Loading…

Cisplatin as a radiation sensitizer in the treatment of advanced head and neck cancers. Results of a phase II study

Background. Surgery and radiotherapy mainstays in the management of advanced head and neck cancer, although historically, only 20–30% of patients survive. Therefore, in an attempt to improve locoregional control and survival, a multimodal protocol using cisplatin as a radiosensitizer was implemented...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cancer 1994-10, Vol.74 (7), p.1927-1932
Main Authors: Chougule, Prakash B, Suk, Steve, Chu, Quyen D., Leone, Louis, Nigri, Peter T., McRae, Robert, Lekas, Mary, Barone, Anthony, Bhat, Dinesh, Bellino, Joseph
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4507-22fda902c3d06a8bc8fc33986dfe5f3609386668e091e94f31c1b9a8739111e83
container_end_page 1932
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1927
container_title Cancer
container_volume 74
creator Chougule, Prakash B
Suk, Steve
Chu, Quyen D.
Leone, Louis
Nigri, Peter T.
McRae, Robert
Lekas, Mary
Barone, Anthony
Bhat, Dinesh
Bellino, Joseph
description Background. Surgery and radiotherapy mainstays in the management of advanced head and neck cancer, although historically, only 20–30% of patients survive. Therefore, in an attempt to improve locoregional control and survival, a multimodal protocol using cisplatin as a radiosensitizer was implemented. Methods. Between 1984 and 1990,68 patients with advanced head and neck cancer (Stages III and IV) were treated with a regimen consisting of an induction phase of 4500 cGy and two cycles of cisplatin followed by an eradicative phase of either radical surgery (Group A, 27 patients) or radical radiotherapy (Group B, 41 patients). The maintenance phase chemotherapy consisted of adjuvant 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) and cisplatin after completion of locoregional treatment. Of the 68 patients, 19 had Stage III disease, and 49 had Stage IV; 21 had no regional lymph node metastases (No), and 47 had regional lymph node metastases (N+). Results. The induction phase yielded a 26% (18 patients) complete response (CR) rate and a 57% (39 patients) partial response (PR) rate (response > 50%), yielding an overall response rate of 83%. Eleven patients (16%) had stable disease (ST) (i. e., < 50% response). The 2‐year survival rates by initial treatment response for patients who had a CR, a PR, and stable disease were 53%, 56%, and 36%, respectively; for Groups A and B, 63% and 45%, respectively; for Stages III and IV, 68% and 43%, respectively; and for NO and N+, 69% and 43%, respectively. In Group A, 14 of 27 patients (52%) had no viable tumor in the surgical specimen (i. e. had pathologic complete tumor clearance [CTC]); this subgroup had a 5‐year survival rate of 58%. Ten patients (37%) who had gross total resection of tumor with negative margins but had tumor present in the specimen had a 5‐year survival of 22%. In Group B, the 5‐year survival rate was 43% for 27 patients who achieved CR after completion of radical radiotherapy (total tumor dose, 6480–7020 cGy). The 5‐year survival rate of the 14 patients who had a PR and stable disease after radical radiotherapy and 3 patients whose resection was incomplete was 0%. The overall 2‐ and 5‐year survival rates for all patients were 53% and 32%, respectively. Of 21 patients in whom treatment failed, most (90%) had a locoregional recurrence: 13 local recurrences (62%), 5 regional (24%), and 1 locoregional (5%). Two patients (10%) experienced failure at distant sites (the lung). Major treatment‐related morbidity developed in two patients
doi_str_mv 10.1002/1097-0142(19941001)74:7<1927::AID-CNCR2820740717>3.0.CO;2-P
