Loading…
Age Does Not Affect Exercise Intensity Progression among Women
Ciolac, EG, Brech, GC, and Greve, JMD. Age does not affect exercise intensity progression among women. J Strength Cond Res 24(11)3023-3031, 2010-It has been recommended that the intensity of exercise training (ET) should progress slowly with lower increments in older than in young people. However, s...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of strength and conditioning research 2010-11, Vol.24 (11), p.3023-3031 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4248-eca4048b7d03fdf4cb8302e6fe02264e15772cea3baecf6d246635d5d07461e93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4248-eca4048b7d03fdf4cb8302e6fe02264e15772cea3baecf6d246635d5d07461e93 |
container_end_page | 3031 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 3023 |
container_title | Journal of strength and conditioning research |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Ciolac, Emmanuel G Brech, Guilherme C Greve, Júlia M D |
description | Ciolac, EG, Brech, GC, and Greve, JMD. Age does not affect exercise intensity progression among women. J Strength Cond Res 24(11)3023-3031, 2010-It has been recommended that the intensity of exercise training (ET) should progress slowly with lower increments in older than in young people. However, scientific evidence supporting this recommendation is lacking. Our aim was to examine possible influences of age on exercise intensity progression in healthy women. Seventeen young (29.1 ± 5.7 years) and 16 older women (64.5 ± 4.5 years) underwent 13 weeks of ET consisting of cycle ergometry (CE, 65-75% of reserve heart rate), whole-body resistance exercise (RE, 60% of 1 repetition maximum [1RM]), and stretching. Muscle strength was assessed before and after ET by the 1RM. Cycle ergometry and RE workloads were recorded for each exercise session, and increases of 5-10% were made whenever adaptation occurred. Absolute muscle strength after ET improved (p < 0.001) in both groups, and there were no significant differences between groups. Relative exercise intensity progression was not significantly different between groups for RE (Pearsonʼs correlation = 0.98 ± 0.01), but it was greater in older women for CE (p = 0.047). The ET was safe because no injuries or major muscle pain was observed in either group. These results suggest that healthy older women are capable of exercising and increasing exercise intensity in the same way as young women. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d09ef6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_762282712</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>762282712</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4248-eca4048b7d03fdf4cb8302e6fe02264e15772cea3baecf6d246635d5d07461e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtr3TAQRkVoaB7tPyjFdJOVkxlJlnQ3hcvNm5AW2tKlsOXRjVPbSiSbJP--CnlBFsPM4szHcIaxLwj7WOHi4PzXah8aQEECDbawIK822DZWQpSSG_0hz6BkaQBxi-2kdA3Aq6oSH9kWBw0Ctdxm35drKg4DpeIyTMXSe3JTcXRP0XWJirNxojF100PxM4Z1pJS6MBb1EMZ18TcMNH5im77uE31-7rvsz_HR79VpefHj5Gy1vCid5NKU5GoJ0jS6BeFbL11jBHBSnoBzJQkrrbmjWjQ1Oa9aLpUSVVu1oKVCWohdtveUexPD7UxpskOXHPV9PVKYk9WKc8M18kx-e0dehzmO-ThrshvURpsMySfIxZBSJG9vYjfU8cEi2Ee7Ntu17-3mta_P2XMzUPu69KLzLfcu9BPF9K-f7yjaK6r76coCIJdcm5ID5qcAQJkLjfgPJoqEqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>815317878</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Age Does Not Affect Exercise Intensity Progression among Women</title><source>HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</source><creator>Ciolac, Emmanuel G ; Brech, Guilherme C ; Greve, Júlia M D</creator><creatorcontrib>Ciolac, Emmanuel G ; Brech, Guilherme C ; Greve, Júlia M D</creatorcontrib><description>Ciolac, EG, Brech, GC, and Greve, JMD. Age does not affect exercise intensity progression among women. J Strength Cond Res 24(11)3023-3031, 2010-It has been recommended that the intensity of exercise training (ET) should progress slowly with lower increments in older than in young people. However, scientific evidence supporting this recommendation is lacking. Our aim was to examine possible influences of age on exercise intensity progression in healthy women. Seventeen young (29.1 ± 5.7 years) and 16 older women (64.5 ± 4.5 years) underwent 13 weeks of ET consisting of cycle ergometry (CE, 65-75% of reserve heart rate), whole-body resistance exercise (RE, 60% of 1 repetition maximum [1RM]), and stretching. Muscle strength was assessed before and after ET by the 1RM. Cycle ergometry and RE workloads were recorded for each exercise session, and increases of 5-10% were made whenever adaptation occurred. Absolute muscle strength after ET improved (p < 0.001) in both groups, and there were no significant differences between groups. Relative exercise intensity progression was not significantly different between groups for RE (Pearsonʼs correlation = 0.98 ± 0.01), but it was greater in older women for CE (p = 0.047). The ET was safe because no injuries or major muscle pain was observed in either group. These results suggest that healthy older women are capable of exercising and increasing exercise intensity in the same way as young women.