Loading…

Turkish nurses’ decision making in the distribution of intensive care beds

The aim of this study was to assess the opinions and role of intensive care unit (ICU) nurses regarding the distribution of ICU beds. We conducted this research among 30% of the attendees at two ICU congresses in Turkey. A self-administered questionnaire was used, which included 13 cases and allocat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nursing ethics 2010-01, Vol.17 (1), p.87-98
Main Authors: Ersoy, Nermin, Akpinar, Aslihan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-1a859097f749206c0e120f633b9305eff2c26b3144781ec3f9f72076578384633
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-1a859097f749206c0e120f633b9305eff2c26b3144781ec3f9f72076578384633
container_end_page 98
container_issue 1
container_start_page 87
container_title Nursing ethics
container_volume 17
creator Ersoy, Nermin
Akpinar, Aslihan
description The aim of this study was to assess the opinions and role of intensive care unit (ICU) nurses regarding the distribution of ICU beds. We conducted this research among 30% of the attendees at two ICU congresses in Turkey. A self-administered questionnaire was used, which included 13 cases and allocation criteria. Of the total (136 nurses), 53.7% participated in admission/discharge decisions. The most important criterion was quality of life as viewed by the physician; the least important was the patient’s social status. According to the findings, the nurses thought that medical benefit and avoiding discrimination were important. On the other hand their ignorance of patients’ autonomous preferences arouses suspicions about these nurses’ role in advocating for patients’ rights. For this reason, nurses’ role in allocation decisions should be clearly described and should also be the basis on which intensive care nurses’ duties in allocation decisions should be determined.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0969733009349992
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764403416</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0969733009349992</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1944482131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-1a859097f749206c0e120f633b9305eff2c26b3144781ec3f9f72076578384633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctK7EAQhhs5ouNl7-oQzkJX0epLurqXIt5gwI2uQ5Kp1taZRLsTwZ2v4ev5JHYYLyAcXRXU_9VfVfyM7XDY5xzxAKy2KCWAlcpaK1bYhCvEHKyxf9hklPNRX2cbMd4CAAqDa2xdABirhZmw6eUQ7ny8ydohRIqvzy_ZjBoffddmi-rOt9eZb7P-hrKZj33w9dCPUudSu6c2-kfKmipQVtMsbrFVV80jbb_XTXZ1cnx5dJZPL07Pjw6neaOE7nNemcKCRYfKCtANEBfgtJS1lVCQc6IRupZcKTScGumsQwGoCzTSqMRtsr2l733oHgaKfbnwsaH5vGqpG2KJWimQiuvfSSkNmkJCInd_JAtMhhZH8N838LYbQpv-LQWkmy2HIkGwhJrQxRjIlffBL6rwVHIox-jK79Glkb_vvkO9oNnnwEdWCciXQKyu6Wvpfw3fAHg9nm4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>201449105</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Turkish nurses’ decision making in the distribution of intensive care beds</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Ersoy, Nermin ; Akpinar, Aslihan</creator><creatorcontrib>Ersoy, Nermin ; Akpinar, Aslihan</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to assess the opinions and role of intensive care unit (ICU) nurses regarding the distribution of ICU beds. We conducted this research among 30% of the attendees at two ICU congresses in Turkey. A self-administered questionnaire was used, which included 13 cases and allocation criteria. Of the total (136 nurses), 53.7% participated in admission/discharge decisions. The most important criterion was quality of life as viewed by the physician; the least important was the patient’s social status. According to the findings, the nurses thought that medical benefit and avoiding discrimination were important. On the other hand their ignorance of patients’ autonomous preferences arouses suspicions about these nurses’ role in advocating for patients’ rights. For this reason, nurses’ role in allocation decisions should be clearly described and should also be the basis on which intensive care nurses’ duties in allocation decisions should be determined.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-7330</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0989</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0969733009349992</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20089628</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Admissions ; Adult ; Critical care ; Decision making ; Decision Making - ethics ; Education ; Ethics, Nursing ; Female ; Health care policy ; Health Care Rationing - ethics ; Health Care Surveys ; Hospital Bed Capacity ; Humans ; Intensive care ; Intensive care units ; Intensive Care Units - ethics ; Male ; Medical ethics ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing care ; Organizational Policy ; Patient Admission ; Patient Discharge ; Patients rights ; Quality of life ; Questionnaires ; Social Justice ; Turkey ; Values</subject><ispartof>Nursing ethics, 2010-01, Vol.17 (1), p.87-98</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2010</rights><rights>SAGE Publications © Jan 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-1a859097f749206c0e120f633b9305eff2c26b3144781ec3f9f72076578384633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-1a859097f749206c0e120f633b9305eff2c26b3144781ec3f9f72076578384633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/201449105?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,21394,21395,27924,27925,30999,31000,33611,33612,34530,34531,43733,44115,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20089628$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ersoy, Nermin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akpinar, Aslihan</creatorcontrib><title>Turkish nurses’ decision making in the distribution of intensive care beds</title><title>Nursing ethics</title><addtitle>Nurs Ethics</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to assess the opinions and role of intensive care unit (ICU) nurses regarding the distribution of ICU beds. We conducted this research among 30% of the attendees at two ICU congresses in Turkey. A self-administered questionnaire was used, which included 13 cases and allocation criteria. Of the total (136 nurses), 53.7% participated in admission/discharge decisions. The most important criterion was quality of life as viewed by the physician; the least important was the patient’s social status. According to the findings, the nurses thought that medical benefit and avoiding discrimination were important. On the other hand their ignorance of patients’ autonomous preferences arouses suspicions about these nurses’ role in advocating for patients’ rights. For this reason, nurses’ role in allocation decisions should be clearly described and should also be the basis on which intensive care nurses’ duties in allocation decisions should be determined.