Loading…
Evaluation of the Tru-Trax cervical mucus penetration test in predicting fertilization and pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization
To evaluate the role of the Tru-Trax cervical mucus penetration testing of prognosis of patient performance in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and to examine its use as a possible screening test prior to IVF, 133 couples presenting with infertility prospectively underwent in-vitro cervical mucus penetr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Human reproduction (Oxford) 1995-06, Vol.10 (6), p.1481-1485 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 1485 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1481 |
container_title | Human reproduction (Oxford) |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | SHARARA, F. I ILLIONS, E. H CODDINGTON, C. C SCOTT, R. T |
description | To evaluate the role of the Tru-Trax cervical mucus penetration testing of prognosis of patient performance in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and to examine its use as a possible screening test prior to IVF, 133 couples presenting with infertility prospectively underwent in-vitro cervical mucus penetration testing. Of these, 66 couples subsequently underwent IVF. The penetration distance of the vanguard spermatozoa in both human and bovine mucus was compared to the fertilization and pregnancy rates during IVF. The fertilization rates in couples with normal human mucus penetration (n = 42, 80.6%) were higher than those with abnormal scores (n = 24, 49.6%; P < 0.001). Similarly, the fertilization rates in those couples with normal bovine mucus penetration (n = 50, 77.5%) were higher than those with abnormal results (n = 16, 40.0%; P < 0.001). Fertilization rates and penetration scores were highly correlated for both human (r = 0.66; P < 0.0001) and bovine (r = 0.66; P < 0.0001) mucus. However, the predictive value of an abnormal result for failed fertilization was poor for both human and bovine penetration, since 83.33 and 81.25% fertilized respectively. Pregnancy rates did not differ among couples with normal and abnormal penetrations. In conclusion, in-vitro cervical mucus penetration testing was highly correlated with fertilization rates in IVF. However, the poor predictive value of an abnormal result may limit the value of this test for generalized pretreatment screening. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77657051</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77657051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p235t-4377f8d686b89275062526366d6da423d29a709bc901b521e03258383a2319c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkEtLAzEUhYMotVZ_gpCFuAvk0TxmKaU-oOCmrodMJlMjM5kxyRTr2h9uSgfB1b1wvnPgnDMwJ0uBEWUcn4M5pkIhQgS5BFcxfmCcXyVmYCZ5wTjFc_Cz3ut21Mn1HvYNTO8WbsOItkF_QWPD3hndwm40Y4SD9TaFE5psTNB5OARbO5Oc38HGhuRa930CtK-P4s5rbw4wu2w88s6jvUuh_09fg4tGt9HeTHcB3h7X29Uz2rw-vaweNmjIfRJaMikbVQslKlVQybGgnAomRC1qvaSspoWWuKhMgUnFKbGYUa6YYpoyUhjOFuD-lDuE_nPMFcrORWPbVnvbj7GUUnCJOcng7QSOVWfrcgiu0-FQTrNl_W7SdcwDNSG3dPEPY4LlEMx-ARu2eAs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77657051</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the Tru-Trax cervical mucus penetration test in predicting fertilization and pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization</title><source>Oxford University Press Archive</source><creator>SHARARA, F. I ; ILLIONS, E. H ; CODDINGTON, C. C ; SCOTT, R. T</creator><creatorcontrib>SHARARA, F. I ; ILLIONS, E. H ; CODDINGTON, C. C ; SCOTT, R. T</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the role of the Tru-Trax cervical mucus penetration testing of prognosis of patient performance in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and to examine its use as a possible screening test prior to IVF, 133 couples presenting with infertility prospectively underwent in-vitro cervical mucus penetration testing. Of these, 66 couples subsequently underwent IVF. The penetration distance of the vanguard spermatozoa in both human and bovine mucus was compared to the fertilization and pregnancy rates during IVF. The fertilization rates in couples with normal human mucus penetration (n = 42, 80.6%) were higher than those with abnormal scores (n = 24, 49.6%; P < 0.001). Similarly, the fertilization rates in those couples with normal bovine mucus penetration (n = 50, 77.5%) were higher than those with abnormal results (n = 16, 40.0%; P < 0.001). Fertilization rates and penetration scores were highly correlated for both human (r = 0.66; P < 0.0001) and bovine (r = 0.66; P < 0.0001) mucus. However, the predictive value of an abnormal result for failed fertilization was poor for both human and bovine penetration, since 83.33 and 81.25% fertilized respectively. Pregnancy rates did not differ among couples with normal and abnormal penetrations. In conclusion, in-vitro cervical mucus penetration testing was highly correlated with fertilization rates in IVF. However, the poor predictive value of an abnormal result may limit the value of this test for generalized pretreatment screening.