Loading…

Effect of foot position on gastrocnemius/soleus stretching in subjects with normal flexibility

Following injury to the ankle or lower extremity, stretching of the gastrocnemius/soleus complex is commonly prescribed. Many authors recommend stretching the gastrocnemius/soleus complex with the foot placed in a supinated position. No research is available, however, that supports the efficacy of s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy 1994-06, Vol.19 (6), p.352-356
Main Authors: Worrell, T W, McCullough, M, Pfeiffer, A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d27799a99fa9552200f1d93fc35492d90d7566e45b997e015183c18eeaac6fa33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d27799a99fa9552200f1d93fc35492d90d7566e45b997e015183c18eeaac6fa33
container_end_page 356
container_issue 6
container_start_page 352
container_title The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy
container_volume 19
creator Worrell, T W
McCullough, M
Pfeiffer, A
description Following injury to the ankle or lower extremity, stretching of the gastrocnemius/soleus complex is commonly prescribed. Many authors recommend stretching the gastrocnemius/soleus complex with the foot placed in a supinated position. No research is available, however, that supports the efficacy of stretching in the supinated vs. the pronated position. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the effect of stretching the gastrocnemius/soleus complex in two foot positions: supinated and pronated. Eleven female and eight male subjects completed 10 stretching sessions with one foot supinated and the other foot pronated. Each stretching session consisted of four 20-second stretches. On pretest and posttest measurements, maximum dorsiflexion range of motion and stretching force exerted through the foot were recorded for each subject. Foot position for the testing procedures and the stretching phase was standardized with individually constructed footprint templates. A two-way analysis of variance (stretching position and time) was used to compare pretest and posttest ankle dorsiflexion measurements. Results indicated a significant increase in dorsiflexion (p = 0.01, pronation + 6.36%, supination + 6.24%) but no significant difference between stretching positions (p = 0.23). We concluded that gastrocnemius/soleus complex stretching in either foot position is effective for increasing dorsiflexion range of motion in healthy subjects with normal flexibility of the gastrocnemius/soleus complex.
doi_str_mv 10.2519/jospt.1994.19.6.352
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76588483</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76588483</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d27799a99fa9552200f1d93fc35492d90d7566e45b997e015183c18eeaac6fa33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF9LwzAUxYMoc04_gQh58q1b0jRp8ihj_oGBL_pqSNNky2ib2qTovr2ZG756uZwLl3POww-AW4zmOcVisfOhj3MsRJFkzuaE5mdgigXhGSZFcQ6mCAuUMYTxJbgKYYfSFKiYgAlHOaUlm4KPlbVGR-gttN5H2PvgovMdTLtRIQ5ed6Z1Y1gE35gxwPQyUW9dt4Gug2Gsdike4JeLW9j5oVUNtI35dpVrXNxfgwurmmBuTncG3h9Xb8vnbP369LJ8WGeaEByzOi9LIZQQVglK8xwhi2tBrCa0EHktUF1SxkxBKyFKgzDFnGjMjVFKM6sImYH7Y28_-M_RhChbF7RpGtUZPwZZMsp5wf83Yl4yzvKDkRyNevAhDMbKfnCtGvYSI3nAL3_xywP-JJLJhD-l7k71Y9Wa-i9z4k1-ABfUg5Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18768623</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of foot position on gastrocnemius/soleus stretching in subjects with normal flexibility</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Worrell, T W ; McCullough, M ; Pfeiffer, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Worrell, T W ; McCullough, M ; Pfeiffer, A</creatorcontrib><description>Following injury to the ankle or lower extremity, stretching of the gastrocnemius/soleus complex is commonly prescribed. Many authors recommend stretching the gastrocnemius/soleus complex with the foot placed in a supinated position. No research is available, however, that supports the efficacy of stretching in the supinated vs. the pronated position. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the effect of stretching the gastrocnemius/soleus complex in two foot positions: supinated and pronated. Eleven female and eight male subjects completed 10 stretching sessions with one foot supinated and the other foot pronated. Each stretching session consisted of four 20-second stretches. On pretest and posttest measurements, maximum dorsiflexion range of motion and stretching force exerted through the foot were recorded for each subject. Foot position for the testing procedures and the stretching phase was standardized with individually constructed footprint templates. A two-way analysis of variance (stretching position and time) was used to compare pretest and posttest ankle dorsiflexion measurements. Results indicated a significant increase in dorsiflexion (p = 0.01, pronation + 6.36%, supination + 6.24%) but no significant difference between stretching positions (p = 0.23). We concluded that gastrocnemius/soleus complex stretching in either foot position is effective for increasing dorsiflexion range of motion in healthy subjects with normal flexibility of the gastrocnemius/soleus complex.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-6011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-1344</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1994.19.6.352</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8025576</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Ankle Injuries - rehabilitation ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Exercise Therapy - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Pronation - physiology ; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology ; Supination - physiology</subject><ispartof>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy, 1994-06, Vol.19 (6), p.352-356</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d27799a99fa9552200f1d93fc35492d90d7566e45b997e015183c18eeaac6fa33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d27799a99fa9552200f1d93fc35492d90d7566e45b997e015183c18eeaac6fa33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8025576$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Worrell, T W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCullough, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeiffer, A</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of foot position on gastrocnemius/soleus stretching in subjects with normal flexibility</title><title>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy</title><addtitle>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther</addtitle><description>Following injury to the ankle or lower extremity, stretching of the gastrocnemius/soleus complex is commonly prescribed. Many authors recommend stretching the gastrocnemius/soleus complex with the foot placed in a supinated position. No research is available, however, that supports the efficacy of stretching in the supinated vs. the pronated position. