“Best-evidence synthesis: An intelligent alternative to meta-analysis”: Discussion. A case of “either-or” or “as well”

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical epidemiology 1995, Vol.48 (1), p.19-21
Main Author: Letzel, H
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bias
Clinical Trials as Topic
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Reproducibility of Results
Review Literature as Topic
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-4339a49f81e7f1fd4721927846ebe07f94dbd94bb60ed58cbab39605dc15b6523
cites
container_end_page 21
container_issue 1
container_start_page 19
container_title Journal of clinical epidemiology
container_volume 48
creator Letzel, H
description
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00135-D
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77137527</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>089543569400135D</els_id><sourcerecordid>77137527</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-4339a49f81e7f1fd4721927846ebe07f94dbd94bb60ed58cbab39605dc15b6523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OHDEQhS2UiAw_N0gkr6KwaGJ32-02i0gTBpJISGxgbbnt6sRRj01sz0SzQ5wjXI6T4GZGLLMqqeqrV_UeQu8pOaWEtp9JJ3nFGt5-kuyEENrwarGHZrQTXcVlTd-g2SvyDh2k9LtAggi-j_ZFxxvC2Aw9PN3_-wopV7B2FrwBnDY-_4Lk0hmee-x8hnF0P8FnrMcM0evs1oBzwEvIutJej5sCP90_nuGFS2aVkgv-FM-x0QlwGHC5AK5IxirEguEQp5ZO-G9RLo0j9HbQY4LjXT1Et5cXN-ffq6vrbz_O51eVqUWdi41GaiaHjoIY6GCZqKmsRcda6IGIQTLbW8n6viVgeWd63TeyJdwayvuW180h-rjVvYvhz6p4Vsvyb_lBewirpISgjeC1KCDbgiaGlCIM6i66pY4bRYmaoldTrmrKVUmmXqJXi7L2Yae_6pdgX5d2WZf5l-0cism1g6iScVPk1kUwWdng_n_gGdvSmbw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77137527</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“Best-evidence synthesis: An intelligent alternative to meta-analysis”: Discussion. A case of “either-or” or “as well”</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Letzel, H</creator><creatorcontrib>Letzel, H</creatorcontrib><identifier>ISSN: 0895-4356</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00135-D</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7853044</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Bias ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Meta-Analysis as Topic ; Reproducibility of Results ; Review Literature as Topic</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical epidemiology, 1995, Vol.48 (1), p.19-21</ispartof><rights>1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-4339a49f81e7f1fd4721927846ebe07f94dbd94bb60ed58cbab39605dc15b6523</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4022,27921,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7853044$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Letzel, H</creatorcontrib><title>“Best-evidence synthesis: An intelligent alternative to meta-analysis”: Discussion. A case of “either-or” or “as well”</title><title>Journal of clinical epidemiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Epidemiol</addtitle><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Meta-Analysis as Topic</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Review Literature as Topic</subject><issn>0895-4356</issn><issn>1878-5921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1OHDEQhS2UiAw_N0gkr6KwaGJ32-02i0gTBpJISGxgbbnt6sRRj01sz0SzQ5wjXI6T4GZGLLMqqeqrV_UeQu8pOaWEtp9JJ3nFGt5-kuyEENrwarGHZrQTXcVlTd-g2SvyDh2k9LtAggi-j_ZFxxvC2Aw9PN3_-wopV7B2FrwBnDY-_4Lk0hmee-x8hnF0P8FnrMcM0evs1oBzwEvIutJej5sCP90_nuGFS2aVkgv-FM-x0QlwGHC5AK5IxirEguEQp5ZO-G9RLo0j9HbQY4LjXT1Et5cXN-ffq6vrbz_O51eVqUWdi41GaiaHjoIY6GCZqKmsRcda6IGIQTLbW8n6viVgeWd63TeyJdwayvuW180h-rjVvYvhz6p4Vsvyb_lBewirpISgjeC1KCDbgiaGlCIM6i66pY4bRYmaoldTrmrKVUmmXqJXi7L2Yae_6pdgX5d2WZf5l-0cism1g6iScVPk1kUwWdng_n_gGdvSmbw</recordid><startdate>1995</startdate><enddate>1995</enddate><creator>Letzel, H</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1995</creationdate><title>“Best-evidence synthesis: An intelligent alternative to meta-analysis”: Discussion. A case of “either-or” or “as well”</title><author>Letzel, H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-4339a49f81e7f1fd4721927846ebe07f94dbd94bb60ed58cbab39605dc15b6523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Meta-Analysis as Topic</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Review Literature as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Letzel, H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Letzel, H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“Best-evidence synthesis: An intelligent alternative to meta-analysis”: Discussion. A case of “either-or” or “as well”</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Epidemiol</addtitle><date>1995</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>19-21</pages><issn>0895-4356</issn><eissn>1878-5921</eissn><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>7853044</pmid><doi>10.1016/0895-4356(94)00135-D</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0895-4356
ispartof Journal of clinical epidemiology, 1995, Vol.48 (1), p.19-21
issn 0895-4356
1878-5921
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77137527
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Bias
Clinical Trials as Topic
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Reproducibility of Results
Review Literature as Topic
title “Best-evidence synthesis: An intelligent alternative to meta-analysis”: Discussion. A case of “either-or” or “as well”
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T18%3A59%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CBest-evidence%20synthesis:%20An%20intelligent%20alternative%20to%20meta-analysis%E2%80%9D:%20Discussion.%20A%20case%20of%20%E2%80%9Ceither-or%E2%80%9D%20or%20%E2%80%9Cas%20well%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20epidemiology&rft.au=Letzel,%20H&rft.date=1995&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=19-21&rft.issn=0895-4356&rft.eissn=1878-5921&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0895-4356(94)00135-D&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77137527%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-4339a49f81e7f1fd4721927846ebe07f94dbd94bb60ed58cbab39605dc15b6523%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77137527&rft_id=info:pmid/7853044&rfr_iscdi=true