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76713911</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76713911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4507-22fda902c3d06a8bc8fc33986dfe5f3609386668e091e94f31c1b9a8739111e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkV-r1DAQxYMo1_XqRxDyJPrQdZJ0m2QV4VL_LVzcy0VB8GHIJlO22m3XJlXWT2_rrhf0QfApzJwzZ8L8GCsFzAWAfCrA6gxELh8La_OxJZ7ofKmfCyv1cnmxepmV78praSToHLTQL9Qc5uX6mcyubrHZzfRtNgMAky1y9fEuuxfj57HUcqHO2JmBcdqaGYtlHfeNS3XLXeSO9y7UY9W1PFIb61T_oJ6PYtoSTz25tKM28a7iLnxzrafAt-QCd23gLfkv3E_NPs75NcWhSfGXle-3LhJfrXhMQzjcZ3cq10R6cHrP2YfXr96Xb7PL9ZtVeXGZ-XwBOpOyCs6C9CpA4czGm8orZU0RKlpUqgCrTFEUhsAKsnmlhBcb64xWVghBRp2zR8fcfd99HSgm3NXRU9O4lrohoi60mLyj8dPR6Psuxp4q3Pf1zvUHFIATEpyOitNR8TcS1DlqnJAgjkjwTySoELBco8SrMf3h6RvDZkfhJvvEYNSro_69bujwf6v_ufkvRf0EcAio4Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76713911</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cisplatin as a radiation sensitizer in the treatment of advanced head and neck cancers. Results of a phase II study</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Chougule, Prakash B ; Suk, Steve ; Chu, Quyen D. ; Leone, Louis ; Nigri, Peter T. ; McRae, Robert ; Lekas, Mary ; Barone, Anthony ; Bhat, Dinesh ; Bellino, Joseph</creator><creatorcontrib>Chougule, Prakash B ; Suk, Steve ; Chu, Quyen D. ; Leone, Louis ; Nigri, Peter T. ; McRae, Robert ; Lekas, Mary ; Barone, Anthony ; Bhat, Dinesh ; Bellino, Joseph</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Surgery and radiotherapy mainstays in the management of advanced head and neck cancer, although historically, only 20–30% of patients survive. Therefore, in an attempt to improve locoregional control and survival, a multimodal protocol using cisplatin as a radiosensitizer was implemented. Methods. Between 1984 and 1990,68 patients with advanced head and neck cancer (Stages III and IV) were treated with a regimen consisting of an induction phase of 4500 cGy and two cycles of cisplatin followed by an eradicative phase of either radical surgery (Group A, 27 patients) or radical radiotherapy (Group B, 41 patients). The maintenance phase chemotherapy consisted of adjuvant 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) and cisplatin after completion of locoregional treatment. Of the 68 patients, 19 had Stage III disease, and 49 had Stage IV; 21 had no regional lymph node metastases (No), and 47 had regional lymph node metastases (N+). Results. The induction phase yielded a 26% (18 patients) complete response (CR) rate and a 57% (39 patients) partial response (PR) rate (response &gt; 50%), yielding an overall response rate of 83%. Eleven patients (16%) had stable disease (ST) (i. e., &lt; 50% response). The 2‐year survival rates by initial treatment response for patients who had a CR, a PR, and stable disease were 53%, 56%, and 36%, respectively; for Groups A and B, 63% and 45%, respectively; for Stages III and IV, 68% and 43%, respectively; and for NO and N+, 69% and 43%, respectively. In Group A, 14 of 27 patients (52%) had no viable tumor in the surgical specimen (i. e. had pathologic complete tumor clearance [CTC]); this subgroup had a 5‐year survival rate of 58%. Ten patients (37%) who had gross total resection of tumor with negative margins but had tumor present in the specimen had a 5‐year survival of 22%. In Group B, the 5‐year survival rate was 43% for 27 patients who achieved CR after completion of radical radiotherapy (total tumor dose, 6480–7020 cGy). The 5‐year survival rate of the 14 patients who had a PR and stable disease after radical radiotherapy and 3 patients whose resection was incomplete was 0%. The overall 2‐ and 5‐year survival rates for all patients were 53% and 32%, respectively. Of 21 patients in whom treatment failed, most (90%) had a locoregional recurrence: 13 local recurrences (62%), 5 regional (24%), and 1 locoregional (5%). Two patients (10%) experienced failure at distant sites (the lung). Major treatment‐related morbidity developed in two patients. Conclusions. Although induction chemotherapy‐radiotherapy produces a high clinical response rate, this does not translate into improved survival compared with historical controls. A subgroup that showed complete tumor clearance (CTC or pathologic complete response) at surgery had an apparent improved survival and merits further study. Patient selection did not appear to be a factor for the CTC group, because the majority of patients in this group had partial responses to induction therapy, nodal disease and advanced tumor stage, and tumor presence in unfavorable sites.