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the effect of stretching the gastrocnemius/soleus complex in two foot positions: supinated and pronated. Eleven female and eight male subjects completed 10 stretching sessions with one foot supinated and the other foot pronated. Each stretching session consisted of four 20-second stretches. On pretest and posttest measurements, maximum dorsiflexion range of motion and stretching force exerted through the foot were recorded for each subject. Foot position for the testing procedures and the stretching phase was standardized with individually constructed footprint templates. A two-way analysis of variance (stretching position and time) was used to compare pretest and posttest ankle dorsiflexion measurements. Results indicated a significant increase in dorsiflexion (p = 0.01, pronation + 6.36%, supination + 6.24%) but no significant difference between stretching positions (p = 0.23). We concluded that gastrocnemius/soleus complex stretching in either foot position is effective for increasing dorsiflexion range of motion in healthy subjects with normal flexibility of the gastrocnemius/soleus complex.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Ankle Injuries - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Exercise Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pronation - physiology</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</subject><subject>Supination - physiology</subject><issn>0190-6011</issn><issn>1938-1344</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkF9LwzAUxYMoc04_gQh58q1b0jRp8ihj_oGBL_pqSNNky2ib2qTovr2ZG756uZwLl3POww-AW4zmOcVisfOhj3MsRJFkzuaE5mdgigXhGSZFcQ6mCAuUMYTxJbgKYYfSFKiYgAlHOaUlm4KPlbVGR-gttN5H2PvgovMdTLtRIQ5ed6Z1Y1gE35gxwPQyUW9dt4Gug2Gsdike4JeLW9j5oVUNtI35dpVrXNxfgwurmmBuTncG3h9Xb8vnbP369LJ8WGeaEByzOi9LIZQQVglK8xwhi2tBrCa0EHktUF1SxkxBKyFKgzDFnGjMjVFKM6sImYH7Y28_-M_RhChbF7RpGtUZPwZZMsp5wf83Yl4yzvKDkRyNevAhDMbKfnCtGvYSI3nAL3_xywP-JJLJhD-l7k71Y9Wa-i9z4k1-ABfUg5Q</recordid><startdate>19940601</startdate><enddate>19940601</enddate><creator>Worrell, T W</creator><creator>McCullough, M</creator><creator>Pfeiffer, A</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940601</creationdate><title>Effect of foot position on gastrocnemius/soleus stretching in subjects with normal flexibility</title><author>Worrell, T W ; McCullough, M ; Pfeiffer, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d27799a99fa9552200f1d93fc35492d90d7566e45b997e015183c18eeaac6fa33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Ankle Injuries - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Exercise Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pronation - physiology</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</topic><topic>Supination - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Worrell, T W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCullough, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeiffer, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Worrell, T W</au><au>McCullough, M</au><au>Pfeiffer, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of foot position on gastrocnemius/soleus stretching in subjects with normal flexibility</atitle><jtitle>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther</addtitle><date>1994-06-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>352</spage><epage>356</epage><pages>352-356</pages><issn>0190-6011</issn><eissn>1938-1344</eissn><abstract>Following injury to the ankle or lower extremity, stretching of the gastrocnemius/soleus complex is commonly prescribed. Many authors recommend stretching the gastrocnemius/soleus complex with the foot placed in a supinated position. No research is available, however, that supports the efficacy of stretching in the supinated vs. the pronated position. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the effect of stretching the gastrocnemius/soleus complex in two foot positions: supinated and pronated. Eleven female and eight male subjects completed 10 stretching sessions with one foot supinated and the other foot pronated. Each stretching session consisted of four 20-second stretches. On pretest and posttest measurements, maximum dorsiflexion range of motion and stretching force exerted through the foot were recorded for each subject. Foot position for the testing procedures and the stretching phase was standardized with individually constructed footprint templates. A two-way analysis of variance (stretching position and time) was used to compare pretest and posttest ankle dorsiflexion measurements. Results indicated a significant increase in dorsiflexion (p = 0.01, pronation + 6.36%, supination + 6.24%) but no significant difference between stretching positions (p = 0.23). We concluded that gastrocnemius/soleus complex stretching in either foot position is effective for increasing dorsiflexion range of motion in healthy subjects with normal flexibility of the gastrocnemius/soleus complex.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>8025576</pmid><doi>10.2519/jospt.1994.19.6.352</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0190-6011
ispartof The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy, 1994-06, Vol.19 (6), p.352-356
issn 0190-6011
1938-1344
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76588483
source EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Adult
Ankle Injuries - rehabilitation
Biomechanical Phenomena
Exercise Therapy - methods
Female
Humans
Male
Pronation - physiology
Range of Motion, Articular - physiology
Supination - physiology
title Effect of foot position on gastrocnemius/soleus stretching in subjects with normal flexibility
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A35%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20foot%20position%20on%20gastrocnemius/soleus%20stretching%20in%20subjects%20with%20normal%20flexibility&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20and%20sports%20physical%20therapy&rft.au=Worrell,%20T%20W&rft.date=1994-06-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=352&rft.epage=356&rft.pages=352-356&rft.issn=0190-6011&rft.eissn=1938-1344&rft_id=info:doi/10.2519/jospt.1994.19.6.352&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76588483%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d27799a99fa9552200f1d93fc35492d90d7566e45b997e015183c18eeaac6fa33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18768623&rft_id=info:pmid/8025576&rfr_iscdi=true