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d09ef6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20703174</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Strength and Conditioning Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aging - physiology ; Cardiovascular disease ; Exercise ; Exercise - physiology ; Exercise Test ; Female ; Humans ; Metabolic disorders ; Middle Aged ; Muscle Strength - physiology ; Older people ; Physical Exertion - physiology ; Physical Fitness ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2010-11, Vol.24 (11), p.3023-3031</ispartof><rights>2010 National Strength and Conditioning Association</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Nov 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4248-eca4048b7d03fdf4cb8302e6fe02264e15772cea3baecf6d246635d5d07461e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4248-eca4048b7d03fdf4cb8302e6fe02264e15772cea3baecf6d246635d5d07461e93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20703174$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ciolac, Emmanuel G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brech, Guilherme C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greve, Júlia M D</creatorcontrib><title>Age Does Not Affect Exercise Intensity Progression among Women</title><title>Journal of strength and conditioning research</title><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><description>Ciolac, EG, Brech, GC, and Greve, JMD. Age does not affect exercise intensity progression among women. J Strength Cond Res 24(11)3023-3031, 2010-It has been recommended that the intensity of exercise training (ET) should progress slowly with lower increments in older than in young people. However, scientific evidence supporting this recommendation is lacking. Our aim was to examine possible influences of age on exercise intensity progression in healthy women. Seventeen young (29.1 ± 5.7 years) and 16 older women (64.5 ± 4.5 years) underwent 13 weeks of ET consisting of cycle ergometry (CE, 65-75% of reserve heart rate), whole-body resistance exercise (RE, 60% of 1 repetition maximum [1RM]), and stretching. Muscle strength was assessed before and after ET by the 1RM. Cycle ergometry and RE workloads were recorded for each exercise session, and increases of 5-10% were made whenever adaptation occurred. Absolute muscle strength after ET improved (p < 0.001) in both groups, and there were no significant differences between groups. Relative exercise intensity progression was not significantly different between groups for RE (Pearsonʼs correlation = 0.98 ± 0.01), but it was greater in older women for CE (p = 0.047). The ET was safe because no injuries or major muscle pain was observed in either group. These results suggest that healthy older women are capable of exercising and increasing exercise intensity in the same way as young women.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aging - physiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Exercise - physiology</subject><subject>Exercise Test</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Metabolic disorders</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscle Strength - physiology</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Physical Exertion - physiology</subject><subject>Physical Fitness</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>1064-8011</issn><issn>1533-4287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkUtr3TAQRkVoaB7tPyjFdJOVkxlJlnQ3hcvNm5AW2tKlsOXRjVPbSiSbJP--CnlBFsPM4szHcIaxLwj7WOHi4PzXah8aQEECDbawIK822DZWQpSSG_0hz6BkaQBxi-2kdA3Aq6oSH9kWBw0Ctdxm35drKg4DpeIyTMXSe3JTcXRP0XWJirNxojF100PxM4Z1pJS6MBb1EMZ18TcMNH5im77uE31-7rvsz_HR79VpefHj5Gy1vCid5NKU5GoJ0jS6BeFbL11jBHBSnoBzJQkrrbmjWjQ1Oa9aLpUSVVu1oKVCWohdtveUexPD7UxpskOXHPV9PVKYk9WKc8M18kx-e0dehzmO-ThrshvURpsMySfIxZBSJG9vYjfU8cEi2Ee7Ntu17-3mta_P2XMzUPu69KLzLfcu9BPF9K-f7yjaK6r76coCIJdcm5ID5qcAQJkLjfgPJoqEqw</recordid><startdate>201011</startdate><enddate>201011</enddate><creator>Ciolac, Emmanuel G</creator><creator>Brech, Guilherme C</creator><creator>Greve, Júlia