Loading…

Small echogenic renal masses: how often is computed tomography used to confirm the sonographic suspicion of angiomyolipoma?

Although renal angiomyolipoma (AML) has a typical ultrasound appearance, many authorities suggest that a computed tomography (CT) scan be obtained to confirm the diagnosis because small echogenic renal cell carcinomas can simulate AML. Our study evaluates the actual follow-up in such patients and fa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 1995-09, Vol.46 (3), p.311-315
Main Authors: Ikeda, Alvin K., Korobkin, Melvyn, Platt, Joel F., Cohan, Richard H., Ellis, James H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-34f3958f95612d44bfb78d4c2348383c5f892820f25b18d6aefbd47052d0313c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-34f3958f95612d44bfb78d4c2348383c5f892820f25b18d6aefbd47052d0313c3
container_end_page 315
container_issue 3
container_start_page 311
container_title Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)
container_volume 46
creator Ikeda, Alvin K.
Korobkin, Melvyn
Platt, Joel F.
Cohan, Richard H.
Ellis, James H.
description Although renal angiomyolipoma (AML) has a typical ultrasound appearance, many authorities suggest that a computed tomography (CT) scan be obtained to confirm the diagnosis because small echogenic renal cell carcinomas can simulate AML. Our study evaluates the actual follow-up in such patients and factors that may affect whether CT confirmation is recommended or obtained. From 1986 through 1992, 36 patients had an ultrasound diagnosis of probable renal AML (well-circumscribed, homogenously echogenic mass). In each case the patient's age, symptoms, ultrasound results and recommendations, and imaging follow-up were recorded. CT confirmation of the sonographic diagnosis was recommended in only 11 of 36 (31%) patients. Only 7 of these 11 patients actually underwent CT, 5 of whom had the diagnosis confirmed by CT detection of intratumoral fat. Ten of 23 patients (43%) over 50 years of age had CT recommended, whereas only 1 of 13 (8%) patients under age 50 years did ( P < 0.05). CT confirmation was recommended for 5 of 13 (38%) lesions greater than 10 mm and for 6 of 23 (26%) smaller masses. None of the 9 patients under age 50 years with small masses (less than 10 mm) had CT recommended. Although many authorities recommend CT to confirm the sonographic diagnosis of renal AML, this algorithm is rarely followed in everyday clinical practice, especially in patients under age 50 years with masses less than 10 mm.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80212-X
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77488660</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S009042959980212X</els_id><sourcerecordid>77488660</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-34f3958f95612d44bfb78d4c2348383c5f892820f25b18d6aefbd47052d0313c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2KFDEURoMoYzv6CANZiOiiNEklVYmbQQb_YMDFKMwupFJJd6SSlLlVSuPLm-lueusqhO_cL5cThK4oeUsJ7d7dEaJIw5kSr5V6IwmjrLl_hDZUsL5RSonHaHNGnqJnAD8JIV3X9Rfoou86IgjfoL930UwTdnaXty4Fi4tLZsLRADh4j3f5D85-cQkHwDbHeV3ciJcc87aYebfHKxzuNUs-lIiXncOQ0zGudbDCHGzIqdZgk7Yhx32ewpyjuX6OnngzgXtxOi_Rj08fv998aW6_ff568-G2sVzypWm5b5WQXomOspHzwQ-9HLllLZetbK3wUjHJiGdioHLsjPPDyHsi2Eha2tr2Er069s4l_1odLDoGsG6aTHJ5Bd33XMoqpILiCNqSAYrzei4hmrLXlOgH6fogXT8Y1Urpg3R9X-euTg-sQ3TjeepkueYvT7kBayZfTLIBzlhbP4UTUbHrI-aqjN_BFQ02uGTdGIqzix5z-M8i_wC28qAw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77488660</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Small echogenic renal masses: how often is computed tomography used to confirm the sonographic suspicion of angiomyolipoma?</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Ikeda, Alvin K. ; Korobkin, Melvyn ; Platt, Joel F. ; Cohan, Richard H. ; Ellis, James H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, Alvin K. ; Korobkin, Melvyn ; Platt, Joel F. ; Cohan, Richard H. ; Ellis, James H.</creatorcontrib><description>Although renal angiomyolipoma (AML) has a typical ultrasound appearance, many authorities suggest that a computed tomography (CT) scan be obtained to confirm the diagnosis because small echogenic renal cell carcinomas can simulate AML. Our study evaluates the actual follow-up in such patients and factors that may affect whether CT confirmation is recommended or obtained. From 1986 through 1992, 36 patients had an ultrasound diagnosis of probable renal AML (well-circumscribed, homogenously echogenic mass). In each case the patient's age, symptoms, ultrasound results and recommendations, and imaging follow-up were recorded. CT confirmation of the sonographic diagnosis was recommended in only 11 of 36 (31%) patients. Only 7 of these 11 patients actually underwent CT, 5 of whom had the diagnosis confirmed by CT detection of intratumoral fat. Ten of 23 patients (43%) over 50 years of age had CT recommended, whereas only 1 of 13 (8%) patients under age 50 years did ( P &lt; 0.05). CT confirmation was recommended for 5 of 13 (38%) lesions greater than 10 mm and for 6 of 23 (26%) smaller masses. None of the 9 patients under age 50 years with small masses (less than 10 mm) had CT recommended. Although many authorities recommend CT to confirm the sonographic diagnosis of renal AML, this algorithm is rarely followed in everyday clinical practice, especially in patients under age 50 years with masses less than 10 mm.