Loading…

Magnetic resonance versus computed tomographic imaging in acute stroke

This study was an attempt to determine whether CT and MRI are comparable or if one is superior to the other in the early detection of ischemic stroke or hematoma. Patients with acute stroke were sought within 3 hours of onset for clinical examination and prospective evaluation by concurrently perfor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Stroke (1970) 1995-05, Vol.26 (5), p.807-812
Main Authors: MOHR, J. P, BILLER, J, GRIMSMAN, K, MARLER, J. R, HILAL, S. K, YUH, W. T. C, TATEMICHI, T. K, HEDGES, S, TALI, E, NGUYEN, H, MUN, I, ADAMS, H. P
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-e13588eba73cd038659b804e81821cc9099b14592749ec2b8fe3e252a952b6643
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-e13588eba73cd038659b804e81821cc9099b14592749ec2b8fe3e252a952b6643
container_end_page 812
container_issue 5
container_start_page 807
container_title Stroke (1970)
container_volume 26
creator MOHR, J. P
BILLER, J
GRIMSMAN, K
MARLER, J. R
HILAL, S. K
YUH, W. T. C
TATEMICHI, T. K
HEDGES, S
TALI, E
NGUYEN, H
MUN, I
ADAMS, H. P
description This study was an attempt to determine whether CT and MRI are comparable or if one is superior to the other in the early detection of ischemic stroke or hematoma. Patients with acute stroke were sought within 3 hours of onset for clinical examination and prospective evaluation by concurrently performed CT and MRI. Repeated clinical and imaging studies were undertaken when possible immediately after imaging and at 24 hours, 3 to 5 days, and 3 months. The study neurologists were blinded to the results of imaging, as were the study radiologists to the clinical findings. The study radiologists read the scans in sequence, mapping each imaging on standard templates before viewing a later scan. No retrospective revisions of imaging mapping of earlier images were undertaken. Sixty-eight patients were recruited within 4 hours and an additional 12 patients within 24 hours. Seventy-five strokes were due to infarction and five to hemorrhage. The median time to first scan was 132 minutes. Although some of the infarctions in 75 patients were detected within 1 hour, the fraction of positive first scans approached an asymptote at 2 to 3 hours. Overall, with the use of conventional non-contrast-enhanced CT and T1- and T2-weighted MRI, neither was superior in the very early detection of either hematoma or infarction. There was a marginally significant correlation between early positive brain imaging and the severity of the stroke. Some patients had initially positive CT and/or MRI scans, but their neurological examination had returned to normal by 24 hours. Overall, CT was better than baseline MRI at predicting 24-hour outcome. After 24 hours, both CT and MR more conspicuously defined the lesion limits than they did at baseline. With the technology available through 1991, neither CT nor MRI proved superior in the detection of the earliest signs of stroke.
doi_str_mv 10.1161/01.str.26.5.807
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77259575</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77259575</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-e13588eba73cd038659b804e81821cc9099b14592749ec2b8fe3e252a952b6643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM1LwzAYh4Moc07PnoQi4q1dPpvkKMOpMBF0nkOavZudazOTVvC_N7Kxg6f38HverwehS4ILQkoyxqSIXShoWYhCYXmEhkRQnvOSqmM0xJjpnHKtT9FZjGuMMWVKDNBASo6FJEM0fbarFrraZQGib23rIPuGEPuYOd9s-w4WWecbvwp2-5GourGrul1ldZtZl9IsbfefcI5OlnYT4WJfR-h9ej-fPOazl4enyd0sd5zrLgfChFJQWcncAjNVCl0pzEERRYlzGmtdES40lVyDo5VaAgMqqNWCVmXJ2Qjd7uZug__qIXamqaODzca24PtopKRCCykSeP0PXPs-tOk2Q7SUUlBGEzTeQS74GAMszTakB8OPIdj86TWYmLf5q6GlESbpTR1X-7F91cDiwO99pvxmn9vo7GYZktA6HjAmCGZSsV88YoF_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197775232</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Magnetic resonance versus computed tomographic imaging in acute stroke</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>MOHR, J. P ; BILLER, J ; GRIMSMAN, K ; MARLER, J. R ; HILAL, S. K ; YUH, W. T. C ; TATEMICHI, T. K ; HEDGES, S ; TALI, E ; NGUYEN, H ; MUN, I ; ADAMS, H. P</creator><creatorcontrib>MOHR, J. P ; BILLER, J ; GRIMSMAN, K ; MARLER, J. R ; HILAL, S. K ; YUH, W. T. C ; TATEMICHI, T. K ; HEDGES, S ; TALI, E ; NGUYEN, H ; MUN, I ; ADAMS, H. P</creatorcontrib><description>This study was an attempt to determine whether CT and MRI are comparable or if one is superior to the other in the early detection of ischemic stroke or hematoma. Patients with acute stroke were sought within 3 hours of onset for clinical examination and prospective evaluation by concurrently performed CT and MRI. Repeated clinical and imaging studies were undertaken when possible immediately after imaging and at 24 hours, 3 to 5 days, and 3 months. The study neurologists were blinded to the results of imaging, as were the study radiologists to the clinical findings. The study radiologists read the scans in sequence, mapping each imaging on standard templates before viewing a later scan. No retrospective revisions of imaging mapping of earlier images were undertaken. Sixty-eight patients were recruited within 4 hours and an additional 12 patients within 24 hours. Seventy-five strokes were due to infarction and five to hemorrhage. The median time to first scan was 132 minutes. Although some of the infarctions in 75 patients were detected within 1 hour, the fraction of positive first scans approached an asymptote at 2 to 3 hours. Overall, with the use of conventional non-contrast-enhanced CT and T1- and T2-weighted MRI, neither was superior in the very early detection of either hematoma or infarction. There was a marginally significant correlation between early positive brain imaging and the severity of the stroke. Some patients had initially positive CT and/or MRI scans, but their neurological examination had returned to normal by 24 hours. Overall, CT was better than baseline MRI at predicting 24-hour outcome. After 24 hours, both CT and MR more conspicuously defined the lesion limits than they did at baseline. With the technology available through 1991, neither CT nor MRI proved superior in the detection of the earliest signs of stroke.