Loading…
Risky procedures by nurses in hospitals: problems and (contemplated) refusals of orders by physicians, and views of physicians and nurses
Occurrence of problems with, refusals of orders and contemplated refusals of orders for risky procedures by nurses in Dutch hospitals and views on the safety of performance was studied using postal questionnaires (600 physicians and 3200 nurses, response 60–71%). Of the respondents, 11–30% experienc...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of nursing studies 2005-09, Vol.42 (7), p.759-771 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-19aaa3d93a86554930bf52c4fd6bef361bfa33325fad733c03719524eb7966973 |
container_end_page | 771 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 759 |
container_title | International journal of nursing studies |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | de Bie, J. Cuperus-Bosma, J.M. van der Jagt, M.A.B. Gevers, J.K.M. van der Wal, G. |
description | Occurrence of problems with, refusals of orders and contemplated refusals of orders for risky procedures by nurses in Dutch hospitals and views on the safety of performance was studied using postal questionnaires (600 physicians and 3200 nurses, response 60–71%). Of the respondents, 11–30% experienced problems with and (contemplated) refusals of orders for risky procedures in the previous 12 months. Gynaecologists and internists most frequently mentioned problems concerning the practical performance of the procedure (44% and 30%, respectively). The reason for a problem or a contemplated refusal most frequently given by nurses was that they disagreed with the medication policy (34% and 35%, respectively). The reason for a refusal most frequently given by the gynaecologists, internists and nurses was that the nurses themselves were of the opinion that they did not have the necessary authorisation (95%, 67%, and 62%, respectively). With regard to certain procedures, the views of professionals are more strict than the current legal regulations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.09.022 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764259909</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A136512023</galeid><els_id>S0020748904002172</els_id><sourcerecordid>A136512023</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-19aaa3d93a86554930bf52c4fd6bef361bfa33325fad733c03719524eb7966973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctu1TAQhr0A0dLyClUkJKASJ4yvibuiqrhUqlQJwdpynAn1ITfsBHQeoW9d5-Sg7ujKlv3NP_Z8hJxRyClQ9WGb-20_hzjNOQMQOegcGHtGjgEYbApR6iPyMsYtANASyhfkiCoohWbimNx_8_HXLhvD4LCeA8as2mVLWNr5Prsb4ugn28aLBala7GJm-zp754Z-wm5s7YT1eRawmWOisqHJhlBj2MeMd7vonbd9fL8v-uPx7x55vNifr-1OyfMmReCrw3pCfnz-9P3q6-bm9sv11eXNxgkQ04Zqay2vNbelklJoDlUjmRNNrSpsuKJVYznnTDa2Ljh3wAuqJRNYFVopXfAT8nbNTR_6PWOcTOejw7a1PQ5zNIUSTGoNOpFv_kuqUsiiLOFJUBYgCi2XxNcr-NO2aHzfDFOwboHNJeVKUgaMJ0qtlAtDjGm2Zgy-s2FnKJjFuNmaf8bNYtyANsl4Kjw7vGOuOqwfyw66E_BxBTANOOkIJjqPfVLvA7rJ1IN_qscD9QnDgg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57047959</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risky procedures by nurses in hospitals: problems and (contemplated) refusals of orders by physicians, and views of physicians and nurses</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Elsevier</source><creator>de Bie, J. ; Cuperus-Bosma, J.M. ; van der Jagt, M.A.B. ; Gevers, J.K.M. ; van der Wal, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>de Bie, J. ; Cuperus-Bosma, J.M. ; van der Jagt, M.A.B. ; Gevers, J.K.M. ; van der Wal, G.</creatorcontrib><description>Occurrence of problems with, refusals of orders and contemplated refusals of orders for risky procedures by nurses in Dutch hospitals and views on the safety of performance was studied using postal questionnaires (600 physicians and 3200 nurses, response 60–71%). Of the respondents, 11–30% experienced problems with and (contemplated) refusals of orders for risky procedures in the previous 12 months. Gynaecologists and internists most frequently mentioned problems concerning the practical performance of the procedure (44% and 30%, respectively). The reason for a problem or a contemplated refusal most frequently given by nurses was that they disagreed with the medication policy (34% and 35%, respectively). The reason for a refusal most frequently given by the gynaecologists, internists and nurses was that the nurses themselves were of the opinion that they did not have the necessary authorisation (95%, 67%, and 62%, respectively). With regard to certain procedures, the views of professionals are more strict than the current legal regulations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7489</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.09.