Loading…
Psychological sequelae following the Gulf War. Factors associated with subsequent morbidity and the effectiveness of psychological debriefing
The aim was to study the effect of brief counselling and psychological debriefing following a trauma on subsequent morbidity. We investigated psychological morbidity in 62 British soldiers whose duties included the handling and identification of dead bodies of allied and enemy soldiers during the Gu...
Saved in:
Published in: | British journal of psychiatry 1994-07, Vol.165 (1), p.60-65 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-328a339c13d8130fd779202c5388724cdb9ff269f656260fe5dec6c7dd0ef59a3 |
container_end_page | 65 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 60 |
container_title | British journal of psychiatry |
container_volume | 165 |
creator | Deahl, MP Gillham, AB Thomas, J Searle, MM Srinivasan, M |
description | The aim was to study the effect of brief counselling and psychological debriefing following a trauma on subsequent morbidity.
We investigated psychological morbidity in 62 British soldiers whose duties included the handling and identification of dead bodies of allied and enemy soldiers during the Gulf War. Of these soldiers, 69% received a psychological debriefing on completion of their duties. The subjects completed by post a demographic questionnaire, the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) and the Impact of Events Scale.
After nine months 50% had evidence of some psychological disturbance suggestive of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD); 18% had sought professional help; 26% reported relationship difficulties. Neither prior training nor the psychological intervention appeared to make any difference to subsequent psychiatric morbidity. Morbidity at nine months was more likely in those with a history of psychological problems and those who believed their lives had been in danger in the Gulf.
These findings show that a psychological debriefing following a series of traumatic events or experiences does not appear to reduce subsequent psychiatric morbidity and highlights the need for further research in military and civilian settings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1192/bjp.165.1.60 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76797156</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2338012007</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-328a339c13d8130fd779202c5388724cdb9ff269f656260fe5dec6c7dd0ef59a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2LFDEQhoMo6-zqzasQEDxtt_noJN1HWdxVWNCD4jGkk8p0hp7OmHTvMD_C_2x2ZlD04imEeuqpSl6EXlFSU9qxd_1mV1MpalpL8gStaKNYRRspnqIVIURVlAnyHF3mvClX3jB1gS5UJzgR3Qr9_JIPdohjXAdrRpzhxwKjAezjOMZ9mNZ4HgDfLaPH302q8a2xc0wZm5yjDWYGh_dhHnBe-mPvNONtTH1wYT5gM7ljO3gPdg4PMEHOOHq8-2uogz4F8GXYC_TMmzHDy_N5hb7dfvh687G6_3z36eb9fWW5aOeKs9Zw3lnKXUs58U6pjhFmBW9bxRrr-s57JjsvhWSSeBAOrLTKOQJedIZfobcn7y7FsnSe9TZkC-NoJohL1kqqTlEh_wvSAlLSkAK--QfcxCVN5RGacd4SykoUhbo-UTbFnBN4vUtha9JBU6Ifw9QlzCIVmmr5KH19li79Ftxv-JxeqeNTfQjrYR8S6GSPX_tH8QvK3Kfe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2338012007</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychological sequelae following the Gulf War. Factors associated with subsequent morbidity and the effectiveness of psychological debriefing</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Cambridge University Press</source><source>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</source><creator>Deahl, MP ; Gillham, AB ; Thomas, J ; Searle, MM ; Srinivasan, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Deahl, MP ; Gillham, AB ; Thomas, J ; Searle, MM ; Srinivasan, M</creatorcontrib><description>The aim was to study the effect of brief counselling and psychological debriefing following a trauma on subsequent morbidity.
We investigated psychological morbidity in 62 British soldiers whose duties included the handling and identification of dead bodies of allied and enemy soldiers during the Gulf War. Of these soldiers, 69% received a psychological debriefing on completion of their duties. The subjects completed by post a demographic questionnaire, the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) and the Impact of Events Scale.
After nine months 50% had evidence of some psychological disturbance suggestive of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD); 18% had sought professional help; 26% reported relationship difficulties. Neither prior training nor the psychological intervention appeared to make any difference to subsequent psychiatric morbidity. Morbidity at nine months was more likely in those with a history of psychological problems and those who believed their lives had been in danger in the Gulf.