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-2499</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4628</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/01.str.26.5.807</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7740571</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SJCCA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cerebrovascular Disorders - diagnosis ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neurology ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system</subject><ispartof>Stroke (1970), 1995-05, Vol.26 (5), p.807-812</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Heart Association, Inc. May 1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-e13588eba73cd038659b804e81821cc9099b14592749ec2b8fe3e252a952b6643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-e13588eba73cd038659b804e81821cc9099b14592749ec2b8fe3e252a952b6643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23911,23912,25120,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3510378$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7740571$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MOHR, J. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BILLER, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRIMSMAN, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARLER, J. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HILAL, S. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YUH, W. T. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TATEMICHI, T. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEDGES, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TALI, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NGUYEN, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MUN, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ADAMS, H. P</creatorcontrib><title>Magnetic resonance versus computed tomographic imaging in acute stroke</title><title>Stroke (1970)</title><addtitle>Stroke</addtitle><description>This study was an attempt to determine whether CT and MRI are comparable or if one is superior to the other in the early detection of ischemic stroke or hematoma. Patients with acute stroke were sought within 3 hours of onset for clinical examination and prospective evaluation by concurrently performed CT and MRI. Repeated clinical and imaging studies were undertaken when possible immediately after imaging and at 24 hours, 3 to 5 days, and 3 months. The study neurologists were blinded to the results of imaging, as were the study radiologists to the clinical findings. The study radiologists read the scans in sequence, mapping each imaging on standard templates before viewing a later scan. No retrospective revisions of imaging mapping of earlier images were undertaken. Sixty-eight patients were recruited within 4 hours and an additional 12 patients within 24 hours. Seventy-five strokes were due to infarction and five to hemorrhage. The median time to first scan was 132 minutes. Although some of the infarctions in 75 patients were detected within 1 hour, the fraction of positive first scans approached an asymptote at 2 to 3 hours. Overall, with the use of conventional non-contrast-enhanced CT and T1- and T2-weighted MRI, neither was superior in the very early detection of either hematoma or infarction. There was a marginally significant correlation between early positive brain imaging and the severity of the stroke. Some patients had initially positive CT and/or MRI scans, but their neurological examination had returned to normal by 24 hours. Overall, CT was better than baseline MRI at predicting 24-hour outcome. After 24 hours, both CT and MR more conspicuously defined the lesion limits than they did at baseline. With the technology available through 1991, neither CT nor MRI proved superior in the detection of the earliest signs of stroke.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cerebrovascular Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system</subject><issn>0039-2499</issn><issn>1524-4628</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkM1LwzAYh4Moc07PnoQi4q1dPpvkKMOpMBF0nkOavZudazOTVvC_N7Kxg6f38HverwehS4ILQkoyxqSIXShoWYhCYXmEhkRQnvOSqmM0xJjpnHKtT9FZjGuMMWVKDNBASo6FJEM0fbarFrraZQGib23rIPuGEPuYOd9s-w4WWecbvwp2-5GourGrul1ldZtZl9IsbfefcI5OlnYT4WJfR-h9ej-fPOazl4enyd0sd5zrLgfChFJQWcncAjNVCl0pzEERRYlzGmtdES40lVyDo5VaAgMqqNWCVmXJ2Qjd7uZug__qIXamqaODzca24PtopKRCCykSeP0PXPs-tOk2Q7SUUlBGEzTeQS74GAMszTakB8OPIdj86TWYmLf5q6GlESbpTR1X-7F91cDiwO99pvxmn9vo7GYZktA6HjAmCGZSsV88YoF_</recordid><startdate>19950501</startdate><enddate>19950501</enddate><creator>MOHR, J. P</creator><creator>BILLER, J</creator><creator>GRIMSMAN, K</creator><creator>MARLER, J. R</creator><creator>HILAL, S. K</creator><creator>YUH, W. T. C</creator><creator>TATEMICHI, T. K</creator><creator>HEDGES, S</creator><creator>TALI, E</creator><creator>NGUYEN, H</creator><creator>MUN, I</creator><creator>ADAMS, H. P</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><general>American