Fantasy Proneness and Psychopathology

• Published in: Journal of personality and social psychology 1987-08, Vol.53 (2), p.327-336
• Main Authors: Rhue, Judith W, Lynn, Steven Jay
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Adult and adolescent clinical studies; Biological and medical sciences; Creativity; Emotional Adjustment; Fantasy; Fantasy (Defense Mechanism); Female; Human; Humans; Male; Medical sciences; Mental disorders; Mental Disorders - psychology; Middle Aged; MMPI; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychometrics; Psychopathology; Psychopathology. Psychiatry; Rorschach Test; Self-Concept; Social Behavior; Social research
• ISSN: 0022-3514; 1939-1315
• DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.53.2.327

Fantasy prone persons ("fantasizers") selected from "normal" populations report experiences associated with psychopathology in clinical populations (e.g., fantasies that reach hallucinatory proportions, difficulty discriminating reality from fantasy). In Study 1, we administered objective (MMPI) and projective (Rorschach) measures to high fantasy prone individuals (upper 4% of college population), medium fantasy prone individuals (middle range), and nonfantasizers (lowest 4%). Subjects who were fantasizers appeared to use fantasy for defensive or adaptive purposes compared with others and produced 8/9 modal code types on the MMPI. On the basis of the MMPI findings, a subset of fantasizers could be described as exhibiting a significant degree of psychopathology. In Study 2, a second sample of fantasy prone individuals could not be distinguished from comparison groups in contacts with professionals for help with psychological problems, use of psychotropic medication, or number of close friendships. Although fantasizers perceived themselves as less well adjusted than comparison subjects and reported greater difficulty in distinguishing fantasy from reality, most fantasizers rated their psychological functioning as adequate and above and did not differ from less fantasy prone subjects in ratings of positivity of self-concept. As demonstrated in Study 1, a subset of fantasizers did appear to be more pathological than other subjects were, with three fantasizers reporting a history of psychiatric hospitalizations. It is estimated that between 10 and 20% of fantasizers exhibit significant signs of maladjustment/psychopathology; however, as a rule, fantasy proneness does not appear to be antecedent to severe manifestations of psychopathology.