Loading…

No monsters, no miracles: in nonlinear sciences hydrology is not an outlier

The end users of hydrological models may be justified for being tired of the excessive uncertainty of these models, not to mention their simplistic approximations and crude modelling. The ever-increasing sophistication of model parameter fitting is simply a smoke-screen that hides the models' l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hydrological sciences journal 2010-01, Vol.55 (6), p.965-979
Main Authors: Schertzer, D., Tchiguirinskaia, I., Lovejoy, S., Hubert, P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-f03e345c1fe3dd26e8b4ba7b06c29ae78d5b6b49e87362b4d3f4dfe4fd99e4e03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-f03e345c1fe3dd26e8b4ba7b06c29ae78d5b6b49e87362b4d3f4dfe4fd99e4e03
container_end_page 979
container_issue 6
container_start_page 965
container_title Hydrological sciences journal
container_volume 55
creator Schertzer, D.
Tchiguirinskaia, I.
Lovejoy, S.
Hubert, P.
description The end users of hydrological models may be justified for being tired of the excessive uncertainty of these models, not to mention their simplistic approximations and crude modelling. The ever-increasing sophistication of model parameter fitting is simply a smoke-screen that hides the models' lack of physical basis, their scale dependence, and their inability to fit widely diverse behaviours. More generally, we have to admit a lack of qualitative improvement in hydrological modelling in recent times. In fact, operational hydrology may have suffered for some time from ignoring the advances in theoretical hydrology, which have, in contrast, greatly stimulated the nonlinear sciences. For instance, more than a century ago fractals were considered as geometrical monsters, whereas decades ago river networks became classical fractal objects, and rainfall and discharges are now classical examples of multifractal fields. These hydrological characteristics are still often ignored by operational hydrology, whereas they explain not only its current limitations, but also how to overcome them. To illustrate these problems, this paper focuses on the fact that hydrological fields are most likely singular with respect to measures of time and volume. This would not only explain the ubiquitous scale dependence of hydrological observations, but would also give the possibility to transform them into scale-independent quantities. The upscaling of a rainfall time series from an hour to a year is therefore discussed in detail, and enables us to quickly introduce other examples. Citation Schertzer, D., Tchiguirinskaia, I., Lovejoy, S. & Hubert, P. (2010) No monsters, no miracles: in nonlinear sciences hydrology is not an outlier! Hydrol. Sci. J. 55(6), 965-979.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/02626667.2010.505173
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_762282807</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>762282807</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-f03e345c1fe3dd26e8b4ba7b06c29ae78d5b6b49e87362b4d3f4dfe4fd99e4e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwBhxyQ0ik-C9OwgWhCiiiggucLcdZUyPXLnYK6tuTKMCR02p2v5mVBqFTgmcEV_gSU0GFEOWM4n5V4IKUbA9NKClwzjgr9tFkQPKBOURHKb1jzHgt2AQ9PoVsHXzqIKaLzPfCRqUdpKvM-l57Zz2omCVtwWtI2WrXxuDC2y6zqb93mfJZ2HbOQjxGB0a5BCc_c4pe725f5ot8-Xz_ML9Z5rp_2uUGM2C80MQAa1sqoGp4o8oGC01rBWXVFo1oeA1VyQRteMsMbw1w09Y1cMBsis7H3JVychPtWsWdDMrKxc1SDjuMS0IoKz5Jz56N7CaGjy2kTq5t0uCc8hC2SZaC0opWuOxJPpI6hpQimL9oguVQs_ytWQ41y7Hm3nY92qw3Ia7VV4iulZ3auRBNVF7bJNm_Cd9dzoN6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>762282807</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>No monsters, no miracles: in nonlinear sciences hydrology is not an outlier</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Schertzer, D. ; Tchiguirinskaia, I. ; Lovejoy, S. ; Hubert, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schertzer, D. ; Tchiguirinskaia, I. ; Lovejoy, S. ; Hubert, P.</creatorcontrib><description>The end users of hydrological models may be justified for being tired of the excessive uncertainty of these models, not to mention their simplistic approximations and crude modelling. The ever-increasing sophistication of model parameter fitting is simply a smoke-screen that hides the models' lack of physical basis, their scale dependence, and their inability to fit widely diverse behaviours. More generally, we have to admit a lack of qualitative improvement in hydrological modelling in recent times. In fact, operational hydrology may have suffered for some time from ignoring the advances in theoretical hydrology, which have, in contrast, greatly stimulated the nonlinear sciences. For instance, more than a century ago fractals were considered as geometrical monsters, whereas decades ago river networks became classical fractal objects, and rainfall and discharges are now classical examples of multifractal fields. These hydrological characteristics are still often ignored by