Loading…
Effect of foot position on gastrocnemius/soleus stretching in subjects with normal flexibility
Following injury to the ankle or lower extremity, stretching of the gastrocnemius/soleus complex is commonly prescribed. Many authors recommend stretching the gastrocnemius/soleus complex with the foot placed in a supinated position. No research is available, however, that supports the efficacy of s...
Saved in:
Published in: | The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy 1994-06, Vol.19 (6), p.352-356 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d27799a99fa9552200f1d93fc35492d90d7566e45b997e015183c18eeaac6fa33 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d27799a99fa9552200f1d93fc35492d90d7566e45b997e015183c18eeaac6fa33 |
container_end_page | 356 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 352 |
container_title | The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Worrell, T W McCullough, M Pfeiffer, A |
description | Following injury to the ankle or lower extremity, stretching of the gastrocnemius/soleus complex is commonly prescribed. Many authors recommend stretching the gastrocnemius/soleus complex with the foot placed in a supinated position. No research is available, however, that supports the efficacy of stretching in the supinated vs. the pronated position. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the effect of stretching the gastrocnemius/soleus complex in two foot positions: supinated and pronated. Eleven female and eight male subjects completed 10 stretching sessions with one foot supinated and the other foot pronated. Each stretching session consisted of four 20-second stretches. On pretest and posttest measurements, maximum dorsiflexion range of motion and stretching force exerted through the foot were recorded for each subject. Foot position for the testing procedures and the stretching phase was standardized with individually constructed footprint templates. A two-way analysis of variance (stretching position and time) was used to compare pretest and posttest ankle dorsiflexion measurements. Results indicated a significant increase in dorsiflexion (p = 0.01, pronation + 6.36%, supination + 6.24%) but no significant difference between stretching positions (p = 0.23). We concluded that gastrocnemius/soleus complex stretching in either foot position is effective for increasing dorsiflexion range of motion in healthy subjects with normal flexibility of the gastrocnemius/soleus complex. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2519/jospt.1994.19.6.352 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76588483</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76588483</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d27799a99fa9552200f1d93fc35492d90d7566e45b997e015183c18eeaac6fa33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF9LwzAUxYMoc04_gQh58q1b0jRp8ihj_oGBL_pqSNNky2ib2qTovr2ZG756uZwLl3POww-AW4zmOcVisfOhj3MsRJFkzuaE5mdgigXhGSZFcQ6mCAuUMYTxJbgKYYfSFKiYgAlHOaUlm4KPlbVGR-gttN5H2PvgovMdTLtRIQ5ed6Z1Y1gE35gxwPQyUW9dt4Gug2Gsdike4JeLW9j5oVUNtI35dpVrXNxfgwurmmBuTncG3h9Xb8vnbP369LJ8WGeaEByzOi9LIZQQVglK8xwhi2tBrCa0EHktUF1SxkxBKyFKgzDFnGjMjVFKM6sImYH7Y28_-M_RhChbF7RpGtUZPwZZMsp5wf83Yl4yzvKDkRyNevAhDMbKfnCtGvYSI3nAL3_xywP-JJLJhD-l7k71Y9Wa-i9z4k1-ABfUg5Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18768623</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of foot position on gastrocnemius/soleus stretching in subjects with normal flexibility</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Worrell, T W ; McCullough, M ; Pfeiffer, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Worrell, T W ; McCullough, M ; Pfeiffer, A</creatorcontrib><description>Following injury to the ankle or lower extremity, stretching of the gastrocnemius/soleus complex is commonly prescribed. Many authors recommend stretching the gastrocnemius/soleus complex with the foot placed in a supinated position. No research is available, however, that supports the efficacy of stretching in the supinated vs. the pronated position. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the effect of stretching the gastrocnemius/soleus complex in two foot positions: supinated and pronated. Eleven female and eight male subjects completed 10 stretching sessions with one foot supinated and the other foot pronated. Each stretching session consisted of four 20-second stretches. On pretest and posttest measurements, maximum dorsiflexion range of motion and stretching force exerted through the foot were recorded for each subject. Foot position for the testing procedures and the stretching phase was standardized with individually constructed footprint templates. A two-way analysis of variance (stretching position and time) was used to compare pretest and posttest ankle dorsiflexion measurements. Results indicated a significant increase in dorsiflexion (p = 0.01, pronation + 6.36%, supination + 6.24%) but no significant difference between stretching positions (p = 0.23). We concluded that gastrocnemius/soleus complex stretching in either foot position is effective for increasing dorsiflexion range of motion in healthy subjects with normal flexibility of the gastrocnemius/soleus complex.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-6011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-1344</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1994.19.6.352</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8025576</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Ankle Injuries - rehabilitation ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Exercise Therapy - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Pronation - physiology ; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology ; Supination - physiology</subject><ispartof>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy, 1994-06, Vol.19 (6), p.352-356</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d27799a99fa9552200f1d93fc35492d90d7566e45b997e015183c18eeaac6fa33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d27799a99fa9552200f1d93fc35492d90d7566e45b997e015183c18eeaac6fa33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8025576$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Worrell, T W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCullough, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeiffer, A</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of foot position on gastrocnemius/soleus stretching in subjects with normal flexibility</title><title>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy</title><addtitle>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther</addtitle><description>Following injury to the ankle or lower extremity, stretching of the gastrocnemius/soleus complex is commonly prescribed. Many authors recommend stretching the gastrocnemius/soleus complex with the foot placed in a supinated position. No research is available, however, that supports the efficacy of stretching in the supinated vs. the pronated position. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the effect of stretching the gastrocnemius/soleus complex in two foot positions: supinated and pronated. Eleven female and eight male subjects completed 10 stretching sessions with one foot supinated and the other foot pronated. Each stretching session consisted of four 20-second stretches. On pretest and posttest measurements, maximum dorsiflexion range of motion and stretching force exerted through the foot were recorded for each subject. Foot position for the testing procedures and the stretching phase was standardized with individually constructed footprint templates. A two-way analysis of variance (stretching position and time) was used to compare pretest and posttest ankle dorsiflexion measurements. Results indicated a significant increase in dorsiflexion (p = 0.01, pronation + 6.36%, supination + 6.24%) but no significant difference between stretching positions (p = 0.23). We concluded that gastrocnemius/soleus complex stretching in either foot position is effective for increasing dorsiflexion range of motion in healthy subjects with normal flexibility of the gastrocnemius/soleus complex.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Ankle Injuries - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Exercise Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pronation - physiology</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</subject><subject>Supination - physiology</subject><issn>0190-6011</issn><issn>1938-1344</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkF9LwzAUxYMoc04_gQh58q1b0jRp8ihj_oGBL_pqSNNky2ib2qTovr2ZG756uZwLl3POww-AW4zmOcVisfOhj3MsRJFkzuaE5mdgigXhGSZFcQ6mCAuUMYTxJbgKYYfSFKiYgAlHOaUlm4KPlbVGR-gttN5H2PvgovMdTLtRIQ5ed6Z1Y1gE35gxwPQyUW9dt4Gug2Gsdike4JeLW9j5oVUNtI35dpVrXNxfgwurmmBuTncG3h9Xb8vnbP369LJ8WGeaEByzOi9LIZQQVglK8xwhi2tBrCa0EHktUF1SxkxBKyFKgzDFnGjMjVFKM6sImYH7Y28_-M_RhChbF7RpGtUZPwZZMsp5wf83Yl4yzvKDkRyNevAhDMbKfnCtGvYSI3nAL3_xywP-JJLJhD-l7k71Y9Wa-i9z4k1-ABfUg5Q</recordid><startdate>19940601</startdate><enddate>19940601</enddate><creator>Worrell, T W</creator><creator>McCullough, M</creator><creator>Pfeiffer, A</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940601</creationdate><title>Effect of foot position on gastrocnemius/soleus stretching in subjects with normal flexibility</title><author>Worrell, T W ; McCullough, M ; Pfeiffer, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d27799a99fa9552200f1d93fc35492d90d7566e45b997e015183c18eeaac6fa33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Ankle Injuries - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Exercise Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pronation - physiology</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</topic><topic>Supination - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Worrell, T W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCullough, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeiffer, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Worrell, T W</au><au>McCullough, M</au><au>Pfeiffer, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of foot position on gastrocnemius/soleus stretching in subjects with normal flexibility</atitle><jtitle>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther</addtitle><date>1994-06-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>352</spage><epage>356</epage><pages>352-356</pages><issn>0190-6011</issn><eissn>1938-1344</eissn><abstract>Following injury to the ankle or lower extremity, stretching of the gastrocnemius/soleus complex is commonly prescribed. Many authors recommend stretching the gastrocnemius/soleus complex with the foot placed in a supinated position. No research is available, however, that supports the efficacy of stretching in the supinated vs. the pronated position. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the effect of stretching the gastrocnemius/soleus complex in two foot positions: supinated and pronated. Eleven female and eight male subjects completed 10 stretching sessions with one foot supinated and the other foot pronated. Each stretching session consisted of four 20-second stretches. On pretest and posttest measurements, maximum dorsiflexion range of motion and stretching force exerted through the foot were recorded for each subject. Foot position for the testing procedures and the stretching phase was standardized with individually constructed footprint templates. A two-way analysis of variance (stretching position and time) was used to compare pretest and posttest ankle dorsiflexion measurements. Results indicated a significant increase in dorsiflexion (p = 0.01, pronation + 6.36%, supination + 6.24%) but no significant difference between stretching positions (p = 0.23). We concluded that gastrocnemius/soleus complex stretching in either foot position is effective for increasing dorsiflexion range of motion in healthy subjects with normal flexibility of the gastrocnemius/soleus complex.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>8025576</pmid><doi>10.2519/jospt.1994.19.6.352</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0190-6011 |
ispartof | The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy, 1994-06, Vol.19 (6), p.352-356 |
issn | 0190-6011 1938-1344 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76588483 |
source | EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Adult Ankle Injuries - rehabilitation Biomechanical Phenomena Exercise Therapy - methods Female Humans Male Pronation - physiology Range of Motion, Articular - physiology Supination - physiology |
title | Effect of foot position on gastrocnemius/soleus stretching in subjects with normal flexibility |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A35%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20foot%20position%20on%20gastrocnemius/soleus%20stretching%20in%20subjects%20with%20normal%20flexibility&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20and%20sports%20physical%20therapy&rft.au=Worrell,%20T%20W&rft.date=1994-06-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=352&rft.epage=356&rft.pages=352-356&rft.issn=0190-6011&rft.eissn=1938-1344&rft_id=info:doi/10.2519/jospt.1994.19.6.352&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76588483%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d27799a99fa9552200f1d93fc35492d90d7566e45b997e015183c18eeaac6fa33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18768623&rft_id=info:pmid/8025576&rfr_iscdi=true |