Loading…
Turkish nurses’ decision making in the distribution of intensive care beds
The aim of this study was to assess the opinions and role of intensive care unit (ICU) nurses regarding the distribution of ICU beds. We conducted this research among 30% of the attendees at two ICU congresses in Turkey. A self-administered questionnaire was used, which included 13 cases and allocat...
Saved in:
Published in: | Nursing ethics 2010-01, Vol.17 (1), p.87-98 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-1a859097f749206c0e120f633b9305eff2c26b3144781ec3f9f72076578384633 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-1a859097f749206c0e120f633b9305eff2c26b3144781ec3f9f72076578384633 |
container_end_page | 98 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 87 |
container_title | Nursing ethics |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Ersoy, Nermin Akpinar, Aslihan |
description | The aim of this study was to assess the opinions and role of intensive care unit (ICU) nurses regarding the distribution of ICU beds. We conducted this research among 30% of the attendees at two ICU congresses in Turkey. A self-administered questionnaire was used, which included 13 cases and allocation criteria. Of the total (136 nurses), 53.7% participated in admission/discharge decisions. The most important criterion was quality of life as viewed by the physician; the least important was the patient’s social status. According to the findings, the nurses thought that medical benefit and avoiding discrimination were important. On the other hand their ignorance of patients’ autonomous preferences arouses suspicions about these nurses’ role in advocating for patients’ rights. For this reason, nurses’ role in allocation decisions should be clearly described and should also be the basis on which intensive care nurses’ duties in allocation decisions should be determined. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0969733009349992 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764403416</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0969733009349992</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1944482131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-1a859097f749206c0e120f633b9305eff2c26b3144781ec3f9f72076578384633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctK7EAQhhs5ouNl7-oQzkJX0epLurqXIt5gwI2uQ5Kp1taZRLsTwZ2v4ev5JHYYLyAcXRXU_9VfVfyM7XDY5xzxAKy2KCWAlcpaK1bYhCvEHKyxf9hklPNRX2cbMd4CAAqDa2xdABirhZmw6eUQ7ny8ydohRIqvzy_ZjBoffddmi-rOt9eZb7P-hrKZj33w9dCPUudSu6c2-kfKmipQVtMsbrFVV80jbb_XTXZ1cnx5dJZPL07Pjw6neaOE7nNemcKCRYfKCtANEBfgtJS1lVCQc6IRupZcKTScGumsQwGoCzTSqMRtsr2l733oHgaKfbnwsaH5vGqpG2KJWimQiuvfSSkNmkJCInd_JAtMhhZH8N838LYbQpv-LQWkmy2HIkGwhJrQxRjIlffBL6rwVHIox-jK79Glkb_vvkO9oNnnwEdWCciXQKyu6Wvpfw3fAHg9nm4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>201449105</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Turkish nurses’ decision making in the distribution of intensive care beds</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Ersoy, Nermin ; Akpinar, Aslihan</creator><creatorcontrib>Ersoy, Nermin ; Akpinar, Aslihan</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to assess the opinions and role of intensive care unit (ICU) nurses regarding the distribution of ICU beds. We conducted this research among 30% of the attendees at two ICU congresses in Turkey. A self-administered questionnaire was used, which included 13 cases and allocation criteria. Of the total (136 nurses), 53.7% participated in admission/discharge decisions. The most important criterion was quality of life as viewed by the physician; the least important was the patient’s social status. According to the findings, the nurses thought that medical benefit and avoiding discrimination were important. On the other hand their ignorance of patients’ autonomous preferences arouses suspicions about these nurses’ role in advocating for patients’ rights. For this reason, nurses’ role in allocation decisions should be clearly described and should also be the basis on which intensive care nurses’ duties in allocation decisions should be determined.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-7330</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0989</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0969733009349992</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20089628</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Admissions ; Adult ; Critical care ; Decision making ; Decision Making - ethics ; Education ; Ethics, Nursing ; Female ; Health care policy ; Health Care Rationing - ethics ; Health Care Surveys ; Hospital Bed Capacity ; Humans ; Intensive care ; Intensive care units ; Intensive Care Units - ethics ; Male ; Medical ethics ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing care ; Organizational Policy ; Patient Admission ; Patient Discharge ; Patients rights ; Quality of life ; Questionnaires ; Social Justice ; Turkey ; Values</subject><ispartof>Nursing ethics, 2010-01, Vol.17 (1), p.87-98</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2010</rights><rights>SAGE Publications © Jan 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-1a859097f749206c0e120f633b9305eff2c26b3144781ec3f9f72076578384633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-1a859097f749206c0e120f633b9305eff2c26b3144781ec3f9f72076578384633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/201449105?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,21394,21395,27924,27925,30999,31000,33611,33612,34530,34531,43733,44115,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20089628$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ersoy, Nermin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akpinar, Aslihan</creatorcontrib><title>Turkish nurses’ decision making in the distribution of intensive care beds</title><title>Nursing ethics</title><addtitle>Nurs Ethics</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to assess the opinions and role of intensive care unit (ICU) nurses regarding the distribution of ICU beds. We conducted this research among 30% of the attendees at two ICU congresses in Turkey. A self-administered questionnaire was used, which included 13 cases and allocation criteria. Of the total (136 nurses), 53.7% participated in admission/discharge decisions. The most important criterion was quality of life as viewed by the physician; the least important was the patient’s social status. According to the findings, the nurses thought that medical benefit and avoiding discrimination were important. On the other hand their ignorance of patients’ autonomous preferences arouses suspicions about these nurses’ role in advocating for patients’ rights. For this reason, nurses’ role in allocation decisions should be clearly described and should also be the basis on which intensive care nurses’ duties in allocation decisions should be determined.