Loading…

Differential effects of stimulation of the cat's red nucleus on lumbar alpha motoneurones and their Renshaw cells

The red nucleus region was stereotaxically stimulated with short trains of high-frequency alternating current pulses in anaesthetized cats. The effects were studied, in contralateral lumbar segments, on the responses of microrecorded individual Renshaw cells (RCs) to antidromic or orthodromic test s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Experimental brain research 1986, Vol.62 (1), p.161-174
Main Authors: HENATSCH, H.-D, MEYER-LOHMANN, J, WINDHORST, U, SCHMIDT, J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-660ec2071654ac44b8888f3528ffd3e72dd16bf1d4cf2539e57c672cccf1188b3
cites
container_end_page 174
container_issue 1
container_start_page 161
container_title Experimental brain research
container_volume 62
creator HENATSCH, H.-D
MEYER-LOHMANN, J
WINDHORST, U
SCHMIDT, J
description The red nucleus region was stereotaxically stimulated with short trains of high-frequency alternating current pulses in anaesthetized cats. The effects were studied, in contralateral lumbar segments, on the responses of microrecorded individual Renshaw cells (RCs) to antidromic or orthodromic test shocks of ventral root or muscle nerve fibres. Monosynaptic reflexes (MRs) of their motoneurone pools were recorded from one of the cut lumbar ventral roots. Averages of 10-20 replicate test responses of the RC (converted into instantaneous frequency curves, IFCs) and of the MR shapes were computed and graphically displayed. 2. Orthodromic (afferent) test shocks induced simultaneously MRs as well as responses of a RC belonging to the same motor pool. From their paired records at systematically varied shock strengths, whole "linkage characteristics" of the relation between the two events could be obtained, representing the functional linkage from the motoraxon collaterals to the RC under study. The overall result of rubral conditioning was a change in the course of the characteristic, which indicated a reduction of this linkage (= relative inhibition of the RC against its recurrent input). 3. Sequential trials with test shocks of constant, submaximal strength were performed with 45 individual RCs. The clearest results were obtained with RC responses to antidromic ventral root shocks: 65% of the RCs were partially inhibited by rubral conditioning. Interposed minor facilitory subcomponents could be seen in the course of inhibited IFCs. Mixed sequences of manifest inhibitory/facilitory effects were observed in 11%; reversed sequences (facilitory/inhibitory) did not occur. A pure but weak facilitation was found in only one case, paralleled by an increase of the MR. RCs belonging to either extensor or flexor motor pools were affected about equally. A little over 20% of the tested RCs remained uninfluenced by rubral stimulation. 4. The MRs, induced by constant, submaximal, orthodromic test shocks, were usually enhanced with only few exceptions, by rubral stimulation. The effects on the orthodromic RC responses were mainly inhibitory, but could be more or less masked by the concurrent increase of the MR, providing a stronger recurrent input to the RC. Such inhibition could be uncovered, however, by observing the above described linkage change. 5. Variation of several parameters of rubral conditioning (train duration, timing of train with respect to test shock, strength o
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF00237412
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76758016</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76758016</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-660ec2071654ac44b8888f3528ffd3e72dd16bf1d4cf2539e57c672cccf1188b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVJ2Gy2vfRe0CE0EHCqkWTJe2w32TawECjt2cjyiHWR5Y0kE_Lva7NLcswc5oN55mWYIeQzsFtgTH_7sWWMCy2BfyBLkIIXAEydkSVjIAtZwfqCXKb0by6FZguyEOtSKQFL8nTXOYcRQ-6MpzjlNic6OJpy14_e5G4Ic5n3SK3J14lGbGkYrcdx4gL1Y9-YSI0_7A3thzwEHOPkEjWhnce6SH9jSHvzTC16nz6Sc2d8wk-nuCJ_t_d_Nr-K3ePPh833XWF5qXOhFEPLmQZVSmOlbKrJnCh55VwrUPO2BdU4aKV1vBRrLLVVmltrHUBVNWJFvh51D3F4GjHluu_SvIEJOIyp1kqXFQP1LghyuihXM3hzBG0cUoro6kPsehNfamD1_Ij67RET_OWkOjY9tq_o6fJT_-rUN8ka76IJtkuvWKVLoQHEf6C1j_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14432266</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differential effects of stimulation of the cat's red nucleus on lumbar alpha motoneurones and their Renshaw cells</title><source>Springer Online Journal Archives (Through 1996)</source><creator>HENATSCH, H.-D ; MEYER-LOHMANN, J ; WINDHORST, U ; SCHMIDT, J</creator><creatorcontrib>HENATSCH, H.