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2350</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7593520</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HUREEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth control ; Cattle ; Cervix Mucus ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Female ; Fertilization ; Fertilization in Vitro ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Rate ; Prospective Studies ; Reference Values ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sperm-Ovum Interactions ; Statistics as Topic ; Sterility. Assisted procreation ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Human reproduction (Oxford), 1995-06, Vol.10 (6), p.1481-1485</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3635130$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7593520$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SHARARA, F. I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ILLIONS, E. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CODDINGTON, C. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCOTT, R. T</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the Tru-Trax cervical mucus penetration test in predicting fertilization and pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization</title><title>Human reproduction (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><description>To evaluate the role of the Tru-Trax cervical mucus penetration testing of prognosis of patient performance in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and to examine its use as a possible screening test prior to IVF, 133 couples presenting with infertility prospectively underwent in-vitro cervical mucus penetration testing. Of these, 66 couples subsequently underwent IVF. The penetration distance of the vanguard spermatozoa in both human and bovine mucus was compared to the fertilization and pregnancy rates during IVF. The fertilization rates in couples with normal human mucus penetration (n = 42, 80.6%) were higher than those with abnormal scores (n = 24, 49.6%; P < 0.001). Similarly, the fertilization rates in those couples with normal bovine mucus penetration (n = 50, 77.5%) were higher than those with abnormal results (n = 16, 40.0%; P < 0.001). Fertilization rates and penetration scores were highly correlated for both human (r = 0.66; P < 0.0001) and bovine (r = 0.66; P < 0.0001) mucus. However, the predictive value of an abnormal result for failed fertilization was poor for both human and bovine penetration, since 83.33 and 81.25% fertilized respectively. Pregnancy rates did not differ among couples with normal and abnormal penetrations. In conclusion, in-vitro cervical mucus penetration testing was highly correlated with fertilization rates in IVF. However, the poor predictive value of an abnormal result may limit the value of this test for generalized pretreatment screening.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cervix Mucus</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sperm-Ovum Interactions</subject><subject>Statistics as Topic</subject><subject>Sterility. Assisted procreation</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0268-1161</issn><issn>1460-2350</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkEtLAzEUhYMotVZ_gpCFuAvk0TxmKaU-oOCmrodMJlMjM5kxyRTr2h9uSgfB1b1wvnPgnDMwJ0uBEWUcn4M5pkIhQgS5BFcxfmCcXyVmYCZ5wTjFc_Cz3ut21Mn1HvYNTO8WbsOItkF_QWPD3hndwm40Y4SD9TaFE5psTNB5OARbO5Oc38HGhuRa930CtK-P4s5rbw4wu2w88s6jvUuh_09fg4tGt9HeTHcB3h7X29Uz2rw-vaweNmjIfRJaMikbVQslKlVQybGgnAomRC1qvaSspoWWuKhMgUnFKbGYUa6YYpoyUhjOFuD-lDuE_nPMFcrORWPbVnvbj7GUUnCJOcng7QSOVWfrcgiu0-FQTrNl_W7SdcwDNSG3dPEPY4LlEMx-ARu2eAs</recordid><startdate>19950601</startdate><enddate>19950601</enddate><creator>SHARARA, F. I</creator><creator>ILLIONS, E. H</creator><creator>CODDINGTON, C. C</creator><creator>SCOTT, R. T</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950601</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the