Loading…

Salbutamol powder inhaled from the Diskhaler compared to salbutamol as nebulizer solution in severe chronic airways obstruction

The bronchodilatory effect of four doses of salbutamol powder (1·6 mg) from a multi-dose dry powder inhaler, the Diskhaler, was compared to the effect of 2·5 ml salbutamol nebulizer solution (1 mg ml −1) from a jet nebulizer, Pari Inhalierboy, in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, cross-over...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Respiratory medicine 1995-03, Vol.89 (3), p.175-179
Main Authors: Hansen, N.C.G., Andersen, P.B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e851f562555e0b263f89aa15404e7412edb4512b1c1b5899bcc4c47ec0111153
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e851f562555e0b263f89aa15404e7412edb4512b1c1b5899bcc4c47ec0111153
container_end_page 179
container_issue 3
container_start_page 175
container_title Respiratory medicine
container_volume 89
creator Hansen, N.C.G.
Andersen, P.B.
description The bronchodilatory effect of four doses of salbutamol powder (1·6 mg) from a multi-dose dry powder inhaler, the Diskhaler, was compared to the effect of 2·5 ml salbutamol nebulizer solution (1 mg ml −1) from a jet nebulizer, Pari Inhalierboy, in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, cross-over study performed on 2 consecutive days. Thirty-two patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a mean FEV 1=29% of predicted value, and at least a 15% increase in FEV 1 after inhaling 5 mg nebulized terbutaline were included. Twenty-eight patients were evaluated: 17 women and 11 men with a mean age of 67 years (range 53–82 years). The mean increases in FEV 1 were greater after inhalation via the Diskhaler, although there was no difference in the patients' subjective assessment of the treatments. The powder inhaler was also effective in patients with the lowest baseline FEV 1 and the lowest inspiratory peak flow through the inhaler. The study demonstrates that dry powder inhalation of salbutamol via a Diskhaler is at least as effective as inhalation of salbutamol via a jet nebulizer in providing bronchodilation in patients with severe COPD.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0954-6111(95)90244-9
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77275707</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0954611195902449</els_id><sourcerecordid>77275707</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e851f562555e0b263f89aa15404e7412edb4512b1c1b5899bcc4c47ec0111153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQhi0EKtvCG4DkA6rgELATO44vSKgUqFSJA71btjPRGpx48SSt2guvXoddLTdOljzf_2vmI-QVZ-854-0HpqWoWs75Wy3faVYLUeknZMNlU1cNa8VTsjkiz8kp4k_GmBaCnZATpUSrmd6QPz9sdMtsxxTpLt31kGmYtjZCT4ecRjpvgX4O-Gv9ytSncWdzmc2J4r-gRTqBW2J4KAymuMwhTaWHItxCBuq3OU3BUxvynb1HmhzOefEr9YI8G2xEeHl4z8jNl8ubi2_V9fevVxefrisvmnquoJN8kG0tpQTm6rYZOm0tl4IJUILX0Dshee245052WjvvhRcKPCvHFyNn5Hxfu8vp9wI4mzGghxjtBGlBo1StpGKqgGIP-pwQMwxml8No873hzKzazerUrE6NluavdqNL7PWhf3Ej9MfQwXOZvznMLXobh2wnH_CINUKqrlvX_LjHoKi4DZAN-gCThz5k8LPpU_j_Ho9FXKBt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77275707</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Salbutamol powder inhaled from the Diskhaler compared to salbutamol as nebulizer solution in severe chronic airways obstruction</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Hansen, N.C.G. ; Andersen, P.B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hansen, N.C.G. ; Andersen, P.B.</creatorcontrib><description>The bronchodilatory effect of four doses of salbutamol powder (1·6 mg) from a multi-dose dry powder inhaler, the Diskhaler, was compared to the effect of 2·5 ml salbutamol nebulizer solution (1 mg ml −1) from a jet nebulizer, Pari Inhalierboy, in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, cross-over study performed on 2 consecutive days. Thirty-two patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a mean FEV 1=29% of predicted value, and at least a 15% increase in FEV 1 after inhaling 5 mg nebulized terbutaline were included. Twenty-eight patients were evaluated: 17 women and 11 men with a mean age of 67 years (range 53–82 years). The mean increases in FEV 1 were greater after inhalation via the Diskhaler, although there was no difference in the patients' subjective assessment of the treatments. The powder inhaler was also effective in patients with the lowest baseline FEV 1 and the lowest inspiratory peak flow through the