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19941001)74:7&lt;1927::AID-CNCR2820740717&gt;3.0.CO;2-P</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8082098</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; chemotherapy ; Cisplatin - therapeutic use ; Female ; head and neck cancer ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - mortality ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Neoplasm Staging ; Prognosis ; radiation therapy ; Radiation-Sensitizing Agents - therapeutic use ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Remission Induction ; sensitization ; survival ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Failure</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 1994-10, Vol.74 (7), p.1927-1932</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1994 American Cancer Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4507-22fda902c3d06a8bc8fc33986dfe5f3609386668e091e94f31c1b9a8739111e83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8082098$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chougule, Prakash B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suk, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Quyen D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leone, Louis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nigri, Peter T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McRae, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lekas, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barone, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhat, Dinesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellino, Joseph</creatorcontrib><title>Cisplatin as a radiation sensitizer in the treatment of advanced head and neck cancers. Results of a phase II study</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>Background. Surgery and radiotherapy mainstays in the management of advanced head and neck cancer, although historically, only 20–30% of patients survive. Therefore, in an attempt to improve locoregional control and survival, a multimodal protocol using cisplatin as a radiosensitizer was implemented. Methods. Between 1984 and 1990,68 patients with advanced head and neck cancer (Stages III and IV) were treated with a regimen consisting of an induction phase of 4500 cGy and two cycles of cisplatin followed by an eradicative phase of either radical surgery (Group A, 27 patients) or radical radiotherapy (Group B, 41 patients). The maintenance phase chemotherapy consisted of adjuvant 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) and cisplatin after completion of locoregional treatment. Of the 68 patients, 19 had Stage III disease, and 49 had Stage IV; 21 had no regional lymph node metastases (No), and 47 had regional lymph node metastases (N+). Results. The induction phase yielded a 26% (18 patients) complete response (CR) rate and a 57% (39 patients) partial response (PR) rate (response &gt; 50%), yielding an overall response rate of 83%. Eleven patients (16%) had stable disease (ST) (i. e., &lt; 50% response). The 2‐year survival rates by initial treatment response for patients who had a CR, a PR, and stable disease were 53%, 56%, and 36%, respectively; for Groups A and B, 63% and 45%, respectively; for Stages III and IV, 68% and 43%, respectively; and for NO and N+, 69% and 43%, respectively. In Group A, 14 of 27 patients (52%) had no viable tumor in the surgical specimen (i. e. had pathologic complete tumor clearance [CTC]); this subgroup had a 5‐year survival rate of 58%. Ten patients (37%) who had gross total resection of tumor with negative margins but had tumor present in the specimen had a 5‐year survival of 22%. In Group B, the 5‐year survival rate was 43% for 27 patients who achieved CR after completion of radical radiotherapy (total tumor dose, 6480–7020 cGy). The 5‐year survival rate of the 14 patients who had a PR and stable disease after radical radiotherapy and 3 patients whose resection was incomplete was 0%. The overall 2‐ and 5‐year survival rates for all patients were 53% and 32%, respectively. Of 21 patients in whom treatment failed, most (90%) had a locoregional recurrence: 13 local recurrences (62%), 5 regional (24%), and 1 locoregional (5%). Two patients (10%) experienced failure at distant sites (the lung). Major treatment‐related morbidity developed in two patients. Conclusions. Although induction chemotherapy‐radiotherapy produces a high clinical response rate, this does not translate into improved survival compared with historical controls. A subgroup that showed complete tumor clearance (CTC or pathologic complete response) at surgery had an apparent improved survival and merits further study. Patient selection did not appear to be a factor for the CTC group, because the majority of patients in this group had partial responses to induction therapy, nodal disease and advanced tumor stage, and tumor presence in unfavorable sites.