Loading…
Prevention of nausea and vomiting after day case gynaecological laparoscopy : a comparison of ondansetron, droperidol, metoclopramide and placebo
We have compared the efficacy of ondansetron, metoclopramide, droperidol and placebo in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in 118 day stay patients undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological procedures. All received a standardised general anaesthetic of fentanyl, propofol, nitrous oxide...
Saved in:
Published in: | Anaesthesia 1995-05, Vol.50 (5), p.403-406 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-f567746a67ae2a9923798a11c15fa500b28ee338ef50d8d7ec15ab228adc67763 |
container_end_page | 406 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 403 |
container_title | Anaesthesia |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | PAXTON, L. D MCKAY, A. C MIRAKHUR, R. K |
description | We have compared the efficacy of ondansetron, metoclopramide, droperidol and placebo in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in 118 day stay patients undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological procedures. All received a standardised general anaesthetic of fentanyl, propofol, nitrous oxide in oxygen and isoflurane. Three to five min before induction of anaesthesia, patients were allocated to receive ondansetron 4 mg, metoclopramide 10 mg, droperidol 1 mg or placebo in a randomised, double-blind manner. Visual analogue scores for nausea, the incidence of emetic episodes, and analgesic and antiemetic consumption were recorded for 48 h postoperatively. The scores for nausea were significantly lower in the ondansetron group (p < 0.01) compared with the other three groups at 1, 2 and 4 h after operation; thereafter there was no difference. The incidence of emesis was lower (p = 0.063) and time to first oral fluids was shorter (p < 0.05) in the ondansetron group. Oral analgesic requirements were significantly greater in the ondansetron group over the 48 h study period. Two patients, one each in the placebo and metoclopramide groups, had to remain in hospital overnight because of persistent emetic symptoms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb05993.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77353752</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77353752</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-f567746a67ae2a9923798a11c15fa500b28ee338ef50d8d7ec15ab228adc67763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UV1r3DAQFKElvab5CQVRSp5iVx-WZeethKQtBNqH9lmspfWhw5ZcyRdyP6P_uL6cuX1Z2JnZZWcI-cRZyZf6siu5rFUhWFWVvG1VOXdMta0sXy7I5gy9IRvGmCxExdp35H3OO8a4aHhzSS61bqWqqg359yvhM4bZx0BjTwPsMwKF4OhzHP3sw5ZCP2OiDg7UQka6PQRAG4e49RYGOsAEKWYbpwO9o0BtHJeBz6d9MTgIGecUwy11KU6YvIvDLR1xjnaIU4LRO3w9OA1gsYsfyNsehozXa78ifx4fft9_L55-fvtx__WpsKKp56JXtdZVDbUGFNC2Quq2Ac4tVz0oxjrRIErZYK-Ya5zGBYBOiAacXZS1vCI3p71Tin_3mGcz-mxxGCBg3GejtVRSK7EQ705Eu_yZE_ZmSn6EdDCcmWMeZmeOppuj6eaYh1nzMC-L-ON6Zd-N6M7SNYAF_7zikBc7-wTB-nymScW4FrX8D3vil-o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77353752</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prevention of nausea and vomiting after day case gynaecological laparoscopy : a comparison of ondansetron, droperidol, metoclopramide and placebo</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>PAXTON, L. D ; MCKAY, A. C ; MIRAKHUR, R. K</creator><creatorcontrib>PAXTON, L. D ; MCKAY, A. C ; MIRAKHUR, R. K</creatorcontrib><description>We have compared the efficacy of ondansetron, metoclopramide, droperidol and placebo in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in 118 day stay patients undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological procedures. All received a standardised general anaesthetic of fentanyl, propofol, nitrous oxide in oxygen and isoflurane. Three to five min before induction of anaesthesia, patients were allocated to receive ondansetron 4 mg, metoclopramide 10 mg, droperidol 1 mg or placebo in a randomised, double-blind manner. Visual analogue scores for nausea, the incidence of emetic episodes, and analgesic and antiemetic consumption were recorded for 48 h postoperatively. The scores for nausea were significantly lower in the ondansetron group (p < 0.01) compared with the other three groups at 1, 2 and 4 h after operation; thereafter there was no difference. The incidence of emesis was lower (p = 0.063) and time to first oral fluids was shorter (p < 0.05) in the ondansetron group. Oral analgesic requirements were significantly greater in the ondansetron group over the 48 h study period. Two patients, one each in the placebo and metoclopramide groups, had to remain in hospital overnight because of persistent emetic symptoms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2409</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb05993.