These findings show that a psychological debriefing following a series of traumatic events or experiences does not appear to reduce subsequent psychiatric morbidity and highlights the need for further research in military and civilian settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1250</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-1465</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1192/bjp.165.1.60</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7953059</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: RCP</publisher><subject>Adult ; Combat Disorders - epidemiology ; Combat Disorders - psychology ; Combat Disorders - rehabilitation ; Complications ; Counseling ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Debriefing ; Gulf War ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Middle East - epidemiology ; Military personnel ; Military Personnel - psychology ; Military Personnel - statistics & numerical data ; Morbidity ; Occupational stress ; Persian Gulf War ; Post traumatic stress disorder ; Psychiatric morbidity ; Psychological intervention ; Psychological problems ; Psychological trauma ; Questionnaires ; Relief Work ; Soldiers ; Training ; Trauma ; Traumatic life events ; United Kingdom - epidemiology ; War ; Warfare</subject><ispartof>British journal of psychiatry, 1994-07, Vol.165 (1), p.60-65</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-328a339c13d8130fd779202c5388724cdb9ff269f656260fe5dec6c7dd0ef59a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2338012007/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2338012007?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12826,21374,21375,27903,27904,30978,33590,33591,34509,34510,43712,44094,73967,74385</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7953059$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Deahl, MP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillham, AB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Searle, MM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srinivasan, M</creatorcontrib><title>Psychological sequelae following the Gulf War. Factors associated with subsequent morbidity and the effectiveness of psychological debriefing</title><title>British journal of psychiatry</title><addtitle>Br J Psychiatry</addtitle><description>The aim was to study the effect of brief counselling and psychological debriefing following a trauma on subsequent morbidity.
We investigated psychological morbidity in 62 British soldiers whose duties included the handling and identification of dead bodies of allied and enemy soldiers during the Gulf War. Of these soldiers, 69% received a psychological debriefing on completion of their duties. The subjects completed by post a demographic questionnaire, the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) and the Impact of Events Scale.
After nine months 50% had evidence of some psychological disturbance suggestive of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD); 18% had sought professional help; 26% reported relationship difficulties. Neither prior training nor the psychological intervention appeared to make any difference to subsequent psychiatric morbidity. Morbidity at nine months was more likely in those with a history of psychological problems and those who believed their lives had been in danger in the Gulf.
These findings show that a psychological debriefing following a series of traumatic events or experiences does not appear to reduce subsequent psychiatric morbidity and highlights the need for further research in military and civilian settings.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Combat Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Combat Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Combat Disorders - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Debriefing</subject><subject>Gulf War</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle East - epidemiology</subject><subject>Military personnel</subject><subject>Military Personnel - psychology</subject><subject>Military Personnel - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Occupational stress</subject><subject>Persian Gulf War</subject><subject>Post traumatic stress disorder</subject><subject>Psychiatric morbidity</subject><subject>Psychological intervention</subject><subject>Psychological problems</subject><subject>Psychological trauma</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Relief Work</subject><subject>Soldiers</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Traumatic life events</subject><subject>United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><subject>War</subject><subject>Warfare</subject><issn>0007-1250</issn><issn>1472-1465</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2LFDEQhoMo6-zqzasQEDxtt_noJN1HWdxVWNCD4jGkk8p0hp7OmHTvMD_C_2x2ZlD04imEeuqpSl6EXlFSU9qxd_1mV1MpalpL8gStaKNYRRspnqIVIURVlAnyHF3mvClX3jB1gS5UJzgR3Qr9_JIPdohjXAdrRpzhxwKjAezjOMZ9mNZ4HgDfLaPH302q8a2xc0wZm5yjDWYGh_dhHnBe-mPvNONtTH1wYT5gM7ljO3gPdg4PMEHOOHq8-2uogz4F8GXYC_TMmzHDy_N5hb7dfvh687G6_3z36eb9fWW5aOeKs9Zw3lnKXUs58U6pjhFmBW9bxRrr-s57JjsvhWSSeBAOrLTKOQJedIZfobcn7y7FsnSe9TZkC-NoJohL1kqqTlEh_wvSAlLSkAK--QfcxCVN5RGacd4SykoUhbo-UTbFnBN4vUtha9JBU6Ifw9QlzCIVmmr5KH19li79Ftxv-JxeqeNTfQjrYR8S6GSPX_tH8QvK3Kfe</recordid><startdate>19940701</startdate><enddate>19940701</enddate><creator>Deahl, MP</creator><creator>Gillham, AB</creator><creator>Thomas, J</creator><creator>Searle, MM</creator><creator>Srinivasan, M</creator><general>RCP</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940701</creationdate><title>Psychological sequelae following