Loading…
Evidence‐based medicine: useful tools for decision making
ABSTRACT Evidence‐based medicine (EBM) integrates clinical experience and patient values with the best available research information. There are four steps in incorporating the best available research evidence in decision making: asking answerable questions; accessing the best information; appraisin...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Medical journal of Australia 2001-03, Vol.174 (5), p.248-253 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4070-ddfe815d9863d6e960e746a0288441e484ec3e50466dc7e63c0054ec072c8cdd3 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4070-ddfe815d9863d6e960e746a0288441e484ec3e50466dc7e63c0054ec072c8cdd3 |
| container_end_page | 253 |
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 248 |
| container_title | Medical journal of Australia |
| container_volume | 174 |
| creator | Craig, Jonathan C Irwig, Les M Stockler, Martin R |
| description | ABSTRACT
Evidence‐based medicine (EBM) integrates clinical experience and patient values with the best available research information.
There are four steps in incorporating the best available research evidence in decision making: asking answerable questions; accessing the best information; appraising the information for validity and relevance; and applying the information to patient care.
Applying EBM to individual patients requires drawing up a balance sheet of benefits and harms based on research and individual patient data.
The most realistic and efficient use of EBM by clinicians at the point of care involves accessing and applying valid and relevant summaries of research evidence (evidence‐based guidelines and systematic reviews).
The future holds promise for improved primary research, better EBM summaries, greater access to these summaries, and better implementation systems for evidence‐based practice.
Computer‐assisted decision support tools for clinicians facilitate integration of individual patient data with the best available research data. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143250.x |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77013417</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77013417</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4070-ddfe815d9863d6e960e746a0288441e484ec3e50466dc7e63c0054ec072c8cdd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkMlOG0EQQFsoEZjlF9BIlnKboXqZXsIJkFkiIi4gcWu1u2uidsYzzrQH7BufkG_Ml2QsG3LOqVRVrxY9QsYUilIacTYrKGcyL7lSBQOgxXJKBWclFKs9MvrofSIjAFbmipnnA3KY0mxIacnUPjmglGmQRo_I-eQlBmw8_nn7PXUJQzbHEH1s8GvWJ6z6Olu2bZ2yqu2ygD6m2DbZ3P2MzY9j8rlydcKTXTwiT9eTx6vb_P7h5u7q4j73AhTkIVSoaRmMljxINBJQCemAaS0ERaEFeo4lCCmDVyi5ByiHGijmtQ-BH5Ev272Lrv3VY1raeUwe69o12PbJKgWUC6oG8HwL-q5NqcPKLro4d93aUrAbd3ZmN37sxo_duLPv7uxqmD7dnemng4R_sztZAzDeAS55V1edawYfH5zRxhg6UJMt9RprXP_PB_b7twv2eLlN-V8EsI0R</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77013417</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evidence‐based medicine: useful tools for decision making</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Craig, Jonathan C ; Irwig, Les M ; Stockler, Martin R</creator><creatorcontrib>Craig, Jonathan C ; Irwig, Les M ; Stockler, Martin R</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
Evidence‐based medicine (EBM) integrates clinical experience and patient values with the best available research information.
There are four steps in incorporating the best available research evidence in decision making: asking answerable questions; accessing the best information; appraising the information for validity and relevance; and applying the information to patient care.
Applying EBM to individual patients requires drawing up a balance sheet of benefits and harms based on research and individual patient data.
The most realistic and efficient use of EBM by clinicians at the point of care involves accessing and applying valid and relevant summaries of research evidence (evidence‐based guidelines and systematic reviews).
The future holds promise for improved primary research, better EBM summaries, greater access to these summaries, and better implementation systems for evidence‐based practice.
Computer‐assisted decision support tools for clinicians facilitate integration of individual patient data with the best available research data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-729X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1326-5377</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143250.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11280698</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MJAUAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sydney: Australasian Medical Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Australia ; Biological and medical sciences ; Computerized, statistical medical data processing and models in biomedicine ; Decision Support Systems, Clinical ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Humans ; Medical management aid. Diagnosis aid ; Medical sciences ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Quality Assurance, Health Care</subject><ispartof>Medical journal of Australia, 2001-03, Vol.174 (5), p.248-253</ispartof><rights>2001 AMPCo Pty Ltd. All rights reserved</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4070-ddfe815d9863d6e960e746a0288441e484ec3e50466dc7e63c0054ec072c8cdd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4070-ddfe815d9863d6e960e746a0288441e484ec3e50466dc7e63c0054ec072c8cdd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=989991$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11280698$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Craig, Jonathan C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irwig, Les M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stockler, Martin R</creatorcontrib><title>Evidence‐based medicine: useful tools for decision making</title><title>Medical journal of Australia</title><addtitle>Med J Aust</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
Evidence‐based medicine (EBM) integrates clinical experience and patient values with the best available research information.
There are four steps in incorporating the best available research evidence in decision making: asking answerable questions; accessing the best information; appraising the information for validity and relevance; and applying the information to patient care.
