Loading…

Risky procedures by nurses in hospitals: problems and (contemplated) refusals of orders by physicians, and views of physicians and nurses

Occurrence of problems with, refusals of orders and contemplated refusals of orders for risky procedures by nurses in Dutch hospitals and views on the safety of performance was studied using postal questionnaires (600 physicians and 3200 nurses, response 60–71%). Of the respondents, 11–30% experienc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of nursing studies 2005-09, Vol.42 (7), p.759-771
Main Authors: de Bie, J., Cuperus-Bosma, J.M., van der Jagt, M.A.B., Gevers, J.K.M., van der Wal, G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-19aaa3d93a86554930bf52c4fd6bef361bfa33325fad733c03719524eb7966973
container_end_page 771
container_issue 7
container_start_page 759
container_title International journal of nursing studies
container_volume 42
creator de Bie, J.
Cuperus-Bosma, J.M.
van der Jagt, M.A.B.
Gevers, J.K.M.
van der Wal, G.
description Occurrence of problems with, refusals of orders and contemplated refusals of orders for risky procedures by nurses in Dutch hospitals and views on the safety of performance was studied using postal questionnaires (600 physicians and 3200 nurses, response 60–71%). Of the respondents, 11–30% experienced problems with and (contemplated) refusals of orders for risky procedures in the previous 12 months. Gynaecologists and internists most frequently mentioned problems concerning the practical performance of the procedure (44% and 30%, respectively). The reason for a problem or a contemplated refusal most frequently given by nurses was that they disagreed with the medication policy (34% and 35%, respectively). The reason for a refusal most frequently given by the gynaecologists, internists and nurses was that the nurses themselves were of the opinion that they did not have the necessary authorisation (95%, 67%, and 62%, respectively). With regard to certain procedures, the views of professionals are more strict than the current legal regulations.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.09.022
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764259909</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A136512023</galeid><els_id>S0020748904002172</els_id><sourcerecordid>A136512023</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-19aaa3d93a86554930bf52c4fd6bef361bfa33325fad733c03719524eb7966973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctu1TAQhr0A0dLyClUkJKASJ4yvibuiqrhUqlQJwdpynAn1ITfsBHQeoW9d5-Sg7ujKlv3NP_Z8hJxRyClQ9WGb-20_hzjNOQMQOegcGHtGjgEYbApR6iPyMsYtANASyhfkiCoohWbimNx_8_HXLhvD4LCeA8as2mVLWNr5Prsb4ugn28aLBala7GJm-zp754Z-wm5s7YT1eRawmWOisqHJhlBj2MeMd7vonbd9fL8v-uPx7x55vNifr-1OyfMmReCrw3pCfnz-9P3q6-bm9sv11eXNxgkQ04Zqay2vNbelklJoDlUjmRNNrSpsuKJVYznnTDa2Ljh3wAuqJRNYFVopXfAT8nbNTR_6PWOcTOejw7a1PQ5zNIUSTGoNOpFv_kuqUsiiLOFJUBYgCi2XxNcr-NO2aHzfDFOwboHNJeVKUgaMJ0qtlAtDjGm2Zgy-s2FnKJjFuNmaf8bNYtyANsl4Kjw7vGOuOqwfyw66E_BxBTANOOkIJjqPfVLvA7rJ1IN_qscD9QnDgg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57047959</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risky procedures by nurses in hospitals: problems and (contemplated) refusals of orders by physicians, and views of physicians and nurses</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Elsevier</source><creator>de Bie, J. ; Cuperus-Bosma, J.M. ; van der Jagt, M.A.B. ; Gevers, J.K.M. ; van der Wal, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>de Bie, J. ; Cuperus-Bosma, J.M. ; van der Jagt, M.A.B. ; Gevers, J.K.M. ; van der Wal, G.</creatorcontrib><description>Occurrence of problems with, refusals of orders and contemplated refusals of orders for risky procedures by nurses in Dutch hospitals and views on the safety of performance was studied using postal questionnaires (600 physicians and 3200 nurses, response 60–71%). Of the respondents, 11–30% experienced problems with and (contemplated) refusals of orders for risky procedures in the previous 12 months. Gynaecologists and internists most frequently mentioned problems concerning the practical performance of the procedure (44% and 30%, respectively). The reason for a problem or a contemplated refusal most frequently given by nurses was that they disagreed with the medication policy (34% and 35%, respectively). The reason for a refusal most frequently given by the gynaecologists, internists and nurses was that the nurses themselves were of the opinion that they did not have the necessary authorisation (95%, 67%, and 62%, respectively). With regard to certain procedures, the views of professionals are more strict than the current legal regulations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7489</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.09.