Abnormal left ventricular early diastolic filling during dobutamine stress Doppler echocardiography is a sensitive indicator of significant coronary artery disease

• Published in: Journal of the American College of Cardiology 1994-12, Vol.24 (7), p.1618-1624
• Main Authors: El-Said, El-Said M., Roelandt, Jos R.T.C., Fioretti, Paolo M., McNeill, Albert J., Forster, Tamas, Boersma, Hendrik, Linker, David T.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; Blood Flow Velocity; Cardiovascular system; Coronary Disease - diagnosis; Coronary Disease - diagnostic imaging; Coronary Disease - physiopathology; Diastole; Dobutamine; Echocardiography, Doppler; Electrocardiography; Exercise Test; Female; Humans; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects); Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Myocardial Contraction; Stroke Volume; Ultrasonic investigative techniques; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology
• ISSN: 0735-1097; 1558-3597
• DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90165-1

Objectives. This study was designed to assess changes in Doppler indexes of left ventricular ejection and filling in response to high dose (40 μg/kg body weight per min) dobutamine stress and their utility in detection of coronary artery disease compared with that of new wall motion abnormalities. Methods. Ten patients with a low likelihood of coronary artery disease served as a control group, and 23 patients with documented single-vessel coronary artery disease underwent baseline and peak dobutamine echocardiographic and Doppler studies. Results. In both groups dobutamine induced similar increases in heart rate and systolic blood pressure. During the test, 14 patients had new wall motion abnormalities, 13 had angina, and 7 had electrocardiographic ST segment changes. No markers of ischemia occurred in the control subjects. Dobutamine induced qualitatively similar changes from baseline to peak dobutamine stress in control subjects and patients in peak aortic velocity (46% vs. 42%, p = NS), average aortic acceleration (61% vs. 43%, p = 0.03) and systolic time-velocity integral (7% vs. 2%, p = NS). Dobutamine caused marked increases in control subjects and decreases in patients in peak early filling velocity (E) (33% vs. −22%, p < 0.0001) and average E acceleration (76% vs. −28%, p < 0.0001). The response of Doppler early filling indexes to dobutamine stress was abnormal in all patients. There was no overlap in the percent change from baseline to peak dobutamine stress between control subjects and patients for E and E acceleration. Conclusions. During dobutamine stress testing, an abnormal response of Doppler indexes of left ventricular early filling is a more sensitive marker of significant single-vessel coronary disease than are new wall motion abnormalities, and it is far superior to the response of Doppler ejection variables as a predictor of coronary artery disease.