Applying EBM to individual patients requires drawing up a balance sheet of benefits and harms based on research and individual patient data.
The most realistic and efficient use of EBM by clinicians at the point of care involves accessing and applying valid and relevant summaries of research evidence (evidence‐based guidelines and systematic reviews).
The future holds promise for improved primary research, better EBM summaries, greater access to these summaries, and better implementation systems for evidence‐based practice.
Computer‐assisted decision support tools for clinicians facilitate integration of individual patient data with the best available research data.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Computerized, statistical medical data processing and models in biomedicine</subject><subject>Decision Support Systems, Clinical</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical management aid. Diagnosis aid</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care</subject><issn>0025-729X</issn><issn>1326-5377</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkMlOG0EQQFsoEZjlF9BIlnKboXqZXsIJkFkiIi4gcWu1u2uidsYzzrQH7BufkG_Ml2QsG3LOqVRVrxY9QsYUilIacTYrKGcyL7lSBQOgxXJKBWclFKs9MvrofSIjAFbmipnnA3KY0mxIacnUPjmglGmQRo_I-eQlBmw8_nn7PXUJQzbHEH1s8GvWJ6z6Olu2bZ2yqu2ygD6m2DbZ3P2MzY9j8rlydcKTXTwiT9eTx6vb_P7h5u7q4j73AhTkIVSoaRmMljxINBJQCemAaS0ERaEFeo4lCCmDVyi5ByiHGijmtQ-BH5Ev272Lrv3VY1raeUwe69o12PbJKgWUC6oG8HwL-q5NqcPKLro4d93aUrAbd3ZmN37sxo_duLPv7uxqmD7dnemng4R_sztZAzDeAS55V1edawYfH5zRxhg6UJMt9RprXP_PB_b7twv2eLlN-V8EsI0R</recordid><startdate>20010305</startdate><enddate>20010305</enddate><creator>Craig, Jonathan C</creator><creator>Irwig, Les M</creator><creator>Stockler, Martin R</creator><general>Australasian Medical Publishing Company</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010305</creationdate><title>Evidence‐based medicine: useful tools for decision making</title><author>Craig, Jonathan C ; Irwig, Les M ; Stockler, Martin R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4070-ddfe815d9863d6e960e746a0288441e484ec3e50466dc7e63c0054ec072c8cdd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Computerized, statistical medical data processing and models in biomedicine</topic><topic>Decision Support Systems, Clinical</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical management aid. Diagnosis aid</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Craig, Jonathan C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irwig, Les M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stockler, Martin R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical journal of Australia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Craig, Jonathan C</au><au>Irwig, Les M</au><au>Stockler, Martin R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evidence‐based medicine: useful tools for decision making</atitle><jtitle>Medical journal of Australia</jtitle><addtitle>Med J Aust</addtitle><date>2001-03-05</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>174</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>248</spage><epage>253</epage><pages>248-253</pages><issn>0025-729X</issn><eissn>1326-5377</eissn><coden>MJAUAJ</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT
Evidence‐based medicine (EBM) integrates clinical experience and patient values with the best available research information.
There are four steps in incorporating the best available research evidence in decision making: asking answerable questions; accessing the best information; appraising the information for validity and relevance; and applying the information to patient care.
Applying EBM to individual patients requires drawing up a balance sheet of benefits and harms based on research and individual patient data.
The most realistic and efficient use of EBM by clinicians at the point of care involves accessing and applying valid and relevant summaries of research evidence (evidence‐based guidelines and systematic reviews).
The future holds promise for improved primary research, better EBM summaries, greater access to these summaries, and better implementation systems for evidence‐based practice.
Computer‐assisted decision support tools for clinicians facilitate integration of individual patient data with the best available research data.</abstract><cop>Sydney</cop><pub>Australasian Medical Publishing Company</pub><pmid>11280698</pmid><doi>10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143250.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0025-729X |
| ispartof | Medical journal of Australia, 2001-03, Vol.174 (5), p.248-253 |
| issn | 0025-729X 1326-5377 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77013417 |
| source | Wiley |
| subjects | Australia Biological and medical sciences Computerized, statistical medical data processing and models in biomedicine Decision Support Systems, Clinical Evidence-Based Medicine Humans Medical management aid. Diagnosis aid Medical sciences Practice Guidelines as Topic Quality Assurance, Health Care |
| title | Evidence‐based medicine: useful tools for decision making |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T10%3A23%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evidence%E2%80%90based%20medicine:%20useful%20tools%20for%20decision%20making&rft.jtitle=Medical%20journal%20of%20Australia&rft.au=Craig,%20Jonathan%20C&rft.date=2001-03-05&rft.volume=174&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=248&rft.epage=253&rft.pages=248-253&rft.issn=0025-729X&rft.eissn=1326-5377&rft.coden=MJAUAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143250.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77013417%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4070-ddfe815d9863d6e960e746a0288441e484ec3e50466dc7e63c0054ec072c8cdd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77013417&rft_id=info:pmid/11280698&rfr_iscdi=true |