecular Weight; NOM; Organic Chemicals - isolation & purification; Other industrial wastes. Sewage sludge; Particle Size; Pollution; Polyethylene Glycols; Polystyrenes; Pore size; Porosity; Powders - chemistry; Sulfonic Acids; Surface area; Surface chemistry; Wastes; Water treatment and pollution
• ISSN: 0043-1354; 1879-2448
• DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.05.029

We examined the natural organic matter (NOM) adsorption characteristics of super-powdered activated carbon (S-PAC) produced by pulverizing commercially available, normal PAC to a submicron particle size range. The adsorption capacities of S-PAC for NOM and polystyrene sulfonates (PSS) with molecular weights (MWs) of 1.1, 1.8, and 4.6 kDa, which we used as model compounds, were considerably higher than those of PAC. The adsorption capacity increases were observed for all five types of carbon tested (two wood-based, two coconut-based, and one coal-based carbon). The adsorption capacities of S-PAC and PAC for polyethylene glycols (PEGs) with MWs of 0.3 and 1.0 were the same. The adsorption capacities of S-PAC for PEGs with MWs of 3.0 and 8.0 kDa were slightly higher than the adsorption capacities of PAC, but the difference in adsorption capacity was not as large as that observed for NOM and the PSSs, even though the MW ranges of the adsorbates were similar. We concluded that the adsorption capacity differences between S-PAC and PAC observed for NOM and PSSs were due to the difference in particle size between the two carbons, rather than to differences in internal pore size or structure, to differences in activation, or to non-attainment of equilibrium that resulted from the change in particle size. The difference in adsorption capacity between S-PAC and PAC was larger for NOM with a high specific UV absorbance (SUVA) value than for low-SUVA NOM. The larger adsorption capacities of S-PAC compared with PAC were explained by the larger specific external surface area per unit mass. We hypothesize that a larger fraction of the internal pore volume is accessible with carbon of smaller particle size because the NOM and PSS molecules preferentially adsorb near the outer surface of the particle and therefore do not completely penetrate the adsorbent particle.