Reconceptualizing 'inappropriateness': researching multiple moral positions in demand for primary healthcare

In a recently completed study of the management of 'out-of-hours' primary healthcare for children and ways in which judgements are made about legitimate access, the construct of 'inappropriate demand' is investigated. This seemingly intractable health care issue has not been reso...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Health (London, England : 1997) England : 1997), 2003-01, Vol.7 (1), p.109-126
Main Author: Ehrich, Kathryn
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Access
Children
Ethics
Health problems
Health services utilization
Moral Judgment
Practitioner Patient Relationship
Primary Health Care
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In a recently completed study of the management of 'out-of-hours' primary healthcare for children and ways in which judgements are made about legitimate access, the construct of 'inappropriate demand' is investigated. This seemingly intractable health care issue has not been resolved by research that rests on a one-sided conceptualization of the 'problem'. In practice, 'demand' arises within complex processes of interaction between people taking a range of moral positions in particular contexts. This is illustrated with interpretations of some ethnographic material from the study. An argument is made for an alternative research approach to such contentious issues that acknowledges multiple and latent moral orientations, and reveals moral judgements in scientific guise.
ISSN:1363-4593
1461-7196
DOI:10.1177/1363459303007001621