Loading…

Smoking topography and carbon monoxide levels in smokers

Factors which effect the expired air carbon monoxide (CO) levels of smokers were examined in matched subject pairs who smoked an equal number of daytime cigarettes but had different CO levels (x̄ difference = 15.4 ppm). Measures of puff number, duration, and spacing, as well as the amount of CO incr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Addictive behaviors 1985, Vol.10 (3), p.319-323
Main Authors: Burling, Thomas A., Stitzer, Maxine L., Bigelow, George E., Mead, Andrew M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-50ba1eab6fbd0183a5572a89cec68578b9f655111a448ef9657f6a6e56036ea03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-50ba1eab6fbd0183a5572a89cec68578b9f655111a448ef9657f6a6e56036ea03
container_end_page 323
container_issue 3
container_start_page 319
container_title Addictive behaviors
container_volume 10
creator Burling, Thomas A.
Stitzer, Maxine L.
Bigelow, George E.
Mead, Andrew M.
description Factors which effect the expired air carbon monoxide (CO) levels of smokers were examined in matched subject pairs who smoked an equal number of daytime cigarettes but had different CO levels (x̄ difference = 15.4 ppm). Measures of puff number, duration, and spacing, as well as the amount of CO increase per cigarette (CO boost), were assessed while subjects smoked a single cigarette in daily laboratory sessions. Subjects with relatively high CO levels had larger increases in CO after smoking a single cigarette than did individuals with low CO levels ( p. < .005) but did not differ on any other smoking topography measure. These data suggest that simple topography measures of puff number and duration may not contribute to between subject differences in tobacco smoke exposure, and that greater attention should be given to more refined measures such as puff volume and depth of inhalation. These data also suggest that the measurement of CO boost per cigarette may provide useful information regarding tobacco smoke intake.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0306-4603(85)90014-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76557797</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0306460385900140</els_id><sourcerecordid>76557797</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-50ba1eab6fbd0183a5572a89cec68578b9f655111a448ef9657f6a6e56036ea03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctOwzAURC0EKqXwByBlgRAsAnYcP7JBQhUvqRILYG05zk0xJHGx24r-PS6NuqSru7hnRqMZhE4JviaY8BtMMU9zjumlZFcFxiRP8R4aEiloymkm9tFwixyioxA-I5MJlg_QIMeSElwMkXxt3ZftpsnczdzU69nHKtFdlRjtS9clrevcj60gaWAJTUhsl4QoAB-O0UGtmwAn_R2h94f7t_FTOnl5fB7fTVKT53KeMlxqArrkdVlhIqlmTGRaFgYMl0zIsqg5Y4QQHXGoC85EzTUHFkNz0JiO0MXGd-bd9wLCXLU2GGga3YFbBCWiXIhC7AQpJYxySneCJKeU4UxGMN-AxrsQPNRq5m2r_UoRrNYTqHW_at2vkkz9TaDWic96_0XZQrUV9Z3H_3n_18Hopva6MzZsMckY45xH7HaDxd5hacGrYCx0BirrwcxV5ez_OX4BZ1qgSQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14335028</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Smoking topography and carbon monoxide levels in smokers</title><source>ScienceDirect: Psychology Backfile</source><creator>Burling, Thomas A. ; Stitzer, Maxine L. ; Bigelow, George E. ; Mead, Andrew M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Burling, Thomas A. ; Stitzer, Maxine L. ; Bigelow, George E. ; Mead, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><description>Factors which effect the expired air carbon monoxide (CO) levels of smokers were examined in matched subject pairs who smoked an equal number of daytime cigarettes but had different CO levels (x̄ difference = 15.4 ppm). Measures of puff number, duration, and spacing, as well as the amount of CO increase per cigarette (CO boost), were assessed while subjects smoked a single cigarette in daily laboratory sessions. Subjects with relatively high CO levels had larger increases in CO after smoking a single cigarette than did individuals with low CO levels ( p. &lt; .005) but did not differ on any other smoking topography measure. These data suggest that simple topography measures of puff number and duration may not contribute to between subject differences in tobacco smoke exposure, and that greater attention should be given to more refined measures such as puff volume and depth of inhalation. These data also suggest that the measurement of CO boost per cigarette may provide useful information regarding tobacco smoke intake.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-4603</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6327</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0306-4603(85)90014-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 4083109</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ADBED9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Carbon Monoxide - analysis ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Nicotine - blood ; Pulmonary Alveoli - analysis ; Respiration ; Smoking ; Tobacco, tobacco smoking ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>Addictive behaviors, 1985, Vol.10 (3), p.319-323</ispartof><rights>1985</rights><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-50ba1eab6fbd0183a5572a89cec68578b9f655111a448ef9657f6a6e56036ea03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-50ba1eab6fbd0183a5572a89cec68578b9f655111a448ef9657f6a6e56036ea03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4010,27904,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=8555666$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4083109$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burling, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stitzer, Maxine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bigelow, George E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mead, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><title>Smoking topography and carbon monoxide levels in smokers</title><title>Addictive