Loading…

Age Does Not Affect Exercise Intensity Progression among Women

Ciolac, EG, Brech, GC, and Greve, JMD. Age does not affect exercise intensity progression among women. J Strength Cond Res 24(11)3023-3031, 2010-It has been recommended that the intensity of exercise training (ET) should progress slowly with lower increments in older than in young people. However, s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of strength and conditioning research 2010-11, Vol.24 (11), p.3023-3031
Main Authors: Ciolac, Emmanuel G, Brech, Guilherme C, Greve, Júlia M D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4248-eca4048b7d03fdf4cb8302e6fe02264e15772cea3baecf6d246635d5d07461e93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4248-eca4048b7d03fdf4cb8302e6fe02264e15772cea3baecf6d246635d5d07461e93
container_end_page 3031
container_issue 11
container_start_page 3023
container_title Journal of strength and conditioning research
container_volume 24
creator Ciolac, Emmanuel G
Brech, Guilherme C
Greve, Júlia M D
description Ciolac, EG, Brech, GC, and Greve, JMD. Age does not affect exercise intensity progression among women. J Strength Cond Res 24(11)3023-3031, 2010-It has been recommended that the intensity of exercise training (ET) should progress slowly with lower increments in older than in young people. However, scientific evidence supporting this recommendation is lacking. Our aim was to examine possible influences of age on exercise intensity progression in healthy women. Seventeen young (29.1 ± 5.7 years) and 16 older women (64.5 ± 4.5 years) underwent 13 weeks of ET consisting of cycle ergometry (CE, 65-75% of reserve heart rate), whole-body resistance exercise (RE, 60% of 1 repetition maximum [1RM]), and stretching. Muscle strength was assessed before and after ET by the 1RM. Cycle ergometry and RE workloads were recorded for each exercise session, and increases of 5-10% were made whenever adaptation occurred. Absolute muscle strength after ET improved (p < 0.001) in both groups, and there were no significant differences between groups. Relative exercise intensity progression was not significantly different between groups for RE (Pearsonʼs correlation = 0.98 ± 0.01), but it was greater in older women for CE (p = 0.047). The ET was safe because no injuries or major muscle pain was observed in either group. These results suggest that healthy older women are capable of exercising and increasing exercise intensity in the same way as young women.
doi_str_mv 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d09ef6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_762282712</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>762282712</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4248-eca4048b7d03fdf4cb8302e6fe02264e15772cea3baecf6d246635d5d07461e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtr3TAQRkVoaB7tPyjFdJOVkxlJlnQ3hcvNm5AW2tKlsOXRjVPbSiSbJP--CnlBFsPM4szHcIaxLwj7WOHi4PzXah8aQEECDbawIK822DZWQpSSG_0hz6BkaQBxi-2kdA3Aq6oSH9kWBw0Ctdxm35drKg4DpeIyTMXSe3JTcXRP0XWJirNxojF100PxM4Z1pJS6MBb1EMZ18TcMNH5im77uE31-7rvsz_HR79VpefHj5Gy1vCid5NKU5GoJ0jS6BeFbL11jBHBSnoBzJQkrrbmjWjQ1Oa9aLpUSVVu1oKVCWohdtveUexPD7UxpskOXHPV9PVKYk9WKc8M18kx-e0dehzmO-ThrshvURpsMySfIxZBSJG9vYjfU8cEi2Ee7Ntu17-3mta_P2XMzUPu69KLzLfcu9BPF9K-f7yjaK6r76coCIJdcm5ID5qcAQJkLjfgPJoqEqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>815317878</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Age Does Not Affect Exercise Intensity Progression among Women</title><source>HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</source><creator>Ciolac, Emmanuel G ; Brech, Guilherme C ; Greve, Júlia M D</creator><creatorcontrib>Ciolac, Emmanuel G ; Brech, Guilherme C ; Greve, Júlia M D</creatorcontrib><description>Ciolac, EG, Brech, GC, and Greve, JMD. Age does not affect exercise intensity progression among women. J Strength Cond Res 24(11)3023-3031, 2010-It has been recommended that the intensity of exercise training (ET) should progress slowly with lower increments in older than in young people. However, scientific evidence supporting this recommendation is lacking. Our aim was to examine possible influences of age on exercise intensity progression in healthy women. Seventeen young (29.1 ± 5.7 years) and 16 older women (64.5 ± 4.5 years) underwent 13 weeks of ET consisting of cycle ergometry (CE, 65-75% of reserve heart rate), whole-body resistance exercise (RE, 60% of 1 repetition maximum [1RM]), and stretching. Muscle strength was assessed before and after ET by the 1RM. Cycle ergometry and RE workloads were recorded for each exercise session, and increases of 5-10% were made whenever adaptation occurred. Absolute muscle strength after ET improved (p &lt; 0.001) in both groups, and there were no significant differences between groups. Relative exercise intensity progression was not significantly different between groups for RE (Pearsonʼs correlation = 0.98 ± 0.01), but it was greater in older women for CE (p = 0.047). The ET was safe because no injuries or major muscle pain was observed in either group. These results suggest that healthy older women are capable of exercising and increasing exercise intensity in the same way as young women.