Priority-setting for nursing research in the Republic of China

Priority‐setting for nursing research in the Republic of China The question of how public funds for research should be allocated has led to participatory priority‐setting in prosperous democracies like Taiwan, Republic of China. Useful criteria for research priorities are scientific merit, social be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of advanced nursing 2000-07, Vol.32 (1), p.19-27
Main Authors: Yin, Teresa J.C., Hsu, Nanly, Tsai, Sing Ling, Wang, Bette Wei, Shaw, Fu Ling, Shih, Fu Jin, Chang, Wen-Yin, Henry, Beverly
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Clinical Nursing Research - organization & administration
Humans
Needs Assessment
Nursing
Nursing Administration Research - organization & administration
Nursing Education Research - organization & administration
nursing research
Nursing Research - organization & administration
Prioritizing
Republic of China
research priorities
Taiwan
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Priority‐setting for nursing research in the Republic of China The question of how public funds for research should be allocated has led to participatory priority‐setting in prosperous democracies like Taiwan, Republic of China. Useful criteria for research priorities are scientific merit, social benefit and feasibility. Taking a health needs approach and using these criteria, nearly 200 nurses from service and education in a national forum participated in describing research priorities. Through the group method of idea‐writing, for clinical nursing, of high priority were assessing quality, care of the elderly, and preventing infectious disease. For nursing education, research addressing advanced role preparation and bridging nursing education and practice were priorities. For nursing management, research of highest priority pertained to economic evaluation, personnel administration, and effectiveness. These suggestions from the deliberation of a committed group of nurses can help shape future national decisions about research funding and training.
ISSN:0309-2402
1365-2648
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01459.x