the Gulf War. Factors associated with subsequent morbidity and the effectiveness of psychological debriefing</title><author>Deahl, MP ; Gillham, AB ; Thomas, J ; Searle, MM ; Srinivasan, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-328a339c13d8130fd779202c5388724cdb9ff269f656260fe5dec6c7dd0ef59a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Combat Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Combat Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Combat Disorders - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Debriefing</topic><topic>Gulf War</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle East - epidemiology</topic><topic>Military personnel</topic><topic>Military Personnel - psychology</topic><topic>Military Personnel - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Occupational stress</topic><topic>Persian Gulf War</topic><topic>Post traumatic stress disorder</topic><topic>Psychiatric morbidity</topic><topic>Psychological intervention</topic><topic>Psychological problems</topic><topic>Psychological trauma</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Relief Work</topic><topic>Soldiers</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Traumatic life events</topic><topic>United Kingdom - epidemiology</topic><topic>War</topic><topic>Warfare</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Deahl, MP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillham, AB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Searle, MM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srinivasan, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Deahl, MP</au><au>Gillham, AB</au><au>Thomas, J</au><au>Searle, MM</au><au>Srinivasan, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychological sequelae following the Gulf War. Factors associated with subsequent morbidity and the effectiveness of psychological debriefing</atitle><jtitle>British journal of psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Psychiatry</addtitle><date>1994-07-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>165</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>60</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>60-65</pages><issn>0007-1250</issn><eissn>1472-1465</eissn><abstract>The aim was to study the effect of brief counselling and psychological debriefing following a trauma on subsequent morbidity.
We investigated psychological morbidity in 62 British soldiers whose duties included the handling and identification of dead bodies of allied and enemy soldiers during the Gulf War. Of these soldiers, 69% received a psychological debriefing on completion of their duties. The subjects completed by post a demographic questionnaire, the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) and the Impact of Events Scale.
After nine months 50% had evidence of some psychological disturbance suggestive of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD); 18% had sought professional help; 26% reported relationship difficulties. Neither prior training nor the psychological intervention appeared to make any difference to subsequent psychiatric morbidity. Morbidity at nine months was more likely in those with a history of psychological problems and those who believed their lives had been in danger in the Gulf.
These findings show that a psychological debriefing following a series of traumatic events or experiences does not appear to reduce subsequent psychiatric morbidity and highlights the need for further research in military and civilian settings.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>RCP</pub><pmid>7953059</pmid><doi>10.1192/bjp.165.1.60</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1250 |
ispartof | British journal of psychiatry, 1994-07, Vol.165 (1), p.60-65 |
issn | 0007-1250 1472-1465 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76797156 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Sociology Collection; Cambridge University Press; ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection |
subjects | Adult Combat Disorders - epidemiology Combat Disorders - psychology Combat Disorders - rehabilitation Complications Counseling Cross-Sectional Studies Debriefing Gulf War Humans Incidence Male Middle East - epidemiology Military personnel Military Personnel - psychology Military Personnel - statistics & numerical data Morbidity Occupational stress Persian Gulf War Post traumatic stress disorder Psychiatric morbidity Psychological intervention Psychological problems Psychological trauma Questionnaires Relief Work Soldiers Training Trauma Traumatic life events United Kingdom - epidemiology War Warfare |
title | Psychological sequelae following the Gulf War. Factors associated with subsequent morbidity and the effectiveness of psychological debriefing |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T08%3A37%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychological%20sequelae%20following%20the%20Gulf%20War.%20Factors%20associated%20with%20subsequent%20morbidity%20and%20the%20effectiveness%20of%20psychological%20debriefing&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20psychiatry&rft.au=Deahl,%20MP&rft.date=1994-07-01&rft.volume=165&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=60-65&rft.issn=0007-1250&rft.eissn=1472-1465&rft_id=info:doi/10.1192/bjp.165.1.60&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2338012007%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-328a339c13d8130fd779202c5388724cdb9ff269f656260fe5dec6c7dd0ef59a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2338012007&rft_id=info:pmid/7953059&rfr_iscdi=true |