Loading…
A comparative evaluation of pressure-triggering and flow-triggering in pressure support ventilation (PSV) for neonates using an animal model
The triggering system in pressure support ventilation needs to respond rapidly, especially in neonates. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of flow-triggered and pressure-triggered pressure support ventilation on neonatal mechanical ventilation using an animal model. Respiratory flow, a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Anaesthesia and intensive care 1995-06, Vol.23 (3), p.302-306 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-17669a18d137e390d6a333adec3a7c3af0847d4441ab4933c1cc0dfe3448b13b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-17669a18d137e390d6a333adec3a7c3af0847d4441ab4933c1cc0dfe3448b13b3 |
container_end_page | 306 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 302 |
container_title | Anaesthesia and intensive care |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | UCHIYAMA, A IMANAKA, H TAENAKA, N NAKANO, S FUJINO, Y YOSHIYA, I |
description | The triggering system in pressure support ventilation needs to respond rapidly, especially in neonates. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of flow-triggered and pressure-triggered pressure support ventilation on neonatal mechanical ventilation using an animal model. Respiratory flow, airway pressure, oesophageal pressure, and diaphragmatic electromyogram were measured during pressure support ventilation in five anaesthetized rabbits. The animals were connected to a VIPBIRD (Bird, U.S.A.) (CPAP mode, pressure support ventilation, 5 cm H2O and PEEP 0 cm H2O). Flow-triggering sensitivity was set at 0.2l/min, 0.5l/min, 1.01l/min, or 1.5l/min. Pressure-triggering sensitivity was set at -1.0 cm H2O. Shorter trigger delay and longer pressure support time were observed in flow-triggering. There was also less diaphragmatic activity in flow-triggering as evidenced by the amplitude of integrated diaphragmatic electromyogram and negative deflection of oesophageal pressure. The findings suggest that flow-triggering will prove superior to pressure-triggering in pressure support ventilation for neonates. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0310057x9502300306 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77558847</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77558847</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-17669a18d137e390d6a333adec3a7c3af0847d4441ab4933c1cc0dfe3448b13b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkd1KxDAQhYMo67r6AoKQCxG9qCadttleLot_ICj4w96VbDpdKmlTk3bVd_ChzdKyCgkZMt8cDnMIOebsknMhrhhwxmLxlcYsBMaAJTtkzKNoGrBQ8F0y3gCBJxb75MC5d8Z4Gop4REYiFpDyZEx-ZlSZqpFWtuUaKa6l7nxpamoK2lh0rrMYtLZcrdCW9YrKOqeFNp___8p6i1LXNY2xLV1j3Za6lzp_en67oIWxtEZTyxYd7Vwv5k9ZSU0rk6M-JHuF1A6PhndCXm-uX-Z3wcPj7f189hCoCEQbcJEkqeTTnINASFmeSACQOSqQwt-CTSORR1HE5TJKARRXiuUFgt_MksMSJuSs122s-ejQtVlVOoVaS--vc5kQcTz1Gh4Me1BZ45zFImust2u_M86yTQTZEMHiLwI_dDKod8sK8-3IsHPfPx360impCytrVbotBnHIUu_6F33jkMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77558847</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative evaluation of pressure-triggering and flow-triggering in pressure support ventilation (PSV) for neonates using an animal model</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>UCHIYAMA, A ; IMANAKA, H ; TAENAKA, N ; NAKANO, S ; FUJINO, Y ; YOSHIYA, I</creator><creatorcontrib>UCHIYAMA, A ; IMANAKA, H ; TAENAKA, N ; NAKANO, S ; FUJINO, Y ; YOSHIYA, I</creatorcontrib><description>The triggering system in pressure support ventilation needs to respond rapidly, especially in neonates. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of flow-triggered and pressure-triggered pressure support ventilation on neonatal mechanical ventilation using an animal model. Respiratory flow, airway pressure, oesophageal pressure, and diaphragmatic electromyogram were measured during pressure support ventilation in five anaesthetized rabbits. The animals were connected to a VIPBIRD (Bird, U.S.A.) (CPAP mode, pressure support ventilation, 5 cm H2O and PEEP 0 cm H2O). Flow-triggering sensitivity was set at 0.2l/min, 0.5l/min, 1.01l/min, or 1.5l/min. Pressure-triggering sensitivity was set at -1.0 cm H2O. Shorter trigger delay and longer pressure support time were observed in flow-triggering. There was also less diaphragmatic activity in flow-triggering as evidenced by the amplitude of integrated diaphragmatic electromyogram and negative deflection of oesophageal pressure. The findings suggest that flow-triggering will prove superior to pressure-triggering in pressure support ventilation for neonates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0310-057X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1448-0271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0310057x9502300306</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7573916</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AINCBS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Edgecliff: