Loading…
Strategies to Measure Nursing Home Residents' Satisfaction and Preferences Related to Incontinence and Mobility Care: Implications for Evaluating Intervention Effects
This study compared four different interview strategies to measure 111 incontinent nursing home residents' “met need” related to incontinence and mobility care. Strategies were compared on criteria related to ceiling effects and stability. Four methods were used: questions that used the term “s...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Gerontologist 1999-06, Vol.39 (3), p.345-355 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-355e6ad639f3a76ace734486547ae70cb5e117f638f9ca7891e0cfd22cec4eab3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 355 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 345 |
container_title | The Gerontologist |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Simmons, Sandra F. Schnelle, John F. |
description | This study compared four different interview strategies to measure 111 incontinent nursing home residents' “met need” related to incontinence and mobility care. Strategies were compared on criteria related to ceiling effects and stability. Four methods were used: questions that used the term “satisfaction” and direct questions about preferences that did not use the term “satisfaction” and which could be translated into three indirect measures of met need. To facilitate a comparison among the four methods, a statement of satisfaction was interpreted as met need. All of these measures were then compared to direct observations of care processes. Residents were more stable in their reports indicating that their care needs were met than they were in their reports that their needs were not met. The direct satisfaction questions produced information most characterized by ceiling effects compared to information elicited by the preference questions. Despite high reported rates of met need as assessed by two of the four methods, direct observations revealed low frequencies of care provision. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/geront/39.3.345 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764073227</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>61331611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-355e6ad639f3a76ace734486547ae70cb5e117f638f9ca7891e0cfd22cec4eab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkkFvEzEQhVcIREPhzA1ZHOhpE3tn115zQ1FCIrVQpSBVXCzHOxu5bLzB9lb0D_V31ksqhDjAyRrNN-_Z45dlrxmdMiphtkPfuzgDOYUplNWTbMJEVecVlOxpNqGU8VxSBifZixBuaKqLQjzPThgFyWtZTLL7q-h1xJ3FQGJPLlCHwSP5NPhg3Y6s-j2SDQbboIvhjFzpaEOrTbS9I9o15NJjix6dSfMb7JJUM-qsnUn3sm5s_OIu-q3tbLwjc-3xPVnvD501epQJpO09Wdzqbkh18ly7iP42-Y0ei7ZFE8PL7Fmru4CvHs_T7Oty8WW-ys8_f1zPP5znpuRFzKGqkOuGg2xBC64NCijLmlel0Cio2VbImGg51K00WtSSITVtUxQGTYl6C6fZ2VH34PsfA4ao9jYY7DrtsB-CErykAtISE_nunySXddIH_n-QATDOWALf_gXe9IN36bmqSJ9dlXUhEzQ7Qsb3IaTlq4O3e-3vFKNqjIQ6RkKBVKBSJNLEm0fZYbvH5g_-mIEE5EfAhog_f_e1_664AFGp1fU3dX25EssNXyoKD6r8xXY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210954829</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strategies to Measure Nursing Home Residents' Satisfaction and Preferences Related to Incontinence and Mobility Care: Implications for Evaluating Intervention Effects</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Simmons, Sandra F. ; Schnelle, John F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Simmons, Sandra F. ; Schnelle, John F.</creatorcontrib><description>This study compared four different interview strategies to measure 111 incontinent nursing home residents' “met need” related to incontinence and mobility care. Strategies were compared on criteria related to ceiling effects and stability. Four methods were used: questions that used the term “satisfaction” and direct questions about preferences that did not use the term “satisfaction” and which could be translated into three indirect measures of met need. To facilitate a comparison among the four methods, a statement of satisfaction was interpreted as met need. All of these measures were then compared to direct observations of care processes. Residents were more stable in their reports indicating that their care needs were met than they were in their reports that their needs were not met. The direct satisfaction questions produced information most characterized by ceiling effects compared to information elicited by the preference questions. Despite high reported rates of met need as assessed by two of the four methods, direct observations revealed low frequencies of care provision.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-9013</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5341</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/geront/39.3.345</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10396892</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GRNTA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Gerontological Society of America</publisher><subject>Aged ; Gerontology ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; Nursing homes ; Nursing Homes - standards ; Patient Satisfaction ; Quality of care ; Quality of life ; Quality of service ; United States ; Unmet need ; Urinary incontinence ; Urinary Incontinence - nursing ; Walking</subject><ispartof>The Gerontologist, 1999-06, Vol.39 (3), p.345-355</ispartof><rights>Copyright Gerontological Society of America, Incorporated Jun 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-355e6ad639f3a76ace734486547ae70cb5e117f638f9ca7891e0cfd22cec4eab3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33774,33775</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10396892$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simmons, Sandra F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnelle, John F.