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16084924</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Delegation, Professional ; Doctor-Nurse collaboration ; Gynecology ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Legal aspects ; Legislation ; Medical treatment ; Netherlands ; Nurse's Role ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing Staff, Hospital - standards ; Physician and patient ; Physician-Nurse Relations ; Physicians ; Practice ; Procedures ; Professional delegation ; Questionnaires ; Refusal ; Risk Management - legislation & jurisprudence ; Risk taking ; Surveys ; Task conflict ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>International journal of nursing studies, 2005-09, Vol.42 (7), p.759-771</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2005 The Lancet Publishing Group, a division of Elsevier Science Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-19aaa3d93a86554930bf52c4fd6bef361bfa33325fad733c03719524eb7966973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16084924$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Bie, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuperus-Bosma, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Jagt, M.A.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gevers, J.K.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Wal, G.</creatorcontrib><title>Risky procedures by nurses in hospitals: problems and (contemplated) refusals of orders by physicians, and views of physicians and nurses</title><title>International journal of nursing studies</title><addtitle>Int J Nurs Stud</addtitle><description>Occurrence of problems with, refusals of orders and contemplated refusals of orders for risky procedures by nurses in Dutch hospitals and views on the safety of performance was studied using postal questionnaires (600 physicians and 3200 nurses, response 60–71%). Of the respondents, 11–30% experienced problems with and (contemplated) refusals of orders for risky procedures in the previous 12 months. Gynaecologists and internists most frequently mentioned problems concerning the practical performance of the procedure (44% and 30%, respectively). The reason for a problem or a contemplated refusal most frequently given by nurses was that they disagreed with the medication policy (34% and 35%, respectively). The reason for a refusal most frequently given by the gynaecologists, internists and nurses was that the nurses themselves were of the opinion that they did not have the necessary authorisation (95%, 67%, and 62%, respectively). With regard to certain procedures, the views of professionals are more strict than the current legal regulations.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Delegation, Professional</subject><subject>Doctor-Nurse collaboration</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Legal aspects</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Nurse's Role</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Staff, Hospital - standards</subject><subject>Physician and patient</subject><subject>Physician-Nurse Relations</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Procedures</subject><subject>Professional delegation</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Refusal</subject><subject>Risk Management - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Risk taking</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Task conflict</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0020-7489</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctu1TAQhr0A0dLyClUkJKASJ4yvibuiqrhUqlQJwdpynAn1ITfsBHQeoW9d5-Sg7ujKlv3NP_Z8hJxRyClQ9WGb-20_hzjNOQMQOegcGHtGjgEYbApR6iPyMsYtANASyhfkiCoohWbimNx_8_HXLhvD4LCeA8as2mVLWNr5Prsb4ugn28aLBala7GJm-zp754Z-wm5s7YT1eRawmWOisqHJhlBj2MeMd7vonbd9fL8v-uPx7x55vNifr-1OyfMmReCrw3pCfnz-9P3q6-bm9sv11eXNxgkQ04Zqay2vNbelklJoDlUjmRNNrSpsuKJVYznnTDa2Ljh3wAuqJRNYFVopXfAT8nbNTR_6PWOcTOejw7a1PQ5zNIUSTGoNOpFv_kuqUsiiLOFJUBYgCi2XxNcr-NO2aHzfDFOwboHNJeVKUgaMJ0qtlAtDjGm2Zgy-s2FnKJjFuNmaf8bNYtyANsl4Kjw7vGOuOqwfyw66E_BxBTANOOkIJjqPfVLvA7rJ1IN_qscD9QnDgg</recordid><startdate>20050901</startdate><enddate>20050901</enddate><creator>de Bie, J.</creator><creator>Cuperus-Bosma, J.M.</creator><creator>van der Jagt, M.A.B.</creator><creator>Gevers, J.K.M.