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16084924</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Delegation, Professional ; Doctor-Nurse collaboration ; Gynecology ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Legal aspects ; Legislation ; Medical treatment ; Netherlands ; Nurse's Role ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing Staff, Hospital - standards ; Physician and patient ; Physician-Nurse Relations ; Physicians ; Practice ; Procedures ; Professional delegation ; Questionnaires ; Refusal ; Risk Management - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Risk taking ; Surveys ; Task conflict ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>International journal of nursing studies, 2005-09, Vol.42 (7), p.759-771</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2005 The Lancet Publishing Group, a division of Elsevier Science Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-19aaa3d93a86554930bf52c4fd6bef361bfa33325fad733c03719524eb7966973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16084924$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Bie, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuperus-Bosma, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Jagt, M.A.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gevers, J.K.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Wal, G.</creatorcontrib><title>Risky procedures by nurses in hospitals: problems and (contemplated) refusals of orders by physicians, and views of physicians and nurses</title><title>International journal of nursing studies</title><addtitle>Int J Nurs Stud</addtitle><description>Occurrence of problems with, refusals of orders and contemplated refusals of orders for risky procedures by nurses in Dutch hospitals and views on the safety of performance was studied using postal questionnaires (600 physicians and 3200 nurses, response 60–71%). Of the respondents, 11–30% experienced problems with and (contemplated) refusals of orders for risky procedures in the previous 12 months. Gynaecologists and internists most frequently mentioned problems concerning the practical performance of the procedure (44% and 30%, respectively). The reason for a problem or a contemplated refusal most frequently given by nurses was that they disagreed with the medication policy (34% and 35%, respectively). The reason for a refusal most frequently given by the gynaecologists, internists and nurses was that the nurses themselves were of the opinion that they did not have the necessary authorisation (95%, 67%, and 62%, respectively). With regard to certain procedures, the views of professionals are more strict than the current legal regulations.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Delegation, Professional</subject><subject>Doctor-Nurse collaboration</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Legal aspects</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Nurse's Role</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Staff, Hospital - standards</subject><subject>Physician and patient</subject><subject>Physician-Nurse Relations</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Procedures</subject><subject>Professional delegation</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Refusal</subject><subject>Risk Management - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Risk taking</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Task conflict</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0020-7489</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctu1TAQhr0A0dLyClUkJKASJ4yvibuiqrhUqlQJwdpynAn1ITfsBHQeoW9d5-Sg7ujKlv3NP_Z8hJxRyClQ9WGb-20_hzjNOQMQOegcGHtGjgEYbApR6iPyMsYtANASyhfkiCoohWbimNx_8_HXLhvD4LCeA8as2mVLWNr5Prsb4ugn28aLBala7GJm-zp754Z-wm5s7YT1eRawmWOisqHJhlBj2MeMd7vonbd9fL8v-uPx7x55vNifr-1OyfMmReCrw3pCfnz-9P3q6-bm9sv11eXNxgkQ04Zqay2vNbelklJoDlUjmRNNrSpsuKJVYznnTDa2Ljh3wAuqJRNYFVopXfAT8nbNTR_6PWOcTOejw7a1PQ5zNIUSTGoNOpFv_kuqUsiiLOFJUBYgCi2XxNcr-NO2aHzfDFOwboHNJeVKUgaMJ0qtlAtDjGm2Zgy-s2FnKJjFuNmaf8bNYtyANsl4Kjw7vGOuOqwfyw66E_BxBTANOOkIJjqPfVLvA7rJ1IN_qscD9QnDgg</recordid><startdate>20050901</startdate><enddate>20050901</enddate><creator>de Bie, J.</creator><creator>Cuperus-Bosma, J.M.</creator><creator>van der Jagt, M.A.B.</creator><creator>Gevers, J.K.M.