operational hydrology, whereas they explain not only its current limitations, but also how to overcome them. To illustrate these problems, this paper focuses on the fact that hydrological fields are most likely singular with respect to measures of time and volume. This would not only explain the ubiquitous scale dependence of hydrological observations, but would also give the possibility to transform them into scale-independent quantities. The upscaling of a rainfall time series from an hour to a year is therefore discussed in detail, and enables us to quickly introduce other examples. Citation Schertzer, D., Tchiguirinskaia, I., Lovejoy, S. &amp; Hubert, P. (2010) No monsters, no miracles: in nonlinear sciences hydrology is not an outlier! Hydrol. Sci. J. 55(6), 965-979.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0262-6667</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2150-3435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2010.505173</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>balance equation ; Earth Sciences ; Environmental Sciences ; fractals ; Global Changes ; Hydrology ; measure ; mesure ; multifractals ; scales ; Sciences of the Universe ; singularities ; singularités ; échelles ; équation de bilan</subject><ispartof>Hydrological sciences journal, 2010-01, Vol.55 (6), p.965-979</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2010 IAHS Press 2010</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-f03e345c1fe3dd26e8b4ba7b06c29ae78d5b6b49e87362b4d3f4dfe4fd99e4e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-f03e345c1fe3dd26e8b4ba7b06c29ae78d5b6b49e87362b4d3f4dfe4fd99e4e03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4930-5115</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://enpc.hal.science/hal-00711235$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schertzer, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tchiguirinskaia, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovejoy, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubert, P.</creatorcontrib><title>No monsters, no miracles: in nonlinear sciences hydrology is not an outlier</title><title>Hydrological sciences journal</title><description>The end users of hydrological models may be justified for being tired of the excessive uncertainty of these models, not to mention their simplistic approximations and crude modelling. The ever-increasing sophistication of model parameter fitting is simply a smoke-screen that hides the models' lack of physical basis, their scale dependence, and their inability to fit widely diverse behaviours. More generally, we have to admit a lack of qualitative improvement in hydrological modelling in recent times. In fact, operational hydrology may have suffered for some time from ignoring the advances in theoretical hydrology, which have, in contrast, greatly stimulated the nonlinear sciences. For instance, more than a century ago fractals were considered as geometrical monsters, whereas decades ago river networks became classical fractal objects, and rainfall and discharges are now classical examples of multifractal fields. These hydrological characteristics are still often ignored by operational hydrology, whereas they explain not only its current limitations, but also how to overcome them. To illustrate these problems, this paper focuses on the fact that hydrological fields are most likely singular with respect to measures of time and volume. This would not only explain the ubiquitous scale dependence of hydrological observations, but would also give the possibility to transform them into scale-independent quantities. The upscaling of a rainfall time series from an hour to a year is therefore discussed in detail, and enables us to quickly introduce other examples. Citation Schertzer, D., Tchiguirinskaia, I., Lovejoy, S. &amp; Hubert, P. (2010) No monsters, no miracles: in nonlinear sciences hydrology is not an outlier! Hydrol. Sci. J. 55(6), 965-979.</description><subject>balance equation</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>fractals</subject><subject>Global Changes</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>measure</subject><subject>mesure</subject><subject>multifractals</subject><subject>scales</subject><subject>Sciences of the Universe</subject><subject>singularities</subject><subject>singularités</subject><subject>échelles</subject><subject>équation de bilan</subject><issn>0262-6667</issn><issn>2150-3435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwBhxyQ0ik-C9OwgWhCiiiggucLcdZUyPXLnYK6tuTKMCR02p2v5mVBqFTgmcEV_gSU0GFEOWM4n5V4IKUbA9NKClwzjgr9tFkQPKBOURHKb1jzHgt2AQ9PoVsHXzqIKaLzPfCRqUdpKvM-l57Zz2omCVtwWtI2WrXxuDC2y6zqb93mfJZ2HbOQjxGB0a5BCc_c4pe725f5ot8-Xz_ML9Z5rp_2uUGM2C80MQAa1sqoGp4o8oGC01rBWXVFo1oeA1VyQRteMsMbw1w09Y1cMBsis7H3JVychPtWsWdDMrKxc1SDjuMS0IoKz5Jz56N7CaGjy2kTq5t0uCc8hC2SZaC0opWuOxJPpI6hpQimL9oguVQs_ytWQ41y7Hm3nY92qw3Ia7VV4iulZ3auRBNVF7bJNm_Cd9dzoN6</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Schertzer, D.