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-9995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80212-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7660504</identifier><identifier>CODEN: URGYAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Angiomyolipoma - diagnostic imaging ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - diagnostic imaging ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Kidney Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Ultrasonic investigative techniques ; Ultrasonography ; Urinary system</subject><ispartof>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 1995-09, Vol.46 (3), p.311-315</ispartof><rights>1995</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-34f3958f95612d44bfb78d4c2348383c5f892820f25b18d6aefbd47052d0313c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-34f3958f95612d44bfb78d4c2348383c5f892820f25b18d6aefbd47052d0313c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3666405$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7660504$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, Alvin K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korobkin, Melvyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Platt, Joel F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohan, Richard H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, James H.</creatorcontrib><title>Small echogenic renal masses: how often is computed tomography used to confirm the sonographic suspicion of angiomyolipoma?</title><title>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><description>Although renal angiomyolipoma (AML) has a typical ultrasound appearance, many authorities suggest that a computed tomography (CT) scan be obtained to confirm the diagnosis because small echogenic renal cell carcinomas can simulate AML. Our study evaluates the actual follow-up in such patients and factors that may affect whether CT confirmation is recommended or obtained. From 1986 through 1992, 36 patients had an ultrasound diagnosis of probable renal AML (well-circumscribed, homogenously echogenic mass). In each case the patient's age, symptoms, ultrasound results and recommendations, and imaging follow-up were recorded. CT confirmation of the sonographic diagnosis was recommended in only 11 of 36 (31%) patients. Only 7 of these 11 patients actually underwent CT, 5 of whom had the diagnosis confirmed by CT detection of intratumoral fat. Ten of 23 patients (43%) over 50 years of age had CT recommended, whereas only 1 of 13 (8%) patients under age 50 years did ( P &lt; 0.05). CT confirmation was recommended for 5 of 13 (38%) lesions greater than 10 mm and for 6 of 23 (26%) smaller masses. None of the 9 patients under age 50 years with small masses (less than 10 mm) had CT recommended. Although many authorities recommend CT to confirm the sonographic diagnosis of renal AML, this algorithm is rarely followed in everyday clinical practice, especially in patients under age 50 years with masses less than 10 mm.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Angiomyolipoma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Ultrasonic investigative techniques</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Urinary system</subject><issn>0090-4295</issn><issn>1527-9995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc2KFDEURoMoYzv6CANZiOiiNEklVYmbQQb_YMDFKMwupFJJd6SSlLlVSuPLm-lueusqhO_cL5cThK4oeUsJ7d7dEaJIw5kSr5V6IwmjrLl_hDZUsL5RSonHaHNGnqJnAD8JIV3X9Rfoou86IgjfoL930UwTdnaXty4Fi4tLZsLRADh4j3f5D85-cQkHwDbHeV3ciJcc87aYebfHKxzuNUs-lIiXncOQ0zGudbDCHGzIqdZgk7Yhx32ewpyjuX6OnngzgXtxOi_Rj08fv998aW6_ff568-G2sVzypWm5b5WQXomOspHzwQ-9HLllLZetbK3wUjHJiGdioHLsjPPDyHsi2Eha2tr2Er069s4l_1odLDoGsG6aTHJ5Bd33XMoqpILiCNqSAYrzei4hmrLXlOgH6fogXT8Y1Urpg3R9X-euTg-sQ3TjeepkueYvT7kBayZfTLIBzlhbP4UTUbHrI-aqjN_BFQ02uGTdGIqzix5z-M8i_wC28qAw</recordid><startdate>19950901</startdate><enddate>19950901</enddate><creator>Ikeda, Alvin K.</creator><creator>Korobkin, Melvyn</creator><creator>Platt, Joel F.</creator><creator>Cohan, Richard H.</creator><creator>Ellis, James H.