</creator><creator>van der Wal, G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>The Lancet Publishing Group, a division of Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050901</creationdate><title>Risky procedures by nurses in hospitals: problems and (contemplated) refusals of orders by physicians, and views of physicians and nurses</title><author>de Bie, J. ; Cuperus-Bosma, J.M. ; van der Jagt, M.A.B. ; Gevers, J.K.M. ; van der Wal, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-19aaa3d93a86554930bf52c4fd6bef361bfa33325fad733c03719524eb7966973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Delegation, Professional</topic><topic>Doctor-Nurse collaboration</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Legal aspects</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Nurse's Role</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Staff, Hospital - standards</topic><topic>Physician and patient</topic><topic>Physician-Nurse Relations</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Procedures</topic><topic>Professional delegation</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Refusal</topic><topic>Risk Management - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Risk taking</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Task conflict</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Bie, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuperus-Bosma, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Jagt, M.A.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gevers, J.K.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Wal, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>International journal of nursing studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Bie, J.</au><au>Cuperus-Bosma, J.M.</au><au>van der Jagt, M.A.B.</au><au>Gevers, J.K.M.</au><au>van der Wal, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risky procedures by nurses in hospitals: problems and (contemplated) refusals of orders by physicians, and views of physicians and nurses</atitle><jtitle>International journal of nursing studies</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Nurs Stud</addtitle><date>2005-09-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>759</spage><epage>771</epage><pages>759-771</pages><issn>0020-7489</issn><abstract>Occurrence of problems with, refusals of orders and contemplated refusals of orders for risky procedures by nurses in Dutch hospitals and views on the safety of performance was studied using postal questionnaires (600 physicians and 3200 nurses, response 60–71%). Of the respondents, 11–30% experienced problems with and (contemplated) refusals of orders for risky procedures in the previous 12 months. Gynaecologists and internists most frequently mentioned problems concerning the practical performance of the procedure (44% and 30%, respectively). The reason for a problem or a contemplated refusal most frequently given by nurses was that they disagreed with the medication policy (34% and 35%, respectively). The reason for a refusal most frequently given by the gynaecologists, internists and nurses was that the nurses themselves were of the opinion that they did not have the necessary authorisation (95%, 67%, and 62%, respectively). With regard to certain procedures, the views of professionals are more strict than the current legal regulations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16084924</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.09.022</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7489
ispartof International journal of nursing studies, 2005-09, Vol.42 (7), p.759-771
issn 0020-7489
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764259909
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Elsevier
subjects Attitude of Health Personnel
Delegation, Professional
Doctor-Nurse collaboration
Gynecology
Hospitals
Humans
Internal Medicine
Laws, regulations and rules
Legal aspects
Legislation
Medical treatment
Netherlands
Nurse's Role
Nurses
Nursing
Nursing Staff, Hospital - standards
Physician and patient
Physician-Nurse Relations
Physicians
Practice
Procedures
Professional delegation
Questionnaires
Refusal
Risk Management - legislation & jurisprudence
Risk taking
Surveys
Task conflict
United Kingdom
title Risky procedures by nurses in hospitals: problems and (contemplated) refusals of orders by physicians, and views of physicians and nurses
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T23%3A25%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risky%20procedures%20by%20nurses%20in%20hospitals:%20problems%20and%20(contemplated)%20refusals%20of%20orders%20by%20physicians,%20and%20views%20of%20physicians%20and%20nurses&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20nursing%20studies&rft.au=de%20Bie,%20J.&rft.date=2005-09-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=759&rft.epage=771&rft.pages=759-771&rft.issn=0020-7489&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.09.022&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA136512023%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-19aaa3d93a86554930bf52c4fd6bef361bfa33325fad733c03719524eb7966973%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57047959&rft_id=info:pmid/16084924&rft_galeid=A136512023&rfr_iscdi=true