Complexity and collaboration in routine practice of CBT : What doesn't work with whom and how might it work better ?

An analysis of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) suggests that effectiveness and efficiency in routine practice of CBT will be compromised unless therapists work in small teams and adopt some of the rigors and objectivity of the research context. It is suggested that clinical practice should includ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of mental health (Abingdon, England) England), 2000-08, Vol.9 (4), p.429-444
Main Authors: DURHAM, R. C, SWAN, J. S, FISHER, P. L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Behavior therapy. Cognitive therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive behaviour therapy
Collaboration
Effectiveness
Medical sciences
Mental disorders
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Therapy
Treatments
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:An analysis of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) suggests that effectiveness and efficiency in routine practice of CBT will be compromised unless therapists work in small teams and adopt some of the rigors and objectivity of the research context. It is suggested that clinical practice should include routing assessment of complexity and severity of problems at a screening interview and quality of collaboration after a trial period of treatment.
ISSN:0963-8237
1360-0567
DOI:10.1080/713680258