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950901</creationdate><title>Small echogenic renal masses: how often is computed tomography used to confirm the sonographic suspicion of angiomyolipoma?</title><author>Ikeda, Alvin K. ; Korobkin, Melvyn ; Platt, Joel F. ; Cohan, Richard H. ; Ellis, James H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-34f3958f95612d44bfb78d4c2348383c5f892820f25b18d6aefbd47052d0313c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Angiomyolipoma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Ultrasonic investigative techniques</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Urinary system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, Alvin K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korobkin, Melvyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Platt, Joel F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohan, Richard H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, James H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ikeda, Alvin K.</au><au>Korobkin, Melvyn</au><au>Platt, Joel F.</au><au>Cohan, Richard H.</au><au>Ellis, James H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Small echogenic renal masses: how often is computed tomography used to confirm the sonographic suspicion of angiomyolipoma?</atitle><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><date>1995-09-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>311</spage><epage>315</epage><pages>311-315</pages><issn>0090-4295</issn><eissn>1527-9995</eissn><coden>URGYAZ</coden><abstract>Although renal angiomyolipoma (AML) has a typical ultrasound appearance, many authorities suggest that a computed tomography (CT) scan be obtained to confirm the diagnosis because small echogenic renal cell carcinomas can simulate AML. Our study evaluates the actual follow-up in such patients and factors that may affect whether CT confirmation is recommended or obtained. From 1986 through 1992, 36 patients had an ultrasound diagnosis of probable renal AML (well-circumscribed, homogenously echogenic mass). In each case the patient's age, symptoms, ultrasound results and recommendations, and imaging follow-up were recorded. CT confirmation of the sonographic diagnosis was recommended in only 11 of 36 (31%) patients. Only 7 of these 11 patients actually underwent CT, 5 of whom had the diagnosis confirmed by CT detection of intratumoral fat. Ten of 23 patients (43%) over 50 years of age had CT recommended, whereas only 1 of 13 (8%) patients under age 50 years did ( P &lt; 0.05). CT confirmation was recommended for 5 of 13 (38%) lesions greater than 10 mm and for 6 of 23 (26%) smaller masses. None of the 9 patients under age 50 years with small masses (less than 10 mm) had CT recommended. Although many authorities recommend CT to confirm the sonographic diagnosis of renal AML, this algorithm is rarely followed in everyday clinical practice, especially in patients under age 50 years with masses less than 10 mm.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>7660504</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80212-X</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-4295
ispartof Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 1995-09, Vol.46 (3), p.311-315
issn 0090-4295
1527-9995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77488660
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Angiomyolipoma - diagnostic imaging
Biological and medical sciences
Carcinoma, Renal Cell - diagnostic imaging
Chi-Square Distribution
Diagnosis, Differential
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Kidney Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Ultrasonic investigative techniques
Ultrasonography
Urinary system
title Small echogenic renal masses: how often is computed tomography used to confirm the sonographic suspicion of angiomyolipoma?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T09%3A43%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Small%20echogenic%20renal%20masses:%20how%20often%20is%20computed%20tomography%20used%20to%20confirm%20the%20sonographic%20suspicion%20of%20angiomyolipoma?&rft.jtitle=Urology%20(Ridgewood,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Ikeda,%20Alvin%20K.&rft.date=1995-09-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=311&rft.epage=315&rft.pages=311-315&rft.issn=0090-4295&rft.eissn=1527-9995&rft.coden=URGYAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80212-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77488660%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-34f3958f95612d44bfb78d4c2348383c5f892820f25b18d6aefbd47052d0313c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77488660&rft_id=info:pmid/7660504&rfr_iscdi=true