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d09ef6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20703174</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Strength and Conditioning Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aging - physiology ; Cardiovascular disease ; Exercise ; Exercise - physiology ; Exercise Test ; Female ; Humans ; Metabolic disorders ; Middle Aged ; Muscle Strength - physiology ; Older people ; Physical Exertion - physiology ; Physical Fitness ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2010-11, Vol.24 (11), p.3023-3031</ispartof><rights>2010 National Strength and Conditioning Association</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Nov 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4248-eca4048b7d03fdf4cb8302e6fe02264e15772cea3baecf6d246635d5d07461e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4248-eca4048b7d03fdf4cb8302e6fe02264e15772cea3baecf6d246635d5d07461e93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20703174$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ciolac, Emmanuel G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brech, Guilherme C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greve, Júlia M D</creatorcontrib><title>Age Does Not Affect Exercise Intensity Progression among Women</title><title>Journal of strength and conditioning research</title><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><description>Ciolac, EG, Brech, GC, and Greve, JMD. Age does not affect exercise intensity progression among women. J Strength Cond Res 24(11)3023-3031, 2010-It has been recommended that the intensity of exercise training (ET) should progress slowly with lower increments in older than in young people. However, scientific evidence supporting this recommendation is lacking. Our aim was to examine possible influences of age on exercise intensity progression in healthy women. Seventeen young (29.1 ± 5.7 years) and 16 older women (64.5 ± 4.5 years) underwent 13 weeks of ET consisting of cycle ergometry (CE, 65-75% of reserve heart rate), whole-body resistance exercise (RE, 60% of 1 repetition maximum [1RM]), and stretching. Muscle strength was assessed before and after ET by the 1RM. Cycle ergometry and RE workloads were recorded for each exercise session, and increases of 5-10% were made whenever adaptation occurred. Absolute muscle strength after ET improved (p &lt; 0.001) in both groups, and there were no significant differences between groups. Relative exercise intensity progression was not significantly different between groups for RE (Pearsonʼs correlation = 0.98 ± 0.01), but it was greater in older women for CE (p = 0.047). The ET was safe because no injuries or major muscle pain was observed in either group. These results suggest that healthy older women are capable of exercising and increasing exercise intensity in the same way as young women.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aging - physiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Exercise - physiology</subject><subject>Exercise Test</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Metabolic disorders</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscle Strength - physiology</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Physical Exertion - physiology</subject><subject>Physical Fitness</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>1064-8011</issn><issn>1533-4287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkUtr3TAQRkVoaB7tPyjFdJOVkxlJlnQ3hcvNm5AW2tKlsOXRjVPbSiSbJP--CnlBFsPM4szHcIaxLwj7WOHi4PzXah8aQEECDbawIK822DZWQpSSG_0hz6BkaQBxi-2kdA3Aq6oSH9kWBw0Ctdxm35drKg4DpeIyTMXSe3JTcXRP0XWJirNxojF100PxM4Z1pJS6MBb1EMZ18TcMNH5im77uE31-7rvsz_HR79VpefHj5Gy1vCid5NKU5GoJ0jS6BeFbL11jBHBSnoBzJQkrrbmjWjQ1Oa9aLpUSVVu1oKVCWohdtveUexPD7UxpskOXHPV9PVKYk9WKc8M18kx-e0dehzmO-ThrshvURpsMySfIxZBSJG9vYjfU8cEi2Ee7Ntu17-3mta_P2XMzUPu69KLzLfcu9BPF9K-f7yjaK6r76coCIJdcm5ID5qcAQJkLjfgPJoqEqw</recordid><startdate>201011</startdate><enddate>201011</enddate><creator>Ciolac, Emmanuel G</creator><creator>Brech, Guilherme