</creatorcontrib><title>Strategies to Measure Nursing Home Residents' Satisfaction and Preferences Related to Incontinence and Mobility Care: Implications for Evaluating Intervention Effects</title><title>The Gerontologist</title><addtitle>Gerontologist</addtitle><description>This study compared four different interview strategies to measure 111 incontinent nursing home residents' “met need” related to incontinence and mobility care. Strategies were compared on criteria related to ceiling effects and stability. Four methods were used: questions that used the term “satisfaction” and direct questions about preferences that did not use the term “satisfaction” and which could be translated into three indirect measures of met need. To facilitate a comparison among the four methods, a statement of satisfaction was interpreted as met need. All of these measures were then compared to direct observations of care processes. Residents were more stable in their reports indicating that their care needs were met than they were in their reports that their needs were not met. The direct satisfaction questions produced information most characterized by ceiling effects compared to information elicited by the preference questions. Despite high reported rates of met need as assessed by two of the four methods, direct observations revealed low frequencies of care provision.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Gerontology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Nursing homes</subject><subject>Nursing Homes - standards</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Quality of service</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Unmet need</subject><subject>Urinary incontinence</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence - nursing</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>0016-9013</issn><issn>1758-5341</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkkFvEzEQhVcIREPhzA1ZHOhpE3tn115zQ1FCIrVQpSBVXCzHOxu5bLzB9lb0D_V31ksqhDjAyRrNN-_Z45dlrxmdMiphtkPfuzgDOYUplNWTbMJEVecVlOxpNqGU8VxSBifZixBuaKqLQjzPThgFyWtZTLL7q-h1xJ3FQGJPLlCHwSP5NPhg3Y6s-j2SDQbboIvhjFzpaEOrTbS9I9o15NJjix6dSfMb7JJUM-qsnUn3sm5s_OIu-q3tbLwjc-3xPVnvD501epQJpO09Wdzqbkh18ly7iP42-Y0ei7ZFE8PL7Fmru4CvHs_T7Oty8WW-ys8_f1zPP5znpuRFzKGqkOuGg2xBC64NCijLmlel0Cio2VbImGg51K00WtSSITVtUxQGTYl6C6fZ2VH34PsfA4ao9jYY7DrtsB-CErykAtISE_nunySXddIH_n-QATDOWALf_gXe9IN36bmqSJ9dlXUhEzQ7Qsb3IaTlq4O3e-3vFKNqjIQ6RkKBVKBSJNLEm0fZYbvH5g_-mIEE5EfAhog_f_e1_664AFGp1fU3dX25EssNXyoKD6r8xXY</recordid><startdate>19990601</startdate><enddate>19990601</enddate><creator>Simmons, Sandra F.</creator><creator>Schnelle, John F.</creator><general>The Gerontological Society of America</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990601</creationdate><title>Strategies to Measure Nursing Home Residents' Satisfaction and Preferences Related to Incontinence and Mobility Care: Implications for Evaluating Intervention Effects</title><author>Simmons, Sandra F. ; Schnelle, John F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-355e6ad639f3a76ace734486547ae70cb5e117f638f9ca7891e0cfd22cec4eab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Gerontology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Nursing homes</topic><topic>Nursing Homes - standards</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Quality of service</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Unmet need</topic><topic>Urinary incontinence</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence - nursing</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simmons, Sandra F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnelle, John F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Gerontologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simmons, Sandra F.</au><au>Schnelle, John F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strategies to Measure Nursing Home Residents' Satisfaction and Preferences Related to Incontinence and Mobility Care: Implications for Evaluating Intervention Effects</atitle><jtitle>The Gerontologist</jtitle><addtitle>Gerontologist</addtitle><date>1999-06-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>345</spage><epage>355</epage><pages>345-355</pages><issn>0016-9013</issn><eissn>1758-5341</eissn><coden>GRNTA3</coden><abstract>This study compared four different interview strategies to measure 111 incontinent nursing home residents' “met need” related to incontinence and mobility care. Strategies were compared on criteria related to ceiling effects and stability. Four methods were used: questions that used the term “satisfaction” and direct questions about preferences that did not use the term “satisfaction” and which could be translated into three indirect measures of met need. To facilitate a comparison among the four methods, a statement of satisfaction was interpreted as met need. All of these measures were then compared to direct observations of care processes. Residents were more stable in their reports indicating that their care needs were met than they were in their reports that their needs were not met. The direct satisfaction questions produced information most characterized by ceiling effects compared to information elicited by the preference questions. Despite high reported rates of met need as assessed by two of the four methods, direct observations revealed low frequencies of care provision.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Gerontological Society of America</pub><pmid>10396892</pmid><doi>10.1093/geront/39.3.345</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-9013 |
ispartof | The Gerontologist, 1999-06, Vol.39 (3), p.345-355 |
issn | 0016-9013 1758-5341 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764073227 |
source | Oxford Journals Online; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Aged Gerontology Humans Interviews as Topic Nursing homes Nursing Homes - standards Patient Satisfaction Quality of care Quality of life Quality of service United States Unmet need Urinary incontinence Urinary Incontinence - nursing Walking |
title | Strategies to Measure Nursing Home Residents' Satisfaction and Preferences Related to Incontinence and Mobility Care: Implications for Evaluating Intervention Effects |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T06%3A01%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strategies%20to%20Measure%20Nursing%20Home%20Residents'%20Satisfaction%20and%20Preferences%20Related%20to%20Incontinence%20and%20Mobility%20Care:%20Implications%20for%20Evaluating%20Intervention%20Effects&rft.jtitle=The%20Gerontologist&rft.au=Simmons,%20Sandra%20F.&rft.date=1999-06-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=345&rft.epage=355&rft.pages=345-355&rft.issn=0016-9013&rft.eissn=1758-5341&rft.coden=GRNTA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/geront/39.3.345&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E61331611%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-355e6ad639f3a76ace734486547ae70cb5e117f638f9ca7891e0cfd22cec4eab3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210954829&rft_id=info:pmid/10396892&rfr_iscdi=true |