</creator><creator>Tchiguirinskaia, I.</creator><creator>Lovejoy, S.</creator><creator>Hubert, P.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4930-5115</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>No monsters, no miracles: in nonlinear sciences hydrology is not an outlier</title><author>Schertzer, D. ; Tchiguirinskaia, I. ; Lovejoy, S. ; Hubert, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-f03e345c1fe3dd26e8b4ba7b06c29ae78d5b6b49e87362b4d3f4dfe4fd99e4e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>balance equation</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>fractals</topic><topic>Global Changes</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>measure</topic><topic>mesure</topic><topic>multifractals</topic><topic>scales</topic><topic>Sciences of the Universe</topic><topic>singularities</topic><topic>singularités</topic><topic>échelles</topic><topic>équation de bilan</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schertzer, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tchiguirinskaia, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovejoy, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubert, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Hydrological sciences journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schertzer, D.</au><au>Tchiguirinskaia, I.</au><au>Lovejoy, S.</au><au>Hubert, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>No monsters, no miracles: in nonlinear sciences hydrology is not an outlier</atitle><jtitle>Hydrological sciences journal</jtitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>965</spage><epage>979</epage><pages>965-979</pages><issn>0262-6667</issn><eissn>2150-3435</eissn><abstract>The end users of hydrological models may be justified for being tired of the excessive uncertainty of these models, not to mention their simplistic approximations and crude modelling. The ever-increasing sophistication of model parameter fitting is simply a smoke-screen that hides the models' lack of physical basis, their scale dependence, and their inability to fit widely diverse behaviours. More generally, we have to admit a lack of qualitative improvement in hydrological modelling in recent times. In fact, operational hydrology may have suffered for some time from ignoring the advances in theoretical hydrology, which have, in contrast, greatly stimulated the nonlinear sciences. For instance, more than a century ago fractals were considered as geometrical monsters, whereas decades ago river networks became classical fractal objects, and rainfall and discharges are now classical examples of multifractal fields. These hydrological characteristics are still often ignored by operational hydrology, whereas they explain not only its current limitations, but also how to overcome them. To illustrate these problems, this paper focuses on the fact that hydrological fields are most likely singular with respect to measures of time and volume. This would not only explain the ubiquitous scale dependence of hydrological observations, but would also give the possibility to transform them into scale-independent quantities. The upscaling of a rainfall time series from an hour to a year is therefore discussed in detail, and enables us to quickly introduce other examples. Citation Schertzer, D., Tchiguirinskaia, I., Lovejoy, S. &amp; Hubert, P. (2010) No monsters, no miracles: in nonlinear sciences hydrology is not an outlier! Hydrol. Sci. J. 55(6), 965-979.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/02626667.2010.505173</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4930-5115</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0262-6667
ispartof Hydrological sciences journal, 2010-01, Vol.55 (6), p.965-979
issn 0262-6667
2150-3435
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_762282807
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
subjects balance equation
Earth Sciences
Environmental Sciences
fractals
Global Changes
Hydrology
measure
mesure
multifractals
scales
Sciences of the Universe
singularities
singularités
échelles
équation de bilan
title No monsters, no miracles: in nonlinear sciences hydrology is not an outlier
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T23%3A10%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=No%20monsters,%20no%20miracles:%20in%20nonlinear%20sciences%20hydrology%20is%20not%20an%20outlier&rft.jtitle=Hydrological%20sciences%20journal&rft.au=Schertzer,%20D.&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=965&rft.epage=979&rft.pages=965-979&rft.issn=0262-6667&rft.eissn=2150-3435&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02626667.2010.505173&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E762282807%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-f03e345c1fe3dd26e8b4ba7b06c29ae78d5b6b49e87362b4d3f4dfe4fd99e4e03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=762282807&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true