M D</creator><general>National Strength and Conditioning Association</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201011</creationdate><title>Age Does Not Affect Exercise Intensity Progression among Women</title><author>Ciolac, Emmanuel G ; Brech, Guilherme C ; Greve, Júlia M D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4248-eca4048b7d03fdf4cb8302e6fe02264e15772cea3baecf6d246635d5d07461e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aging - physiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Exercise - physiology</topic><topic>Exercise Test</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Metabolic disorders</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscle Strength - physiology</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Physical Exertion - physiology</topic><topic>Physical Fitness</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ciolac, Emmanuel G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brech, Guilherme C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greve, Júlia M D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ciolac, Emmanuel G</au><au>Brech, Guilherme C</au><au>Greve, Júlia M D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Age Does Not Affect Exercise Intensity Progression among Women</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><date>2010-11</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3023</spage><epage>3031</epage><pages>3023-3031</pages><issn>1064-8011</issn><eissn>1533-4287</eissn><abstract>Ciolac, EG, Brech, GC, and Greve, JMD. Age does not affect exercise intensity progression among women. J Strength Cond Res 24(11)3023-3031, 2010-It has been recommended that the intensity of exercise training (ET) should progress slowly with lower increments in older than in young people. However, scientific evidence supporting this recommendation is lacking. Our aim was to examine possible influences of age on exercise intensity progression in healthy women. Seventeen young (29.1 ± 5.7 years) and 16 older women (64.5 ± 4.5 years) underwent 13 weeks of ET consisting of cycle ergometry (CE, 65-75% of reserve heart rate), whole-body resistance exercise (RE, 60% of 1 repetition maximum [1RM]), and stretching. Muscle strength was assessed before and after ET by the 1RM. Cycle ergometry and RE workloads were recorded for each exercise session, and increases of 5-10% were made whenever adaptation occurred. Absolute muscle strength after ET improved (p < 0.001) in both groups, and there were no significant differences between groups. Relative exercise intensity progression was not significantly different between groups for RE (Pearsonʼs correlation = 0.98 ± 0.01), but it was greater in older women for CE (p = 0.047). The ET was safe because no injuries or major muscle pain was observed in either group. These results suggest that healthy older women are capable of exercising and increasing exercise intensity in the same way as young women.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Strength and Conditioning Association</pub><pmid>20703174</pmid><doi>10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d09ef6</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1064-8011 |
ispartof | Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2010-11, Vol.24 (11), p.3023-3031 |
issn | 1064-8011 1533-4287 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_762282712 |
source | HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
subjects | Adult Aging - physiology Cardiovascular disease Exercise Exercise - physiology Exercise Test Female Humans Metabolic disorders Middle Aged Muscle Strength - physiology Older people Physical Exertion - physiology Physical Fitness Young adults |
title | Age Does Not Affect Exercise Intensity Progression among Women |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T10%3A15%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Age%20Does%20Not%20Affect%20Exercise%20Intensity%20Progression%20among%20Women&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strength%20and%20conditioning%20research&rft.au=Ciolac,%20Emmanuel%20G&rft.date=2010-11&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3023&rft.epage=3031&rft.pages=3023-3031&rft.issn=1064-8011&rft.eissn=1533-4287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d09ef6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E762282712%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4248-eca4048b7d03fdf4cb8302e6fe02264e15772cea3baecf6d246635d5d07461e93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=815317878&rft_id=info:pmid/20703174&rfr_iscdi=true |