</description><subject>Admissions</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Critical care</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision Making - ethics</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Ethics, Nursing</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health Care Rationing - ethics</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Hospital Bed Capacity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intensive care units</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - ethics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical ethics</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing care</subject><subject>Organizational Policy</subject><subject>Patient Admission</subject><subject>Patient Discharge</subject><subject>Patients rights</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Social Justice</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>0969-7330</issn><issn>1477-0989</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctK7EAQhhs5ouNl7-oQzkJX0epLurqXIt5gwI2uQ5Kp1taZRLsTwZ2v4ev5JHYYLyAcXRXU_9VfVfyM7XDY5xzxAKy2KCWAlcpaK1bYhCvEHKyxf9hklPNRX2cbMd4CAAqDa2xdABirhZmw6eUQ7ny8ydohRIqvzy_ZjBoffddmi-rOt9eZb7P-hrKZj33w9dCPUudSu6c2-kfKmipQVtMsbrFVV80jbb_XTXZ1cnx5dJZPL07Pjw6neaOE7nNemcKCRYfKCtANEBfgtJS1lVCQc6IRupZcKTScGumsQwGoCzTSqMRtsr2l733oHgaKfbnwsaH5vGqpG2KJWimQiuvfSSkNmkJCInd_JAtMhhZH8N838LYbQpv-LQWkmy2HIkGwhJrQxRjIlffBL6rwVHIox-jK79Glkb_vvkO9oNnnwEdWCciXQKyu6Wvpfw3fAHg9nm4</recordid><startdate>201001</startdate><enddate>201001</enddate><creator>Ersoy, Nermin</creator><creator>Akpinar, Aslihan</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201001</creationdate><title>Turkish nurses’ decision making in the distribution of intensive care beds</title><author>Ersoy, Nermin ; Akpinar, Aslihan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-1a859097f749206c0e120f633b9305eff2c26b3144781ec3f9f72076578384633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Admissions</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Critical care</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision Making - ethics</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Ethics, Nursing</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health Care Rationing - ethics</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Hospital Bed Capacity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intensive care units</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - ethics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical ethics</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing care</topic><topic>Organizational Policy</topic><topic>Patient Admission</topic><topic>Patient Discharge</topic><topic>Patients rights</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Social Justice</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ersoy, Nermin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akpinar, Aslihan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nursing ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ersoy, Nermin</au><au>Akpinar, Aslihan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Turkish nurses’ decision making in the distribution of intensive care beds</atitle><jtitle>Nursing ethics</jtitle><addtitle>Nurs Ethics</addtitle><date>2010-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>87</spage><epage>98</epage><pages>87-98</pages><issn>0969-7330</issn><eissn>1477-0989</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to assess the opinions and role of intensive care unit (ICU) nurses regarding the distribution of ICU beds. We conducted this research among 30% of the attendees at two ICU congresses in Turkey. A self-administered questionnaire was used, which included 13 cases and allocation criteria. Of the total (136 nurses), 53.7% participated in admission/discharge decisions. The most important criterion was quality of life as viewed by the physician; the least important was the patient’s social status. According to the findings, the nurses thought that medical benefit and avoiding discrimination were important. On the other hand their ignorance of patients’ autonomous preferences arouses suspicions about these nurses’ role in advocating for patients’ rights. For this reason, nurses’ role in allocation decisions should be clearly described and should also be the basis on which intensive care nurses’ duties in allocation decisions should be determined.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>20089628</pmid><doi>10.1177/0969733009349992</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0969-7330
ispartof Nursing ethics, 2010-01, Vol.17 (1), p.87-98
issn 0969-7330
1477-0989
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764403416
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Social Science Premium Collection; Sociology Collection; Sage Journals Online
subjects Admissions
Adult
Critical care
Decision making
Decision Making - ethics
Education
Ethics, Nursing
Female
Health care policy
Health Care Rationing - ethics
Health Care Surveys
Hospital Bed Capacity
Humans
Intensive care
Intensive care units
Intensive Care Units - ethics
Male
Medical ethics
Middle Aged
Mortality
Nurses
Nursing
Nursing care
Organizational Policy
Patient Admission
Patient Discharge
Patients rights
Quality of life
Questionnaires
Social Justice
Turkey
Values
title Turkish nurses’ decision making in the distribution of intensive care beds
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T16%3A57%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Turkish%20nurses%E2%80%99%20decision%20making%20in%20the%20distribution%20of%20intensive%20care%20beds&rft.jtitle=Nursing%20ethics&rft.au=Ersoy,%20Nermin&rft.date=2010-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=98&rft.pages=87-98&rft.issn=0969-7330&rft.eissn=1477-0989&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0969733009349992&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1944482131%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-1a859097f749206c0e120f633b9305eff2c26b3144781ec3f9f72076578384633%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=201449105&rft_id=info:pmid/20089628&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0969733009349992&rfr_iscdi=true