</description><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>chemotherapy</subject><subject>Cisplatin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>head and neck cancer</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiation-Sensitizing Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Remission Induction</subject><subject>sensitization</subject><subject>survival</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkV-r1DAQxYMo1_XqRxDyJPrQdZJ0m2QV4VL_LVzcy0VB8GHIJlO22m3XJlXWT2_rrhf0QfApzJwzZ8L8GCsFzAWAfCrA6gxELh8La_OxJZ7ofKmfCyv1cnmxepmV78praSToHLTQL9Qc5uX6mcyubrHZzfRtNgMAky1y9fEuuxfj57HUcqHO2JmBcdqaGYtlHfeNS3XLXeSO9y7UY9W1PFIb61T_oJ6PYtoSTz25tKM28a7iLnxzrafAt-QCd23gLfkv3E_NPs75NcWhSfGXle-3LhJfrXhMQzjcZ3cq10R6cHrP2YfXr96Xb7PL9ZtVeXGZ-XwBOpOyCs6C9CpA4czGm8orZU0RKlpUqgCrTFEUhsAKsnmlhBcb64xWVghBRp2zR8fcfd99HSgm3NXRU9O4lrohoi60mLyj8dPR6Psuxp4q3Pf1zvUHFIATEpyOitNR8TcS1DlqnJAgjkjwTySoELBco8SrMf3h6RvDZkfhJvvEYNSro_69bujwf6v_ufkvRf0EcAio4Q</recordid><startdate>19941001</startdate><enddate>19941001</enddate><creator>Chougule, Prakash B</creator><creator>Suk, Steve</creator><creator>Chu, Quyen D.</creator><creator>Leone, Louis</creator><creator>Nigri, Peter T.</creator><creator>McRae, Robert</creator><creator>Lekas, Mary</creator><creator>Barone, Anthony</creator><creator>Bhat, Dinesh</creator><creator>Bellino, Joseph</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19941001</creationdate><title>Cisplatin as a radiation sensitizer in the treatment of advanced head and neck cancers. Results of a phase II study</title><author>Chougule, Prakash B ; Suk, Steve ; Chu, Quyen D. ; Leone, Louis ; Nigri, Peter T. ; McRae, Robert ; Lekas, Mary ; Barone, Anthony ; Bhat, Dinesh ; Bellino, Joseph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4507-22fda902c3d06a8bc8fc33986dfe5f3609386668e091e94f31c1b9a8739111e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>chemotherapy</topic><topic>Cisplatin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>head and neck cancer</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiation-Sensitizing Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Remission Induction</topic><topic>sensitization</topic><topic>survival</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chougule, Prakash B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suk, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Quyen D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leone, Louis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nigri, Peter T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McRae, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lekas, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barone, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhat, Dinesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellino, Joseph</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chougule, Prakash B</au><au>Suk, Steve</au><au>Chu, Quyen D.</au><au>Leone, Louis</au><au>Nigri, Peter T.</au><au>McRae, Robert</au><au>Lekas, Mary</au><au>Barone, Anthony</au><au>Bhat, Dinesh</au><au>Bellino, Joseph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cisplatin as a radiation sensitizer in the treatment of advanced head and neck cancers. Results of a phase II study</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>1994-10-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1927</spage><epage>1932</epage><pages>1927-1932</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><abstract>Background. Surgery and radiotherapy mainstays in the management of advanced head and neck cancer, although historically, only 20–30% of patients survive. Therefore, in an attempt to improve locoregional control and survival, a multimodal protocol using cisplatin as a radiosensitizer was implemented. Methods. Between 1984 and 1990,68 patients with advanced head and neck cancer (Stages III and IV) were treated with a regimen consisting of an induction phase of 4500 cGy and two cycles of cisplatin followed by an eradicative phase of either radical surgery (Group A, 27 patients) or radical