Tru-Trax cervical mucus penetration test in predicting fertilization and pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization</title><author>SHARARA, F. I ; ILLIONS, E. H ; CODDINGTON, C. C ; SCOTT, R. T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p235t-4377f8d686b89275062526366d6da423d29a709bc901b521e03258383a2319c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cervix Mucus</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sperm-Ovum Interactions</topic><topic>Statistics as Topic</topic><topic>Sterility. Assisted procreation</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SHARARA, F. I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ILLIONS, E. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CODDINGTON, C. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCOTT, R. T</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SHARARA, F. I</au><au>ILLIONS, E. H</au><au>CODDINGTON, C. C</au><au>SCOTT, R. T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the Tru-Trax cervical mucus penetration test in predicting fertilization and pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization</atitle><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><date>1995-06-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1481</spage><epage>1485</epage><pages>1481-1485</pages><issn>0268-1161</issn><eissn>1460-2350</eissn><coden>HUREEE</coden><abstract>To evaluate the role of the Tru-Trax cervical mucus penetration testing of prognosis of patient performance in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and to examine its use as a possible screening test prior to IVF, 133 couples presenting with infertility prospectively underwent in-vitro cervical mucus penetration testing. Of these, 66 couples subsequently underwent IVF. The penetration distance of the vanguard spermatozoa in both human and bovine mucus was compared to the fertilization and pregnancy rates during IVF. The fertilization rates in couples with normal human mucus penetration (n = 42, 80.6%) were higher than those with abnormal scores (n = 24, 49.6%; P < 0.001). Similarly, the fertilization rates in those couples with normal bovine mucus penetration (n = 50, 77.5%) were higher than those with abnormal results (n = 16, 40.0%; P < 0.001). Fertilization rates and penetration scores were highly correlated for both human (r = 0.66; P < 0.0001) and bovine (r = 0.66; P < 0.0001) mucus. However, the predictive value of an abnormal result for failed fertilization was poor for both human and bovine penetration, since 83.33 and 81.25% fertilized respectively. Pregnancy rates did not differ among couples with normal and abnormal penetrations. In conclusion, in-vitro cervical mucus penetration testing was highly correlated with fertilization rates in IVF. However, the poor predictive value of an abnormal result may limit the value of this test for generalized pretreatment screening.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>7593520</pmid><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-1161 |
ispartof | Human reproduction (Oxford), 1995-06, Vol.10 (6), p.1481-1485 |
issn | 0268-1161 1460-2350 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77657051 |
source | Oxford University Press Archive |
subjects | Animals Biological and medical sciences Birth control Cattle Cervix Mucus Evaluation Studies as Topic Female Fertilization Fertilization in Vitro Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Male Medical sciences Pregnancy Pregnancy Rate Prospective Studies Reference Values Sensitivity and Specificity Sperm-Ovum Interactions Statistics as Topic Sterility. Assisted procreation Treatment Outcome |
title | Evaluation of the Tru-Trax cervical mucus penetration test in predicting fertilization and pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T16%3A21%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20Tru-Trax%20cervical%20mucus%20penetration%20test%20in%20predicting%20fertilization%20and%20pregnancy%20rates%20in%20in-vitro%20fertilization&rft.jtitle=Human%20reproduction%20(Oxford)&rft.au=SHARARA,%20F.%20I&rft.date=1995-06-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1481&rft.epage=1485&rft.pages=1481-1485&rft.issn=0268-1161&rft.eissn=1460-2350&rft.coden=HUREEE&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E77657051%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p235t-4377f8d686b89275062526366d6da423d29a709bc901b521e03258383a2319c53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77657051&rft_id=info:pmid/7593520&rfr_iscdi=true |