inhaler. The study demonstrates that dry powder inhalation of salbutamol via a Diskhaler is at least as effective as inhalation of salbutamol via a jet nebulizer in providing bronchodilation in patients with severe COPD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-6111</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-3064</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0954-6111(95)90244-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7746909</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Administration, Inhalation ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Albuterol - administration &amp; dosage ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cross-Over Studies ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Forced Expiratory Volume ; Humans ; Lung Diseases, Obstructive - diagnosis ; Lung Diseases, Obstructive - drug therapy ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nebulizers and Vaporizers ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Powders ; Respiratory system ; Solutions</subject><ispartof>Respiratory medicine, 1995-03, Vol.89 (3), p.175-179</ispartof><rights>1995</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e851f562555e0b263f89aa15404e7412edb4512b1c1b5899bcc4c47ec0111153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e851f562555e0b263f89aa15404e7412edb4512b1c1b5899bcc4c47ec0111153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3457885$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7746909$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hansen, N.C.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, P.B.</creatorcontrib><title>Salbutamol powder inhaled from the Diskhaler compared to salbutamol as nebulizer solution in severe chronic airways obstruction</title><title>Respiratory medicine</title><addtitle>Respir Med</addtitle><description>The bronchodilatory effect of four doses of salbutamol powder (1·6 mg) from a multi-dose dry powder inhaler, the Diskhaler, was compared to the effect of 2·5 ml salbutamol nebulizer solution (1 mg ml −1) from a jet nebulizer, Pari Inhalierboy, in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, cross-over study performed on 2 consecutive days. Thirty-two patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a mean FEV 1=29% of predicted value, and at least a 15% increase in FEV 1 after inhaling 5 mg nebulized terbutaline were included. Twenty-eight patients were evaluated: 17 women and 11 men with a mean age of 67 years (range 53–82 years). The mean increases in FEV 1 were greater after inhalation via the Diskhaler, although there was no difference in the patients' subjective assessment of the treatments. The powder inhaler was also effective in patients with the lowest baseline FEV 1 and the lowest inspiratory peak flow through the inhaler. The study demonstrates that dry powder inhalation of salbutamol via a Diskhaler is at least as effective as inhalation of salbutamol via a jet nebulizer in providing bronchodilation in patients with severe COPD.</description><subject>Administration, Inhalation</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Albuterol - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forced Expiratory Volume</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung Diseases, Obstructive - diagnosis</subject><subject>Lung Diseases, Obstructive - drug therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nebulizers and Vaporizers</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Powders</subject><subject>Respiratory system</subject><subject>Solutions</subject><issn>0954-6111</issn><issn>1532-3064</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQhi0EKtvCG4DkA6rgELATO44vSKgUqFSJA71btjPRGpx48SSt2guvXoddLTdOljzf_2vmI-QVZ-854-0HpqWoWs75Wy3faVYLUeknZMNlU1cNa8VTsjkiz8kp4k_GmBaCnZATpUSrmd6QPz9sdMtsxxTpLt31kGmYtjZCT4ecRjpvgX4O-Gv9ytSncWdzmc2J4r-gRTqBW2J4KAymuMwhTaWHItxCBuq3OU3BUxvynb1HmhzOefEr9YI8G2xEeHl4z8jNl8ubi2_V9fevVxefrisvmnquoJN8kG0tpQTm6rYZOm0tl4IJUILX0Dshee245052WjvvhRcKPCvHFyNn5Hxfu8vp9wI4mzGghxjtBGlBo1StpGKqgGIP-pwQMwxml8No873hzKzazerUrE6NluavdqNL7PWhf3Ej9MfQwXOZvznMLXobh2wnH_CINUKqrlvX_LjHoKi4DZAN-gCThz5k8LPpU_j_Ho9FXKBt</recordid><startdate>19950301</startdate><enddate>19950301</enddate><creator>Hansen, N.C.G.</creator><creator>Andersen, P.B.