C</creator><creator>Greve, Júlia M D</creator><general>National Strength and Conditioning Association</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201011</creationdate><title>Age Does Not Affect Exercise Intensity Progression among Women</title><author>Ciolac, Emmanuel G ; Brech, Guilherme C ; Greve, Júlia M D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4248-eca4048b7d03fdf4cb8302e6fe02264e15772cea3baecf6d246635d5d07461e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aging - physiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Exercise - physiology</topic><topic>Exercise Test</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Metabolic disorders</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscle Strength - physiology</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Physical Exertion - physiology</topic><topic>Physical Fitness</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ciolac, Emmanuel G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brech, Guilherme C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greve, Júlia M D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ciolac, Emmanuel G</au><au>Brech, Guilherme C</au><au>Greve, Júlia M D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Age Does Not Affect Exercise Intensity Progression among Women</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><date>2010-11</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3023</spage><epage>3031</epage><pages>3023-3031</pages><issn>1064-8011</issn><eissn>1533-4287</eissn><abstract>Ciolac, EG, Brech, GC, and Greve, JMD. Age does not affect exercise intensity progression among women. J Strength Cond Res 24(11)3023-3031, 2010-It has been recommended that the intensity of exercise training (ET) should progress slowly with lower increments in older than in young people. However, scientific evidence supporting this recommendation is lacking. Our aim was to examine possible influences of age on exercise intensity progression in healthy women. Seventeen young (29.1 ± 5.7 years) and 16 older women (64.5 ± 4.5 years) underwent 13 weeks of ET consisting of cycle ergometry (CE, 65-75% of reserve heart rate), whole-body resistance exercise (RE, 60% of 1 repetition maximum [1RM]), and stretching. Muscle strength was assessed before and after ET by the 1RM. Cycle ergometry and RE workloads were recorded for each exercise session, and increases of 5-10% were made whenever adaptation occurred. Absolute muscle strength after ET improved (p &lt; 0.001) in both groups, and there were no significant differences between groups. Relative exercise intensity progression was not significantly different between groups for RE (Pearsonʼs correlation = 0.98 ± 0.01), but it was greater in older women for CE (p = 0.047). The ET was safe because no injuries or major muscle pain was observed in either group. These results suggest that healthy older women are capable of exercising and increasing exercise intensity in the same way as young women.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Strength and Conditioning Association</pub><pmid>20703174</pmid><doi>10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d09ef6</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1064-8011
ispartof Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2010-11, Vol.24 (11), p.3023-3031
issn 1064-8011
1533-4287
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_762282712
source HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
subjects Adult
Aging - physiology
Cardiovascular disease
Exercise
Exercise - physiology
Exercise Test
Female
Humans
Metabolic disorders
Middle Aged
Muscle Strength - physiology
Older people
Physical Exertion - physiology
Physical Fitness
Young adults
title Age Does Not Affect Exercise Intensity Progression among Women
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T10%3A15%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Age%20Does%20Not%20Affect%20Exercise%20Intensity%20Progression%20among%20Women&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strength%20and%20conditioning%20research&rft.au=Ciolac,%20Emmanuel%20G&rft.date=2010-11&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3023&rft.epage=3031&rft.pages=3023-3031&rft.issn=1064-8011&rft.eissn=1533-4287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d09ef6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E762282712%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4248-eca4048b7d03fdf4cb8302e6fe02264e15772cea3baecf6d246635d5d07461e93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=815317878&rft_id=info:pmid/20703174&rfr_iscdi=true