Loading…

Prevention of nausea and vomiting after day case gynaecological laparoscopy : a comparison of ondansetron, droperidol, metoclopramide and placebo

We have compared the efficacy of ondansetron, metoclopramide, droperidol and placebo in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in 118 day stay patients undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological procedures. All received a standardised general anaesthetic of fentanyl, propofol, nitrous oxide...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Anaesthesia 1995-05, Vol.50 (5), p.403-406
Main Authors: PAXTON, L. D, MCKAY, A. C, MIRAKHUR, R. K
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-f567746a67ae2a9923798a11c15fa500b28ee338ef50d8d7ec15ab228adc67763
container_end_page 406
container_issue 5
container_start_page 403
container_title Anaesthesia
container_volume 50
creator PAXTON, L. D
MCKAY, A. C
MIRAKHUR, R. K
description We have compared the efficacy of ondansetron, metoclopramide, droperidol and placebo in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in 118 day stay patients undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological procedures. All received a standardised general anaesthetic of fentanyl, propofol, nitrous oxide in oxygen and isoflurane. Three to five min before induction of anaesthesia, patients were allocated to receive ondansetron 4 mg, metoclopramide 10 mg, droperidol 1 mg or placebo in a randomised, double-blind manner. Visual analogue scores for nausea, the incidence of emetic episodes, and analgesic and antiemetic consumption were recorded for 48 h postoperatively. The scores for nausea were significantly lower in the ondansetron group (p < 0.01) compared with the other three groups at 1, 2 and 4 h after operation; thereafter there was no difference. The incidence of emesis was lower (p = 0.063) and time to first oral fluids was shorter (p < 0.05) in the ondansetron group. Oral analgesic requirements were significantly greater in the ondansetron group over the 48 h study period. Two patients, one each in the placebo and metoclopramide groups, had to remain in hospital overnight because of persistent emetic symptoms.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb05993.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77353752</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77353752</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-f567746a67ae2a9923798a11c15fa500b28ee338ef50d8d7ec15ab228adc67763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UV1r3DAQFKElvab5CQVRSp5iVx-WZeethKQtBNqH9lmspfWhw5ZcyRdyP6P_uL6cuX1Z2JnZZWcI-cRZyZf6siu5rFUhWFWVvG1VOXdMta0sXy7I5gy9IRvGmCxExdp35H3OO8a4aHhzSS61bqWqqg359yvhM4bZx0BjTwPsMwKF4OhzHP3sw5ZCP2OiDg7UQka6PQRAG4e49RYGOsAEKWYbpwO9o0BtHJeBz6d9MTgIGecUwy11KU6YvIvDLR1xjnaIU4LRO3w9OA1gsYsfyNsehozXa78ifx4fft9_L55-fvtx__WpsKKp56JXtdZVDbUGFNC2Quq2Ac4tVz0oxjrRIErZYK-Ya5zGBYBOiAacXZS1vCI3p71Tin_3mGcz-mxxGCBg3GejtVRSK7EQ705Eu_yZE_ZmSn6EdDCcmWMeZmeOppuj6eaYh1nzMC-L-ON6Zd-N6M7SNYAF_7zikBc7-wTB-nymScW4FrX8D3vil-o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77353752</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prevention of nausea and vomiting after day case gynaecological laparoscopy : a comparison of ondansetron, droperidol, metoclopramide and placebo</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>PAXTON, L. D ; MCKAY, A. C ; MIRAKHUR, R. K</creator><creatorcontrib>PAXTON, L. D ; MCKAY, A. C ; MIRAKHUR, R. K</creatorcontrib><description>We have compared the efficacy of ondansetron, metoclopramide, droperidol and placebo in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in 118 day stay patients undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological procedures. All received a standardised general anaesthetic of fentanyl, propofol, nitrous oxide in oxygen and isoflurane. Three to five min before induction of anaesthesia, patients were allocated to receive ondansetron 4 mg, metoclopramide 10 mg, droperidol 1 mg or placebo in a randomised, double-blind manner. Visual analogue scores for nausea, the incidence of emetic episodes, and analgesic and antiemetic consumption were recorded for 48 h postoperatively. The scores for nausea were significantly lower in the ondansetron group (p &lt; 0.01) compared with the other three groups at 1, 2 and 4 h after operation; thereafter there was no difference. The incidence of emesis was lower (p = 0.063) and time to first oral fluids was shorter (p &lt; 0.05) in the ondansetron group. Oral analgesic requirements were significantly greater in the ondansetron group over the 48 h study period. Two patients, one each in the placebo and metoclopramide groups, had to remain in hospital overnight because of persistent emetic symptoms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2409</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb05993.