-D ; MEYER-LOHMANN, J ; WINDHORST, U ; SCHMIDT, J</creatorcontrib><description>The red nucleus region was stereotaxically stimulated with short trains of high-frequency alternating current pulses in anaesthetized cats. The effects were studied, in contralateral lumbar segments, on the responses of microrecorded individual Renshaw cells (RCs) to antidromic or orthodromic test shocks of ventral root or muscle nerve fibres. Monosynaptic reflexes (MRs) of their motoneurone pools were recorded from one of the cut lumbar ventral roots. Averages of 10-20 replicate test responses of the RC (converted into instantaneous frequency curves, IFCs) and of the MR shapes were computed and graphically displayed. 2. Orthodromic (afferent) test shocks induced simultaneously MRs as well as responses of a RC belonging to the same motor pool. From their paired records at systematically varied shock strengths, whole "linkage characteristics" of the relation between the two events could be obtained, representing the functional linkage from the motoraxon collaterals to the RC under study. The overall result of rubral conditioning was a change in the course of the characteristic, which indicated a reduction of this linkage (= relative inhibition of the RC against its recurrent input). 3. Sequential trials with test shocks of constant, submaximal strength were performed with 45 individual RCs. The clearest results were obtained with RC responses to antidromic ventral root shocks: 65% of the RCs were partially inhibited by rubral conditioning. Interposed minor facilitory subcomponents could be seen in the course of inhibited IFCs. Mixed sequences of manifest inhibitory/facilitory effects were observed in 11%; reversed sequences (facilitory/inhibitory) did not occur. A pure but weak facilitation was found in only one case, paralleled by an increase of the MR. RCs belonging to either extensor or flexor motor pools were affected about equally. A little over 20% of the tested RCs remained uninfluenced by rubral stimulation. 4. The MRs, induced by constant, submaximal, orthodromic test shocks, were usually enhanced with only few exceptions, by rubral stimulation. The effects on the orthodromic RC responses were mainly inhibitory, but could be more or less masked by the concurrent increase of the MR, providing a stronger recurrent input to the RC. Such inhibition could be uncovered, however, by observing the above described linkage change. 5. Variation of several parameters of rubral conditioning (train duration, timing of train with respect to test shock, strength of train) modified the inhibitory effects on antidromic RC responses to a certain extent without changing their principal character.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-4819</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00237412</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3956631</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EXBRAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain Mapping ; Cats ; Electric Stimulation ; Evoked Potentials ; Extrapyramidal Tracts - physiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Interneurons - physiology ; Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration ; Motor Neurons - physiology ; Neural Inhibition ; Red Nucleus - physiology ; Reflex, Monosynaptic ; Spinal Cord - physiology ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><ispartof>Experimental brain research, 1986, Vol.62 (1), p.161-174</ispartof><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-660ec2071654ac44b8888f3528ffd3e72dd16bf1d4cf2539e57c672cccf1188b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=8753711$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3956631$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HENATSCH, H.-D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEYER-LOHMANN, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WINDHORST, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHMIDT, J</creatorcontrib><title>Differential effects of stimulation of the cat's red nucleus on lumbar alpha motoneurones and their Renshaw cells</title><title>Experimental brain research</title><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><description>The red nucleus region was stereotaxically stimulated with short trains of high-frequency alternating current pulses in anaesthetized cats. The effects were studied, in contralateral lumbar segments, on the responses of microrecorded individual Renshaw cells (RCs) to antidromic or orthodromic test shocks of ventral root or muscle nerve fibres. Monosynaptic reflexes (MRs) of their motoneurone pools were recorded from one of the cut lumbar ventral roots. Averages of 10-20 replicate test responses of the RC (converted into instantaneous frequency curves, IFCs) and of the MR shapes were computed and graphically displayed. 