behaviors</title><addtitle>Addict Behav</addtitle><description>Factors which effect the expired air carbon monoxide (CO) levels of smokers were examined in matched subject pairs who smoked an equal number of daytime cigarettes but had different CO levels (x̄ difference = 15.4 ppm). Measures of puff number, duration, and spacing, as well as the amount of CO increase per cigarette (CO boost), were assessed while subjects smoked a single cigarette in daily laboratory sessions. Subjects with relatively high CO levels had larger increases in CO after smoking a single cigarette than did individuals with low CO levels ( p. &lt; .005) but did not differ on any other smoking topography measure. These data suggest that simple topography measures of puff number and duration may not contribute to between subject differences in tobacco smoke exposure, and that greater attention should be given to more refined measures such as puff volume and depth of inhalation. These data also suggest that the measurement of CO boost per cigarette may provide useful information regarding tobacco smoke intake.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carbon Monoxide - analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Nicotine - blood</subject><subject>Pulmonary Alveoli - analysis</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>0306-4603</issn><issn>1873-6327</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkctOwzAURC0EKqXwByBlgRAsAnYcP7JBQhUvqRILYG05zk0xJHGx24r-PS6NuqSru7hnRqMZhE4JviaY8BtMMU9zjumlZFcFxiRP8R4aEiloymkm9tFwixyioxA-I5MJlg_QIMeSElwMkXxt3ZftpsnczdzU69nHKtFdlRjtS9clrevcj60gaWAJTUhsl4QoAB-O0UGtmwAn_R2h94f7t_FTOnl5fB7fTVKT53KeMlxqArrkdVlhIqlmTGRaFgYMl0zIsqg5Y4QQHXGoC85EzTUHFkNz0JiO0MXGd-bd9wLCXLU2GGga3YFbBCWiXIhC7AQpJYxySneCJKeU4UxGMN-AxrsQPNRq5m2r_UoRrNYTqHW_at2vkkz9TaDWic96_0XZQrUV9Z3H_3n_18Hopva6MzZsMckY45xH7HaDxd5hacGrYCx0BirrwcxV5ez_OX4BZ1qgSQ</recordid><startdate>1985</startdate><enddate>1985</enddate><creator>Burling, Thomas A.</creator><creator>Stitzer, Maxine L.</creator><creator>Bigelow, George E.</creator><creator>Mead, Andrew M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1985</creationdate><title>Smoking topography and carbon monoxide levels in smokers</title><author>Burling, Thomas A. ; Stitzer, Maxine L. ; Bigelow, George E. ; Mead, Andrew M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-50ba1eab6fbd0183a5572a89cec68578b9f655111a448ef9657f6a6e56036ea03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carbon Monoxide - analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Nicotine - blood</topic><topic>Pulmonary Alveoli - analysis</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burling, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stitzer, Maxine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bigelow, George E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mead, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Addictive behaviors</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burling, Thomas A.</au><au>Stitzer, Maxine L.</au><au>Bigelow, George E.</au><au>Mead, Andrew M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Smoking topography and carbon monoxide levels in smokers</atitle><jtitle>Addictive behaviors</jtitle><addtitle>Addict Behav</addtitle><date>1985</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>319</spage><epage>323</epage><pages>319-323</pages><issn>0306-4603</issn><eissn>1873-6327</eissn><coden>ADBED9</coden><abstract>Factors which effect the expired air carbon monoxide (CO) levels of smokers were examined in matched subject pairs who smoked an equal number of daytime cigarettes but had different CO levels (x̄ difference = 15.4 ppm). Measures of puff number, duration, and spacing, as well as the amount of CO increase per cigarette (CO boost), were assessed while subjects smoked a single cigarette in daily laboratory sessions. Subjects with relatively high CO levels had larger increases in CO after smoking a single cigarette than did individuals with low CO levels ( p. &lt; .005) but did not differ on any other smoking topography measure. These data suggest that simple topography measures of puff number and duration may not contribute to between subject differences in tobacco smoke exposure, and that greater attention should be given to more refined measures such as puff volume and depth of inhalation. These data also suggest that the measurement of CO boost per cigarette may provide useful information regarding tobacco smoke intake.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>4083109</pmid><doi>10.1016/0306-4603(85)90014-0</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0306-4603
ispartof Addictive behaviors, 1985, Vol.10 (3), p.319-323
issn 0306-4603
1873-6327
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76557797
source ScienceDirect: Psychology Backfile
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Carbon Monoxide - analysis
Female
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Nicotine - blood
Pulmonary Alveoli - analysis
Respiration
Smoking
Tobacco, tobacco smoking
Toxicology
title Smoking topography and carbon monoxide levels in smokers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T08%3A46%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Smoking%20topography%20and%20carbon%20monoxide%20levels%20in%20smokers&rft.jtitle=Addictive%20behaviors&rft.au=Burling,%20Thomas%20A.&rft.date=1985&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=319&rft.epage=323&rft.pages=319-323&rft.issn=0306-4603&rft.eissn=1873-6327&rft.coden=ADBED9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0306-4603(85)90014-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76557797%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-50ba1eab6fbd0183a5572a89cec68578b9f655111a448ef9657f6a6e56036ea03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14335028&rft_id=info:pmid/4083109&rfr_iscdi=true