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7793544</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANASAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell</publisher><subject>Adult ; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures ; Anesthesia, General ; Biological and medical sciences ; Digestive system ; Double-Blind Method ; Droperidol - therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Medical sciences ; Metoclopramide - therapeutic use ; Nausea - prevention &amp; control ; Ondansetron - therapeutic use ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control ; Sterilization, Tubal ; Vomiting - prevention &amp; control</subject><ispartof>Anaesthesia, 1995-05, Vol.50 (5), p.403-406</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-f567746a67ae2a9923798a11c15fa500b28ee338ef50d8d7ec15ab228adc67763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3501726$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7793544$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>PAXTON, L. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCKAY, A. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MIRAKHUR, R. K</creatorcontrib><title>Prevention of nausea and vomiting after day case gynaecological laparoscopy : a comparison of ondansetron, droperidol, metoclopramide and placebo</title><title>Anaesthesia</title><addtitle>Anaesthesia</addtitle><description>We have compared the efficacy of ondansetron, metoclopramide, droperidol and placebo in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in 118 day stay patients undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological procedures. All received a standardised general anaesthetic of fentanyl, propofol, nitrous oxide in oxygen and isoflurane. Three to five min before induction of anaesthesia, patients were allocated to receive ondansetron 4 mg, metoclopramide 10 mg, droperidol 1 mg or placebo in a randomised, double-blind manner. Visual analogue scores for nausea, the incidence of emetic episodes, and analgesic and antiemetic consumption were recorded for 48 h postoperatively. The scores for nausea were significantly lower in the ondansetron group (p &lt; 0.01) compared with the other three groups at 1, 2 and 4 h after operation; thereafter there was no difference. The incidence of emesis was lower (p = 0.063) and time to first oral fluids was shorter (p &lt; 0.05) in the ondansetron group. Oral analgesic requirements were significantly greater in the ondansetron group over the 48 h study period. Two patients, one each in the placebo and metoclopramide groups, had to remain in hospital overnight because of persistent emetic symptoms.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Anesthesia, General</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Digestive system</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Droperidol - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Metoclopramide - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Nausea - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Ondansetron - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Sterilization, Tubal</subject><subject>Vomiting - prevention &amp; control</subject><issn>0003-2409</issn><issn>1365-2044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9UV1r3DAQFKElvab5CQVRSp5iVx-WZeethKQtBNqH9lmspfWhw5ZcyRdyP6P_uL6cuX1Z2JnZZWcI-cRZyZf6siu5rFUhWFWVvG1VOXdMta0sXy7I5gy9IRvGmCxExdp35H3OO8a4aHhzSS61bqWqqg359yvhM4bZx0BjTwPsMwKF4OhzHP3sw5ZCP2OiDg7UQka6PQRAG4e49RYGOsAEKWYbpwO9o0BtHJeBz6d9MTgIGecUwy11KU6YvIvDLR1xjnaIU4LRO3w9OA1gsYsfyNsehozXa78ifx4fft9_L55-fvtx__WpsKKp56JXtdZVDbUGFNC2Quq2Ac4tVz0oxjrRIErZYK-Ya5zGBYBOiAacXZS1vCI3p71Tin_3mGcz-mxxGCBg3GejtVRSK7EQ705Eu_yZE_ZmSn6EdDCcmWMeZmeOppuj6eaYh1nzMC-L-ON6Zd-N6M7SNYAF_7zikBc7-wTB-nymScW4FrX8D3vil-o</recordid><startdate>19950501</startdate><enddate>19950501</enddate><creator>PAXTON, L. D</creator><creator>MCKAY, A. C</creator><creator>MIRAKHUR, R. K</creator><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950501</creationdate><title>Prevention of nausea and vomiting after day case gynaecological laparoscopy : a comparison of ondansetron, droperidol, metoclopramide and placebo</title><author>PAXTON, L. D ; MCKAY, A. C ; MIRAKHUR, R. K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-f567746a67ae2a9923798a11c15fa500b28ee338ef50d8d7ec15ab228adc67763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Anesthesia, General</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Digestive system</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Droperidol - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Metoclopramide - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Nausea - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Ondansetron - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Sterilization, Tubal</topic><topic>Vomiting - prevention &amp; control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PAXTON, L. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCKAY, A. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MIRAKHUR, R. K</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anaesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PAXTON, L. D</au><au>MCKAY, A. C</au><au>MIRAKHUR, R. K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prevention of nausea and vomiting after day case gynaecological laparoscopy : a comparison of ondansetron, droperidol, metoclopramide and placebo</atitle><jtitle>Anaesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anaesthesia</addtitle><date>1995-05-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>403</spage><epage>406</epage><pages>403-406</pages><issn>0003-2409</issn><eissn>1365-2044</eissn><coden>ANASAB</coden><abstract>We have compared the efficacy of ondansetron, metoclopramide, droperidol and placebo in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in 118 day stay patients undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological procedures. All received a standardised general anaesthetic of fentanyl, propofol, nitrous oxide in oxygen and isoflurane. Three to five min before induction of anaesthesia, patients were allocated to receive ondansetron 4 mg, metoclopramide 10 mg, droperidol 1 mg or placebo in a randomised, double-blind manner. Visual analogue scores for nausea, the incidence of emetic episodes, and analgesic and antiemetic consumption were recorded for 48 h postoperatively. The scores for nausea were significantly lower in the ondansetron group (p &lt; 0.01) compared with the other three groups at 1, 2 and 4 h after operation; thereafter there was no difference. The incidence of emesis was lower (p = 0.063) and time to first oral fluids was shorter (p &lt; 0.05) in the ondansetron group. Oral analgesic requirements were significantly greater in the ondansetron group over the 48 h study period. Two patients, one each in the placebo and metoclopramide groups, had to remain in hospital overnight because of persistent emetic symptoms.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell</pub><pmid>7793544</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb05993.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2409
ispartof Anaesthesia, 1995-05, Vol.50 (5), p.403-406
issn 0003-2409
1365-2044
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77353752
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
Anesthesia, General
Biological and medical sciences
Digestive system
Double-Blind Method
Droperidol - therapeutic use
Female
Humans
Laparoscopy
Medical sciences
Metoclopramide - therapeutic use
Nausea - prevention & control
Ondansetron - therapeutic use
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Postoperative Complications - prevention & control
Sterilization, Tubal
Vomiting - prevention & control
title Prevention of nausea and vomiting after day case gynaecological laparoscopy : a comparison of ondansetron, droperidol, metoclopramide and placebo
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T06%3A17%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevention%20of%20nausea%20and%20vomiting%20after%20day%20case%20gynaecological%20laparoscopy%20:%20a%20comparison%20of%20ondansetron,%20droperidol,%20metoclopramide%20and%20placebo&rft.jtitle=Anaesthesia&rft.au=PAXTON,%20L.%20D&rft.date=1995-05-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=403&rft.epage=406&rft.pages=403-406&rft.issn=0003-2409&rft.eissn=1365-2044&rft.coden=ANASAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb05993.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77353752%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-f567746a67ae2a9923798a11c15fa500b28ee338ef50d8d7ec15ab228adc67763%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77353752&rft_id=info:pmid/7793544&rfr_iscdi=true