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7793544</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANASAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell</publisher><subject>Adult ; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures ; Anesthesia, General ; Biological and medical sciences ; Digestive system ; Double-Blind Method ; Droperidol - therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Medical sciences ; Metoclopramide - therapeutic use ; Nausea - prevention & control ; Ondansetron - therapeutic use ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Postoperative Complications - prevention & control ; Sterilization, Tubal ; Vomiting - prevention & control</subject><ispartof>Anaesthesia, 1995-05, Vol.50 (5), p.403-406</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-f567746a67ae2a9923798a11c15fa500b28ee338ef50d8d7ec15ab228adc67763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3501726$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7793544$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>PAXTON, L. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCKAY, A. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MIRAKHUR, R. K</creatorcontrib><title>Prevention of nausea and vomiting after day case gynaecological laparoscopy : a comparison of ondansetron, droperidol, metoclopramide and placebo</title><title>Anaesthesia</title><addtitle>Anaesthesia</addtitle><description>We have compared the efficacy of ondansetron, metoclopramide, droperidol and placebo in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in 118 day stay patients undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological procedures. All received a standardised general anaesthetic of fentanyl, propofol, nitrous oxide in oxygen and isoflurane. Three to five min before induction of anaesthesia, patients were allocated to receive ondansetron 4 mg, metoclopramide 10 mg, droperidol 1 mg or placebo in a randomised, double-blind manner. Visual analogue scores for nausea, the incidence of emetic episodes, and analgesic and antiemetic consumption were recorded for 48 h postoperatively. The scores for nausea were significantly lower in the ondansetron group (p < 0.01) compared with the other three groups at 1, 2 and 4 h after operation; thereafter there was no difference. The incidence of emesis was lower (p = 0.063) and time to first oral fluids was shorter (p < 0.05) in the ondansetron group. Oral analgesic requirements were significantly greater in the ondansetron group over the 48 h study period. Two patients, one each in the placebo and metoclopramide groups, had to remain in hospital overnight because of persistent emetic symptoms.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Anesthesia, General</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Digestive system</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Droperidol - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Metoclopramide - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Nausea - prevention & control</subject><subject>Ondansetron - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</subject><subject>Sterilization, Tubal</subject><subject>Vomiting - prevention & control</subject><issn>0003-2409</issn><issn>1365-2044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9UV1r3DAQFKElvab5CQVRSp5iVx-WZeethKQtBNqH9lmspfWhw5ZcyRdyP6P_uL6cuX1Z2JnZZWcI-cRZyZf6siu5rFUhWFWVvG1VOXdMta0sXy7I5gy9IRvGmCxExdp35H3OO8a4aHhzSS61bqWqqg359yvhM4bZx0BjTwPsMwKF4OhzHP3sw5ZCP2OiDg7UQka6PQRAG4e49RYGOsAEKWYbpwO9o0BtHJeBz6d9MTgIGecUwy11KU6YvIvDLR1xjnaIU4LRO3w9OA1gsYsfyNsehozXa78ifx4fft9_L55-fvtx__WpsKKp56JXtdZVDbUGFNC2Quq2Ac4tVz0oxjrRIErZYK-Ya5zGBYBOiAacXZS1vCI3p71Tin_3mGcz-mxxGCBg3GejtVRSK7EQ705Eu_yZE_ZmSn6EdDCcmWMeZmeOppuj6eaYh1nzMC-L-ON6Zd-N6M7SNYAF_7zikBc7-wTB-nymScW4FrX8D3vil-o</recordid><startdate>19950501</startdate><enddate>19950501</enddate><creator>PAXTON, L. D</creator><creator>MCKAY, A. C</creator><creator>MIRAKHUR, R. K</creator><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950501</creationdate><title>Prevention of nausea and vomiting after day case gynaecological laparoscopy : a comparison of ondansetron, droperidol, metoclopramide and placebo</title><author>PAXTON, L. D ; MCKAY, A. C ; MIRAKHUR, R. K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-f567746a67ae2a9923798a11c15fa500b28ee338ef50d8d7ec15ab228adc67763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Anesthesia, General</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Digestive system</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Droperidol - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Metoclopramide - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Nausea - prevention & control</topic><topic>Ondansetron - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</topic><topic>Sterilization, Tubal</topic><topic>Vomiting - prevention & control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PAXTON, L. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCKAY, A. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MIRAKHUR, R. K</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anaesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PAXTON, L. D</au><au>MCKAY, A. C</au><au>MIRAKHUR, R. K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prevention of nausea and vomiting after day case gynaecological laparoscopy : a comparison of ondansetron, droperidol, metoclopramide and placebo</atitle><jtitle>Anaesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anaesthesia</addtitle><date>1995-05-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>403</spage><epage>406</epage><pages>403-406</pages><issn>0003-2409</issn><eissn>1365-2044</eissn><coden>ANASAB</coden><abstract>We have compared the efficacy of ondansetron, metoclopramide, droperidol and placebo in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in 118 day stay patients undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological procedures. All received a standardised general anaesthetic of fentanyl, propofol, nitrous oxide in oxygen and isoflurane. Three to five min before induction of anaesthesia, patients were allocated to receive ondansetron 4 mg, metoclopramide 10 mg, droperidol 1 mg or placebo in a randomised, double-blind manner. Visual analogue scores for nausea, the incidence of emetic episodes, and analgesic and antiemetic consumption were recorded for 48 h postoperatively. The scores for nausea were significantly lower in the ondansetron group (p < 0.01) compared with the other three groups at 1, 2 and 4 h after operation; thereafter there was no difference. The incidence of emesis was lower (p = 0.063) and time to first oral fluids was shorter (p < 0.05) in the ondansetron group. Oral analgesic requirements were significantly greater in the ondansetron group over the 48 h study period. Two patients, one each in the placebo and metoclopramide groups, had to remain in hospital overnight because of persistent emetic symptoms.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell</pub><pmid>7793544</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb05993.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-2409 |
ispartof | Anaesthesia, 1995-05, Vol.50 (5), p.403-406 |
issn | 0003-2409 1365-2044 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77353752 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Ambulatory Surgical Procedures Anesthesia, General Biological and medical sciences Digestive system Double-Blind Method Droperidol - therapeutic use Female Humans Laparoscopy Medical sciences Metoclopramide - therapeutic use Nausea - prevention & control Ondansetron - therapeutic use Pharmacology. Drug treatments Postoperative Complications - prevention & control Sterilization, Tubal Vomiting - prevention & control |
title | Prevention of nausea and vomiting after day case gynaecological laparoscopy : a comparison of ondansetron, droperidol, metoclopramide and placebo |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T06%3A17%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevention%20of%20nausea%20and%20vomiting%20after%20day%20case%20gynaecological%20laparoscopy%20:%20a%20comparison%20of%20ondansetron,%20droperidol,%20metoclopramide%20and%20placebo&rft.jtitle=Anaesthesia&rft.au=PAXTON,%20L.%20D&rft.date=1995-05-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=403&rft.epage=406&rft.pages=403-406&rft.issn=0003-2409&rft.eissn=1365-2044&rft.coden=ANASAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb05993.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77353752%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-f567746a67ae2a9923798a11c15fa500b28ee338ef50d8d7ec15ab228adc67763%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77353752&rft_id=info:pmid/7793544&rfr_iscdi=true |