Loading…

A comparative evaluation of pressure-triggering and flow-triggering in pressure support ventilation (PSV) for neonates using an animal model

The triggering system in pressure support ventilation needs to respond rapidly, especially in neonates. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of flow-triggered and pressure-triggered pressure support ventilation on neonatal mechanical ventilation using an animal model. Respiratory flow, a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Anaesthesia and intensive care 1995-06, Vol.23 (3), p.302-306
Main Authors: UCHIYAMA, A, IMANAKA, H, TAENAKA, N, NAKANO, S, FUJINO, Y, YOSHIYA, I
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-17669a18d137e390d6a333adec3a7c3af0847d4441ab4933c1cc0dfe3448b13b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-17669a18d137e390d6a333adec3a7c3af0847d4441ab4933c1cc0dfe3448b13b3
container_end_page 306
container_issue 3
container_start_page 302
container_title Anaesthesia and intensive care
container_volume 23
creator UCHIYAMA, A
IMANAKA, H
TAENAKA, N
NAKANO, S
FUJINO, Y
YOSHIYA, I
description The triggering system in pressure support ventilation needs to respond rapidly, especially in neonates. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of flow-triggered and pressure-triggered pressure support ventilation on neonatal mechanical ventilation using an animal model. Respiratory flow, airway pressure, oesophageal pressure, and diaphragmatic electromyogram were measured during pressure support ventilation in five anaesthetized rabbits. The animals were connected to a VIPBIRD (Bird, U.S.A.) (CPAP mode, pressure support ventilation, 5 cm H2O and PEEP 0 cm H2O). Flow-triggering sensitivity was set at 0.2l/min, 0.5l/min, 1.01l/min, or 1.5l/min. Pressure-triggering sensitivity was set at -1.0 cm H2O. Shorter trigger delay and longer pressure support time were observed in flow-triggering. There was also less diaphragmatic activity in flow-triggering as evidenced by the amplitude of integrated diaphragmatic electromyogram and negative deflection of oesophageal pressure. The findings suggest that flow-triggering will prove superior to pressure-triggering in pressure support ventilation for neonates.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0310057x9502300306
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77558847</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77558847</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-17669a18d137e390d6a333adec3a7c3af0847d4441ab4933c1cc0dfe3448b13b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkd1KxDAQhYMo67r6AoKQCxG9qCadttleLot_ICj4w96VbDpdKmlTk3bVd_ChzdKyCgkZMt8cDnMIOebsknMhrhhwxmLxlcYsBMaAJTtkzKNoGrBQ8F0y3gCBJxb75MC5d8Z4Gop4REYiFpDyZEx-ZlSZqpFWtuUaKa6l7nxpamoK2lh0rrMYtLZcrdCW9YrKOqeFNp___8p6i1LXNY2xLV1j3Za6lzp_en67oIWxtEZTyxYd7Vwv5k9ZSU0rk6M-JHuF1A6PhndCXm-uX-Z3wcPj7f189hCoCEQbcJEkqeTTnINASFmeSACQOSqQwt-CTSORR1HE5TJKARRXiuUFgt_MksMSJuSs122s-ejQtVlVOoVaS--vc5kQcTz1Gh4Me1BZ45zFImust2u_M86yTQTZEMHiLwI_dDKod8sK8-3IsHPfPx360impCytrVbotBnHIUu_6F33jkMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77558847</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative evaluation of pressure-triggering and flow-triggering in pressure support ventilation (PSV) for neonates using an animal model</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>UCHIYAMA, A ; IMANAKA, H ; TAENAKA, N ; NAKANO, S ; FUJINO, Y ; YOSHIYA, I</creator><creatorcontrib>UCHIYAMA, A ; IMANAKA, H ; TAENAKA, N ; NAKANO, S ; FUJINO, Y ; YOSHIYA, I</creatorcontrib><description>The triggering system in pressure support ventilation needs to respond rapidly, especially in neonates. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of flow-triggered and pressure-triggered pressure support ventilation on neonatal mechanical ventilation using an animal model. Respiratory flow, airway pressure, oesophageal pressure, and diaphragmatic electromyogram were measured during pressure support ventilation in five anaesthetized rabbits. The animals were connected to a VIPBIRD (Bird, U.S.A.) (CPAP mode, pressure support ventilation, 5 cm H2O and PEEP 0 cm H2O). Flow-triggering sensitivity was set at 0.2l/min, 0.5l/min, 1.01l/min, or 1.5l/min. Pressure-triggering sensitivity was set at -1.0 cm H2O. Shorter trigger delay and longer pressure support time were observed in flow-triggering. There was also less diaphragmatic activity in flow-triggering as evidenced by the amplitude of integrated diaphragmatic electromyogram and negative deflection of oesophageal pressure. The findings suggest that flow-triggering will prove superior to pressure-triggering in pressure support ventilation for neonates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0310-057X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1448-0271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0310057x9502300306</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7573916</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AINCBS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Edgecliff: Anaesthesia and Intensive Care</publisher><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Diaphragm - physiology ; Disease Models, Animal ; Electromyography ; Emergency and intensive care: neonates and children. Prematurity. Sudden death ; Esophagus - physiology ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Inhalation ; Intensive care medicine ; Medical sciences ; Oxygen - administration &amp; dosage ; Positive-Pressure Respiration - methods ; Pressure ; Pulmonary Ventilation - physiology ; Rabbits ; Rheology ; Tidal Volume ; Time Factors ; Work of Breathing - physiology</subject><ispartof>Anaesthesia and intensive care, 1995-06, Vol.23 (3), p.302-306</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-17669a18d137e390d6a333adec3a7c3af0847d4441ab4933c1cc0dfe3448b13b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-17669a18d137e390d6a333adec3a7c3af0847d4441ab4933c1cc0dfe3448b13b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3520993$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7573916$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>UCHIYAMA, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IMANAKA, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAENAKA, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAKANO, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FUJINO, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YOSHIYA, I</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative evaluation of pressure-triggering and flow-triggering in pressure support ventilation (PSV) for neonates using an animal model</title><title>Anaesthesia and intensive care</title><addtitle>Anaesth Intensive Care</addtitle><description>The triggering system in pressure support ventilation needs to respond rapidly, especially in neonates. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of flow-triggered and pressure-triggered pressure support ventilation on neonatal mechanical ventilation using an animal model. Respiratory flow, airway pressure, oesophageal pressure, and diaphragmatic electromyogram were measured during pressure support ventilation in five anaesthetized rabbits. The animals were connected to a VIPBIRD (Bird, U.S.A.) (CPAP mode, pressure support ventilation, 5 cm H2O and PEEP 0 cm H2O). Flow-triggering sensitivity was set at 0.2l/min, 0.5l/min, 1.01l/min, or 1.5l/min. Pressure-triggering sensitivity was set at -1.0 cm H2O. Shorter trigger delay and longer pressure support time were observed in flow-triggering. There was also less diaphragmatic activity in flow-triggering as evidenced by the amplitude of integrated diaphragmatic electromyogram and negative deflection of oesophageal pressure. The findings suggest that flow-triggering will prove superior to pressure-triggering in pressure support ventilation for neonates.</description><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diaphragm - physiology</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive care: neonates and children. Prematurity. Sudden death</subject><subject>Esophagus - physiology</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Inhalation</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Oxygen - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Positive-Pressure Respiration - methods</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Pulmonary Ventilation - physiology</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Rheology</subject><subject>Tidal Volume</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Work of Breathing - physiology</subject><issn>0310-057X</issn><issn>1448-0271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkd1KxDAQhYMo67r6AoKQCxG9qCadttleLot_ICj4w96VbDpdKmlTk3bVd_ChzdKyCgkZMt8cDnMIOebsknMhrhhwxmLxlcYsBMaAJTtkzKNoGrBQ8F0y3gCBJxb75MC5d8Z4Gop4REYiFpDyZEx-ZlSZqpFWtuUaKa6l7nxpamoK2lh0rrMYtLZcrdCW9YrKOqeFNp___8p6i1LXNY2xLV1j3Za6lzp_en67oIWxtEZTyxYd7Vwv5k9ZSU0rk6M-JHuF1A6PhndCXm-uX-Z3wcPj7f189hCoCEQbcJEkqeTTnINASFmeSACQOSqQwt-CTSORR1HE5TJKARRXiuUFgt_MksMSJuSs122s-ejQtVlVOoVaS--vc5kQcTz1Gh4Me1BZ45zFImust2u_M86yTQTZEMHiLwI_dDKod8sK8-3IsHPfPx360impCytrVbotBnHIUu_6F33jkMw</recordid><startdate>19950601</startdate><enddate>19950601</enddate><creator>UCHIYAMA, A</creator><creator>IMANAKA, H</creator><creator>TAENAKA, N</creator><creator>NAKANO, S</creator><creator>FUJINO, Y</creator><creator>YOSHIYA, I</creator><general>Anaesthesia and Intensive Care</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950601</creationdate><title>A comparative evaluation of pressure-triggering and flow-triggering in pressure support ventilation (PSV) for neonates using an animal model</title><author>UCHIYAMA, A ; IMANAKA, H ; TAENAKA, N ; NAKANO, S ; FUJINO, Y ; YOSHIYA, I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-17669a18d137e390d6a333adec3a7c3af0847d4441ab4933c1cc0dfe3448b13b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diaphragm - physiology</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive care: neonates and children. Prematurity. Sudden death</topic><topic>Esophagus - physiology</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Inhalation</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Oxygen - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Positive-Pressure Respiration - methods</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Pulmonary Ventilation - physiology</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Rheology</topic><topic>Tidal Volume</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Work of Breathing - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>UCHIYAMA, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IMANAKA, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAENAKA, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAKANO, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FUJINO, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YOSHIYA, I</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anaesthesia and intensive care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>UCHIYAMA, A</au><au>IMANAKA, H</au><au>TAENAKA, N</au><au>NAKANO, S</au><au>FUJINO, Y</au><au>YOSHIYA, I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative evaluation of pressure-triggering and flow-triggering in pressure support ventilation (PSV) for neonates using an animal model</atitle><jtitle>Anaesthesia and intensive care</jtitle><addtitle>Anaesth Intensive Care</addtitle><date>1995-06-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>302</spage><epage>306</epage><pages>302-306</pages><issn>0310-057X</issn><eissn>1448-0271</eissn><coden>AINCBS</coden><abstract>The triggering system in pressure support ventilation needs to respond rapidly, especially in neonates. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of flow-triggered and pressure-triggered pressure support ventilation on neonatal mechanical ventilation using an animal model. Respiratory flow, airway pressure, oesophageal pressure, and diaphragmatic electromyogram were measured during pressure support ventilation in five anaesthetized rabbits. The animals were connected to a VIPBIRD (Bird, U.S.A.) (CPAP mode, pressure support ventilation, 5 cm H2O and PEEP 0 cm H2O). Flow-triggering sensitivity was set at 0.2l/min, 0.5l/min, 1.01l/min, or 1.5l/min. Pressure-triggering sensitivity was set at -1.0 cm H2O. Shorter trigger delay and longer pressure support time were observed in flow-triggering. There was also less diaphragmatic activity in flow-triggering as evidenced by the amplitude of integrated diaphragmatic electromyogram and negative deflection of oesophageal pressure. The findings suggest that flow-triggering will prove superior to pressure-triggering in pressure support ventilation for neonates.</abstract><cop>Edgecliff</cop><pub>Anaesthesia and Intensive Care</pub><pmid>7573916</pmid><doi>10.1177/0310057x9502300306</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0310-057X
ispartof Anaesthesia and intensive care, 1995-06, Vol.23 (3), p.302-306
issn 0310-057X
1448-0271
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77558847
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Diaphragm - physiology
Disease Models, Animal
Electromyography
Emergency and intensive care: neonates and children. Prematurity. Sudden death
Esophagus - physiology
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Inhalation
Intensive care medicine
Medical sciences
Oxygen - administration & dosage
Positive-Pressure Respiration - methods
Pressure
Pulmonary Ventilation - physiology
Rabbits
Rheology
Tidal Volume
Time Factors
Work of Breathing - physiology
title A comparative evaluation of pressure-triggering and flow-triggering in pressure support ventilation (PSV) for neonates using an animal model
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A52%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20evaluation%20of%20pressure-triggering%20and%20flow-triggering%20in%20pressure%20support%20ventilation%20(PSV)%20for%20neonates%20using%20an%20animal%20model&rft.jtitle=Anaesthesia%20and%20intensive%20care&rft.au=UCHIYAMA,%20A&rft.date=1995-06-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=302&rft.epage=306&rft.pages=302-306&rft.issn=0310-057X&rft.eissn=1448-0271&rft.coden=AINCBS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0310057x9502300306&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77558847%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-17669a18d137e390d6a333adec3a7c3af0847d4441ab4933c1cc0dfe3448b13b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77558847&rft_id=info:pmid/7573916&rfr_iscdi=true