</creator><creator>van der Wal, G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>The Lancet Publishing Group, a division of Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050901</creationdate><title>Risky procedures by nurses in hospitals: problems and (contemplated) refusals of orders by physicians, and views of physicians and nurses</title><author>de Bie, J. ; Cuperus-Bosma, J.M. ; van der Jagt, M.A.B. ; Gevers, J.K.M. ; van der Wal, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-19aaa3d93a86554930bf52c4fd6bef361bfa33325fad733c03719524eb7966973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Delegation, Professional</topic><topic>Doctor-Nurse collaboration</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Legal aspects</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Nurse's Role</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Staff, Hospital - standards</topic><topic>Physician and patient</topic><topic>Physician-Nurse Relations</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Procedures</topic><topic>Professional delegation</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Refusal</topic><topic>Risk Management - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Risk taking</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Task conflict</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Bie, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuperus-Bosma, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Jagt, M.A.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gevers, J.K.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Wal, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>International journal of nursing studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Bie, J.</au><au>Cuperus-Bosma, J.M.</au><au>van der Jagt, M.A.B.</au><au>Gevers, J.K.M.</au><au>van der Wal, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risky procedures by nurses in hospitals: problems and (contemplated) refusals of orders by physicians, and views of physicians and nurses</atitle><jtitle>International journal of nursing studies</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Nurs Stud</addtitle><date>2005-09-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>759</spage><epage>771</epage><pages>759-771</pages><issn>0020-7489</issn><abstract>Occurrence of problems with, refusals of orders and contemplated refusals of orders for risky procedures by nurses in Dutch hospitals and views on the safety of performance was studied using postal questionnaires (600 physicians and 3200 nurses, response 60–71%). Of the respondents, 11–30% experienced problems with and (contemplated) refusals of orders for risky procedures in the previous 12 months. Gynaecologists and internists most frequently mentioned problems concerning the practical performance of the procedure (44% and 30%, respectively). The reason for a problem or a contemplated refusal most frequently given by nurses was that they disagreed with the medication policy (34% and 35%, respectively). The reason for a refusal most frequently given by the gynaecologists, internists and nurses was that the nurses themselves were of the opinion that they did not have the necessary authorisation (95%, 67%, and 62%, respectively). With regard to certain procedures, the views of professionals are more strict than the current legal regulations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16084924</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.09.022</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-7489 |
ispartof | International journal of nursing studies, 2005-09, Vol.42 (7), p.759-771 |
issn | 0020-7489 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764259909 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Elsevier |
subjects | Attitude of Health Personnel Delegation, Professional Doctor-Nurse collaboration Gynecology Hospitals Humans Internal Medicine Laws, regulations and rules Legal aspects Legislation Medical treatment Netherlands Nurse's Role Nurses Nursing Nursing Staff, Hospital - standards Physician and patient Physician-Nurse Relations Physicians Practice Procedures Professional delegation Questionnaires Refusal Risk Management - legislation & jurisprudence Risk taking Surveys Task conflict United Kingdom |
title | Risky procedures by nurses in hospitals: problems and (contemplated) refusals of orders by physicians, and views of physicians and nurses |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T23%3A25%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risky%20procedures%20by%20nurses%20in%20hospitals:%20problems%20and%20(contemplated)%20refusals%20of%20orders%20by%20physicians,%20and%20views%20of%20physicians%20and%20nurses&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20nursing%20studies&rft.au=de%20Bie,%20J.&rft.date=2005-09-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=759&rft.epage=771&rft.pages=759-771&rft.issn=0020-7489&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.09.022&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA136512023%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-19aaa3d93a86554930bf52c4fd6bef361bfa33325fad733c03719524eb7966973%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57047959&rft_id=info:pmid/16084924&rft_galeid=A136512023&rfr_iscdi=true |