2. Orthodromic (afferent) test shocks induced simultaneously MRs as well as responses of a RC belonging to the same motor pool. From their paired records at systematically varied shock strengths, whole "linkage characteristics" of the relation between the two events could be obtained, representing the functional linkage from the motoraxon collaterals to the RC under study. The overall result of rubral conditioning was a change in the course of the characteristic, which indicated a reduction of this linkage (= relative inhibition of the RC against its recurrent input). 3. Sequential trials with test shocks of constant, submaximal strength were performed with 45 individual RCs. The clearest results were obtained with RC responses to antidromic ventral root shocks: 65% of the RCs were partially inhibited by rubral conditioning. Interposed minor facilitory subcomponents could be seen in the course of inhibited IFCs. Mixed sequences of manifest inhibitory/facilitory effects were observed in 11%; reversed sequences (facilitory/inhibitory) did not occur. A pure but weak facilitation was found in only one case, paralleled by an increase of the MR. RCs belonging to either extensor or flexor motor pools were affected about equally. A little over 20% of the tested RCs remained uninfluenced by rubral stimulation. 4. The MRs, induced by constant, submaximal, orthodromic test shocks, were usually enhanced with only few exceptions, by rubral stimulation. The effects on the orthodromic RC responses were mainly inhibitory, but could be more or less masked by the concurrent increase of the MR, providing a stronger recurrent input to the RC. Such inhibition could be uncovered, however, by observing the above described linkage change. 5. Variation of several parameters of rubral conditioning (train duration, timing of train with respect to test shock, strength of train) modified the inhibitory effects on antidromic RC responses to a certain extent without changing their principal character.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Cats</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials</subject><subject>Extrapyramidal Tracts - physiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Interneurons - physiology</subject><subject>Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration</subject><subject>Motor Neurons - physiology</subject><subject>Neural Inhibition</subject><subject>Red Nucleus - physiology</subject><subject>Reflex, Monosynaptic</subject><subject>Spinal Cord - physiology</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><issn>0014-4819</issn><issn>1432-1106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVJ2Gy2vfRe0CE0EHCqkWTJe2w32TawECjt2cjyiHWR5Y0kE_Lva7NLcswc5oN55mWYIeQzsFtgTH_7sWWMCy2BfyBLkIIXAEydkSVjIAtZwfqCXKb0by6FZguyEOtSKQFL8nTXOYcRQ-6MpzjlNic6OJpy14_e5G4Ic5n3SK3J14lGbGkYrcdx4gL1Y9-YSI0_7A3thzwEHOPkEjWhnce6SH9jSHvzTC16nz6Sc2d8wk-nuCJ_t_d_Nr-K3ePPh833XWF5qXOhFEPLmQZVSmOlbKrJnCh55VwrUPO2BdU4aKV1vBRrLLVVmltrHUBVNWJFvh51D3F4GjHluu_SvIEJOIyp1kqXFQP1LghyuihXM3hzBG0cUoro6kPsehNfamD1_Ij67RET_OWkOjY9tq_o6fJT_-rUN8ka76IJtkuvWKVLoQHEf6C1j_A</recordid><startdate>1986</startdate><enddate>1986</enddate><creator>HENATSCH, H.-D</creator><creator>MEYER-LOHMANN, J</creator><creator>WINDHORST, U</creator><creator>SCHMIDT, J</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1986</creationdate><title>Differential effects of stimulation of the cat's red nucleus on lumbar alpha motoneurones and their Renshaw cells</title><author>HENATSCH, H.-D ; MEYER-LOHMANN, J ; WINDHORST, U ; SCHMIDT, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-660ec2071654ac44b8888f3528ffd3e72dd16bf1d4cf2539e57c672cccf1188b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Cats</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials</topic><topic>Extrapyramidal Tracts - physiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Interneurons - physiology</topic><topic>Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration</topic><topic>Motor Neurons - physiology</topic><topic>Neural Inhibition</topic><topic>Red Nucleus - physiology</topic><topic>Reflex, Monosynaptic</topic><topic>Spinal Cord - physiology</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HENATSCH, H.-D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEYER-LOHMANN, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WINDHORST, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHMIDT, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HENATSCH, H.