Loading…

What influence does experience play in heel prick blood sampling?

The objective of this study was to investigate the role of ‘experience’ in performing the heel prick test. Babies ( n = 340) were randomly allocated to be tested with either the Tenderfoot or Genie Lancet heel prick device. Testing was conducted by nine midwives ( n = 4, experienced, more than 20 ye...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of neonatal nursing : JNN 2006-06, Vol.12 (3), p.97-102
Main Authors: Jill Shepherd, Ashley, Glenesk, Ann, Niven, Catherine
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The objective of this study was to investigate the role of ‘experience’ in performing the heel prick test. Babies ( n = 340) were randomly allocated to be tested with either the Tenderfoot or Genie Lancet heel prick device. Testing was conducted by nine midwives ( n = 4, experienced, more than 20 years qualified) who performed the heel prick procedure routinely and rotational midwives ( n = 5, less experienced, 4–8 years qualified) who only performed the heel prick procedure when working in the community. Test technique outcomes investigated included (1) cleaning of heel, (2) babies position, (3) feeding at test, (4) use of soothing words. Other test outcomes (1) quality of the blood sample, (2) number of heel pricks required to take sample, (3) blood flow, (4) presence of bruising (5) time taken to collect sample, (6) time squeezing the heel and (7) time baby cried were also studied. The experienced midwives were more likely to hold the baby during testing but less likely to clean the infants heel prior to the incision. The experienced midwives collected a better quality sample, in less time and required fewer heel pricks than the less experienced midwifery group.
ISSN:1355-1841
1878-089X
DOI:10.1016/j.jnn.2006.03.012