Anaesthesia and Intensive Care</publisher><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Diaphragm - physiology ; Disease Models, Animal ; Electromyography ; Emergency and intensive care: neonates and children. Prematurity. Sudden death ; Esophagus - physiology ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Inhalation ; Intensive care medicine ; Medical sciences ; Oxygen - administration & dosage ; Positive-Pressure Respiration - methods ; Pressure ; Pulmonary Ventilation - physiology ; Rabbits ; Rheology ; Tidal Volume ; Time Factors ; Work of Breathing - physiology</subject><ispartof>Anaesthesia and intensive care, 1995-06, Vol.23 (3), p.302-306</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-17669a18d137e390d6a333adec3a7c3af0847d4441ab4933c1cc0dfe3448b13b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-17669a18d137e390d6a333adec3a7c3af0847d4441ab4933c1cc0dfe3448b13b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3520993$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7573916$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>UCHIYAMA, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IMANAKA, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAENAKA, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAKANO, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FUJINO, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YOSHIYA, I</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative evaluation of pressure-triggering and flow-triggering in pressure support ventilation (PSV) for neonates using an animal model</title><title>Anaesthesia and intensive care</title><addtitle>Anaesth Intensive Care</addtitle><description>The triggering system in pressure support ventilation needs to respond rapidly, especially in neonates. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of flow-triggered and pressure-triggered pressure support ventilation on neonatal mechanical ventilation using an animal model. Respiratory flow, airway pressure, oesophageal pressure, and diaphragmatic electromyogram were measured during pressure support ventilation in five anaesthetized rabbits. The animals were connected to a VIPBIRD (Bird, U.S.A.) (CPAP mode, pressure support ventilation, 5 cm H2O and PEEP 0 cm H2O). Flow-triggering sensitivity was set at 0.2l/min, 0.5l/min, 1.01l/min, or 1.5l/min. Pressure-triggering sensitivity was set at -1.0 cm H2O. Shorter trigger delay and longer pressure support time were observed in flow-triggering. There was also less diaphragmatic activity in flow-triggering as evidenced by the amplitude of integrated diaphragmatic electromyogram and negative deflection of oesophageal pressure. The findings suggest that flow-triggering will prove superior to pressure-triggering in pressure support ventilation for neonates.</description><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diaphragm - physiology</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive care: neonates and children. Prematurity. Sudden death</subject><subject>Esophagus - physiology</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Inhalation</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Oxygen - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Positive-Pressure Respiration - methods</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Pulmonary Ventilation - physiology</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Rheology</subject><subject>Tidal Volume</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Work of Breathing - physiology</subject><issn>0310-057X</issn><issn>1448-0271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkd1KxDAQhYMo67r6AoKQCxG9qCadttleLot_ICj4w96VbDpdKmlTk3bVd_ChzdKyCgkZMt8cDnMIOebsknMhrhhwxmLxlcYsBMaAJTtkzKNoGrBQ8F0y3gCBJxb75MC5d8Z4Gop4REYiFpDyZEx-ZlSZqpFWtuUaKa6l7nxpamoK2lh0rrMYtLZcrdCW9YrKOqeFNp___8p6i1LXNY2xLV1j3Za6lzp_en67oIWxtEZTyxYd7Vwv5k9ZSU0rk6M-JHuF1A6PhndCXm-uX-Z3wcPj7f189hCoCEQbcJEkqeTTnINASFmeSACQOSqQwt-CTSORR1HE5TJKARRXiuUFgt_MksMSJuSs122s-ejQtVlVOoVaS--vc5kQcTz1Gh4Me1BZ45zFImust2u_M86yTQTZEMHiLwI_dDKod8sK8-3IsHPfPx360impCytrVbotBnHIUu_6F33jkMw</recordid><startdate>19950601</startdate><enddate>19950601</enddate><creator>UCHIYAMA, A</creator><creator>IMANAKA, H</creator><creator>TAENAKA, N</creator><creator>NAKANO, S</creator><creator>FUJINO, Y</creator><creator>YOSHIYA, I</creator><general>Anaesthesia and Intensive Care</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950601</creationdate><title>A comparative evaluation of pressure-triggering and flow-triggering in pressure support ventilation (PSV) for neonates using an animal model</title><author>UCHIYAMA, A ; IMANAKA, H ; TAENAKA, N ; NAKANO, S ; FUJINO, Y ; YOSHIYA, I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-17669a18d137e390d6a333adec3a7c3af0847d4441ab4933c1cc0dfe3448b13b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diaphragm - physiology</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive care: neonates and children. Prematurity. Sudden death</topic><topic>Esophagus - physiology</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Inhalation</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Oxygen - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Positive-Pressure Respiration - methods</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Pulmonary Ventilation - physiology</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Rheology</topic><topic>Tidal Volume</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Work of Breathing - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>UCHIYAMA, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IMANAKA, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAENAKA, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAKANO, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FUJINO, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YOSHIYA, I</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anaesthesia and intensive care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>UCHIYAMA, A</au><au>IMANAKA, H</au><au>TAENAKA, N</au><au>NAKANO, S</au><au>FUJINO, Y</au><au>YOSHIYA, I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative evaluation of pressure-triggering and flow-triggering in pressure support ventilation (PSV) for neonates using an animal model</atitle><jtitle>Anaesthesia and intensive care</jtitle><addtitle>Anaesth Intensive Care</addtitle><date>1995-06-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>302</spage><epage>306</epage><pages>302-306</pages><issn>0310-057X</issn><eissn>1448-0271</eissn><coden>AINCBS</coden><abstract>The triggering system in pressure support ventilation needs to respond rapidly, especially in neonates. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of flow-triggered and pressure-triggered pressure support ventilation on neonatal mechanical ventilation using an animal model. Respiratory flow, airway pressure, oesophageal pressure, and diaphragmatic electromyogram were measured during pressure support ventilation in five anaesthetized rabbits. The animals were connected to a VIPBIRD (Bird, U.S.A.) (CPAP mode, pressure support ventilation, 5 cm H2O and PEEP 0 cm H2O). Flow-triggering sensitivity was set at 0.2l/min, 0.5l/min, 1.01l/min, or 1.5l/min. Pressure-triggering sensitivity was set at -1.0 cm H2O. Shorter trigger delay and longer pressure support time were observed in flow-triggering. There was also less diaphragmatic activity in flow-triggering as evidenced by the amplitude of integrated diaphragmatic electromyogram and negative deflection of oesophageal pressure. The findings suggest that flow-triggering will prove superior to pressure-triggering in pressure support ventilation for neonates.</abstract><cop>Edgecliff</cop><pub>Anaesthesia and Intensive Care</pub><pmid>7573916</pmid><doi>10.1177/0310057x9502300306</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0310-057X |
ispartof | Anaesthesia and intensive care, 1995-06, Vol.23 (3), p.302-306 |
issn | 0310-057X 1448-0271 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77558847 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Animals Biological and medical sciences Diaphragm - physiology Disease Models, Animal Electromyography Emergency and intensive care: neonates and children. Prematurity. Sudden death Esophagus - physiology Evaluation Studies as Topic Humans Infant, Newborn Inhalation Intensive care medicine Medical sciences Oxygen - administration & dosage Positive-Pressure Respiration - methods Pressure Pulmonary Ventilation - physiology Rabbits Rheology Tidal Volume Time Factors Work of Breathing - physiology |
title | A comparative evaluation of pressure-triggering and flow-triggering in pressure support ventilation (PSV) for neonates using an animal model |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A52%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20evaluation%20of%20pressure-triggering%20and%20flow-triggering%20in%20pressure%20support%20ventilation%20(PSV)%20for%20neonates%20using%20an%20animal%20model&rft.jtitle=Anaesthesia%20and%20intensive%20care&rft.au=UCHIYAMA,%20A&rft.date=1995-06-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=302&rft.epage=306&rft.pages=302-306&rft.issn=0310-057X&rft.eissn=1448-0271&rft.coden=AINCBS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0310057x9502300306&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77558847%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-17669a18d137e390d6a333adec3a7c3af0847d4441ab4933c1cc0dfe3448b13b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77558847&rft_id=info:pmid/7573916&rfr_iscdi=true |