-D</au><au>MEYER-LOHMANN, J</au><au>WINDHORST, U</au><au>SCHMIDT, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differential effects of stimulation of the cat's red nucleus on lumbar alpha motoneurones and their Renshaw cells</atitle><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><date>1986</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>161</spage><epage>174</epage><pages>161-174</pages><issn>0014-4819</issn><eissn>1432-1106</eissn><coden>EXBRAP</coden><abstract>The red nucleus region was stereotaxically stimulated with short trains of high-frequency alternating current pulses in anaesthetized cats. The effects were studied, in contralateral lumbar segments, on the responses of microrecorded individual Renshaw cells (RCs) to antidromic or orthodromic test shocks of ventral root or muscle nerve fibres. Monosynaptic reflexes (MRs) of their motoneurone pools were recorded from one of the cut lumbar ventral roots. Averages of 10-20 replicate test responses of the RC (converted into instantaneous frequency curves, IFCs) and of the MR shapes were computed and graphically displayed. 2. Orthodromic (afferent) test shocks induced simultaneously MRs as well as responses of a RC belonging to the same motor pool. From their paired records at systematically varied shock strengths, whole "linkage characteristics" of the relation between the two events could be obtained, representing the functional linkage from the motoraxon collaterals to the RC under study. The overall result of rubral conditioning was a change in the course of the characteristic, which indicated a reduction of this linkage (= relative inhibition of the RC against its recurrent input). 3. Sequential trials with test shocks of constant, submaximal strength were performed with 45 individual RCs. The clearest results were obtained with RC responses to antidromic ventral root shocks: 65% of the RCs were partially inhibited by rubral conditioning. Interposed minor facilitory subcomponents could be seen in the course of inhibited IFCs. Mixed sequences of manifest inhibitory/facilitory effects were observed in 11%; reversed sequences (facilitory/inhibitory) did not occur. A pure but weak facilitation was found in only one case, paralleled by an increase of the MR. RCs belonging to either extensor or flexor motor pools were affected about equally. A little over 20% of the tested RCs remained uninfluenced by rubral stimulation. 4. The MRs, induced by constant, submaximal, orthodromic test shocks, were usually enhanced with only few exceptions, by rubral stimulation. The effects on the orthodromic RC responses were mainly inhibitory, but could be more or less masked by the concurrent increase of the MR, providing a stronger recurrent input to the RC. Such inhibition could be uncovered, however, by observing the above described linkage change. 5. Variation of several parameters of rubral conditioning (train duration, timing of train with respect to test shock, strength of train) modified the inhibitory effects on antidromic RC responses to a certain extent without changing their principal character.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>3956631</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF00237412</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-4819
ispartof Experimental brain research, 1986, Vol.62 (1), p.161-174
issn 0014-4819
1432-1106
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76758016
source Springer Online Journal Archives (Through 1996)
subjects Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Brain Mapping
Cats
Electric Stimulation
Evoked Potentials
Extrapyramidal Tracts - physiology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Interneurons - physiology
Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration
Motor Neurons - physiology
Neural Inhibition
Red Nucleus - physiology
Reflex, Monosynaptic
Spinal Cord - physiology
Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs
title Differential effects of stimulation of the cat's red nucleus on lumbar alpha motoneurones and their Renshaw cells
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T18%3A16%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differential%20effects%20of%20stimulation%20of%20the%20cat's%20red%20nucleus%20on%20lumbar%20alpha%20motoneurones%20and%20their%20Renshaw%20cells&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20brain%20research&rft.au=HENATSCH,%20H.-D&rft.date=1986&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=161&rft.epage=174&rft.pages=161-174&rft.issn=0014-4819&rft.eissn=1432-1106&rft.coden=EXBRAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00237412&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76758016%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-660ec2071654ac44b8888f3528ffd3e72dd16bf1d4cf2539e57c672cccf1188b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14432266&rft_id=info:pmid/3956631&rfr_iscdi=true