Loading…
Smoking topography and carbon monoxide levels in smokers
Factors which effect the expired air carbon monoxide (CO) levels of smokers were examined in matched subject pairs who smoked an equal number of daytime cigarettes but had different CO levels (x̄ difference = 15.4 ppm). Measures of puff number, duration, and spacing, as well as the amount of CO incr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Addictive behaviors 1985, Vol.10 (3), p.319-323 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-50ba1eab6fbd0183a5572a89cec68578b9f655111a448ef9657f6a6e56036ea03 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-50ba1eab6fbd0183a5572a89cec68578b9f655111a448ef9657f6a6e56036ea03 |
container_end_page | 323 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 319 |
container_title | Addictive behaviors |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Burling, Thomas A. Stitzer, Maxine L. Bigelow, George E. Mead, Andrew M. |
description | Factors which effect the expired air carbon monoxide (CO) levels of smokers were examined in matched subject pairs who smoked an equal number of daytime cigarettes but had different CO levels (x̄ difference = 15.4 ppm). Measures of puff number, duration, and spacing, as well as the amount of CO increase per cigarette (CO boost), were assessed while subjects smoked a single cigarette in daily laboratory sessions. Subjects with relatively high CO levels had larger increases in CO after smoking a single cigarette than did individuals with low CO levels (
p. < .005) but did not differ on any other smoking topography measure. These data suggest that simple topography measures of puff number and duration may not contribute to between subject differences in tobacco smoke exposure, and that greater attention should be given to more refined measures such as puff volume and depth of inhalation. These data also suggest that the measurement of CO boost per cigarette may provide useful information regarding tobacco smoke intake. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0306-4603(85)90014-0 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76557797</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0306460385900140</els_id><sourcerecordid>76557797</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-50ba1eab6fbd0183a5572a89cec68578b9f655111a448ef9657f6a6e56036ea03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctOwzAURC0EKqXwByBlgRAsAnYcP7JBQhUvqRILYG05zk0xJHGx24r-PS6NuqSru7hnRqMZhE4JviaY8BtMMU9zjumlZFcFxiRP8R4aEiloymkm9tFwixyioxA-I5MJlg_QIMeSElwMkXxt3ZftpsnczdzU69nHKtFdlRjtS9clrevcj60gaWAJTUhsl4QoAB-O0UGtmwAn_R2h94f7t_FTOnl5fB7fTVKT53KeMlxqArrkdVlhIqlmTGRaFgYMl0zIsqg5Y4QQHXGoC85EzTUHFkNz0JiO0MXGd-bd9wLCXLU2GGga3YFbBCWiXIhC7AQpJYxySneCJKeU4UxGMN-AxrsQPNRq5m2r_UoRrNYTqHW_at2vkkz9TaDWic96_0XZQrUV9Z3H_3n_18Hopva6MzZsMckY45xH7HaDxd5hacGrYCx0BirrwcxV5ez_OX4BZ1qgSQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14335028</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Smoking topography and carbon monoxide levels in smokers</title><source>ScienceDirect: Psychology Backfile</source><creator>Burling, Thomas A. ; Stitzer, Maxine L. ; Bigelow, George E. ; Mead, Andrew M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Burling, Thomas A. ; Stitzer, Maxine L. ; Bigelow, George E. ; Mead, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><description>Factors which effect the expired air carbon monoxide (CO) levels of smokers were examined in matched subject pairs who smoked an equal number of daytime cigarettes but had different CO levels (x̄ difference = 15.4 ppm). Measures of puff number, duration, and spacing, as well as the amount of CO increase per cigarette (CO boost), were assessed while subjects smoked a single cigarette in daily laboratory sessions. Subjects with relatively high CO levels had larger increases in CO after smoking a single cigarette than did individuals with low CO levels (
p. < .005) but did not differ on any other smoking topography measure. These data suggest that simple topography measures of puff number and duration may not contribute to between subject differences in tobacco smoke exposure, and that greater attention should be given to more refined measures such as puff volume and depth of inhalation. These data also suggest that the measurement of CO boost per cigarette may provide useful information regarding tobacco smoke intake.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-4603</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6327</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0306-4603(85)90014-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 4083109</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ADBED9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Carbon Monoxide - analysis ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Nicotine - blood ; Pulmonary Alveoli - analysis ; Respiration ; Smoking ; Tobacco, tobacco smoking ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>Addictive behaviors, 1985, Vol.10 (3), p.319-323</ispartof><rights>1985</rights><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-50ba1eab6fbd0183a5572a89cec68578b9f655111a448ef9657f6a6e56036ea03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-50ba1eab6fbd0183a5572a89cec68578b9f655111a448ef9657f6a6e56036ea03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4010,27904,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=8555666$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4083109$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burling, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stitzer, Maxine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bigelow, George E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mead, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><title>Smoking topography and carbon monoxide levels in smokers</title><title>Addictive behaviors</title><addtitle>Addict Behav</addtitle><description>Factors which effect the expired air carbon monoxide (CO) levels of smokers were examined in matched subject pairs who smoked an equal number of daytime cigarettes but had different CO levels (x̄ difference = 15.4 ppm). Measures of puff number, duration, and spacing, as well as the amount of CO increase per cigarette (CO boost), were assessed while subjects smoked a single cigarette in daily laboratory sessions. Subjects with relatively high CO levels had larger increases in CO after smoking a single cigarette than did individuals with low CO levels (
