Individual differences in the reinforcing and subjective effects of amphetamine and diazepam

This study explored the relation between the reinforcing properties of different drugs and their subjective effects. Preference for a drug (amphetamine or diazepam) over placebo was measured in a choice procedure, and mood changes after drug administration were monitored by self-report questionnaire...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Drug and alcohol dependence 1986-02, Vol.16 (4), p.341-360
Main Authors: de Wit, H., Uhlenhuth, E.H., Johanson, C.E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Affect - drug effects
Amphetamine
Amphetamine - pharmacology
Arousal - drug effects
Biological and medical sciences
Diazepam
Diazepam - pharmacology
Drug preference
Humans
Individual differences
Individuality
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Motivation - drug effects
Neuropharmacology
Personality Tests
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Psychoanaleptics: cns stimulant, antidepressant agent, nootropic agent, mood stabilizer..., (alzheimer disease)
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopharmacology
Set (Psychology)
Subjective effects
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study explored the relation between the reinforcing properties of different drugs and their subjective effects. Preference for a drug (amphetamine or diazepam) over placebo was measured in a choice procedure, and mood changes after drug administration were monitored by self-report questionnaires. Individual differences in behavioral drug preferences were then examined for their relationships to subjective drug responses as well as other subject variables. In Part I, the subjective effects of amphetamine were compared in those subjects who consistently preferred (i.e. chose) amphetamine over placebo, and those who preferred placebo over amphetamine. The two subject groups showed markedly different subjective responses to the stimulant drug: the choosers reported increased positive mood and euphoria, whereas the non-choosers reported only increased anxiety and depression. In Part II, the subjective effects of diazepam in consistent choosers of diazepam were compared to the subjective effects in consistent non-choosers of the drug. The non-choosers showed appreciable subjective effects, which were predominantly sedative in quality. In contrast to the results with amphetamine, the choosers showed negligible subjective drug effects. These results underline the importance of considering more than one response measure when attempting to characterize the reinforcing effects of drugs.
ISSN:0376-8716
1879-0046
DOI:10.1016/0376-8716(86)90068-2