</description><subject>Admissions</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Critical care</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision Making - ethics</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Ethics, Nursing</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health Care Rationing - ethics</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Hospital Bed Capacity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intensive care units</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - ethics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical ethics</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing care</subject><subject>Organizational Policy</subject><subject>Patient Admission</subject><subject>Patient Discharge</subject><subject>Patients rights</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Social Justice</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>0969-7330</issn><issn>1477-0989</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctK7EAQhhs5ouNl7-oQzkJX0epLurqXIt5gwI2uQ5Kp1taZRLsTwZ2v4ev5JHYYLyAcXRXU_9VfVfyM7XDY5xzxAKy2KCWAlcpaK1bYhCvEHKyxf9hklPNRX2cbMd4CAAqDa2xdABirhZmw6eUQ7ny8ydohRIqvzy_ZjBoffddmi-rOt9eZb7P-hrKZj33w9dCPUudSu6c2-kfKmipQVtMsbrFVV80jbb_XTXZ1cnx5dJZPL07Pjw6neaOE7nNemcKCRYfKCtANEBfgtJS1lVCQc6IRupZcKTScGumsQwGoCzTSqMRtsr2l733oHgaKfbnwsaH5vGqpG2KJWimQiuvfSSkNmkJCInd_JAtMhhZH8N838LYbQpv-LQWkmy2HIkGwhJrQxRjIlffBL6rwVHIox-jK79Glkb_vvkO9oNnnwEdWCciXQKyu6Wvpfw3fAHg9nm4</recordid><startdate>201001</startdate><enddate>201001</enddate><creator>Ersoy, Nermin</creator><creator>Akpinar, Aslihan</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201001</creationdate><title>Turkish nurses’ decision making in the distribution of intensive care beds</title><author>Ersoy, Nermin ; Akpinar, Aslihan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-1a859097f749206c0e120f633b9305eff2c26b3144781ec3f9f72076578384633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Admissions</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Critical care</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision Making - ethics</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Ethics, Nursing</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health Care Rationing - ethics</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Hospital Bed Capacity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intensive care units</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - ethics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical ethics</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing care</topic><topic>Organizational Policy</topic><topic>Patient Admission</topic><topic>Patient Discharge</topic><topic>Patients rights</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Social Justice</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ersoy, Nermin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akpinar, Aslihan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nursing ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ersoy, Nermin</au><au>Akpinar, Aslihan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Turkish nurses’ decision making in the distribution of intensive care beds</atitle><jtitle>Nursing ethics</jtitle><addtitle>Nurs Ethics</addtitle><date>2010-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>87</spage><epage>98</epage><pages>87-98</pages><issn>0969-7330</issn><eissn>1477-0989</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to assess the opinions and role of intensive care unit (ICU) nurses regarding the distribution of ICU beds. We conducted this research among 30% of the attendees at two ICU congresses in Turkey. A self-administered questionnaire was used, which included 13 cases and allocation criteria. Of the total (136 nurses), 53.7% participated in admission/discharge decisions. The most important criterion was quality of life as viewed by the physician; the least important was the patient’s social status. According to the findings, the nurses thought that medical benefit and avoiding discrimination were important. On the other hand their ignorance of patients’ autonomous preferences arouses suspicions about these nurses’ role in advocating for patients’ rights. For this reason, nurses’ role in allocation decisions should be clearly described and should also be the basis on which intensive care nurses’ duties in allocation decisions should be determined.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>20089628</pmid><doi>10.1177/0969733009349992</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0969-7330 |
ispartof | Nursing ethics, 2010-01, Vol.17 (1), p.87-98 |
issn | 0969-7330 1477-0989 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764403416 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Social Science Premium Collection; Sociology Collection; Sage Journals Online |
subjects | Admissions Adult Critical care Decision making Decision Making - ethics Education Ethics, Nursing Female Health care policy Health Care Rationing - ethics Health Care Surveys Hospital Bed Capacity Humans Intensive care Intensive care units Intensive Care Units - ethics Male Medical ethics Middle Aged Mortality Nurses Nursing Nursing care Organizational Policy Patient Admission Patient Discharge Patients rights Quality of life Questionnaires Social Justice Turkey Values |
title | Turkish nurses’ decision making in the distribution of intensive care beds |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T16%3A57%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Turkish%20nurses%E2%80%99%20decision%20making%20in%20the%20distribution%20of%20intensive%20care%20beds&rft.jtitle=Nursing%20ethics&rft.au=Ersoy,%20Nermin&rft.date=2010-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=98&rft.pages=87-98&rft.issn=0969-7330&rft.eissn=1477-0989&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0969733009349992&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1944482131%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-1a859097f749206c0e120f633b9305eff2c26b3144781ec3f9f72076578384633%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=201449105&rft_id=info:pmid/20089628&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0969733009349992&rfr_iscdi=true |