p. < .005) but did not differ on any other smoking topography measure. These data suggest that simple topography measures of puff number and duration may not contribute to between subject differences in tobacco smoke exposure, and that greater attention should be given to more refined measures such as puff volume and depth of inhalation. These data also suggest that the measurement of CO boost per cigarette may provide useful information regarding tobacco smoke intake.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carbon Monoxide - analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Nicotine - blood</subject><subject>Pulmonary Alveoli - analysis</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>0306-4603</issn><issn>1873-6327</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkctOwzAURC0EKqXwByBlgRAsAnYcP7JBQhUvqRILYG05zk0xJHGx24r-PS6NuqSru7hnRqMZhE4JviaY8BtMMU9zjumlZFcFxiRP8R4aEiloymkm9tFwixyioxA-I5MJlg_QIMeSElwMkXxt3ZftpsnczdzU69nHKtFdlRjtS9clrevcj60gaWAJTUhsl4QoAB-O0UGtmwAn_R2h94f7t_FTOnl5fB7fTVKT53KeMlxqArrkdVlhIqlmTGRaFgYMl0zIsqg5Y4QQHXGoC85EzTUHFkNz0JiO0MXGd-bd9wLCXLU2GGga3YFbBCWiXIhC7AQpJYxySneCJKeU4UxGMN-AxrsQPNRq5m2r_UoRrNYTqHW_at2vkkz9TaDWic96_0XZQrUV9Z3H_3n_18Hopva6MzZsMckY45xH7HaDxd5hacGrYCx0BirrwcxV5ez_OX4BZ1qgSQ</recordid><startdate>1985</startdate><enddate>1985</enddate><creator>Burling, Thomas A.</creator><creator>Stitzer, Maxine L.</creator><creator>Bigelow, George E.</creator><creator>Mead, Andrew M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1985</creationdate><title>Smoking topography and carbon monoxide levels in smokers</title><author>Burling, Thomas A. ; Stitzer, Maxine L. ; Bigelow, George E. ; Mead, Andrew M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-50ba1eab6fbd0183a5572a89cec68578b9f655111a448ef9657f6a6e56036ea03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carbon Monoxide - analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Nicotine - blood</topic><topic>Pulmonary Alveoli - analysis</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burling, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stitzer, Maxine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bigelow, George E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mead, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Addictive behaviors</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burling, Thomas A.</au><au>Stitzer, Maxine L.</au><au>Bigelow, George E.</au><au>Mead, Andrew M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Smoking topography and carbon monoxide levels in smokers</atitle><jtitle>Addictive behaviors</jtitle><addtitle>Addict Behav</addtitle><date>1985</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>319</spage><epage>323</epage><pages>319-323</pages><issn>0306-4603</issn><eissn>1873-6327</eissn><coden>ADBED9</coden><abstract>Factors which effect the expired air carbon monoxide (CO) levels of smokers were examined in matched subject pairs who smoked an equal number of daytime cigarettes but had different CO levels (x̄ difference = 15.4 ppm). Measures of puff number, duration, and spacing, as well as the amount of CO increase per cigarette (CO boost), were assessed while subjects smoked a single cigarette in daily laboratory sessions. Subjects with relatively high CO levels had larger increases in CO after smoking a single cigarette than did individuals with low CO levels (
p. < .005) but did not differ on any other smoking topography measure. These data suggest that simple topography measures of puff number and duration may not contribute to between subject differences in tobacco smoke exposure, and that greater attention should be given to more refined measures such as puff volume and depth of inhalation. These data also suggest that the measurement of CO boost per cigarette may provide useful information regarding tobacco smoke intake.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>4083109</pmid><doi>10.1016/0306-4603(85)90014-0</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0306-4603 |
ispartof | Addictive behaviors, 1985, Vol.10 (3), p.319-323 |
issn | 0306-4603 1873-6327 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76557797 |
source | ScienceDirect: Psychology Backfile |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Carbon Monoxide - analysis Female Humans Male Medical sciences Nicotine - blood Pulmonary Alveoli - analysis Respiration Smoking Tobacco, tobacco smoking Toxicology |
title | Smoking topography and carbon monoxide levels in smokers |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T08%3A46%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Smoking%20topography%20and%20carbon%20monoxide%20levels%20in%20smokers&rft.jtitle=Addictive%20behaviors&rft.au=Burling,%20Thomas%20A.&rft.date=1985&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=319&rft.epage=323&rft.pages=319-323&rft.issn=0306-4603&rft.eissn=1873-6327&rft.coden=ADBED9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0306-4603(85)90014-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76557797%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-50ba1eab6fbd0183a5572a89cec68578b9f655111a448ef9657f6a6e56036ea03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14335028&rft_id=info:pmid/4083109&rfr_iscdi=true |