Heart Association, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950501</creationdate><title>Magnetic resonance versus computed tomographic imaging in acute stroke</title><author>MOHR, J. P ; BILLER, J ; GRIMSMAN, K ; MARLER, J. R ; HILAL, S. K ; YUH, W. T. C ; TATEMICHI, T. K ; HEDGES, S ; TALI, E ; NGUYEN, H ; MUN, I ; ADAMS, H. P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-e13588eba73cd038659b804e81821cc9099b14592749ec2b8fe3e252a952b6643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cerebrovascular Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MOHR, J. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BILLER, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRIMSMAN, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARLER, J. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HILAL, S. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YUH, W. T. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TATEMICHI, T. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEDGES, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TALI, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NGUYEN, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MUN, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ADAMS, H. P</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Stroke (1970)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MOHR, J. P</au><au>BILLER, J</au><au>GRIMSMAN, K</au><au>MARLER, J. R</au><au>HILAL, S. K</au><au>YUH, W. T. C</au><au>TATEMICHI, T. K</au><au>HEDGES, S</au><au>TALI, E</au><au>NGUYEN, H</au><au>MUN, I</au><au>ADAMS, H. P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Magnetic resonance versus computed tomographic imaging in acute stroke</atitle><jtitle>Stroke (1970)</jtitle><addtitle>Stroke</addtitle><date>1995-05-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>807</spage><epage>812</epage><pages>807-812</pages><issn>0039-2499</issn><eissn>1524-4628</eissn><coden>SJCCA7</coden><abstract>This study was an attempt to determine whether CT and MRI are comparable or if one is superior to the other in the early detection of ischemic stroke or hematoma. Patients with acute stroke were sought within 3 hours of onset for clinical examination and prospective evaluation by concurrently performed CT and MRI. Repeated clinical and imaging studies were undertaken when possible immediately after imaging and at 24 hours, 3 to 5 days, and 3 months. The study neurologists were blinded to the results of imaging, as were the study radiologists to the clinical findings. The study radiologists read the scans in sequence, mapping each imaging on standard templates before viewing a later scan. No retrospective revisions of imaging mapping of earlier images were undertaken. Sixty-eight patients were recruited within 4 hours and an additional 12 patients within 24 hours. Seventy-five strokes were due to infarction and five to hemorrhage. The median time to first scan was 132 minutes. Although some of the infarctions in 75 patients were detected within 1 hour, the fraction of positive first scans approached an asymptote at 2 to 3 hours. Overall, with the use of conventional non-contrast-enhanced CT and T1- and T2-weighted MRI, neither was superior in the very early detection of either hematoma or infarction. There was a marginally significant correlation between early positive brain imaging and the severity of the stroke. Some patients had initially positive CT and/or MRI scans, but their neurological examination had returned to normal by 24 hours. Overall, CT was better than baseline MRI at predicting 24-hour outcome. After 24 hours, both CT and MR more conspicuously defined the lesion limits than they did at baseline. With the technology available through 1991, neither CT nor MRI proved superior in the detection of the earliest signs of stroke.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>7740571</pmid><doi>10.1161/01.str.26.5.807</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-2499
ispartof Stroke (1970), 1995-05, Vol.26 (5), p.807-812
issn 0039-2499
1524-4628
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77259575
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Cerebrovascular Disorders - diagnosis
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neurology
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system
title Magnetic resonance versus computed tomographic imaging in acute stroke
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T06%3A00%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20versus%20computed%20tomographic%20imaging%20in%20acute%20stroke&rft.jtitle=Stroke%20(1970)&rft.au=MOHR,%20J.%20P&rft.date=1995-05-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=807&rft.epage=812&rft.pages=807-812&rft.issn=0039-2499&rft.eissn=1524-4628&rft.coden=SJCCA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/01.str.26.5.807&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77259575%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-e13588eba73cd038659b804e81821cc9099b14592749ec2b8fe3e252a952b6643%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197775232&rft_id=info:pmid/7740571&rfr_iscdi=true