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950301</creationdate><title>Salbutamol powder inhaled from the Diskhaler compared to salbutamol as nebulizer solution in severe chronic airways obstruction</title><author>Hansen, N.C.G. ; Andersen, P.B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e851f562555e0b263f89aa15404e7412edb4512b1c1b5899bcc4c47ec0111153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Administration, Inhalation</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Albuterol - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forced Expiratory Volume</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung Diseases, Obstructive - diagnosis</topic><topic>Lung Diseases, Obstructive - drug therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nebulizers and Vaporizers</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Powders</topic><topic>Respiratory system</topic><topic>Solutions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hansen, N.C.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, P.B.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Respiratory medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hansen, N.C.G.</au><au>Andersen, P.B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Salbutamol powder inhaled from the Diskhaler compared to salbutamol as nebulizer solution in severe chronic airways obstruction</atitle><jtitle>Respiratory medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Respir Med</addtitle><date>1995-03-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>175</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>175-179</pages><issn>0954-6111</issn><eissn>1532-3064</eissn><abstract>The bronchodilatory effect of four doses of salbutamol powder (1·6 mg) from a multi-dose dry powder inhaler, the Diskhaler, was compared to the effect of 2·5 ml salbutamol nebulizer solution (1 mg ml −1) from a jet nebulizer, Pari Inhalierboy, in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, cross-over study performed on 2 consecutive days. Thirty-two patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a mean FEV 1=29% of predicted value, and at least a 15% increase in FEV 1 after inhaling 5 mg nebulized terbutaline were included. Twenty-eight patients were evaluated: 17 women and 11 men with a mean age of 67 years (range 53–82 years). The mean increases in FEV 1 were greater after inhalation via the Diskhaler, although there was no difference in the patients' subjective assessment of the treatments. The powder inhaler was also effective in patients with the lowest baseline FEV 1 and the lowest inspiratory peak flow through the inhaler. The study demonstrates that dry powder inhalation of salbutamol via a Diskhaler is at least as effective as inhalation of salbutamol via a jet nebulizer in providing bronchodilation in patients with severe COPD.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>7746909</pmid><doi>10.1016/0954-6111(95)90244-9</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0954-6111
ispartof Respiratory medicine, 1995-03, Vol.89 (3), p.175-179
issn 0954-6111
1532-3064
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77275707
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Administration, Inhalation
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Albuterol - administration & dosage
Biological and medical sciences
Cross-Over Studies
Double-Blind Method
Female
Forced Expiratory Volume
Humans
Lung Diseases, Obstructive - diagnosis
Lung Diseases, Obstructive - drug therapy
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Nebulizers and Vaporizers
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Powders
Respiratory system
Solutions
title Salbutamol powder inhaled from the Diskhaler compared to salbutamol as nebulizer solution in severe chronic airways obstruction
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T21%3A35%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Salbutamol%20powder%20inhaled%20from%20the%20Diskhaler%20compared%20to%20salbutamol%20as%20nebulizer%20solution%20in%20severe%20chronic%20airways%20obstruction&rft.jtitle=Respiratory%20medicine&rft.au=Hansen,%20N.C.G.&rft.date=1995-03-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=175-179&rft.issn=0954-6111&rft.eissn=1532-3064&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0954-6111(95)90244-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77275707%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e851f562555e0b263f89aa15404e7412edb4512b1c1b5899bcc4c47ec0111153%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77275707&rft_id=info:pmid/7746909&rfr_iscdi=true