radiotherapy (Group B, 41 patients). The maintenance phase chemotherapy consisted of adjuvant 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) and cisplatin after completion of locoregional treatment. Of the 68 patients, 19 had Stage III disease, and 49 had Stage IV; 21 had no regional lymph node metastases (No), and 47 had regional lymph node metastases (N+). Results. The induction phase yielded a 26% (18 patients) complete response (CR) rate and a 57% (39 patients) partial response (PR) rate (response &gt; 50%), yielding an overall response rate of 83%. Eleven patients (16%) had stable disease (ST) (i. e., &lt; 50% response). The 2‐year survival rates by initial treatment response for patients who had a CR, a PR, and stable disease were 53%, 56%, and 36%, respectively; for Groups A and B, 63% and 45%, respectively; for Stages III and IV, 68% and 43%, respectively; and for NO and N+, 69% and 43%, respectively. In Group A, 14 of 27 patients (52%) had no viable tumor in the surgical specimen (i. e. had pathologic complete tumor clearance [CTC]); this subgroup had a 5‐year survival rate of 58%. Ten patients (37%) who had gross total resection of tumor with negative margins but had tumor present in the specimen had a 5‐year survival of 22%. In Group B, the 5‐year survival rate was 43% for 27 patients who achieved CR after completion of radical radiotherapy (total tumor dose, 6480–7020 cGy). The 5‐year survival rate of the 14 patients who had a PR and stable disease after radical radiotherapy and 3 patients whose resection was incomplete was 0%. The overall 2‐ and 5‐year survival rates for all patients were 53% and 32%, respectively. Of 21 patients in whom treatment failed, most (90%) had a locoregional recurrence: 13 local recurrences (62%), 5 regional (24%), and 1 locoregional (5%). Two patients (10%) experienced failure at distant sites (the lung). Major treatment‐related morbidity developed in two patients. Conclusions. Although induction chemotherapy‐radiotherapy produces a high clinical response rate, this does not translate into improved survival compared with historical controls. A subgroup that showed complete tumor clearance (CTC or pathologic complete response) at surgery had an apparent improved survival and merits further study. Patient selection did not appear to be a factor for the CTC group, because the majority of patients in this group had partial responses to induction therapy, nodal disease and advanced tumor stage, and tumor presence in unfavorable sites.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>8082098</pmid><doi>10.1002/1097-0142(19941001)74:7&lt;1927::AID-CNCR2820740717&gt;3.0.CO;2-P</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 1994-10, Vol.74 (7), p.1927-1932
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76713911
source EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
chemotherapy
Cisplatin - therapeutic use
Female
head and neck cancer
Head and Neck Neoplasms - drug therapy
Head and Neck Neoplasms - mortality
Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology
Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery
Humans
Male
Neoplasm Staging
Prognosis
radiation therapy
Radiation-Sensitizing Agents - therapeutic use
Radiotherapy Dosage
Remission Induction
sensitization
survival
Survival Analysis
Treatment Failure
title Cisplatin as a radiation sensitizer in the treatment of advanced head and neck cancers. Results of a phase II study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T00%3A34%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cisplatin%20as%20a%20radiation%20sensitizer%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20advanced%20head%20and%20neck%20cancers.%20Results%20of%20a%20phase%20II%20study&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Chougule,%20Prakash%20B&rft.date=1994-10-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1927&rft.epage=1932&rft.pages=1927-1932&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/1097-0142(19941001)74:7%3C1927::AID-CNCR2820740717%3E3.0.CO;2-P&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76713911%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4507-22fda902c3d06a8bc8fc33986dfe5f3609386668e091e94f31c1b9a8739111e83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76713911&rft_id=info:pmid/8082098&rfr_iscdi=true